Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus · Alternative Education Accountability

Hawley Center for Accelerated Learning

Jones County · Region 14: Abilene · 5 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Change
−91 ptssince 2023-24
Not Rated

At a glance

TEA did not issue an overall rating for Hawley Center for Accelerated Learning for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this school is below.

Read the full rating context and placement

TEA did not issue an overall rating for Hawley Center for Accelerated Learning for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this school is below.

TEA did not issue an overall rating for this school. Scores below are the figures TEA published; the letter grades are the state's where it issued them.

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 3 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Discipline and removal from class
  8. Spending per student
  9. Teachers and actual class size
  10. Where this comes from

3 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas average 91 2023-242024-252025-26

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26Not Rated—89.6 788 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25Not Rated—89.8 784 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24A9188.7 768 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement—Not reported · similar economic context 90.6 · 777 reporting
  • School Progress—Not reported · similar economic context 85.9 · 775 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps—Not reported · similar economic context 87 · 772 reporting
  • Academic Growth—Not reported · similar economic context 83.6 · 766 reporting
  • Relative Performance—Not reported · similar economic context 79.4 · 775 reporting
  • Hawley Center for Accelerated Learning
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (788 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement—Not rated—
School Progress—Not rated—
Closing the Gaps—Not rated—
Academic Growth—Not rated—
Relative Performance—Not rated—

The scores above are the ones TEA published. TEA did not issue letter grades for this school, so none are shown: the A–F thresholds marked on the chart are the state's, but applying them here would produce a grade the state chose to withhold.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 87.8% · 777 reporting
  • Meets grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 70.3% · 777 reporting
  • Masters grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 39.6% · 777 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 89.2% · 777 reporting
  • Meets grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 74.7% · 777 reporting
  • Masters grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 41.8% · 777 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 86.2% · 775 reporting
  • Meets grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 65.9% · 775 reporting
  • Masters grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 34.5% · 775 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 86.3% · 336 reporting
  • Meets grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 66.2% · 336 reporting
  • Masters grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 40.4% · 336 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (788 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Completion

Four-Year
0.0%−85.6 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
0.0%−83.8 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
0.0%−88.8 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−4.1 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's alternative-education accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
40.0%−49.5 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria40.0%89.5%−49.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 168 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course0.0%68.2%−68.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 170 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA0.0%53.1%−53.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 170 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)0.0%30.6%−30.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 170 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course20.0%38.2%−18.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 170 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification0.0%30.5%−30.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 170 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.0%0.4%−0.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 170 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%3.7%−3.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 170 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%8.2%−8.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 170 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness0.0%2.3%−2.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 170 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student0.0%5.8%−5.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 170 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces20.0%2.4%+17.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 170 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
5
Economically disadvantaged
20.0%−0.8 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
0.0%−10.4 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
20.0%+3.3 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
70.6%−25.1 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
72.7%+64.4 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Hawley Center for Accelerated Learning

Hispanic: 20%White: 80%
  • Hispanic 20%
  • White 80%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 788 reporting for every category shown · 788 in full cohort

African American: 7.6%Hispanic: 24.3%White: 48.3%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 14%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 5.4%
  • African American 7.6%
  • Hispanic 24.3%
  • White 48.3%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 14%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 5.4%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
5
Economically disadvantaged students
1
Emergent bilingual students
0
Special education students
1

TEA context labels

  • Alternative education campus under AEA procedures
  • Alternative education type: dropout recovery school
  • Rated under AEA procedures

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
10
Students in TEA mobility denominator
11
TEA-published mobility rate
90.9%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Suppressed

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
10

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Hawley Center for Accelerated Learning
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2023–24 18 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2024–25 10 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Hawley Center for Accelerated Learning in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
In-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$8k$19k$29k20242025
  • Hawley Center for Accelerated Learning
  • Parent district: Hawley ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$9,228
Selected comparison
$11,039

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 783 rated schools reporting

−$1,811 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $9,228 per student for this campus, $23,054 per student for its parent district, Hawley ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearHawley Center for Accelerated LearningParent district: Hawley ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2024$16,939$20,753$18,125$10,901 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 768 rated schools reporting
2025$9,228$23,054$18,972$11,039 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 783 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$39,350−$29,578 vs similar economic context
Teachers
1−54.5 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
5−10.0 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Hawley Center for Accelerated Learning

1 to 5 years: 100%
  • 1 to 5 years 100%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 788 reporting for every category shown · 788 in full cohort

Beginning: 4.5%1 to 5 years: 22.9%6 to 10 years: 19.9%11 to 20 years: 32.5%21 to 30 years: 17.2%Over 30 years: 2.9%
  • Beginning 4.5%
  • 1 to 5 years 22.9%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.9%
  • 11 to 20 years 32.5%
  • 21 to 30 years 17.2%
  • Over 30 years 2.9%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Hawley Center for Accelerated Learning in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classHawley Center for Accelerated Learning · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English2.218
Secondary languages other than English1.520.4
Secondary math1.218.4
Secondary science2.320.6
Secondary social studies2.220.7

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 127904003.