+14.0 ptsvs 83 average · 64 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1 of 64tied with 2 others
Score vs similar-size group
+14.0 ptsvs 83 average · 304 similarly sized rated charter campuses
Similar size placement
4 of 304tied with 5 others
Score vs state
+15.3 ptsvs 81.7 average · 829 rated Texas charter campuses
Texas charter placement
9 of 829tied with 13 others
A97
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 92 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 83 average for 64 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 83 average for 304 similarly sized rated charter campuses.The current score is above the 81.7 average for 829 rated Texas charter campuses.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Current strength
Overall score above the similar-context average
97+14 pts vs 83
97 is 14 points above
the 83 average among 64 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Tied for 1st of 64 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure; 3 charter campuses share that value.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Harmony School of Endeavor - Austin is rated A by TEA, scoring 97 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83 average for 64 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context. It is up 6 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1st of 64 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context (tied with 2 others).
Harmony School of Endeavor - Austin is rated A by TEA, scoring 97 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83 average for 304 similarly sized rated charter campuses. It is up 6 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 4th of 304 similarly sized rated charter campuses (tied with 5 others).
Harmony School of Endeavor - Austin is rated A by TEA, scoring 97 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.7 average for 829 rated Texas charter campuses. It is up 6 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 92 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement96 A+12.7 vs similar economic context · 64 reporting
School Progress95 A+16.2 vs similar economic context · 62 reporting
Closing the Gaps98 A+17.9 vs similar economic context · 61 reporting
Academic Growth85 B+11.4 vs similar economic context · 62 reporting
Relative Performance95 A+18.7 vs similar economic context · 62 reporting
Harmony School of Endeavor - Austin
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (64 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
96
A
—
School Progress
95
A
—
Closing the Gaps
98
A
—
Academic Growth
85
B
5
Relative Performance
95
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (96), so
School Progress (95) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 96.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level89%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 64 reporting
Meets grade level72%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 64 reporting
Masters grade level42%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 64 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level91%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 64 reporting
Meets grade level78%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 64 reporting
Masters grade level48%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 64 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level88%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 63 reporting
Meets grade level71%+25 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 63 reporting
Masters grade level40%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 63 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level91%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 62 reporting
Meets grade level69%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 62 reporting
Masters grade level44%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 62 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level76%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 49 reporting
Meets grade level50%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 49 reporting
Masters grade level22%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 49 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (64 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Graduation
Four-Year
100.0%+41.5 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 37 rated charter campuses reporting
Five-Year
100.0%+46.3 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 36 rated charter campuses reporting
Six-Year
100.0%+50.2 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 37 rated charter campuses reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−1.0 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 37 rated charter campuses reporting
These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only charter campuses in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported charter campus rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
College, career and military readiness
Total credit for CCMR criteria
98.0%+18.4 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
Criterion
This school% of graduates
Averagesimilar economic context
Differencepercentage points
Reportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria
98.0%
79.6%
+18.4
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 32 rated charter campuses reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
97.6%
59.0%
+38.6
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 35 rated charter campuses reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
92.9%
43.3%
+49.6
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 35 rated charter campuses reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
59.5%
14.8%
+44.7
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 35 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
83.3%
37.6%
+45.7
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 35 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned an industry-based certification
9.5%
4.1%
+5.4
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 35 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate
0.0%
0.2%
−0.2
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 35 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned an associate degree
0.0%
9.1%
−9.1
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 35 rated charter campuses reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit
71.4%
6.7%
+64.7
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 35 rated charter campuses reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness
0.0%
1.6%
−1.6
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 35 rated charter campuses reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student
7.1%
5.6%
+1.5
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 35 rated charter campuses reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces
2.4%
2.1%
+0.3
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 35 rated charter campuses reporting
Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of
meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this
school minus the average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate,
counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that
criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported charter campus percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
After high school: the following fall
Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.
Graduates in the report
30
Class of 2023–24
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
20
66.7% of graduates
Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
5
16.7% of graduates
Not trackable
5
Fall 2024
Graduates in the report
This school
30
Selected comparison
96.9
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 21 rated charter campuses reporting
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
This school
20
Selected comparison
30.4
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 21 rated charter campuses reporting
Texas-public enrollment rate
This school
66.7%
Selected comparison
42.7%
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 21 rated charter campuses reporting
+24.0 pts vs similar economic context
Not-found rate
This school
16.7%
Selected comparison
53.1%
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 21 rated charter campuses reporting
−36.4 pts vs similar economic context
Not-trackable rate
This school
16.7%
Selected comparison
4.3%
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 21 rated charter campuses reporting
+12.4 pts vs similar economic context
Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.
Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.
“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.
“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
991
Economically disadvantaged
34.8%±0.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
41.7%+30.8 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
5.4%−8.0 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.3%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
14.7%−0.1 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Harmony School of Endeavor - Austin
African American 9.9%
Hispanic 15.9%
White 31.3%
American Indian 0.1%
Asian 40.3%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.4%
Selected comparison averageFor charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 64 reporting for every category shown · 64 in full cohort
African American 11.6%
Hispanic 36.4%
White 39.1%
American Indian 0.4%
Asian 7.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.9%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized charter campuses · 304 reporting for every category shown · 304 in full cohort
African American 14.5%
Hispanic 65.4%
White 9.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 7.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.1%
Texas charter average829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
African American 17.5%
Hispanic 61.8%
White 12.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.5%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.5%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
991
Economically disadvantaged students
345
Emergent bilingual students
413
Special education students
54
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
121
Students in TEA mobility denominator
978
TEA-published mobility rate
12.4%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 991 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 9 (0.9%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
991
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−9
Decrease · −0.9%
Change since 2021–22
+207
Increase · +26.4%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
991
Selected comparison
529.7
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 64 rated charter campuses reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Harmony School of Endeavor - Austin
School year
Students enrolledHarmony School of Endeavor - Austin
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
784
First available year
433.1
2022–23
896
Increase of 112 (14.3%)
465.1
2023–24
961
Increase of 65 (7.3%)
490.2
2024–25
1,000
Increase of 39 (4.1%)
503.1
2025–26
991
Decrease of 9 (0.9%)
529.7
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting charter campuses in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
73
6.8% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
136
12.58 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
1,081
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
6.8%
Selected comparison
7.1%
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 34 rated charter campuses reporting
−0.3 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
12.58
Selected comparison
11.4
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 36 rated charter campuses reporting
+1.2 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Harmony School of Endeavor - Austin
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
868
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2021–22
901
67
7.4%
93
10.32
8.9%
15.7
2022–23
1,012
51
5.0%
85
8.40
9.1%
15.3
2023–24
1,058
57
5.4%
86
8.13
7.7%
13.4
2024–25
1,081
73
6.8%
136
12.58
7.1%
11.4
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Harmony School of Endeavor - Austin in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
73
6.8%
136
12.58
7.1%
11.4
In-school suspensions
71
6.6%
108
9.99
5.2%
6.9
Out-of-school suspensions
16
1.5%
28
2.59
4.9%
7
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter campuses can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Harmony School of Endeavor - Austin
Parent district: Harmony Public Schools - Central Texas
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$10,250
Selected comparison
$13,076
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 60 rated charter campuses reporting
−$2,826 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $10,250 per student for this campus, $13,138 per student for its parent district, Harmony Public Schools - Central Texas, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Harmony School of Endeavor - Austin
Parent district: Harmony Public Schools - Central Texas
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$11,204
$10,445
$13,054
$7,319
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 37 rated charter campuses reporting
2019
$8,976
$10,152
$13,108
$8,067
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 40 rated charter campuses reporting
2020
$10,347
$10,877
$14,058
$8,515
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 41 rated charter campuses reporting
2021
$8,149
$10,319
$14,797
$9,031
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 44 rated charter campuses reporting
2022
$13,346
$13,221
$15,708
$10,346
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 51 rated charter campuses reporting
2023
$11,110
$12,437
$16,792
$10,373
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 55 rated charter campuses reporting
2024
$10,904
$13,006
$18,125
$11,897
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 59 rated charter campuses reporting
2025
$10,250
$13,138
$18,972
$13,076
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 60 rated charter campuses reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$63,780+$4,048 vs similar economic context
Teachers
55+21.0 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
18.2−1.6 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Harmony School of Endeavor - Austin
Beginning 3.7%
1 to 5 years 36.7%
6 to 10 years 29.4%
11 to 20 years 30.3%
Selected comparison averageFor charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 64 reporting for every category shown · 64 in full cohort
Beginning 13.2%
1 to 5 years 41.1%
6 to 10 years 21%
11 to 20 years 17.2%
21 to 30 years 6.7%
Over 30 years 0.8%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized charter campuses · 304 reporting for every category shown · 304 in full cohort
Beginning 13.7%
1 to 5 years 47.7%
6 to 10 years 20%
11 to 20 years 12.4%
21 to 30 years 2.9%
Over 30 years 0.4%
Texas charter average829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
Beginning 13%
1 to 5 years 44.3%
6 to 10 years 19.6%
11 to 20 years 15.4%
21 to 30 years 4.8%
Over 30 years 0.9%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Harmony School of Endeavor - Austin in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classHarmony School of Endeavor - Austin · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
24.3
19.2
Grade 1
24
20.5
Grade 2
26.3
20.6
Grade 3
28.3
20.8
Grade 4
25.2
22.4
Grade 5
24.7
21.3
Grade 6
27.5
20.9
Secondary English
18.6
15.5
Secondary languages other than English
19.9
16.2
Secondary math
20.7
14.6
Secondary science
23.1
16.6
Secondary social studies
19.5
16
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 12 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
6 measures
1of 120
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit
Similar size · of the 120 that report this measure
1of 64
Overall score
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 64 that report this measure · tied with 2
1of 64
All Subjects — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 64 that report this measure
1of 64
Reading — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 64 that report this measure
1of 61
Closing the Gaps
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 61 that report this measure
1of 35
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 35 that report this measure
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
6 measures
3of 120
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
Similar size · of the 120 that report this measure
3of 63
Math — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 63 that report this measure
3of 63
Math — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 63 that report this measure · tied with 1
3of 62
School Progress
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 62 that report this measure · tied with 1
3of 62
Relative Performance
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 62 that report this measure
3of 35
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 35 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
8 measures
4of 64
Student Achievement
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 64 that report this measure · tied with 1
4of 35
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 35 that report this measure
4of 35
Earned an industry-based certification
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 35 that report this measure
8of 62
Science — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 62 that report this measure
10of 64
All Subjects — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 64 that report this measure · tied with 1
10of 64
Reading — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 64 that report this measure · tied with 2
10of 35
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 35 that report this measure
10of 32
College, career or military ready
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 32 that report this measure · tied with 1
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 227816004.