Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Hearne JH/HS

Robertson County · Region 06: Huntsville · 332 students

Current score
61/1002025-26
Change
−2 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−16.6 ptsvs 77.6 average · 2,106 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,906 of 2,106tied with 14 others
D61

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 78 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 77.6 average for 2,106 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Hearne JH/HS is rated D by TEA, scoring 61 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 77.6 average for 2,106 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 1,906th of 2,106 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 14 others).

2 consecutive years rated unacceptable.

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. Official improvement and transfer notices
  3. 5 years of ratings
  4. Where the score comes from
  5. Student outcomes
  6. After high school: the following fall
  7. Who this school serves
  8. Student counts behind the percentages
  9. Enrollment over time
  10. Discipline and removal from class
  11. Spending per student
  12. Teachers and actual class size
  13. Where this school ranks best
  14. Where this comes from

Official improvement and transfer notices

Official state and federal designations can carry support, reporting requirements or a family transfer option that a single A–F rating does not explain.

2026 federal improvement status

Comprehensive Support and Improvement

Official support label: Comprehensive Identified

Identification reason: CSI Low Performance

TEA track year 1 · Title I campus

Open the official TEA list and methodology

Schools identified for improvement

This school
Listed
Selected comparison
33.9%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,106 rated schools reporting

Schools on the PEG list

This school
Not listed
Selected comparison
9.2%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,106 rated schools reporting

Selected comparison percentages are the share of reporting schools in that group found on each dated list. They are neutral prevalence context; changing the comparison never changes this school's official status.

These are dated TEA statuses, fetched 24 August 2026; they are not added to or subtracted from this site's rating.

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
9080706050 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageHearne JH/HS 6369686861 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated C with 78 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26D6177.6 2,106 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25D6877.3 2,088 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24D6873.8 2,070 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23D6973.4 2,064 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22D6381.8 2,038 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement62 D−8.3 vs similar economic context · 1,955 reporting
  • School Progress64 D−14.7 vs similar economic context · 1,952 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps54 F−20.9 vs similar economic context · 1,938 reporting
  • Academic Growth59 F−14.1 vs similar economic context · 1,921 reporting
  • Relative Performance64 D−12.7 vs similar economic context · 1,951 reporting
  • Hearne JH/HS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,106 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement62D8
School Progress64D6
Closing the Gaps54F6
Academic Growth59F1
Relative Performance64D6

Closest to moving up: School Progress, 6 points below C in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (64), so Student Achievement (62) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 64.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level57%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,955 reporting
  • Meets grade level26%−15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,955 reporting
  • Masters grade level8%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,955 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level55%−14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,954 reporting
  • Meets grade level27%−17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,954 reporting
  • Masters grade level5%−13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,954 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level51%−15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,948 reporting
  • Meets grade level15%−24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,948 reporting
  • Masters grade level5%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,948 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level67%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,839 reporting
  • Meets grade level35%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,839 reporting
  • Masters grade level7%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,839 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level61%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 619 reporting
  • Meets grade level28%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 619 reporting
  • Masters grade level16%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 619 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,106 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
91.5%+2.3 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 203 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
92.1%+2.2 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 203 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
94.0%+4.6 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 203 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
1.9%±0.0 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 204 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
55.0%−28.8 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria55.0%83.8%−28.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 243 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course8.9%56.8%−47.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 244 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA1.8%19.4%−17.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 244 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)0.0%13.2%−13.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 244 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course32.1%26.9%+5.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 244 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification17.9%33.4%−15.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 244 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.0%2.9%−2.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 244 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%6.8%−6.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 244 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit19.6%6.2%+13.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 244 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness1.8%2.5%−0.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 244 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student10.7%7.4%+3.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 244 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces1.8%2.5%−0.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 244 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

After high school: the following fall

Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.

Graduates in the report
58

Class of 2023–24

Enrolled in Texas public higher education
18

31.0% of graduates

Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
38

65.5% of graduates

Not trackable
2

Fall 2024

Graduates in the report

This school
58
Selected comparison
263.4

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 227 rated schools reporting

Enrolled in Texas public higher education

This school
18
Selected comparison
99.9

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 227 rated schools reporting

Texas-public enrollment rate

This school
31.0%
Selected comparison
36.4%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 227 rated schools reporting

−5.4 pts vs similar economic context

Not-found rate

This school
65.5%
Selected comparison
55.5%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 227 rated schools reporting

+10.0 pts vs similar economic context

Not-trackable rate

This school
3.4%
Selected comparison
8.1%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 227 rated schools reporting

−4.7 pts vs similar economic context

Most common named Texas public destinations

  1. BLINN COLLEGE DISTRICT (003549)9

Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.

Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.

“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.

“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
332
Economically disadvantaged
92.4%+1.4 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
19.9%−20.8 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
25.7%+8.0 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
88.9%−4.1 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
43.1%+20.0 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Hearne JH/HS

African American: 44.7%Hispanic: 45.9%White: 7.3%Asian: 0.3%Two or More Races: 1.8%
  • African American 44.7%
  • Hispanic 45.9%
  • White 7.3%
  • Asian 0.3%
  • Two or More Races 1.8%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,106 reporting for every category shown · 2,106 in full cohort

African American: 14.9%Hispanic: 76.4%White: 5.5%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.3%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 1.6%
  • African American 14.9%
  • Hispanic 76.4%
  • White 5.5%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.3%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 1.6%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
331
Economically disadvantaged students
306
Emergent bilingual students
66
Special education students
85

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
64
Students in TEA mobility denominator
382
TEA-published mobility rate
16.8%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 332 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 9 (2.6%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
332

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−9

Decrease · −2.6%

Change since 2021–22
+100

Increase · +43.1%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
332
Selected comparison
570.1

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,084 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Hearne JH/HS
School yearStudents enrolledHearne JH/HSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 232 First available year 615.2
2022–23 343 Increase of 111 (47.8%) 611.7
2023–24 359 Increase of 16 (4.7%) 601.9
2024–25 341 Decrease of 18 (5.0%) 595.3
2025–26 332 Decrease of 9 (2.6%) 570.1

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
111

29.1% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
262

68.59 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
382

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
29.1%
Selected comparison
13.1%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,274 rated schools reporting

+16.0 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
68.59
Selected comparison
31.2

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,373 rated schools reporting

+37.4 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Hearne JH/HS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 247 21 8.5% 33 13.36 7.1% 13.5
2021–22 257 119 46.3% 422 164.20 12.6% 30
2022–23 387 134 34.6% 457 118.09 13.6% 33
2023–24 392 133 33.9% 413 105.36 13.7% 33.2
2024–25 382 111 29.1% 262 68.59 13.1% 31.2
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Hearne JH/HS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 111 29.1% 262 68.59 13.1% 31.2
In-school suspensions 57 14.9% 105 27.49 11.4% 22.1
Out-of-school suspensions 63 16.5% 102 26.70 9.4% 15.5
DAEP placements 48 12.6% 55 14.40 5.1% 6.2
Mandatory DAEP placements 16 4.2% 17 4.45 3.9% 4.6
Discretionary DAEP placements 34 8.9% 38 9.95 3.4% 4
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$16k$26k20182020202220242025
  • Hearne JH/HS
  • Parent district: Hearne ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$15,895
Selected comparison
$13,207

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,086 rated schools reporting

+$2,688 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $15,895 per student for this campus, $25,061 per student for its parent district, Hearne ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearHearne JH/HSParent district: Hearne ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$10,730$13,363$13,054$8,318 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,987 rated schools reporting
2019$11,594$15,402$13,108$8,336 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,014 rated schools reporting
2020$14,250$17,139$14,058$8,839 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,018 rated schools reporting
2021$16,732$22,967$14,797$9,650 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,021 rated schools reporting
2022$15,749$22,782$15,708$11,226 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,038 rated schools reporting
2023$17,073$23,240$16,792$11,730 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,063 rated schools reporting
2024$15,327$23,240$18,125$12,652 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,073 rated schools reporting
2025$15,895$25,061$18,972$13,207 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,086 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$62,343−$5,930 vs similar economic context
Teachers
41+0.6 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
8.2−6.4 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Hearne JH/HS

Beginning: 9.6%1 to 5 years: 28.6%6 to 10 years: 21.7%11 to 20 years: 31.8%21 to 30 years: 6.2%Over 30 years: 2.5%
  • Beginning 9.6%
  • 1 to 5 years 28.6%
  • 6 to 10 years 21.7%
  • 11 to 20 years 31.8%
  • 21 to 30 years 6.2%
  • Over 30 years 2.5%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,106 reporting for every category shown · 2,106 in full cohort

Beginning: 7.5%1 to 5 years: 27.2%6 to 10 years: 18.8%11 to 20 years: 27.1%21 to 30 years: 14.8%Over 30 years: 3.4%
  • Beginning 7.5%
  • 1 to 5 years 27.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 18.8%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.1%
  • 21 to 30 years 14.8%
  • Over 30 years 3.4%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Hearne JH/HS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classHearne JH/HS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English10.615.1
Secondary languages other than English12.918.3
Secondary math12.216.7
Secondary science13.717.7
Secondary social studies15.317.7

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 181 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#1 rankings

First-place results

1 measure

  • 1of 11

    Per-student spending

    Robertson County · of the 11 that report this measure

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

14 measures

  • 8of 73

    Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit

    Region 06: Huntsville · of the 73 that report this measure

  • 8of 10

    Science — Approaches

    Robertson County · of the 10 that report this measure

  • 8of 10

    Science — Meets

    Robertson County · of the 10 that report this measure

  • 8of 10

    Science — Masters

    Robertson County · of the 10 that report this measure

  • 9of 11

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Robertson County · of the 11 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 10of 11

    Student Achievement

    Robertson County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 10of 11

    Academic Growth

    Robertson County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 10of 11

    All Subjects — Meets

    Robertson County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 10of 11

    All Subjects — Masters

    Robertson County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 10of 11

    Reading — Approaches

    Robertson County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 10of 11

    Reading — Meets

    Robertson County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 10of 11

    Math — Approaches

    Robertson County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 10of 11

    Math — Meets

    Robertson County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 10of 11

    Math — Masters

    Robertson County · of the 11 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 198905002.