Recent movement
Overall score rose 3 points
80 to 83 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 83 is 5.6 points above the 77.4 average among 2,262 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Traditional public school campus
Hazel Ingram Elem
Ellis County · Region 10: Richardson · 310 students
- Current score
- 83/1002025-26
- Change
- +2 ptssince 2021-22
- Score vs similar economic context
- +5.6 ptsvs 77.4 average · 2,262 rated schools serving a similar economic context
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
- 685 of 2,262tied with 78 others
- Score vs region
- +0.8 ptsvs 82.2 average · 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson
- Region 10: Richardson placement
- 602 of 1,157tied with 35 others
- Score vs county
- +2.8 ptsvs 80.2 average · 64 rated schools in Ellis County
- Ellis County placement
- 27 of 64tied with 3 others
- Score vs similar-size group
- +2.5 ptsvs 80.5 average · 2,884 similarly sized rated schools
- Similar size placement
- 1,242 of 2,884tied with 86 others
- Score vs state
- +1.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
- Texas placement
- 3,601 of 7,646tied with 244 others
B83
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 88 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 77.4 average for 2,262 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 82.2 average for 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson.The current score is above the 80.2 average for 64 rated schools in Ellis County.The current score is above the 80.5 average for 2,884 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Recent movement
Overall score rose 3 points
80 to 83 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureRecent movement
Overall score rose 3 points
80 to 83 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 83 is 2.8 points above the 80.2 average among 64 schools in Ellis County reporting this measure.
Recent movement
Overall score rose 3 points
80 to 83 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 83 is 2.5 points above the 80.5 average among 2,884 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
Recent movement
Overall score rose 3 points
80 to 83 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureSelected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Hazel Ingram Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 83 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.4 average for 2,262 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 685th of 2,262 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 78 others).
Hazel Ingram Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 83 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.2 average for 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson. It is up 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 602nd of 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson (tied with 35 others).
Hazel Ingram Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 83 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.2 average for 64 rated schools in Ellis County. It is up 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 27th of 64 rated schools in Ellis County (tied with 3 others).
Hazel Ingram Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 83 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.5 average for 2,884 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1,242nd of 2,884 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 86 others).
Hazel Ingram Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 83 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 3,601st of 7,646 rated Texas schools (tied with 244 others).
Put the numbers in context
Compare with
Jump to a section
5 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 88 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
View the yearly scores and comparisons
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | B | 83 | 77.4 2,262 reporting | 81.3 7,646 reporting |
| 2024-25 | B | 80 | 77.0 2,248 reporting | 81.2 7,554 reporting |
| 2023-24 | C | 79 | 74.3 2,231 reporting | 78.9 7,466 reporting |
| 2022-23 | C | 72 | 74.7 2,217 reporting | 79.1 7,377 reporting |
| 2021-22 | B | 81 | 81.7 2,197 reporting | 83.7 7,283 reporting |
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- Hazel Ingram Elem
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,262 in cohort)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | — | Not rated | — |
| School Progress | — | Not rated | — |
| Closing the Gaps | — | Not rated | — |
| Academic Growth | — | Not rated | — |
| Relative Performance | — | Not rated | — |
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 310
- Economically disadvantaged
- 82.9%−0.7 pts vs similar economic context
- English learners
- 43.5%+11.1 pts vs similar economic context
- Special education
- 17.4%−1.1 pts vs similar economic context
- Attendance
- —
- Chronically absent
- —
Student demographics
Hazel Ingram Elem
- African American 10.3%
- Hispanic 76.1%
- White 10.6%
- Two or More Races 2.9%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,262 reporting for every category shown · 2,262 in full cohort
- African American 14.4%
- Hispanic 70.6%
- White 10.7%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 1.5%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 2.3%
Selected comparison average For Region 10: Richardson · 1,157 reporting for every category shown · 1,157 in full cohort
- African American 17.4%
- Hispanic 43.5%
- White 24.5%
- American Indian 0.6%
- Asian 9.9%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 4%
Selected comparison average For Ellis County · 64 reporting for every category shown · 64 in full cohort
- African American 17%
- Hispanic 43.6%
- White 34.3%
- American Indian 0.2%
- Asian 0.6%
- Pacific Islander 0.2%
- Two or More Races 4.2%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 2,884 reporting for every category shown · 2,884 in full cohort
- African American 11%
- Hispanic 53.2%
- White 30%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 2.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.2%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- African American 11.5%
- Hispanic 52.6%
- White 27.8%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 4.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
- Students in this TEA accountability summary
- 310
- Economically disadvantaged students
- 257
- Emergent bilingual students
- 135
- Special education students
- 54
TEA context labels
- Highest grade is early education, pre-K or kindergarten
Campus mobility · 2024–25
- Mobile students
- Not reported
- Students in TEA mobility denominator
- Not reported
- TEA-published mobility rate
- Not reported
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA did not publish an enrollment count for 2025–26 in this PEIMS report, so no current year-over-year change is calculated. The latest available PEIMS count is 335 students in 2024–25.
- Latest available PEIMS enrollment
- 335
2024–25
Enrollment in 2024–25
- This school
- 335
- Selected comparison
- 637.7
| School year | Students enrolledHazel Ingram Elem | Change from previous school year | Average enrollmentselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021–22 | 338 | First available year | 647.8 |
| 2022–23 | Not reported | Not available | — |
| 2023–24 | Not reported | Not available | — |
| 2024–25 | 335 | No adjacent prior year | 637.7 |
| 2025–26 | Not reported | Not available | — |
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
- Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
- Suppressed
Rate not available
- Disciplinary actions
- 22
6.06 per 100 students
- Cumulative year-end enrollment
- 363
2024–25
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
- This school
- 6.06
- Selected comparison
- 32.1
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020–21 | 368 | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| 2021–22 | 376 | Suppressed | — | 12 | 3.19 | — | 30.8 |
| 2022–23 | 348 | 14 | 4.0% | 25 | 7.18 | 13.7% | 34 |
| 2023–24 | 355 | 16 | 4.5% | 29 | 8.17 | 13.7% | 33.9 |
| 2024–25 | 363 | Suppressed | — | 22 | 6.06 | — | 32.1 |
See 2024–25 discipline categories
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | Suppressed | — | 22 | 6.06 | — | 32.1 |
| In-school suspensions | Suppressed | — | 22 | 6.06 | — | 23.3 |
| Out-of-school suspensions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
- Hazel Ingram Elem
- Parent district: Ferris ISD
- Texas average
- Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
- This school
- $12,437
- Selected comparison
- $13,165
For 2025, TEA reported $12,437 per student for this campus, $16,914 per student for its parent district, Ferris ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
| Year | Hazel Ingram Elem | Parent district: Ferris ISD | Texas average | Selected comparison average | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | $6,498 | $11,206 | $13,054 | $8,246 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,131 rated schools reporting |
| 2019 | $4,150 | $13,082 | $13,108 | $8,340 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,159 rated schools reporting |
| 2020 | $9,919 | $12,797 | $14,058 | $8,851 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,172 rated schools reporting |
| 2021 | $11,044 | $13,962 | $14,797 | $9,534 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,179 rated schools reporting |
| 2022 | $11,236 | $15,113 | $15,708 | $11,040 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,197 rated schools reporting |
| 2023 | $11,051 | $13,321 | $16,792 | $11,521 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,216 rated schools reporting |
| 2024 | $12,604 | $15,961 | $18,125 | $12,451 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,230 rated schools reporting |
| 2025 | $12,437 | $16,914 | $18,972 | $13,165 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,246 rated schools reporting |
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
- Average salary
- $67,843+$423 vs similar economic context
- Teachers
- 24−18.5 vs similar economic context
- Students per staff member
- 12.9−1.4 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Hazel Ingram Elem
- Beginning 8.3%
- 1 to 5 years 41.7%
- 6 to 10 years 29.2%
- 11 to 20 years 8.3%
- 21 to 30 years 12.5%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,262 reporting for every category shown · 2,262 in full cohort
- Beginning 7%
- 1 to 5 years 27.6%
- 6 to 10 years 19%
- 11 to 20 years 27.2%
- 21 to 30 years 15%
- Over 30 years 3.6%
Selected comparison average For Region 10: Richardson · 1,157 reporting for every category shown · 1,157 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.9%
- 1 to 5 years 29%
- 6 to 10 years 20.1%
- 11 to 20 years 27.5%
- 21 to 30 years 13.7%
- Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison average For Ellis County · 64 reporting for every category shown · 64 in full cohort
- Beginning 5.1%
- 1 to 5 years 23.9%
- 6 to 10 years 20.5%
- 11 to 20 years 33.1%
- 21 to 30 years 14.9%
- Over 30 years 2.5%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 2,884 reporting for every category shown · 2,884 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.2%
- 1 to 5 years 25.1%
- 6 to 10 years 18.5%
- 11 to 20 years 28.8%
- 21 to 30 years 16.9%
- Over 30 years 4.1%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- Beginning 6.2%
- 1 to 5 years 25.6%
- 6 to 10 years 19.2%
- 11 to 20 years 28.7%
- 21 to 30 years 15.9%
- Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
| Grade or subject | Average students per classHazel Ingram Elem · 2024–25 | Average students per classselected comparison |
|---|---|---|
| Kindergarten | 19.5 | 18.1 |
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 1 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 070905103.