+14.7 ptsvs 77.3 average · 2,372 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
90 of 2,372tied with 40 others
Score vs region
+8.7 ptsvs 83.3 average · 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston
Region 04: Houston placement
185 of 1,303tied with 67 others
Score vs county
+8.6 ptsvs 83.4 average · 105 rated schools in Galveston County
Galveston County placement
13 of 105tied with 4 others
Score vs similar-size group
+11.9 ptsvs 80.1 average · 4,026 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
348 of 4,026tied with 134 others
Score vs state
+10.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
838 of 7,646tied with 318 others
A92
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 95 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 77.3 average for 2,372 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 83.3 average for 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston.The current score is above the 83.4 average for 105 rated schools in Galveston County.The current score is above the 80.1 average for 4,026 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
80%vs 40.8% avg · +39.2 pts
Masters
46%vs 16% avg · +30 pts
Among 2,213 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Heights Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.3 average for 2,372 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 90th of 2,372 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 40 others).
Heights Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.3 average for 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 185th of 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston (tied with 67 others).
Heights Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.4 average for 105 rated schools in Galveston County. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 13th of 105 rated schools in Galveston County (tied with 4 others).
Heights Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.1 average for 4,026 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 348th of 4,026 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 134 others).
Heights Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 95 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement93 A+22.1 vs similar economic context · 2,213 reporting
School Progress94 A+15.5 vs similar economic context · 2,206 reporting
Closing the Gaps88 B+13.5 vs similar economic context · 2,192 reporting
Academic Growth75 C+2.7 vs similar economic context · 2,164 reporting
Relative Performance94 A+17.3 vs similar economic context · 2,206 reporting
Heights Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,372 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
93
A
—
School Progress
94
A
—
Closing the Gaps
88
B
2
Academic Growth
75
C
5
Relative Performance
94
A
—
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 2 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (94), so
Student Achievement (93) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 94.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level94%+27 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,213 reporting
Meets grade level80%+39 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,213 reporting
Masters grade level46%+30 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,213 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level97%+28 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,212 reporting
Meets grade level81%+36 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,212 reporting
Masters grade level45%+27 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,212 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level92%+26 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,202 reporting
Meets grade level78%+40 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,202 reporting
Masters grade level47%+33 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,202 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,372 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
403
Economically disadvantaged
85.9%−0.6 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
24.6%−10.9 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
23.3%+4.9 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.6%+1.5 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
17.5%−4.6 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Heights Elem
African American 20.6%
Hispanic 57.6%
White 15.9%
Asian 0.2%
Two or More Races 5.7%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,372 reporting for every category shown · 2,372 in full cohort
African American 14.3%
Hispanic 73.3%
White 8.6%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 04: Houston · 1,303 reporting for every category shown · 1,303 in full cohort
African American 19.1%
Hispanic 53.8%
White 16.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 6.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Galveston County · 105 reporting for every category shown · 105 in full cohort
African American 14.2%
Hispanic 41.5%
White 35.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.3%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 4.4%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,026 reporting for every category shown · 4,026 in full cohort
African American 11.7%
Hispanic 54.8%
White 26.4%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 3.3%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.3%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
403
Economically disadvantaged students
346
Emergent bilingual students
99
Special education students
94
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
64
Students in TEA mobility denominator
367
TEA-published mobility rate
17.4%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 403 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 9 (2.2%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
403
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−9
Decrease · −2.2%
Change since 2021–22
+61
Increase · +17.8%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
403
Selected comparison
606.6
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,344 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Heights Elem
School year
Students enrolledHeights Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
342
First available year
641.8
2022–23
401
Increase of 59 (17.3%)
639.4
2023–24
410
Increase of 9 (2.2%)
631.1
2024–25
412
Increase of 2 (0.5%)
627.2
2025–26
403
Decrease of 9 (2.2%)
606.6
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
15
3.50 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
428
2024–25
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
3.5
Selected comparison
32.1
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,728 rated schools reporting
−28.6 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Heights Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
401
12
3.0%
30
7.48
7.7%
15
2021–22
368
15
4.1%
21
5.71
12.7%
30.3
2022–23
447
17
3.8%
23
5.15
13.6%
33.7
2023–24
441
12
2.7%
15
3.40
13.7%
33.9
2024–25
428
Suppressed
—
15
3.50
—
32.1
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Heights Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Suppressed
—
15
3.50
—
32.1
In-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
14
3.27
—
23.1
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Heights Elem
Parent district: Texas City ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$13,580
Selected comparison
$13,289
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,357 rated schools reporting
+$291 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $13,580 per student for this campus, $32,061 per student for its parent district, Texas City ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Heights Elem
Parent district: Texas City ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$8,262
$14,618
$13,054
$8,256
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,234 rated schools reporting
2019
$8,707
$15,889
$13,108
$8,323
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,265 rated schools reporting
2020
$9,193
$19,291
$14,058
$8,842
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,275 rated schools reporting
2021
$10,672
$22,800
$14,797
$9,546
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,281 rated schools reporting
2022
$11,922
$22,665
$15,708
$11,041
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,301 rated schools reporting
2023
$11,423
$20,933
$16,792
$11,565
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,327 rated schools reporting
2024
$12,111
$24,821
$18,125
$12,535
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,342 rated schools reporting
2025
$13,580
$32,061
$18,972
$13,289
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,357 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$69,710+$2,032 vs similar economic context
Teachers
31−11.3 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
13.2−1.2 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Heights Elem
1 to 5 years 31.4%
6 to 10 years 22.9%
11 to 20 years 29.4%
21 to 30 years 9.8%
Over 30 years 6.5%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,372 reporting for every category shown · 2,372 in full cohort
Beginning 7.2%
1 to 5 years 27.4%
6 to 10 years 19%
11 to 20 years 27.3%
21 to 30 years 15.1%
Over 30 years 3.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 04: Houston · 1,303 reporting for every category shown · 1,303 in full cohort
Beginning 7.7%
1 to 5 years 27.3%
6 to 10 years 20.6%
11 to 20 years 27.2%
21 to 30 years 13.5%
Over 30 years 2.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Galveston County · 105 reporting for every category shown · 105 in full cohort
Beginning 3.7%
1 to 5 years 22.4%
6 to 10 years 20.6%
11 to 20 years 27.9%
21 to 30 years 14%
Over 30 years 3.8%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,026 reporting for every category shown · 4,026 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 25.7%
6 to 10 years 19.1%
11 to 20 years 28.9%
21 to 30 years 16.4%
Over 30 years 3.5%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Heights Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classHeights Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
18
18.1
Grade 1
16.4
18.5
Grade 2
16.8
18.4
Grade 3
16.3
18.8
Grade 4
16.7
18.8
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 90 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
5 measures
2of 93
Relative Performance
Galveston County · of the 93 that report this measure · tied with 2
2of 93
All Subjects — Approaches
Galveston County · of the 93 that report this measure · tied with 1
2of 93
Reading — Approaches
Galveston County · of the 93 that report this measure
3of 93
All Subjects — Meets
Galveston County · of the 93 that report this measure · tied with 1
3of 93
Math — Meets
Galveston County · of the 93 that report this measure · tied with 2
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
6 measures
4of 93
All Subjects — Masters
Galveston County · of the 93 that report this measure · tied with 2
5of 93
Reading — Meets
Galveston County · of the 93 that report this measure · tied with 2
5of 93
Math — Masters
Galveston County · of the 93 that report this measure
6of 93
Math — Approaches
Galveston County · of the 93 that report this measure · tied with 1
8of 93
Reading — Masters
Galveston County · of the 93 that report this measure · tied with 1
9of 97
Per-student spending
Galveston County · of the 97 that report this measure
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
3 measures
48of 2,206
School Progress
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,206 that report this measure · tied with 15
51of 2,213
Student Achievement
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,213 that report this measure · tied with 8
90of 2,372
Overall score
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,372 that report this measure · tied with 40
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 084906102.