Districts, charter school systems & campuses · Source: Texas Education Agency
Hill Country HSA91vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Traditional public school campus · Alternative Education Accountability
Hill Country HS
Kerr County · Region 20: San Antonio · 29 students
Current score
91/1002025-26
Change
+6 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+11.2 ptsvs 79.8 average · 2,001 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
191 of 2,001tied with 82 others
Score vs region
+12.4 ptsvs 78.6 average · 650 rated schools in Region 20: San Antonio
Region 20: San Antonio placement
58 of 650tied with 23 others
Score vs county
+7.0 ptsvs 84 average · 16 rated schools in Kerr County
Kerr County placement
3 of 16tied with 1 other
Score vs similar-size group
+6.9 ptsvs 84.1 average · 51 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
15 of 51tied with 2 others
Score vs state
+9.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
1,157 of 7,646tied with 413 others
A91
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 91 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 79.8 average for 2,001 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 78.6 average for 650 rated schools in Region 20: San Antonio.The current score is above the 84 average for 16 rated schools in Kerr County.The current score is above the 84.1 average for 51 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
83%vs 47.7% avg · +35.3 pts
Masters
33%vs 19.4% avg · +13.6 pts
Among 1,894 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Hill Country HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 79.8 average for 2,001 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 6 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 191st of 2,001 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 82 others).
Hill Country HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 78.6 average for 650 rated schools in Region 20: San Antonio. It is up 6 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 58th of 650 rated schools in Region 20: San Antonio (tied with 23 others).
Hill Country HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 84 average for 16 rated schools in Kerr County. It is up 6 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 3rd of 16 rated schools in Kerr County (tied with 1 other).
Hill Country HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 84.1 average for 51 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 6 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 15th of 51 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 2 others).
Hill Country HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 6 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 91 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement91 A+13.5 vs similar economic context · 1,894 reporting
School Progress—Not reported · similar economic context 80.7 · 1,887 reporting
Closing the Gaps—Not reported · similar economic context 77 · 1,869 reporting
Approaches grade level100%+27 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 926 reporting
Meets grade level86%+40 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 926 reporting
Masters grade level57%+37 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 926 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,001 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Completion
Four-Year
62.0%−11.8 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 43 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
83.1%+4.2 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 43 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
87.9%+7.2 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 43 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−4.5 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 43 rated schools reporting
These measures use TEA's alternative-education accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
College, career and military readiness
Total credit for CCMR criteria
38.0%−49.9 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
Criterion
This school% of graduates
Averagesimilar economic context
Differencepercentage points
Reportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria
38.0%
87.9%
−49.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 484 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
15.1%
59.7%
−44.6
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 488 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
1.9%
27.7%
−25.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 488 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
0.0%
10.9%
−10.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 488 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
1.9%
33.7%
−31.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 488 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification
7.5%
37.9%
−30.4
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 488 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate
0.0%
1.8%
−1.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 488 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree
0.0%
7.1%
−7.1
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 488 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit
1.9%
3.7%
−1.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 488 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness
15.1%
3.3%
+11.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 488 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student
0.0%
8.0%
−8.0
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 488 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces
1.9%
3.2%
−1.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 488 rated schools reporting
Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of
meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this
school minus the average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate,
counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that
criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
After high school: the following fall
Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.
Graduates in the report
57
Class of 2023–24
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
3
5.3% of graduates
Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
53
93.0% of graduates
Not trackable
1
Fall 2024
Graduates in the report
This school
57
Selected comparison
238.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 391 rated schools reporting
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
This school
3
Selected comparison
104.7
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 391 rated schools reporting
Texas-public enrollment rate
This school
5.3%
Selected comparison
43.8%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 391 rated schools reporting
−38.5 pts vs similar economic context
Not-found rate
This school
93.0%
Selected comparison
50.8%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 391 rated schools reporting
+42.2 pts vs similar economic context
Not-trackable rate
This school
1.8%
Selected comparison
5.4%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 391 rated schools reporting
−3.6 pts vs similar economic context
Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.
Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.
“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.
“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
29
Economically disadvantaged
65.5%±0.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
13.8%−4.4 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
24.1%+5.2 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
76.8%−17.3 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
73.4%+56.5 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Hill Country HS
African American 6.9%
Hispanic 41.4%
White 51.7%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,001 reporting for every category shown · 2,001 in full cohort
African American 11.4%
Hispanic 52.3%
White 29.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.2%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 20: San Antonio · 650 reporting for every category shown · 650 in full cohort
African American 5.2%
Hispanic 70.7%
White 19.2%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 1.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.9%
Selected comparison averageFor Kerr County · 16 reporting for every category shown · 16 in full cohort
African American 1.3%
Hispanic 46.7%
White 48.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 0.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.1%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 51 reporting for every category shown · 51 in full cohort
African American 6.8%
Hispanic 56%
White 33.7%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 0.7%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 2.4%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
29
Economically disadvantaged students
19
Emergent bilingual students
4
Special education students
7
TEA context labels
Alternative education campus under AEA procedures
Alternative education type: dropout recovery school
Rated under AEA procedures
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
98
Students in TEA mobility denominator
108
TEA-published mobility rate
90.7%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 29 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 14 (32.6%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
29
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−14
Decrease · −32.6%
Change since 2021–22
−2
Decrease · −6.5%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
29
Selected comparison
624.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,966 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Hill Country HS
School year
Students enrolledHill Country HS
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
31
First available year
641.9
2022–23
42
Increase of 11 (35.5%)
647.8
2023–24
38
Decrease of 4 (9.5%)
644.1
2024–25
43
Increase of 5 (13.2%)
639.7
2025–26
29
Decrease of 14 (32.6%)
624.5
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
Suppressed
Rate not available
Cumulative year-end enrollment
115
2024–25
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Hill Country HS
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
105
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2021–22
120
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2022–23
122
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2023–24
115
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2024–25
115
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Hill Country HS in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
In-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Hill Country HS
Parent district: Kerrville ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$14,297
Selected comparison
$12,728
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,976 rated schools reporting
+$1,569 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $14,297 per student for this campus, $13,346 per student for its parent district, Kerrville ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Hill Country HS
Parent district: Kerrville ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$17,078
$9,716
$13,054
$7,951
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,841 rated schools reporting
2019
$16,178
$11,168
$13,108
$8,116
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,856 rated schools reporting
2020
$21,643
$19,351
$14,058
$8,695
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,875 rated schools reporting
2021
$15,359
$18,361
$14,797
$9,164
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,889 rated schools reporting
2022
$19,370
$13,440
$15,708
$10,497
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,909 rated schools reporting
2023
$14,802
$13,128
$16,792
$11,200
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,932 rated schools reporting
2024
$16,867
$14,077
$18,125
$12,094
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,961 rated schools reporting
2025
$14,297
$13,346
$18,972
$12,728
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,976 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$63,576−$2,832 vs similar economic context
Teachers
4−38.7 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
7.3−6.6 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Hill Country HS
6 to 10 years 25%
11 to 20 years 25%
21 to 30 years 25%
Over 30 years 25%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,001 reporting for every category shown · 2,001 in full cohort
Beginning 6.3%
1 to 5 years 26.4%
6 to 10 years 19.1%
11 to 20 years 27.8%
21 to 30 years 15.8%
Over 30 years 4%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 20: San Antonio · 650 reporting for every category shown · 650 in full cohort
Beginning 4.5%
1 to 5 years 23.5%
6 to 10 years 19.8%
11 to 20 years 31.3%
21 to 30 years 17%
Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Kerr County · 16 reporting for every category shown · 16 in full cohort
Beginning 2.9%
1 to 5 years 19.6%
6 to 10 years 20.1%
11 to 20 years 32.7%
21 to 30 years 19.9%
Over 30 years 4.9%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 51 reporting for every category shown · 51 in full cohort
Beginning 3.7%
1 to 5 years 20.8%
6 to 10 years 8.4%
11 to 20 years 28.8%
21 to 30 years 15.5%
Over 30 years 9.1%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Hill Country HS in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classHill Country HS · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English
10
15
Secondary languages other than English
3
17.6
Secondary math
8
15.9
Secondary science
6.5
17.3
Secondary social studies
6
17.2
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 116 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
6 measures
1of 7,260
All Subjects — Approaches
Texas average · of the 7,260 that report this measure · tied with 24
1of 123
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness
Region 20: San Antonio · of the 123 that report this measure
1of 43
All Subjects — Masters
Similar size · of the 43 that report this measure
1of 34
Social Studies — Masters
Similar size · of the 34 that report this measure
1of 15
All Subjects — Meets
Kerr County · of the 15 that report this measure
1of 14
Dropout Rate (lowest is best)
Region 20: San Antonio (alternative-education accountability only) · of the 14 that report this measure
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
4 measures
2of 34
Social Studies — Meets
Similar size · of the 34 that report this measure
3of 30
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit
Similar size · of the 30 that report this measure
3of 16
Overall score
Kerr County · of the 16 that report this measure · tied with 1
3of 15
Student Achievement
Kerr County · of the 15 that report this measure · tied with 1
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
2 measures
4of 16
Per-student spending
Kerr County · of the 16 that report this measure
9of 14
Six-Year Completion Rate
Region 20: San Antonio (alternative-education accountability only) · of the 14 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 133903105.