+14.2 ptsvs 82.8 average · 105 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
2 of 105tied with 3 others
Score vs similar-size group
+15.6 ptsvs 81.4 average · 454 similarly sized rated charter campuses
Similar size placement
5 of 454tied with 5 others
Score vs state
+15.3 ptsvs 81.7 average · 829 rated Texas charter campuses
Texas charter placement
9 of 829tied with 13 others
A97
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 92 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 82.8 average for 105 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 81.4 average for 454 similarly sized rated charter campuses.The current score is above the 81.7 average for 829 rated Texas charter campuses.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Recent domain gain
School Progress rose 4 points
93 to 972024-25 to 2025-26
97 is 15.2 points above
the 81.8 average among 104 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Tied for 1st of 104 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure; 3 charter campuses share that value.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Harmony Science Academy - Euless is rated A by TEA, scoring 97 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.8 average for 105 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context. It is up 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 2nd of 105 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context (tied with 3 others).
Harmony Science Academy - Euless is rated A by TEA, scoring 97 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.4 average for 454 similarly sized rated charter campuses. It is up 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 5th of 454 similarly sized rated charter campuses (tied with 5 others).
Harmony Science Academy - Euless is rated A by TEA, scoring 97 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.7 average for 829 rated Texas charter campuses. It is up 4 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 92 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement97 A+15.2 vs similar economic context · 105 reporting
School Progress97 A+15.2 vs similar economic context · 104 reporting
Closing the Gaps97 A+16.1 vs similar economic context · 101 reporting
Academic Growth88 B+13.2 vs similar economic context · 98 reporting
Relative Performance97 A+17.1 vs similar economic context · 103 reporting
Harmony Science Academy - Euless
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (105 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
97
A
—
School Progress
97
A
—
Closing the Gaps
97
A
—
Academic Growth
88
B
2
Relative Performance
97
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level91%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 105 reporting
Meets grade level77%+28 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 105 reporting
Masters grade level45%+24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 105 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level94%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 105 reporting
Meets grade level81%+26 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 105 reporting
Masters grade level45%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 105 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level91%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 104 reporting
Meets grade level77%+37 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 104 reporting
Masters grade level45%+29 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 104 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level94%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 100 reporting
Meets grade level83%+37 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 100 reporting
Masters grade level52%+30 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 100 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level83%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 70 reporting
Meets grade level59%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 70 reporting
Masters grade level35%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 70 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (105 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Graduation
Four-Year
95.2%+19.9 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 34 rated charter campuses reporting
Five-Year
100.0%+35.5 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 34 rated charter campuses reporting
Six-Year
100.0%+36.4 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 34 rated charter campuses reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−0.3 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 34 rated charter campuses reporting
These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only charter campuses in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported charter campus rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
College, career and military readiness
Total credit for CCMR criteria
100.0%+16.7 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
Criterion
This school% of graduates
Averagesimilar economic context
Differencepercentage points
Reportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria
100.0%
83.3%
+16.7
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 48 rated charter campuses reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
98.4%
70.4%
+28.0
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 49 rated charter campuses reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
84.4%
32.0%
+52.4
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 49 rated charter campuses reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
53.1%
14.2%
+38.9
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 49 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
79.7%
23.8%
+55.9
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 49 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned an industry-based certification
42.2%
12.1%
+30.1
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 49 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate
0.0%
0.3%
−0.3
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 49 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned an associate degree
0.0%
3.4%
−3.4
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 49 rated charter campuses reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit
39.1%
3.1%
+36.0
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 49 rated charter campuses reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness
0.0%
4.5%
−4.5
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 49 rated charter campuses reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student
4.7%
7.9%
−3.2
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 49 rated charter campuses reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces
4.7%
1.6%
+3.1
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 49 rated charter campuses reporting
Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of
meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this
school minus the average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate,
counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that
criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported charter campus percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
After high school: the following fall
Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.
Graduates in the report
76
Class of 2023–24
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
54
71.1% of graduates
Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
13
17.1% of graduates
Not trackable
9
Fall 2024
Graduates in the report
This school
76
Selected comparison
72.3
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 31 rated charter campuses reporting
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
This school
54
Selected comparison
31.5
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 31 rated charter campuses reporting
Texas-public enrollment rate
This school
71.1%
Selected comparison
38.6%
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 31 rated charter campuses reporting
+32.5 pts vs similar economic context
Not-found rate
This school
17.1%
Selected comparison
55.6%
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 31 rated charter campuses reporting
−38.5 pts vs similar economic context
Not-trackable rate
This school
11.8%
Selected comparison
5.8%
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 31 rated charter campuses reporting
+6.0 pts vs similar economic context
Most common named Texas public destinations
U. OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON (003656)25
U. OF TEXAS AT DALLAS (009741)13
TARRANT COUNTY COLLEGE DIST (003626)5
Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.
Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.
“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.
“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
684
Economically disadvantaged
52.8%−1.5 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
26.6%+7.3 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
9.2%−4.3 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.1%+2.5 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
11.9%−11.3 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Harmony Science Academy - Euless
African American 28.2%
Hispanic 15.8%
White 24.4%
American Indian 0.4%
Asian 27.5%
Two or More Races 3.7%
Selected comparison averageFor charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 105 reporting for every category shown · 105 in full cohort
African American 19.7%
Hispanic 46%
White 23%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 7.2%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized charter campuses · 454 reporting for every category shown · 454 in full cohort
African American 15.6%
Hispanic 65.7%
White 9.7%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 6.5%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.1%
Texas charter average829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
African American 17.5%
Hispanic 61.8%
White 12.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.5%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.5%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
684
Economically disadvantaged students
361
Emergent bilingual students
182
Special education students
63
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
77
Students in TEA mobility denominator
702
TEA-published mobility rate
11%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 684 students in 2025–26, an increase of 25 (3.8%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
684
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+25
Increase · +3.8%
Change since 2021–22
+72
Increase · +11.8%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
684
Selected comparison
496.9
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 105 rated charter campuses reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Harmony Science Academy - Euless
School year
Students enrolledHarmony Science Academy - Euless
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
612
First available year
428.9
2022–23
590
Decrease of 22 (3.6%)
444.5
2023–24
620
Increase of 30 (5.1%)
481.5
2024–25
659
Increase of 39 (6.3%)
488.4
2025–26
684
Increase of 25 (3.8%)
496.9
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting charter campuses in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
49
7.0% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
78
11.14 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
700
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
7.0%
Selected comparison
9.0%
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 72 rated charter campuses reporting
−2.0 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
11.14
Selected comparison
14.2
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 77 rated charter campuses reporting
−3.1 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Harmony Science Academy - Euless
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
735
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2021–22
681
35
5.1%
44
6.46
9.0%
14.3
2022–23
641
93
14.5%
169
26.37
9.5%
14.8
2023–24
655
49
7.5%
65
9.92
8.7%
14.9
2024–25
700
49
7.0%
78
11.14
9.0%
14.2
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Harmony Science Academy - Euless in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
49
7.0%
78
11.14
9.0%
14.2
In-school suspensions
16
2.3%
18
2.57
6.0%
8.6
Out-of-school suspensions
41
5.9%
57
8.14
7.1%
9.7
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter campuses can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Harmony Science Academy - Euless
Parent district: Harmony Public Schools - North Texas
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$11,425
Selected comparison
$11,048
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 102 rated charter campuses reporting
+$378 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $11,425 per student for this campus, $12,496 per student for its parent district, Harmony Public Schools - North Texas, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Harmony Science Academy - Euless
Parent district: Harmony Public Schools - North Texas
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$9,675
$9,815
$13,054
$7,724
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 73 rated charter campuses reporting
2019
$9,229
$9,866
$13,108
$8,232
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 78 rated charter campuses reporting
2020
$10,562
$10,577
$14,058
$8,694
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 83 rated charter campuses reporting
2021
$8,796
$10,522
$14,797
$9,018
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 86 rated charter campuses reporting
2022
$11,715
$12,674
$15,708
$10,221
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 90 rated charter campuses reporting
2023
$11,994
$12,533
$16,792
$10,782
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 95 rated charter campuses reporting
2024
$12,151
$13,324
$18,125
$10,829
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 96 rated charter campuses reporting
2025
$11,425
$12,496
$18,972
$11,048
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 102 rated charter campuses reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$67,574+$6,089 vs similar economic context
Teachers
37+7.7 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
18.4+0.4 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Harmony Science Academy - Euless
Beginning 2.7%
1 to 5 years 29.5%
6 to 10 years 33%
11 to 20 years 16.1%
21 to 30 years 16.1%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 105 reporting for every category shown · 105 in full cohort
Beginning 14.1%
1 to 5 years 39.9%
6 to 10 years 20.8%
11 to 20 years 17.9%
21 to 30 years 6.1%
Over 30 years 1.2%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized charter campuses · 454 reporting for every category shown · 454 in full cohort
Beginning 13.8%
1 to 5 years 46.7%
6 to 10 years 20.2%
11 to 20 years 13.4%
21 to 30 years 3.6%
Over 30 years 0.4%
Texas charter average829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
Beginning 13%
1 to 5 years 44.3%
6 to 10 years 19.6%
11 to 20 years 15.4%
21 to 30 years 4.8%
Over 30 years 0.9%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Harmony Science Academy - Euless in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classHarmony Science Academy - Euless · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 6
29.3
21
Secondary English
25.4
15.6
Secondary languages other than English
23.7
15
Secondary math
24.7
15.8
Secondary science
23.8
16.8
Secondary social studies
24
16.7
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
2 measures
1of 816
Relative Performance
Texas charter average · of the 816 that report this measure · tied with 6
1of 454
School Progress
Similar size · of the 454 that report this measure · tied with 3
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
5 measures
2of 104
Math — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 104 that report this measure
2of 49
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 49 that report this measure
3of 105
All Subjects — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 105 that report this measure · tied with 1
3of 104
Math — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 104 that report this measure
3of 49
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 49 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
17 measures
4of 454
Student Achievement
Similar size · of the 454 that report this measure · tied with 5
4of 105
Reading — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 105 that report this measure · tied with 2
4of 101
Closing the Gaps
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 101 that report this measure · tied with 2
4of 100
Science — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 100 that report this measure
5of 454
Overall score
Similar size · of the 454 that report this measure · tied with 5
5of 105
All Subjects — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 105 that report this measure
5of 105
Reading — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 105 that report this measure
5of 105
Reading — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 105 that report this measure · tied with 2
5of 100
Science — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 100 that report this measure
5of 49
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 49 that report this measure
5of 49
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 49 that report this measure
5of 49
Earned an industry-based certification
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 49 that report this measure
6of 105
All Subjects — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 105 that report this measure · tied with 1
6of 49
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 49 that report this measure
8of 104
Math — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 104 that report this measure
9of 49
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 49 that report this measure
10of 70
Social Studies — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 70 that report this measure · tied with 1
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 161807009.