STAAR result
Science above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 60%vs 45.7% avg · +14.3 pts
- Masters
- 41%vs 20.3% avg · +20.7 pts
Among 1,735 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measureTraditional public school campus
Harts Bluff MS
Titus County · Region 08: Mt Pleasant · 206 students
- Current score
- 74/1002025-26
- Change
- −7 ptssince 2023-24
- Score vs similar economic context
- −5.9 ptsvs 79.9 average · 2,005 rated schools serving a similar economic context
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
- 1,439 of 2,005tied with 66 others
- Score vs region
- −7.5 ptsvs 81.5 average · 142 rated schools in Region 08: Mt Pleasant
- Region 08: Mt Pleasant placement
- 114 of 142tied with 6 others
- Score vs county
- −9.1 ptsvs 83.1 average · 14 rated schools in Titus County
- Titus County placement
- 13 of 14among reporting schools
- Score vs similar-size group
- −7.3 ptsvs 81.3 average · 1,347 similarly sized rated schools
- Similar size placement
- 1,049 of 1,347tied with 37 others
- Score vs state
- −7.3 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
- Texas placement
- 5,844 of 7,646tied with 207 others
C74
At a glance
The available rating history is moving down. The current score is below the 79.9 average for 2,005 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is below the 81.5 average for 142 rated schools in Region 08: Mt Pleasant.The current score is below the 83.1 average for 14 rated schools in Titus County.The current score is below the 81.3 average for 1,347 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average
8.5% −8.3 pts vs 16.8%
- 8.5% is 8.3 percentage points lower than the 16.8% average among 1,941 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Current strength
Attendance above the similar-context average
95.8% +1.7 pts vs 94.1%
- 95.8% is 1.7 percentage points above the 94.1% average among 1,941 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the Region 08: Mt Pleasant average
8.5% −7.1 pts vs 15.6%
- 8.5% is 7.1 percentage points lower than the 15.6% average among 134 schools in Region 08: Mt Pleasant reporting this measure.
Current strength
Attendance above the Region 08: Mt Pleasant average
95.8% +1.3 pts vs 94.5%
- 95.8% is 1.3 percentage points above the 94.5% average among 134 schools in Region 08: Mt Pleasant reporting this measure.
Top placement
Chronically absent
8.5% Tied for 1st-lowest of 13 schools in Titus County reporting this measure · 2025-26 · 2 share this value
See the full measureTop placement
Attendance
95.8% 1st of 13 schools in Titus County reporting this measure · 2025-26
See the full measureSTAAR result
Science above similar-size averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 60%vs 48.2% avg · +11.8 pts
- Masters
- 41%vs 21.3% avg · +19.7 pts
Among 1,141 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
See the full measureCurrent strength
Chronically absent lower than the similar-size average
8.5% −7.5 pts vs 16%
- 8.5% is 7.5 percentage points lower than the 16% average among 1,239 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
Current strength
Attendance above the similar-size average
95.8% +1.6 pts vs 94.2%
- 95.8% is 1.6 percentage points above the 94.2% average among 1,240 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
STAAR result
Science above Texas averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 60%vs 47.1% avg · +12.9 pts
- Masters
- 41%vs 22.8% avg · +18.2 pts
Among 6,717 Texas schools reporting this measure.
See the full measureCurrent strength
Chronically absent lower than the Texas average
8.5% −8.2 pts vs 16.7%
- 8.5% is 8.2 percentage points lower than the 16.7% average among 7,358 Texas schools reporting this measure.
Current strength
Attendance above the Texas average
95.8% +1.7 pts vs 94.1%
- 95.8% is 1.7 percentage points above the 94.1% average among 7,366 Texas schools reporting this measure.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Harts Bluff MS is rated C by TEA, scoring 74 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 79.9 average for 2,005 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 7 points since 2023-24.
Ranks 1,439th of 2,005 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 66 others).
Harts Bluff MS is rated C by TEA, scoring 74 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.5 average for 142 rated schools in Region 08: Mt Pleasant. It is down 7 points since 2023-24.
Ranks 114th of 142 rated schools in Region 08: Mt Pleasant (tied with 6 others).
Harts Bluff MS is rated C by TEA, scoring 74 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 83.1 average for 14 rated schools in Titus County. It is down 7 points since 2023-24.
Ranks 13th of 14 rated schools in Titus County.
Harts Bluff MS is rated C by TEA, scoring 74 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.3 average for 1,347 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 7 points since 2023-24.
Ranks 1,049th of 1,347 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 37 others).
Harts Bluff MS is rated C by TEA, scoring 74 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 7 points since 2023-24.
Ranks 5,844th of 7,646 rated Texas schools (tied with 207 others).
Put the numbers in context
Compare with
Jump to a section
- Overview
- Official improvement and transfer notices
- 3 years of ratings
- Where the score comes from
- Student outcomes
- Who this school serves
- Student counts behind the percentages
- Enrollment over time
- Discipline and removal from class
- Spending per student
- Teachers and actual class size
- Where this school ranks best
- Where this comes from
Official improvement and transfer notices
Official state and federal designations can carry support, reporting requirements or a family transfer option that a single A–F rating does not explain.
2026 federal improvement status
Targeted Support and Improvement
Official support label: TSI
Identification reason: Special Education
TEA track year 0
Schools identified for improvement
- This school
- Listed
- Selected comparison
- 27.4%
Schools on the PEG list
- This school
- Not listed
- Selected comparison
- 3.0%
Selected comparison percentages are the share of reporting schools in that group found on each dated list. They are neutral prevalence context; changing the comparison never changes this school's official status.
These are dated TEA statuses, fetched 24 August 2026; they are not added to or subtracted from this site's rating.
3 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
View the yearly scores and comparisons
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | C | 74 | 79.9 2,005 reporting | 81.3 7,646 reporting |
| 2024-25 | B | 85 | 79.6 1,982 reporting | 81.2 7,554 reporting |
| 2023-24 | B | 81 | 77.7 1,966 reporting | 78.9 7,466 reporting |
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- Harts Bluff MS
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,005 in cohort)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | 75 | C | 5 |
| School Progress | 80 | B | 10 |
| Closing the Gaps | 60 | D | 10 |
| Academic Growth | 65 | D | 5 |
| Relative Performance | 80 | B | 10 |
Closest to moving up: School Progress, 10 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (80), so Student Achievement (75) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 80.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
- Approaches grade level
- Meets grade level
- Masters grade level
- Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,005 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 206
- Economically disadvantaged
- 65.0%−0.1 pts vs similar economic context
- English learners
- 27.2%+9.2 pts vs similar economic context
- Special education
- 15.5%−3.4 pts vs similar economic context
- Attendance
- 95.8%+1.7 pts vs similar economic context
- Chronically absent
- 8.5%−8.3 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Harts Bluff MS
- African American 1.5%
- Hispanic 52.4%
- White 42.2%
- Asian 1.5%
- Two or More Races 2.4%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,005 reporting for every category shown · 2,005 in full cohort
- African American 11.4%
- Hispanic 51.8%
- White 30.4%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 2.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.2%
- Two or More Races 3.7%
Selected comparison average For Region 08: Mt Pleasant · 142 reporting for every category shown · 142 in full cohort
- African American 16.3%
- Hispanic 21.3%
- White 54.6%
- American Indian 0.5%
- Asian 0.7%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 6.5%
Selected comparison average For Titus County · 14 reporting for every category shown · 14 in full cohort
- African American 7.9%
- Hispanic 61.2%
- White 28.3%
- American Indian 0.2%
- Asian 0.7%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 1.7%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 1,347 reporting for every category shown · 1,347 in full cohort
- African American 8.5%
- Hispanic 47.2%
- White 39.6%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 1.1%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.1%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- African American 11.5%
- Hispanic 52.6%
- White 27.8%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 4.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
- Students in this TEA accountability summary
- 206
- Economically disadvantaged students
- 134
- Emergent bilingual students
- 56
- Special education students
- 32
Campus mobility · 2024–25
- Mobile students
- 14
- Students in TEA mobility denominator
- 200
- TEA-published mobility rate
- 7%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 206 students in 2025–26, an increase of 12 (6.2%) from 2024–25.
- Latest enrollment
- 206
2025–26
- Change from 2024–25
- +12
Increase · +6.2%
- Change since 2023–24
- +17
Increase · +9.0%
Enrollment in 2025–26
- This school
- 206
- Selected comparison
- 624
| School year | Students enrolledHarts Bluff MS | Change from previous school year | Average enrollmentselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023–24 | 189 | First available year | 643.4 |
| 2024–25 | 194 | Increase of 5 (2.6%) | 638.6 |
| 2025–26 | 206 | Increase of 12 (6.2%) | 624 |
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
- Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
- 18
9.0% of cumulative year-end enrollment
- Disciplinary actions
- 34
17.00 per 100 students
- Cumulative year-end enrollment
- 200
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
- This school
- 9.0%
- Selected comparison
- 12.9%
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
- This school
- 17
- Selected comparison
- 30.4
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023–24 | 192 | 11 | 5.7% | 16 | 8.33 | 13.2% | 31.9 |
| 2024–25 | 200 | 18 | 9.0% | 34 | 17.00 | 12.9% | 30.4 |
See 2024–25 discipline categories
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | 18 | 9.0% | 34 | 17.00 | 12.9% | 30.4 |
| In-school suspensions | 14 | 7.0% | 21 | 10.50 | 11.6% | 23.1 |
| Out-of-school suspensions | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| DAEP placements | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
- Harts Bluff MS
- Parent district: Harts Bluff ISD
- Texas average
- Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
- This school
- $6,624
- Selected comparison
- $12,697
For 2025, TEA reported $6,624 per student for this campus, $13,248 per student for its parent district, Harts Bluff ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
| Year | Harts Bluff MS | Parent district: Harts Bluff ISD | Texas average | Selected comparison average | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | $7,011 | $13,522 | $18,125 | $12,083 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,963 rated schools reporting |
| 2025 | $6,624 | $13,248 | $18,972 | $12,697 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,979 rated schools reporting |
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
- Average salary
- $66,250−$162 vs similar economic context
- Teachers
- 18−24.6 vs similar economic context
- Students per staff member
- 11.4−2.5 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Harts Bluff MS
- Beginning 6.1%
- 1 to 5 years 35%
- 6 to 10 years 12.2%
- 11 to 20 years 24.4%
- 21 to 30 years 10.6%
- Over 30 years 11.7%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,005 reporting for every category shown · 2,005 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.3%
- 1 to 5 years 26.3%
- 6 to 10 years 19.1%
- 11 to 20 years 27.9%
- 21 to 30 years 15.8%
- Over 30 years 4.1%
Selected comparison average For Region 08: Mt Pleasant · 142 reporting for every category shown · 142 in full cohort
- Beginning 5.6%
- 1 to 5 years 24.2%
- 6 to 10 years 18.4%
- 11 to 20 years 27.3%
- 21 to 30 years 17.2%
- Over 30 years 6.5%
Selected comparison average For Titus County · 14 reporting for every category shown · 14 in full cohort
- Beginning 3.7%
- 1 to 5 years 29.2%
- 6 to 10 years 20%
- 11 to 20 years 27.7%
- 21 to 30 years 15.6%
- Over 30 years 3.8%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 1,347 reporting for every category shown · 1,347 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.7%
- 1 to 5 years 23.7%
- 6 to 10 years 17.4%
- 11 to 20 years 28.4%
- 21 to 30 years 17.6%
- Over 30 years 5.4%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- Beginning 6.2%
- 1 to 5 years 25.6%
- 6 to 10 years 19.2%
- 11 to 20 years 28.7%
- 21 to 30 years 15.9%
- Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
| Grade or subject | Average students per classHarts Bluff MS · 2024–25 | Average students per classselected comparison |
|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 16.2 | 17.7 |
| Secondary English | 13.2 | 15.1 |
| Secondary math | 11.3 | 15.9 |
| Secondary science | 14 | 17.3 |
| Secondary social studies | 13.9 | 17.2 |
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
Where this school ranks best
Out of 114 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
2 measures
-
1of 13
Attendance
Titus County · of the 13 that report this measure
-
1of 13
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Titus County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 1
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
10 measures
-
7of 110
Science — Masters
Region 08: Mt Pleasant · of the 110 that report this measure
-
7of 13
Reading — Approaches
Titus County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
9of 13
Academic Growth
Titus County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
9of 13
All Subjects — Masters
Titus County · of the 13 that report this measure
-
9of 13
Math — Masters
Titus County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
10of 13
Student Achievement
Titus County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
10of 13
Relative Performance
Titus County · of the 13 that report this measure
-
10of 13
Reading — Masters
Titus County · of the 13 that report this measure
-
10of 13
Math — Approaches
Titus County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 2
-
10of 13
Math — Meets
Titus County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 1
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 225907041.