Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Harvest Ridge Elem

Bastrop County · Region 13: Austin · 747 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
67/1002025-26
Change
+1 ptssince 2024-25
Score vs similar economic context
−13.9 ptsvs 80.9 average · 1,937 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,796 of 1,937tied with 19 others
D67

At a glance

The available rating history is moving up. The current score is below the 80.9 average for 1,937 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Harvest Ridge Elem is rated D by TEA, scoring 67 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 80.9 average for 1,937 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 1 point since 2024-25.

Ranks 1,796th of 1,937 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 19 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 2 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

2 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageHarvest Ridge Elem 6667 2024-252025-26

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26D6780.9 1,937 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25D6680.7 1,911 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement58 F−21.5 vs similar economic context · 1,858 reporting
  • School Progress66 D−15.4 vs similar economic context · 1,851 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps69 D−9.2 vs similar economic context · 1,834 reporting
  • Academic Growth66 D−8.6 vs similar economic context · 1,800 reporting
  • Relative Performance55 F−24.5 vs similar economic context · 1,851 reporting
  • Harvest Ridge Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,937 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement58F2
School Progress66D4
Closing the Gaps69D1
Academic Growth66D4
Relative Performance55F5

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 1 point below C in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (66), so Student Achievement (58) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 66.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level57%−18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,858 reporting
  • Meets grade level31%−19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,858 reporting
  • Masters grade level12%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,858 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level62%−15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,855 reporting
  • Meets grade level37%−18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,855 reporting
  • Masters grade level17%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,855 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level55%−18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,847 reporting
  • Meets grade level27%−17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,847 reporting
  • Masters grade level10%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,847 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level45%−31 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,705 reporting
  • Meets grade level22%−26 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,705 reporting
  • Masters grade level6%−16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,705 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,937 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
747
Economically disadvantaged
59.3%−0.3 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
44.0%+28.4 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
17.7%−1.1 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
93.5%−0.8 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
20.6%+4.9 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Harvest Ridge Elem

African American: 14.1%Hispanic: 67.7%White: 12.3%American Indian: 0.4%Asian: 0.7%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 4.7%
  • African American 14.1%
  • Hispanic 67.7%
  • White 12.3%
  • American Indian 0.4%
  • Asian 0.7%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 4.7%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,937 reporting for every category shown · 1,937 in full cohort

African American: 10.2%Hispanic: 47.5%White: 35.5%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2.4%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3.9%
  • African American 10.2%
  • Hispanic 47.5%
  • White 35.5%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2.4%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.9%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
745
Economically disadvantaged students
442
Emergent bilingual students
328
Special education students
132

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
80
Students in TEA mobility denominator
425
TEA-published mobility rate
18.8%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 747 students in 2025–26, an increase of 151 (25.3%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
747

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+151

Increase · +25.3%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
747
Selected comparison
630.7

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,904 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Harvest Ridge Elem
School yearStudents enrolledHarvest Ridge ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2024–25 596 First available year 638.7
2025–26 747 Increase of 151 (25.3%) 630.7

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Not reported

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Not reported

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
682

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Harvest Ridge Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2024–25 682 Not reported — Not reported — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Harvest Ridge Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Not reported — Not reported — — —
In-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$8k$17k$26k2025
  • Harvest Ridge Elem
  • Parent district: Elgin ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$9,226
Selected comparison
$12,421

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,907 rated schools reporting

−$3,195 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $9,226 per student for this campus, $24,943 per student for its parent district, Elgin ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearHarvest Ridge ElemParent district: Elgin ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2025$9,226$24,943$18,972$12,421 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,907 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$57,087−$9,395 vs similar economic context
Teachers
37−4.5 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
20+0.8 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Harvest Ridge Elem

Beginning: 22.6%1 to 5 years: 44.9%6 to 10 years: 24.2%11 to 20 years: 5.6%21 to 30 years: 2.7%
  • Beginning 22.6%
  • 1 to 5 years 44.9%
  • 6 to 10 years 24.2%
  • 11 to 20 years 5.6%
  • 21 to 30 years 2.7%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,937 reporting for every category shown · 1,937 in full cohort

Beginning: 6%1 to 5 years: 25.3%6 to 10 years: 19.2%11 to 20 years: 28.4%21 to 30 years: 16.3%Over 30 years: 4.3%
  • Beginning 6%
  • 1 to 5 years 25.3%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.2%
  • 11 to 20 years 28.4%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.3%
  • Over 30 years 4.3%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Harvest Ridge Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classHarvest Ridge Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten22.417.9
Grade 126.418.2
Grade 221.518.4
Grade 32618.6
Grade 425.118.9

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

1 measure

  • 9of 31

    Reading — Masters

    Bastrop County · of the 31 that report this measure · tied with 1

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 011902105.