Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Hamshire-Fannett HS

Jefferson County · Region 05: Beaumont · 613 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
95/1002025-26
Change
+18 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+8.1 ptsvs 86.9 average · 1,078 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
59 of 1,078tied with 29 others
A95

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 77 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 86.9 average for 1,078 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent movement

Overall score rose 7 points

88 to 95 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 95 is 8.1 points above the 86.9 average among 1,078 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Recent domain gain

Relative Performance rose 11 points

78 to 89 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 89 is 9 points above the 80 average among 1,053 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Closing the Gaps above the similar-context average

94 +9.6 pts vs 84.4

  • 94 is 9.6 points above the 84.4 average among 1,045 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Hamshire-Fannett HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 95 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 86.9 average for 1,078 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 18 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 59th of 1,078 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 29 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. After high school: the following fall
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this school ranks best
  13. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageHamshire-Fannett HS 7775768895 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated C with 77 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9586.9 1,078 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8886.8 1,058 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24C7685.5 1,041 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23C7585.8 1,027 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22C7787.2 1,011 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement95 A+7.4 vs similar economic context · 1,055 reporting
  • School Progress89 B+5.0 vs similar economic context · 1,053 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps94 A+9.6 vs similar economic context · 1,045 reporting
  • Academic Growth85 B+5.1 vs similar economic context · 1,035 reporting
  • Relative Performance89 B+9.0 vs similar economic context · 1,053 reporting
  • Hamshire-Fannett HS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,078 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement95A—
School Progress89B1
Closing the Gaps94A—
Academic Growth85B5
Relative Performance89B1

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (95), so School Progress (89) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 95.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level89%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,055 reporting
  • Meets grade level66%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,055 reporting
  • Masters grade level20%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,055 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level82%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,054 reporting
  • Meets grade level66%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,054 reporting
  • Masters grade level10%−23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,054 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level87%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,052 reporting
  • Meets grade level46%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,052 reporting
  • Masters grade level16%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,052 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level98%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 963 reporting
  • Meets grade level78%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 963 reporting
  • Masters grade level31%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 963 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level97%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 544 reporting
  • Meets grade level72%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 544 reporting
  • Masters grade level37%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 544 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,078 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
100.0%+8.0 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 315 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
98.5%+6.9 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 314 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
100.0%+8.7 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 315 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−0.3 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 315 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
99.0%+9.7 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria99.0%89.3%+9.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 312 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course80.0%63.6%+16.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 312 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA20.0%41.9%−21.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 312 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)10.0%19.3%−9.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 312 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course47.3%38.7%+8.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 312 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification43.3%35.8%+7.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 312 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.7%0.7%+0.0 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 312 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%4.5%−4.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 312 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%6.3%−6.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 312 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness2.7%2.6%+0.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 312 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student4.0%6.9%−2.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 312 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces4.7%3.1%+1.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 312 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

After high school: the following fall

Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.

Graduates in the report
133

Class of 2023–24

Enrolled in Texas public higher education
78

58.6% of graduates

Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
50

37.6% of graduates

Not trackable
5

Fall 2024

Graduates in the report

This school
133
Selected comparison
290.5

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 266 rated schools reporting

Enrolled in Texas public higher education

This school
78
Selected comparison
140.2

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 266 rated schools reporting

Texas-public enrollment rate

This school
58.6%
Selected comparison
49.3%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 266 rated schools reporting

+9.3 pts vs similar economic context

Not-found rate

This school
37.6%
Selected comparison
44.8%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 266 rated schools reporting

−7.2 pts vs similar economic context

Not-trackable rate

This school
3.8%
Selected comparison
6.0%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 266 rated schools reporting

−2.2 pts vs similar economic context

Most common named Texas public destinations

  1. LAMAR UNIVERSITY (003581)27
  2. LAMAR INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY (036273)18
  3. BLINN COLLEGE DISTRICT (003549)9

Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.

Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.

“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.

“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
613
Economically disadvantaged
31.6%−0.9 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
4.3%−5.9 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
11.3%−6.0 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.6%−0.6 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
15.7%+4.7 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Hamshire-Fannett HS

African American: 10.6%Hispanic: 24.1%White: 60.6%American Indian: 0.5%Asian: 1.6%Two or More Races: 2.6%
  • African American 10.6%
  • Hispanic 24.1%
  • White 60.6%
  • American Indian 0.5%
  • Asian 1.6%
  • Two or More Races 2.6%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,078 reporting for every category shown · 1,078 in full cohort

African American: 9.1%Hispanic: 30.5%White: 48%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 7.1%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 4.8%
  • African American 9.1%
  • Hispanic 30.5%
  • White 48%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 7.1%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 4.8%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
611
Economically disadvantaged students
193
Emergent bilingual students
26
Special education students
69

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
52
Students in TEA mobility denominator
658
TEA-published mobility rate
7.9%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 613 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 20 (3.2%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
613

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−20

Decrease · −3.2%

Change since 2021–22
+9

Increase · +1.5%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
613
Selected comparison
785.3

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,065 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Hamshire-Fannett HS
School yearStudents enrolledHamshire-Fannett HSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 604 First available year 797.1
2022–23 635 Increase of 31 (5.1%) 800.5
2023–24 620 Decrease of 15 (2.4%) 797.5
2024–25 633 Increase of 13 (2.1%) 794.1
2025–26 613 Decrease of 20 (3.2%) 785.3

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
93

14.1% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
208

31.61 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
658

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
14.1%
Selected comparison
9.2%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 812 rated schools reporting

+4.9 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
31.61
Selected comparison
18.9

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 895 rated schools reporting

+12.7 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Hamshire-Fannett HS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 611 40 6.5% 60 9.82 7.4% 13.3
2021–22 623 84 13.5% 147 23.60 9.7% 19.6
2022–23 653 86 13.2% 177 27.11 9.8% 20.2
2023–24 639 82 12.8% 136 21.28 9.4% 20.1
2024–25 658 93 14.1% 208 31.61 9.2% 18.9
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Hamshire-Fannett HS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 93 14.1% 208 31.61 9.2% 18.9
In-school suspensions 65 9.9% 123 18.69 8.2% 14.6
Out-of-school suspensions 23 3.5% 28 4.26 4.5% 6.1
DAEP placements 42 6.4% 55 8.36 3.3% 3.8
Mandatory DAEP placements 32 4.9% 42 6.38 2.6% 2.9
Discretionary DAEP placements 12 1.8% 13 1.98 1.6% 1.9
JJAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$28k$50k20182020202220242025
  • Hamshire-Fannett HS
  • Parent district: Hamshire-Fannett ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$10,481
Selected comparison
$11,762

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,057 rated schools reporting

−$1,281 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $10,481 per student for this campus, $14,533 per student for its parent district, Hamshire-Fannett ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearHamshire-Fannett HSParent district: Hamshire-Fannett ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$8,538$13,750$13,054$7,651 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 951 rated schools reporting
2019$9,050$11,114$13,108$7,791 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 968 rated schools reporting
2020$9,042$14,321$14,058$8,127 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 978 rated schools reporting
2021$9,710$13,652$14,797$8,550 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 990 rated schools reporting
2022$18,750$15,665$15,708$9,791 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,010 rated schools reporting
2023$47,488$23,976$16,792$10,345 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,028 rated schools reporting
2024$20,749$17,250$18,125$11,454 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,040 rated schools reporting
2025$10,481$14,533$18,972$11,762 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,057 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$53,709−$14,455 vs similar economic context
Teachers
47−4.3 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
13−1.5 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Hamshire-Fannett HS

Beginning: 9.2%1 to 5 years: 35%6 to 10 years: 27.5%11 to 20 years: 9.6%21 to 30 years: 12.4%Over 30 years: 6.4%
  • Beginning 9.2%
  • 1 to 5 years 35%
  • 6 to 10 years 27.5%
  • 11 to 20 years 9.6%
  • 21 to 30 years 12.4%
  • Over 30 years 6.4%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,078 reporting for every category shown · 1,078 in full cohort

Beginning: 4.8%1 to 5 years: 22.5%6 to 10 years: 19.7%11 to 20 years: 32.2%21 to 30 years: 17.3%Over 30 years: 3.3%
  • Beginning 4.8%
  • 1 to 5 years 22.5%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.7%
  • 11 to 20 years 32.2%
  • 21 to 30 years 17.3%
  • Over 30 years 3.3%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Hamshire-Fannett HS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classHamshire-Fannett HS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English10.516.5
Secondary languages other than English1818.6
Secondary math16.517.3
Secondary science13.818.9
Secondary social studies12.118.9

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 184 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

7 measures

  • 2of 53

    Overall score

    Jefferson County · of the 53 that report this measure

  • 2of 47

    Student Achievement

    Jefferson County · of the 47 that report this measure

  • 2of 47

    Closing the Gaps

    Jefferson County · of the 47 that report this measure

  • 2of 47

    Science — Approaches

    Jefferson County · of the 47 that report this measure

  • 2of 20

    Social Studies — Approaches

    Jefferson County · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 3of 47

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Jefferson County · of the 47 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 3of 47

    Science — Meets

    Jefferson County · of the 47 that report this measure

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

12 measures

  • 4of 37

    College, career or military ready

    Region 05: Beaumont · of the 37 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 4of 20

    Social Studies — Meets

    Jefferson County · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 4of 20

    Social Studies — Masters

    Jefferson County · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 5of 47

    Academic Growth

    Jefferson County · of the 47 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 5of 37

    Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course

    Region 05: Beaumont · of the 37 that report this measure

  • 5of 37

    Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)

    Region 05: Beaumont · of the 37 that report this measure

  • 6of 47

    School Progress

    Jefferson County · of the 47 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 6of 47

    Relative Performance

    Jefferson County · of the 47 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 6of 47

    All Subjects — Meets

    Jefferson County · of the 47 that report this measure

  • 6of 47

    Math — Approaches

    Jefferson County · of the 47 that report this measure

  • 8of 47

    Science — Masters

    Jefferson County · of the 47 that report this measure

  • 10of 47

    Reading — Meets

    Jefferson County · of the 47 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 123914001.