Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average
0% −24 pts vs 24%
- 0% is 24 percentage points lower than the 24% average among 404 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Open-enrollment charter campus · Alternative Education Accountability
Harris County Youth Village
Excel Academy · Seabrook · 49 students
Official school websiteSchool information and family resources
Not Rated
At a glance
TEA did not issue an overall rating for Harris County Youth Village for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this charter campus is below.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Current strength
Attendance above the similar-context average
100% +7.4 pts vs 92.6%
- 100% is 7.4 percentage points above the 92.6% average among 404 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the similar-size average
0% −43.4 pts vs 43.4%
- 0% is 43.4 percentage points lower than the 43.4% average among 27 similarly sized charter campuses reporting this measure.
Current strength
Attendance above the similar-size average
100% +10.9 pts vs 89.1%
- 100% is 10.9 percentage points above the 89.1% average among 27 similarly sized charter campuses reporting this measure.
Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the Texas charter average
0% −22.5 pts vs 22.5%
- 0% is 22.5 percentage points lower than the 22.5% average among 807 Texas charter campuses reporting this measure.
Current strength
Attendance above the Texas charter average
100% +7.1 pts vs 92.9%
- 100% is 7.1 percentage points above the 92.9% average among 807 Texas charter campuses reporting this measure.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
TEA did not issue an overall rating for Harris County Youth Village for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this charter campus is below.
TEA did not issue an overall rating for Harris County Youth Village for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this charter campus is below.
TEA did not issue an overall rating for Harris County Youth Village for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this charter campus is below.
TEA did not issue an overall rating for this school. Scores below are the figures TEA published; the letter grades are the state's where it issued them.
Put the numbers in context
Compare with
Jump to a section
5 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
View the yearly scores and comparisons
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas charter average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Not Rated | — | 80.5 407 reporting | 81.7 829 reporting |
| 2024-25 | Not Rated | — | 78.8 399 reporting | 81.3 797 reporting |
| 2023-24 | Not Rated | — | 76.5 391 reporting | 79.5 776 reporting |
| 2022-23 | Not Rated | — | 76.1 380 reporting | 79.6 749 reporting |
| 2021-22 | Not Rated | — | 83.5 357 reporting | 84.5 700 reporting |
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- Harris County Youth Village
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate (407 in cohort)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | — | Not rated | — |
| School Progress | — | Not rated | — |
| Closing the Gaps | — | Not rated | — |
| Academic Growth | — | Not rated | — |
| Relative Performance | — | Not rated | — |
The scores above are the ones TEA published. TEA did not issue letter grades for this school, so none are shown: the A–F thresholds marked on the chart are the state's, but applying them here would produce a grade the state chose to withhold.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 49
- Economically disadvantaged
- 89.8%+0.4 pts vs similar economic context
- English learners
- 22.4%−21.1 pts vs similar economic context
- Special education
- 22.4%+9.8 pts vs similar economic context
- Attendance
- 100.0%+7.4 pts vs similar economic context
- Chronically absent
- 0.0%−24.0 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Harris County Youth Village
- African American 57.1%
- Hispanic 34.7%
- White 4.1%
- Two or More Races 4.1%
Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 407 reporting for every category shown · 407 in full cohort
- African American 18.5%
- Hispanic 74.9%
- White 3.5%
- American Indian 0.2%
- Asian 1.5%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 1.3%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized charter campuses · 30 reporting for every category shown · 30 in full cohort
- African American 20.6%
- Hispanic 43.8%
- White 30.7%
- American Indian 0.1%
- Asian 0.7%
- Pacific Islander 0.2%
- Two or More Races 3.9%
Texas charter average 829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
- African American 17.5%
- Hispanic 61.8%
- White 12.2%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 5.5%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 2.5%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
- Students in this TEA accountability summary
- 49
- Economically disadvantaged students
- 44
- Emergent bilingual students
- 11
- Special education students
- 11
TEA context labels
- Alternative education type: residential facility
- Rated under AEA procedures
- Residential treatment facility under AEA or AskTED
Campus mobility · 2024–25
- Mobile students
- 189
- Students in TEA mobility denominator
- 189
- TEA-published mobility rate
- 100%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 49 students in 2025–26, an increase of 6 (14.0%) from 2024–25.
- Latest enrollment
- 49
2025–26
- Change from 2024–25
- +6
Increase · +14.0%
- Change since 2021–22
- +14
Increase · +40.0%
Enrollment in 2025–26
- This school
- 49
- Selected comparison
- 510.9
| School year | Students enrolledHarris County Youth Village | Change from previous school year | Average enrollmentselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021–22 | 35 | First available year | 495.2 |
| 2022–23 | 42 | Increase of 7 (20.0%) | 507.3 |
| 2023–24 | 37 | Decrease of 5 (11.9%) | 512.6 |
| 2024–25 | 43 | Increase of 6 (16.2%) | 515.6 |
| 2025–26 | 49 | Increase of 6 (14.0%) | 510.9 |
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting charter campuses in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
- Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
- Not reported
Rate not available
- Disciplinary actions
- Not reported
Rate not available
- Cumulative year-end enrollment
- 153
2024–25
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020–21 | 128 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| 2021–22 | 139 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| 2022–23 | 143 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| 2023–24 | 126 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| 2024–25 | 153 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
See 2024–25 discipline categories
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| In-school suspensions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Out-of-school suspensions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter campuses can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
- Harris County Youth Village
- Parent district: Excel Academy
- Texas average
- Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
- This school
- $21,221
- Selected comparison
- $11,832
For 2025, TEA reported $21,221 per student for this campus, $17,968 per student for its parent district, Excel Academy, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
| Year | Harris County Youth Village | Parent district: Excel Academy | Texas average | Selected comparison average | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | $16,097 | $15,422 | $13,054 | $8,531 | average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 244 rated charter campuses reporting |
| 2019 | $30,599 | $17,180 | $13,108 | $8,619 | average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 304 rated charter campuses reporting |
| 2020 | $18,299 | $18,173 | $14,058 | $9,145 | average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 321 rated charter campuses reporting |
| 2021 | $30,592 | $20,038 | $14,797 | $9,477 | average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 346 rated charter campuses reporting |
| 2022 | $29,473 | $20,650 | $15,708 | $11,356 | average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 365 rated charter campuses reporting |
| 2023 | $23,474 | $17,631 | $16,792 | $11,407 | average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 378 rated charter campuses reporting |
| 2024 | $28,013 | $21,971 | $18,125 | $11,492 | average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 389 rated charter campuses reporting |
| 2025 | $21,221 | $17,968 | $18,972 | $11,832 | average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 401 rated charter campuses reporting |
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
- Average salary
- $72,712+$8,867 vs similar economic context
- Teachers
- 8−21.8 vs similar economic context
- Students per staff member
- 6.4−11.5 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Harris County Youth Village
- Beginning 10.5%
- 1 to 5 years 13.2%
- 6 to 10 years 10.5%
- 11 to 20 years 26.3%
- 21 to 30 years 13.2%
- Over 30 years 26.3%
Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 407 reporting for every category shown · 407 in full cohort
- Beginning 13%
- 1 to 5 years 47.4%
- 6 to 10 years 19.9%
- 11 to 20 years 14.9%
- 21 to 30 years 4.1%
- Over 30 years 0.7%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized charter campuses · 30 reporting for every category shown · 30 in full cohort
- Beginning 9.9%
- 1 to 5 years 39.2%
- 6 to 10 years 13.9%
- 11 to 20 years 24.8%
- 21 to 30 years 12%
- Over 30 years 0.3%
Texas charter average 829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
- Beginning 13%
- 1 to 5 years 44.3%
- 6 to 10 years 19.6%
- 11 to 20 years 15.4%
- 21 to 30 years 4.8%
- Over 30 years 0.9%
Average students in a class
| Grade or subject | Average students per classHarris County Youth Village · 2024–25 | Average students per classselected comparison |
|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 1 | 23.6 |
| Secondary English | 14.8 | 19 |
| Secondary math | 10 | 19.5 |
| Secondary science | 9.2 | 20.4 |
| Secondary social studies | 10.6 | 20.5 |
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 101811004.