+16.0 ptsvs 81 average · 1,899 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
18 of 1,899tied with 16 others
Score vs region
+11.3 ptsvs 85.7 average · 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg
Region 01: Edinburg placement
13 of 505tied with 5 others
Score vs county
+11.0 ptsvs 86 average · 127 rated schools in Cameron County
Cameron County placement
3 of 127among reporting schools
Score vs similar-size group
+16.9 ptsvs 80.1 average · 4,653 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
49 of 4,653tied with 43 others
Score vs state
+15.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
82 of 7,646tied with 63 others
A97
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is flat; under the rules in force back then it scored 97 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 81 average for 1,899 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 85.7 average for 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg.The current score is above the 86 average for 127 rated schools in Cameron County.The current score is above the 80.1 average for 4,653 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
77%vs 50.6% avg · +26.4 pts
Masters
28%vs 21.1% avg · +6.9 pts
Among 1,828 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Harlingen School of Health Professions is rated A by TEA, scoring 97 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81 average for 1,899 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 18th of 1,899 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 16 others).
Harlingen School of Health Professions is rated A by TEA, scoring 97 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 85.7 average for 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 13th of 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg (tied with 5 others).
Harlingen School of Health Professions is rated A by TEA, scoring 97 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 86 average for 127 rated schools in Cameron County. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 3rd of 127 rated schools in Cameron County.
Harlingen School of Health Professions is rated A by TEA, scoring 97 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.1 average for 4,653 similarly sized rated schools. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 49th of 4,653 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 43 others).
Harlingen School of Health Professions is rated A by TEA, scoring 97 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 97 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement97 A+17.1 vs similar economic context · 1,828 reporting
School Progress96 A+14.7 vs similar economic context · 1,820 reporting
Closing the Gaps98 A+19.8 vs similar economic context · 1,803 reporting
Academic Growth80 B+5.4 vs similar economic context · 1,769 reporting
Relative Performance96 A+16.6 vs similar economic context · 1,820 reporting
Harlingen School of Health Professions
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,899 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
97
A
—
School Progress
96
A
—
Closing the Gaps
98
A
—
Academic Growth
80
B
10
Relative Performance
96
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (97), so
School Progress (96) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 97.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level94%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,828 reporting
Meets grade level77%+26 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,828 reporting
Masters grade level28%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,828 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level98%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,825 reporting
Meets grade level90%+35 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,825 reporting
Masters grade level27%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,825 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level90%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,815 reporting
Meets grade level56%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,815 reporting
Masters grade level18%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,815 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level99%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,675 reporting
Meets grade level84%+35 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,675 reporting
Masters grade level33%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,675 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level87%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 933 reporting
Meets grade level66%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 933 reporting
Masters grade level35%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 933 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,899 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Graduation
Four-Year
100.0%+6.5 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 493 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
100.0%+6.8 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 489 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
100.0%+7.6 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 489 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−0.5 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 496 rated schools reporting
These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
College, career and military readiness
Total credit for CCMR criteria
100.0%+12.1 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
Criterion
This school% of graduates
Averagesimilar economic context
Differencepercentage points
Reportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria
100.0%
87.9%
+12.1
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 527 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
97.3%
58.6%
+38.7
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 530 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
97.3%
28.0%
+69.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 530 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
50.7%
10.0%
+40.7
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 530 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
37.3%
34.0%
+3.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 530 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification
96.0%
37.9%
+58.1
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 530 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate
0.0%
1.8%
−1.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 530 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree
0.0%
5.5%
−5.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 530 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit
0.0%
3.7%
−3.7
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 530 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness
0.0%
3.2%
−3.2
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 530 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student
2.7%
7.7%
−5.0
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 530 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces
2.7%
3.5%
−0.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 530 rated schools reporting
Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of
meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this
school minus the average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate,
counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that
criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
After high school: the following fall
Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.
Graduates in the report
65
Class of 2023–24
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
47
72.3% of graduates
Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
14
21.5% of graduates
Not trackable
4
Fall 2024
Graduates in the report
This school
65
Selected comparison
222
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 415 rated schools reporting
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
This school
47
Selected comparison
97.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 415 rated schools reporting
Texas-public enrollment rate
This school
72.3%
Selected comparison
45.1%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 415 rated schools reporting
+27.2 pts vs similar economic context
Not-found rate
This school
21.5%
Selected comparison
50.2%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 415 rated schools reporting
−28.7 pts vs similar economic context
Not-trackable rate
This school
6.2%
Selected comparison
4.7%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 415 rated schools reporting
+1.5 pts vs similar economic context
Most common named Texas public destinations
U. OF TEXAS-RIO GRANDE VALLEY (003599)21
TEXAS STATE T. C. CONNECT (119642)13
Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.
Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.
“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.
“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
485
Economically disadvantaged
57.1%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
4.9%−9.9 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
2.3%−16.5 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.3%+2.0 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
7.0%−8.5 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Harlingen School of Health Professions
African American 0.2%
Hispanic 92.4%
White 4.9%
Asian 1%
Two or More Races 1.4%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,899 reporting for every category shown · 1,899 in full cohort
African American 10%
Hispanic 45.9%
White 37.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.4%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.9%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 01: Edinburg · 505 reporting for every category shown · 505 in full cohort
African American 0.2%
Hispanic 97.5%
White 1.9%
Asian 0.3%
Two or More Races 0.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Cameron County · 127 reporting for every category shown · 127 in full cohort
African American 0.3%
Hispanic 96.2%
White 2.9%
American Indian 0.1%
Asian 0.4%
Two or More Races 0.2%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,653 reporting for every category shown · 4,653 in full cohort
African American 12.1%
Hispanic 55.1%
White 25%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 3.9%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
485
Economically disadvantaged students
277
Emergent bilingual students
24
Special education students
11
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
23
Students in TEA mobility denominator
460
TEA-published mobility rate
5%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 485 students in 2025–26, an increase of 37 (8.3%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
485
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+37
Increase · +8.3%
Change since 2021–22
+126
Increase · +35.1%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
485
Selected comparison
628.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,863 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Harlingen School of Health Professions
School year
Students enrolledHarlingen School of Health Professions
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
359
First available year
634.2
2022–23
376
Increase of 17 (4.7%)
640.7
2023–24
377
Increase of 1 (0.3%)
638.7
2024–25
448
Increase of 71 (18.8%)
635
2025–26
485
Increase of 37 (8.3%)
628.5
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
11
2.47 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
445
2024–25
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
2.47
Selected comparison
27.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,562 rated schools reporting
−25.3 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Harlingen School of Health Professions
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
410
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2021–22
362
10
2.8%
13
3.59
12.4%
27.9
2022–23
375
Suppressed
—
12
3.20
—
29.7
2023–24
384
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2024–25
445
Suppressed
—
11
2.47
—
27.8
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Harlingen School of Health Professions in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Suppressed
—
11
2.47
—
27.8
In-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Harlingen School of Health Professions
Parent district: Harlingen CISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$9,615
Selected comparison
$12,400
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,870 rated schools reporting
−$2,785 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $9,615 per student for this campus, $15,557 per student for its parent district, Harlingen CISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Harlingen School of Health Professions
Parent district: Harlingen CISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$8,514
$12,239
$13,054
$7,956
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,724 rated schools reporting
2019
$8,555
$11,687
$13,108
$8,123
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,744 rated schools reporting
2020
$8,773
$12,803
$14,058
$8,713
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,763 rated schools reporting
2021
$9,358
$13,641
$14,797
$9,085
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,775 rated schools reporting
2022
$11,033
$14,669
$15,708
$10,515
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,793 rated schools reporting
2023
$11,865
$15,587
$16,792
$11,068
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,818 rated schools reporting
2024
$12,131
$16,629
$18,125
$11,845
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,845 rated schools reporting
2025
$9,615
$15,557
$18,972
$12,400
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,870 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$65,409−$1,149 vs similar economic context
Teachers
39−2.4 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
12.4−6.9 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Harlingen School of Health Professions
Beginning 7.9%
1 to 5 years 11.2%
6 to 10 years 28.1%
11 to 20 years 32.1%
21 to 30 years 12.5%
Over 30 years 7.9%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,899 reporting for every category shown · 1,899 in full cohort
Beginning 5.8%
1 to 5 years 25%
6 to 10 years 19.4%
11 to 20 years 28.6%
21 to 30 years 16.4%
Over 30 years 4.3%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 01: Edinburg · 505 reporting for every category shown · 505 in full cohort
Beginning 2.7%
1 to 5 years 19.3%
6 to 10 years 16.2%
11 to 20 years 35%
21 to 30 years 22.6%
Over 30 years 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Cameron County · 127 reporting for every category shown · 127 in full cohort
Beginning 2.5%
1 to 5 years 20.5%
6 to 10 years 14.9%
11 to 20 years 35.1%
21 to 30 years 22.3%
Over 30 years 4.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,653 reporting for every category shown · 4,653 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 26.2%
6 to 10 years 19.4%
11 to 20 years 28.9%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.3%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Harlingen School of Health Professions in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classHarlingen School of Health Professions · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English
10.8
14.8
Secondary languages other than English
16.1
17.2
Secondary math
13.4
15.6
Secondary science
9.7
17.1
Secondary social studies
12.8
17
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 200 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
3 measures
1of 124
Science — Approaches
Cameron County · of the 124 that report this measure · tied with 1
1of 86
Earned an industry-based certification
Region 01: Edinburg · of the 86 that report this measure
1of 23
College, career or military ready
Cameron County · of the 23 that report this measure · tied with 2
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
11 measures
2of 126
Attendance
Cameron County · of the 126 that report this measure · tied with 1
2of 125
Closing the Gaps
Cameron County · of the 125 that report this measure · tied with 2
3of 127
Overall score
Cameron County · of the 127 that report this measure
3of 125
Student Achievement
Cameron County · of the 125 that report this measure
3of 125
School Progress
Cameron County · of the 125 that report this measure · tied with 2
3of 125
Relative Performance
Cameron County · of the 125 that report this measure · tied with 2
3of 125
Reading — Approaches
Cameron County · of the 125 that report this measure
3of 125
Reading — Meets
Cameron County · of the 125 that report this measure · tied with 1
3of 23
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
Cameron County · of the 23 that report this measure
3of 23
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
Cameron County · of the 23 that report this measure
3of 23
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
Cameron County · of the 23 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
6 measures
4of 126
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Cameron County · of the 126 that report this measure
4of 125
All Subjects — Approaches
Cameron County · of the 125 that report this measure · tied with 2
4of 125
All Subjects — Meets
Cameron County · of the 125 that report this measure
4of 124
Science — Meets
Cameron County · of the 124 that report this measure
10of 52
Social Studies — Masters
Cameron County · of the 52 that report this measure
10of 23
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
Cameron County · of the 23 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 031903008.