Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Hardin JH

Liberty County · Region 05: Beaumont · 303 students

Current score
71/1002025-26
Change
+2 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−11.2 ptsvs 82.2 average · 1,674 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,502 of 1,674tied with 32 others
C71

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 71 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 82.2 average for 1,674 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

Reading above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
60%vs 58.6% avg · +1.4 pts
Masters
30%vs 25.2% avg · +4.8 pts

Among 1,615 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Hardin JH is rated C by TEA, scoring 71 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 82.2 average for 1,674 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 2 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 1,502nd of 1,674 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 32 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. Official improvement and transfer notices
  3. 5 years of ratings
  4. Where the score comes from
  5. Student outcomes
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this school ranks best
  13. Where this comes from

Official improvement and transfer notices

Official state and federal designations can carry support, reporting requirements or a family transfer option that a single A–F rating does not explain.

2026 federal improvement status

Targeted Support and Improvement

Official support label: TSI

Identification reason: Special Education

TEA track year 0 · Title I campus

Open the official TEA list and methodology

Schools identified for improvement

This school
Listed
Selected comparison
18.8%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,674 rated schools reporting

Schools on the PEG list

This school
Not listed
Selected comparison
1.0%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,674 rated schools reporting

Selected comparison percentages are the share of reporting schools in that group found on each dated list. They are neutral prevalence context; changing the comparison never changes this school's official status.

These are dated TEA statuses, fetched 24 August 2026; they are not added to or subtracted from this site's rating.

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageHardin JH 6973688271 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated C with 71 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26C7182.2 1,674 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8282.5 1,647 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24D6880.5 1,621 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23C7381.1 1,601 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22D6983.6 1,579 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement73 C−9.0 vs similar economic context · 1,617 reporting
  • School Progress70 C−11.7 vs similar economic context · 1,612 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps66 D−13.4 vs similar economic context · 1,598 reporting
  • Academic Growth70 C−5.9 vs similar economic context · 1,584 reporting
  • Relative Performance63 D−16.3 vs similar economic context · 1,612 reporting
  • Hardin JH
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,674 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement73C7
School Progress70C10
Closing the Gaps66D4
Academic Growth70C10
Relative Performance63D7

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 4 points below C in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (73), so School Progress (70) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 73.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level66%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,617 reporting
  • Meets grade level41%−13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,617 reporting
  • Masters grade level16%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,617 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level79%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,615 reporting
  • Meets grade level60%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,615 reporting
  • Masters grade level30%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,615 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level53%−22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,609 reporting
  • Meets grade level24%−23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,609 reporting
  • Masters grade level4%−15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,609 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level75%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,498 reporting
  • Meets grade level45%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,498 reporting
  • Masters grade level12%−13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,498 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level57%−20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 836 reporting
  • Meets grade level26%−24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 836 reporting
  • Masters grade level8%−16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 836 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,674 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
303
Economically disadvantaged
49.2%−0.5 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
7.6%−5.3 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
20.8%+2.1 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.7%+0.1 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
14.0%−0.1 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Hardin JH

African American: 5%Hispanic: 23.4%White: 69%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 0.3%Two or More Races: 2%
  • African American 5%
  • Hispanic 23.4%
  • White 69%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 0.3%
  • Two or More Races 2%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,674 reporting for every category shown · 1,674 in full cohort

African American: 9.4%Hispanic: 40.2%White: 42.3%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 3.3%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4.2%
  • African American 9.4%
  • Hispanic 40.2%
  • White 42.3%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 3.3%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4.2%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
303
Economically disadvantaged students
149
Emergent bilingual students
23
Special education students
63

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
44
Students in TEA mobility denominator
315
TEA-published mobility rate
14%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 303 students in 2025–26, an increase of 6 (2.0%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
303

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+6

Increase · +2.0%

Change since 2021–22
−43

Decrease · −12.4%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
303
Selected comparison
650.6

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,637 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Hardin JH
School yearStudents enrolledHardin JHChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 346 First available year 651.2
2022–23 316 Decrease of 30 (8.7%) 655.9
2023–24 275 Decrease of 41 (13.0%) 655.7
2024–25 297 Increase of 22 (8.0%) 652.3
2025–26 303 Increase of 6 (2.0%) 650.6

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
65

20.6% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
179

56.83 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
315

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
20.6%
Selected comparison
11.9%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,293 rated schools reporting

+8.7 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
56.83
Selected comparison
26.5

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,390 rated schools reporting

+30.3 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Hardin JH
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 382 42 11.0% 80 20.94 9.5% 18.1
2021–22 387 105 27.1% 204 52.71 11.8% 25.8
2022–23 339 85 25.1% 255 75.22 12.3% 27.7
2023–24 301 75 24.9% 174 57.81 12.2% 28.1
2024–25 315 65 20.6% 179 56.83 11.9% 26.5
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Hardin JH in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 65 20.6% 179 56.83 11.9% 26.5
In-school suspensions 59 18.7% 120 38.10 10.7% 20.3
Out-of-school suspensions 27 8.6% 47 14.92 6.0% 8.4
DAEP placements 10 3.2% 12 3.81 4.5% 5.2
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$5k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Hardin JH
  • Parent district: Hardin ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$7,566
Selected comparison
$12,001

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,645 rated schools reporting

−$4,435 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $7,566 per student for this campus, $13,881 per student for its parent district, Hardin ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearHardin JHParent district: Hardin ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$7,655$11,348$13,054$7,852 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,521 rated schools reporting
2019$6,429$10,642$13,108$8,037 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,540 rated schools reporting
2020$6,069$11,978$14,058$8,530 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,552 rated schools reporting
2021$6,979$14,117$14,797$8,927 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,570 rated schools reporting
2022$6,428$12,786$15,708$10,250 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,581 rated schools reporting
2023$6,591$11,874$16,792$10,711 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,600 rated schools reporting
2024$8,147$13,989$18,125$11,542 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,619 rated schools reporting
2025$7,566$13,881$18,972$12,001 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,645 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$65,826−$1,155 vs similar economic context
Teachers
21−22.0 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.7−5.3 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Hardin JH

Beginning: 23.8%1 to 5 years: 24.3%6 to 10 years: 8.3%11 to 20 years: 17.5%21 to 30 years: 21.4%Over 30 years: 5.3%
  • Beginning 23.8%
  • 1 to 5 years 24.3%
  • 6 to 10 years 8.3%
  • 11 to 20 years 17.5%
  • 21 to 30 years 21.4%
  • Over 30 years 5.3%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,674 reporting for every category shown · 1,674 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.6%1 to 5 years: 24.2%6 to 10 years: 19.3%11 to 20 years: 29.6%21 to 30 years: 16.8%Over 30 years: 4.2%
  • Beginning 5.6%
  • 1 to 5 years 24.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.3%
  • 11 to 20 years 29.6%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.8%
  • Over 30 years 4.2%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Hardin JH in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classHardin JH · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 621.417.7
Secondary English15.615.1
Secondary languages other than English1617.4
Secondary math18.716
Secondary science17.817.5
Secondary social studies1817.5

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

3 measures

  • 3of 29

    Reading — Approaches

    Liberty County · of the 29 that report this measure

  • 3of 29

    Reading — Meets

    Liberty County · of the 29 that report this measure

  • 3of 29

    Reading — Masters

    Liberty County · of the 29 that report this measure

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

11 measures

  • 4of 29

    All Subjects — Masters

    Liberty County · of the 29 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 5of 30

    Attendance

    Liberty County · of the 30 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 6of 30

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Liberty County · of the 30 that report this measure

  • 8of 29

    All Subjects — Meets

    Liberty County · of the 29 that report this measure

  • 9of 29

    Science — Meets

    Liberty County · of the 29 that report this measure

  • 9of 15

    Social Studies — Approaches

    Liberty County · of the 15 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 9of 15

    Social Studies — Meets

    Liberty County · of the 15 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 10of 29

    Student Achievement

    Liberty County · of the 29 that report this measure

  • 10of 29

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Liberty County · of the 29 that report this measure

  • 10of 29

    Science — Approaches

    Liberty County · of the 29 that report this measure

  • 10of 15

    Social Studies — Masters

    Liberty County · of the 15 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 146904041.