Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Harrold School

Wilbarger County · Region 09: Wichita Falls · 159 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
88/1002025-26
Change
+5 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+6.0 ptsvs 82 average · 1,706 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
432 of 1,706tied with 66 others
B88

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 87 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 82 average for 1,706 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent domain gain

School Progress rose 3 points

84 to 87 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 87 is 5.4 points above the 81.6 average among 1,638 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Overall score above the similar-context average

88 +6 pts vs 82

  • 88 is 6 points above the 82 average among 1,706 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Closing the Gaps above the similar-context average

87 +7.7 pts vs 79.3

  • 87 is 7.7 points above the 79.3 average among 1,623 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Harrold School is rated B by TEA, scoring 88 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82 average for 1,706 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 5 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 432nd of 1,706 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 66 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageHarrold School 8380819088 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 87 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8882.0 1,706 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25A9082.2 1,682 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24B8180.2 1,656 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8080.8 1,634 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22B8383.5 1,611 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement89 B+7.4 vs similar economic context · 1,643 reporting
  • School Progress87 B+5.4 vs similar economic context · 1,638 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps87 B+7.7 vs similar economic context · 1,623 reporting
  • Academic Growth82 B+6.2 vs similar economic context · 1,603 reporting
  • Relative Performance87 B+7.7 vs similar economic context · 1,638 reporting
  • Harrold School
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,706 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement89B1
School Progress87B3
Closing the Gaps87B3
Academic Growth82B8
Relative Performance87B3

Closest to moving up: Student Achievement, 1 point below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (89), so School Progress (87) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 89.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level85%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,643 reporting
  • Meets grade level56%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,643 reporting
  • Masters grade level19%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,643 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level89%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,641 reporting
  • Meets grade level66%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,641 reporting
  • Masters grade level23%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,641 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level89%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,635 reporting
  • Meets grade level57%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,635 reporting
  • Masters grade level16%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,635 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level84%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,516 reporting
  • Meets grade level51%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,516 reporting
  • Masters grade level24%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,516 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level66%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 845 reporting
  • Meets grade level28%−22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 845 reporting
  • Masters grade level3%−20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 845 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,706 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
100.0%+6.8 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 435 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
100.0%+7.3 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 432 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 437 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
91.0%+2.9 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria91.0%88.1%+2.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 456 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course9.1%59.3%−50.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 458 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA9.1%29.4%−20.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 458 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)0.0%10.6%−10.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 458 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course54.5%33.4%+21.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 458 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification45.5%38.0%+7.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 458 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.0%1.5%−1.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 458 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%4.6%−4.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 458 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%4.2%−4.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 458 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness0.0%3.1%−3.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 458 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student9.1%7.3%+1.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 458 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces0.0%3.4%−3.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 458 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
159
Economically disadvantaged
50.3%−0.6 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
1.9%−11.3 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
18.2%−0.6 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.3%+1.8 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
5.4%−9.0 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Harrold School

African American: 3.1%Hispanic: 24.5%White: 62.3%American Indian: 3.8%Two or More Races: 6.3%
  • African American 3.1%
  • Hispanic 24.5%
  • White 62.3%
  • American Indian 3.8%
  • Two or More Races 6.3%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,706 reporting for every category shown · 1,706 in full cohort

African American: 9.5%Hispanic: 41.1%White: 41.7%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 3.1%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4.2%
  • African American 9.5%
  • Hispanic 41.1%
  • White 41.7%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 3.1%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4.2%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
159
Economically disadvantaged students
80
Emergent bilingual students
3
Special education students
29

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
25
Students in TEA mobility denominator
169
TEA-published mobility rate
14.8%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 159 students in 2025–26, an increase of 5 (3.2%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
159

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+5

Increase · +3.2%

Change since 2021–22
+54

Increase · +51.4%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
159
Selected comparison
646.2

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,666 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Harrold School
School yearStudents enrolledHarrold SchoolChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 105 First available year 650.2
2022–23 138 Increase of 33 (31.4%) 654.6
2023–24 152 Increase of 14 (10.1%) 654.1
2024–25 154 Increase of 2 (1.3%) 650.1
2025–26 159 Increase of 5 (3.2%) 646.2

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Suppressed

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
174

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Harrold School
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 131 15 11.4% 21 16.03 9.6% 18.4
2021–22 113 Suppressed — 12 10.62 — 26.4
2022–23 154 10 6.5% 13 8.44 12.4% 28.3
2023–24 167 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2024–25 174 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Harrold School in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
In-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$20k$33k20182020202220242025
  • Harrold School
  • Parent district: Harrold ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$11,995
Selected comparison
$11,981

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,680 rated schools reporting

+$14 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $11,995 per student for this campus, $31,308 per student for its parent district, Harrold ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearHarrold SchoolParent district: Harrold ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$9,445$16,577$13,054$7,831 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,555 rated schools reporting
2019$10,516$29,710$13,108$8,012 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,575 rated schools reporting
2020$12,640$25,851$14,058$8,540 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,587 rated schools reporting
2021$12,438$23,267$14,797$8,950 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,603 rated schools reporting
2022$14,653$24,455$15,708$10,235 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,613 rated schools reporting
2023$14,124$24,534$16,792$10,696 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,633 rated schools reporting
2024$12,217$20,714$18,125$11,516 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,654 rated schools reporting
2025$11,995$31,308$18,972$11,981 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,680 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$62,776−$4,093 vs similar economic context
Teachers
17−25.7 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
9.5−10.3 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Harrold School

Beginning: 22.2%1 to 5 years: 44.9%6 to 10 years: 5.4%11 to 20 years: 11.4%21 to 30 years: 16.2%
  • Beginning 22.2%
  • 1 to 5 years 44.9%
  • 6 to 10 years 5.4%
  • 11 to 20 years 11.4%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.2%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,706 reporting for every category shown · 1,706 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.6%1 to 5 years: 24.4%6 to 10 years: 19.3%11 to 20 years: 29.4%21 to 30 years: 16.7%Over 30 years: 4.3%
  • Beginning 5.6%
  • 1 to 5 years 24.4%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.3%
  • 11 to 20 years 29.4%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.7%
  • Over 30 years 4.3%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Harrold School in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classHarrold School · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten418
Grade 11118.4
Grade 21118.6
Grade 31219.1
Grade 41419.1
Grade 51720
Grade 615.417.7
Secondary English15.315.1
Secondary math13.815.9
Secondary science1617.5
Secondary social studies1317.5

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 11 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 156 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

2 measures

  • 9of 92

    Attendance

    Region 09: Wichita Falls · of the 92 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 10of 37

    Earned college credit for a dual credit course

    Region 09: Wichita Falls · of the 37 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 244901001.