Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Open-enrollment charter campus

Harmony School of Innovation - Odessa

Harmony Public Schools - West Texas · Odessa · 644 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
78/1002025-26
Score vs similar economic context
−3.0 ptsvs 81 average · 134 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
86 of 134tied with 3 others
C78

At a glance

The current score is below the 81 average for 134 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

Reading above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
56%vs 51.7% avg · +4.3 pts
Masters
25%vs 22.4% avg · +2.6 pts

Among 134 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Current strength

Closing the Gaps above the similar-context average

84 +6 pts vs 78

  • 84 is 6 points above the 78 average among 130 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Harmony School of Innovation - Odessa is rated C by TEA, scoring 78 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81 average for 134 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this charter campus, so there is no trend to read yet.

Ranks 86th of 134 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context (tied with 3 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 1 year of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Teachers
  8. Where this comes from

1 year of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 78 2025-26

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas charter average
2025-26C7881.0 134 reporting81.7 829 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement72 C−8.2 vs similar economic context · 134 reporting
  • School Progress75 C−5.6 vs similar economic context · 134 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps84 B+6.0 vs similar economic context · 130 reporting
  • Academic Growth62 D−11.2 vs similar economic context · 125 reporting
  • Relative Performance75 C−4.3 vs similar economic context · 133 reporting
  • Harmony School of Innovation - Odessa
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (134 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement72C8
School Progress75C5
Closing the Gaps84B6
Academic Growth62D8
Relative Performance75C5

Closest to moving up: School Progress, 5 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (75), so Student Achievement (72) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 75.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level72%−0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 134 reporting
  • Meets grade level44%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 134 reporting
  • Masters grade level17%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 134 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level81%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 134 reporting
  • Meets grade level56%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 134 reporting
  • Masters grade level25%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 134 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level69%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 132 reporting
  • Meets grade level39%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 132 reporting
  • Masters grade level13%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 132 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level68%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 129 reporting
  • Meets grade level35%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 129 reporting
  • Masters grade level11%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 129 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level46%−27 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 90 reporting
  • Meets grade level17%−23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 90 reporting
  • Masters grade level2%−17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 90 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (134 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
644
Economically disadvantaged
59.3%−1.6 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
24.7%+3.1 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
12.1%−1.2 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
—
Chronically absent
—

Student demographics

Harmony School of Innovation - Odessa

African American: 5.7%Hispanic: 75.5%White: 13.4%American Indian: 0.5%Asian: 3.3%Pacific Islander: 0.3%Two or More Races: 1.4%
  • African American 5.7%
  • Hispanic 75.5%
  • White 13.4%
  • American Indian 0.5%
  • Asian 3.3%
  • Pacific Islander 0.3%
  • Two or More Races 1.4%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 134 reporting for every category shown · 134 in full cohort

African American: 23.1%Hispanic: 49.6%White: 16.4%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 7%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3.4%
  • African American 23.1%
  • Hispanic 49.6%
  • White 16.4%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 7%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.4%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
644
Economically disadvantaged students
382
Emergent bilingual students
159
Special education students
78

TEA context labels

  • New campus compared with last year’s fall enrollment

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
Not reported
Students in TEA mobility denominator
Not reported
TEA-published mobility rate
Not reported

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Teachers

Average salary
$63,795+$1,536 vs similar economic context
Teachers
37+7.8 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
17.5−0.4 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Harmony School of Innovation - Odessa

Beginning: 31.5%1 to 5 years: 20.9%6 to 10 years: 34.8%11 to 20 years: 13%
  • Beginning 31.5%
  • 1 to 5 years 20.9%
  • 6 to 10 years 34.8%
  • 11 to 20 years 13%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 134 reporting for every category shown · 134 in full cohort

Beginning: 15.4%1 to 5 years: 41%6 to 10 years: 20.8%11 to 20 years: 16.8%21 to 30 years: 4.9%Over 30 years: 1.1%
  • Beginning 15.4%
  • 1 to 5 years 41%
  • 6 to 10 years 20.8%
  • 11 to 20 years 16.8%
  • 21 to 30 years 4.9%
  • Over 30 years 1.1%

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 071806009.