+4.0 ptsvs 79 average · 2,001 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
705 of 2,001tied with 80 others
Score vs region
+4.5 ptsvs 78.5 average · 301 rated schools in Region 12: Waco
Region 12: Waco placement
102 of 301tied with 11 others
Score vs county
+3.2 ptsvs 79.8 average · 21 rated schools in Hill County
Hill County placement
9 of 21tied with 1 other
Score vs similar-size group
+2.9 ptsvs 80.1 average · 4,220 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
1,785 of 4,220tied with 126 others
Score vs state
+1.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
3,601 of 7,646tied with 244 others
B83
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 68 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 79 average for 2,001 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 78.5 average for 301 rated schools in Region 12: Waco.The current score is above the 79.8 average for 21 rated schools in Hill County.The current score is above the 80.1 average for 4,220 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
55%vs 45.8% avg · +9.2 pts
Masters
23%vs 18.2% avg · +4.8 pts
Among 1,876 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Hillsboro Int is rated B by TEA, scoring 83 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 79 average for 2,001 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 13 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 705th of 2,001 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 80 others).
Hillsboro Int is rated B by TEA, scoring 83 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 78.5 average for 301 rated schools in Region 12: Waco. It is up 13 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 102nd of 301 rated schools in Region 12: Waco (tied with 11 others).
Hillsboro Int is rated B by TEA, scoring 83 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 79.8 average for 21 rated schools in Hill County. It is up 13 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 9th of 21 rated schools in Hill County (tied with 1 other).
Hillsboro Int is rated B by TEA, scoring 83 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.1 average for 4,220 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 13 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1,785th of 4,220 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 126 others).
Hillsboro Int is rated B by TEA, scoring 83 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 13 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated Not Rated with 68 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement80 B+4.2 vs similar economic context · 1,876 reporting
School Progress86 B+5.9 vs similar economic context · 1,869 reporting
Closing the Gaps77 C+0.8 vs similar economic context · 1,858 reporting
Academic Growth78 C+4.9 vs similar economic context · 1,814 reporting
Relative Performance86 B+7.5 vs similar economic context · 1,869 reporting
Hillsboro Int
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,001 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
80
B
10
School Progress
86
B
4
Closing the Gaps
77
C
3
Academic Growth
78
C
2
Relative Performance
86
B
4
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 3 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (86), so
Student Achievement (80) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 86.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level82%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,876 reporting
Meets grade level55%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,876 reporting
Masters grade level23%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,876 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level83%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,874 reporting
Meets grade level63%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,874 reporting
Masters grade level28%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,874 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level83%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,866 reporting
Meets grade level54%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,866 reporting
Masters grade level21%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,866 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level72%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,723 reporting
Meets grade level38%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,723 reporting
Masters grade level14%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,723 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,001 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
423
Economically disadvantaged
70.9%±0.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
19.9%−1.2 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
20.8%+2.0 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.7%+1.8 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
9.2%−8.7 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Hillsboro Int
African American 10.4%
Hispanic 60.8%
White 23.9%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 1.7%
Two or More Races 3.1%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,001 reporting for every category shown · 2,001 in full cohort
African American 12.5%
Hispanic 57.6%
White 24%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 12: Waco · 301 reporting for every category shown · 301 in full cohort
African American 14.2%
Hispanic 37.4%
White 40.7%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.1%
Pacific Islander 0.7%
Two or More Races 5.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Hill County · 21 reporting for every category shown · 21 in full cohort
African American 5.3%
Hispanic 38.8%
White 51.6%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 0.5%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.6%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,220 reporting for every category shown · 4,220 in full cohort
African American 11.8%
Hispanic 55%
White 26.1%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 3.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
423
Economically disadvantaged students
300
Emergent bilingual students
84
Special education students
88
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
48
Students in TEA mobility denominator
460
TEA-published mobility rate
10.4%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 423 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 5 (1.2%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
423
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−5
Decrease · −1.2%
Change since 2021–22
+31
Increase · +7.9%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
423
Selected comparison
634.6
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,966 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Hillsboro Int
School year
Students enrolledHillsboro Int
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
392
First available year
646.2
2022–23
429
Increase of 37 (9.4%)
652.9
2023–24
440
Increase of 11 (2.6%)
651.3
2024–25
428
Decrease of 12 (2.7%)
650.2
2025–26
423
Decrease of 5 (1.2%)
634.6
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
61
13.3% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
105
22.83 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
460
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
13.3%
Selected comparison
13.0%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,529 rated schools reporting
+0.3 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
22.83
Selected comparison
30.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,638 rated schools reporting
−8.1 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Hillsboro Int
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
412
25
6.1%
42
10.19
9.5%
18.9
2021–22
426
29
6.8%
51
11.97
13.0%
30.5
2022–23
447
25
5.6%
43
9.62
13.5%
32.5
2023–24
465
42
9.0%
97
20.86
13.3%
32.3
2024–25
460
61
13.3%
105
22.83
13.0%
30.9
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Hillsboro Int in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
61
13.3%
105
22.83
13.0%
30.9
In-school suspensions
56
12.2%
87
18.91
11.6%
23.3
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
10
2.17
—
11.2
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Hillsboro Int
Parent district: Hillsboro ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$7,660
Selected comparison
$13,148
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,982 rated schools reporting
−$5,488 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $7,660 per student for this campus, $16,471 per student for its parent district, Hillsboro ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Hillsboro Int
Parent district: Hillsboro ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$6,985
$11,433
$13,054
$8,040
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,847 rated schools reporting
2019
$6,978
$12,268
$13,108
$8,199
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,866 rated schools reporting
2020
$7,616
$13,564
$14,058
$8,741
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,887 rated schools reporting
2021
$7,942
$25,904
$14,797
$9,250
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,901 rated schools reporting
2022
$7,060
$15,866
$15,708
$10,511
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,925 rated schools reporting
2023
$7,732
$16,048
$16,792
$11,219
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,945 rated schools reporting
2024
$7,754
$18,408
$18,125
$12,420
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,966 rated schools reporting
2025
$7,660
$16,471
$18,972
$13,148
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,982 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$67,018+$575 vs similar economic context
Teachers
30−12.9 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.1+0.1 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Hillsboro Int
Beginning 10%
1 to 5 years 13.3%
6 to 10 years 15.6%
11 to 20 years 29.6%
21 to 30 years 25.2%
Over 30 years 6.3%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,001 reporting for every category shown · 2,001 in full cohort
Beginning 6.6%
1 to 5 years 27.1%
6 to 10 years 19%
11 to 20 years 27.4%
21 to 30 years 15.4%
Over 30 years 3.9%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 12: Waco · 301 reporting for every category shown · 301 in full cohort
Beginning 6.8%
1 to 5 years 26.8%
6 to 10 years 19%
11 to 20 years 27.1%
21 to 30 years 16.2%
Over 30 years 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Hill County · 21 reporting for every category shown · 21 in full cohort
Beginning 8.5%
1 to 5 years 25.4%
6 to 10 years 16.8%
11 to 20 years 27.7%
21 to 30 years 16.5%
Over 30 years 5%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,220 reporting for every category shown · 4,220 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 25.7%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.9%
21 to 30 years 16.3%
Over 30 years 3.5%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Hillsboro Int in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classHillsboro Int · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 4
20.9
18.8
Grade 5
22.5
19.8
Grade 6
23.2
17.8
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 3 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
3 measures
3of 20
Reading — Approaches
Hill County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 2
3of 20
Reading — Masters
Hill County · of the 20 that report this measure
3of 20
Math — Meets
Hill County · of the 20 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
14 measures
4of 20
All Subjects — Masters
Hill County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 1
4of 20
Math — Masters
Hill County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 2
5of 20
All Subjects — Approaches
Hill County · of the 20 that report this measure
5of 20
Math — Approaches
Hill County · of the 20 that report this measure
6of 20
All Subjects — Meets
Hill County · of the 20 that report this measure
6of 20
Reading — Meets
Hill County · of the 20 that report this measure
6of 19
Academic Growth
Hill County · of the 19 that report this measure
8of 21
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Hill County · of the 21 that report this measure · tied with 1
8of 20
Relative Performance
Hill County · of the 20 that report this measure
9of 21
Overall score
Hill County · of the 21 that report this measure · tied with 1
9of 21
Attendance
Hill County · of the 21 that report this measure
9of 20
School Progress
Hill County · of the 20 that report this measure
10of 20
Student Achievement
Hill County · of the 20 that report this measure
10of 19
Science — Masters
Hill County · of the 19 that report this measure · tied with 1
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 109904109.