−3.0 ptsvs 81 average · 134 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
86 of 134tied with 3 others
Score vs similar-size group
−3.1 ptsvs 81.1 average · 456 similarly sized rated charter campuses
Similar size placement
292 of 456tied with 13 others
Score vs state
−3.7 ptsvs 81.7 average · 829 rated Texas charter campuses
Texas charter placement
551 of 829tied with 20 others
C78
At a glance
The current score is below the 81 average for 134 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context.The current score is below the 81.1 average for 456 similarly sized rated charter campuses.The current score is below the 81.7 average for 829 rated Texas charter campuses.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
Reading above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
56%vs 51.7% avg · +4.3 pts
Masters
25%vs 22.4% avg · +2.6 pts
Among 134 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Harmony School of Innovation - Odessa is rated C by TEA, scoring 78 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81 average for 134 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this charter campus, so there is no trend to read yet.
Ranks 86th of 134 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context (tied with 3 others).
Harmony School of Innovation - Odessa is rated C by TEA, scoring 78 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.1 average for 456 similarly sized rated charter campuses. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this charter campus, so there is no trend to read yet.
Ranks 292nd of 456 similarly sized rated charter campuses (tied with 13 others).
Harmony School of Innovation - Odessa is rated C by TEA, scoring 78 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.7 average for 829 rated Texas charter campuses. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this charter campus, so there is no trend to read yet.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement72 C−8.2 vs similar economic context · 134 reporting
School Progress75 C−5.6 vs similar economic context · 134 reporting
Closing the Gaps84 B+6.0 vs similar economic context · 130 reporting
Academic Growth62 D−11.2 vs similar economic context · 125 reporting
Relative Performance75 C−4.3 vs similar economic context · 133 reporting
Harmony School of Innovation - Odessa
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (134 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
72
C
8
School Progress
75
C
5
Closing the Gaps
84
B
6
Academic Growth
62
D
8
Relative Performance
75
C
5
Closest to moving up: School Progress, 5 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (75), so
Student Achievement (72) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 75.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level72%−0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 134 reporting
Meets grade level44%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 134 reporting
Masters grade level17%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 134 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level81%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 134 reporting
Meets grade level56%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 134 reporting
Masters grade level25%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 134 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level69%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 132 reporting
Meets grade level39%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 132 reporting
Masters grade level13%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 132 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level68%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 129 reporting
Meets grade level35%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 129 reporting
Masters grade level11%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 129 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level46%−27 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 90 reporting
Meets grade level17%−23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 90 reporting
Masters grade level2%−17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 90 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (134 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
644
Economically disadvantaged
59.3%−1.6 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
24.7%+3.1 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
12.1%−1.2 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
—
Chronically absent
—
Student demographics
Harmony School of Innovation - Odessa
African American 5.7%
Hispanic 75.5%
White 13.4%
American Indian 0.5%
Asian 3.3%
Pacific Islander 0.3%
Two or More Races 1.4%
Selected comparison averageFor charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 134 reporting for every category shown · 134 in full cohort
African American 23.1%
Hispanic 49.6%
White 16.4%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 7%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized charter campuses · 456 reporting for every category shown · 456 in full cohort
African American 16.1%
Hispanic 64.7%
White 9.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 6.6%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.2%
Texas charter average829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
African American 17.5%
Hispanic 61.8%
White 12.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.5%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.5%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
644
Economically disadvantaged students
382
Emergent bilingual students
159
Special education students
78
TEA context labels
New campus compared with last year’s fall enrollment
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
Not reported
Students in TEA mobility denominator
Not reported
TEA-published mobility rate
Not reported
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Teachers
Average salary
$63,795+$1,536 vs similar economic context
Teachers
37+7.8 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
17.5−0.4 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Harmony School of Innovation - Odessa
Beginning 31.5%
1 to 5 years 20.9%
6 to 10 years 34.8%
11 to 20 years 13%
Selected comparison averageFor charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 134 reporting for every category shown · 134 in full cohort
Beginning 15.4%
1 to 5 years 41%
6 to 10 years 20.8%
11 to 20 years 16.8%
21 to 30 years 4.9%
Over 30 years 1.1%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized charter campuses · 456 reporting for every category shown · 456 in full cohort
Beginning 13.6%
1 to 5 years 46.8%
6 to 10 years 20.2%
11 to 20 years 13.4%
21 to 30 years 3.6%
Over 30 years 0.4%
Texas charter average829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
Beginning 13%
1 to 5 years 44.3%
6 to 10 years 19.6%
11 to 20 years 15.4%
21 to 30 years 4.8%
Over 30 years 0.9%
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 071806009.