+11.9 ptsvs 82.1 average · 1,691 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
70 of 1,691tied with 28 others
Score vs region
+14.0 ptsvs 80 average · 352 rated schools in Region 07: Kilgore
Region 07: Kilgore placement
18 of 352tied with 12 others
Score vs county
+11.6 ptsvs 82.4 average · 59 rated schools in Smith County
Smith County placement
4 of 59tied with 5 others
Score vs similar-size group
+13.9 ptsvs 80.1 average · 4,747 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
194 of 4,747tied with 75 others
Score vs state
+12.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
379 of 7,646tied with 208 others
A94
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 95 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 82.1 average for 1,691 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 80 average for 352 rated schools in Region 07: Kilgore.The current score is above the 82.4 average for 59 rated schools in Smith County.The current score is above the 80.1 average for 4,747 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
81%vs 53.4% avg · +27.6 pts
Masters
46%vs 23.3% avg · +22.7 pts
Among 1,633 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Gus Winston Cain Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.1 average for 1,691 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 70th of 1,691 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 28 others).
Gus Winston Cain Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80 average for 352 rated schools in Region 07: Kilgore. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 18th of 352 rated schools in Region 07: Kilgore (tied with 12 others).
Gus Winston Cain Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.4 average for 59 rated schools in Smith County. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 4th of 59 rated schools in Smith County (tied with 5 others).
Gus Winston Cain Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.1 average for 4,747 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 194th of 4,747 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 75 others).
Gus Winston Cain Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 95 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement94 A+12.2 vs similar economic context · 1,633 reporting
School Progress93 A+11.3 vs similar economic context · 1,628 reporting
Closing the Gaps95 A+15.6 vs similar economic context · 1,614 reporting
Academic Growth91 A+15.1 vs similar economic context · 1,598 reporting
Relative Performance93 A+13.7 vs similar economic context · 1,628 reporting
Gus Winston Cain Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,691 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
94
A
—
School Progress
93
A
—
Closing the Gaps
95
A
—
Academic Growth
91
A
—
Relative Performance
93
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (94), so
School Progress (93) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 94.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level94%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,633 reporting
Meets grade level81%+28 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,633 reporting
Masters grade level46%+23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,633 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level93%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,631 reporting
Meets grade level78%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,631 reporting
Masters grade level41%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,631 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level96%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,625 reporting
Meets grade level83%+36 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,625 reporting
Masters grade level49%+30 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,625 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level96%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,511 reporting
Meets grade level84%+32 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,511 reporting
Masters grade level54%+29 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,511 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,691 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
518
Economically disadvantaged
49.6%−0.6 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
5.6%−7.4 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
24.7%+6.0 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.1%+0.5 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
12.1%−2.1 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Gus Winston Cain Elem
African American 9.5%
Hispanic 17.8%
White 65.6%
American Indian 0.4%
Asian 1.5%
Two or More Races 5.2%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,691 reporting for every category shown · 1,691 in full cohort
African American 9.5%
Hispanic 40.6%
White 42.1%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 3.2%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 07: Kilgore · 352 reporting for every category shown · 352 in full cohort
African American 13.6%
Hispanic 28.4%
White 52.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 0.8%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Smith County · 59 reporting for every category shown · 59 in full cohort
African American 17.9%
Hispanic 35.7%
White 40.6%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.3%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,747 reporting for every category shown · 4,747 in full cohort
African American 12.2%
Hispanic 55%
White 24.7%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.5%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
518
Economically disadvantaged students
257
Emergent bilingual students
29
Special education students
128
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
32
Students in TEA mobility denominator
406
TEA-published mobility rate
7.9%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 518 students in 2025–26, an increase of 10 (2.0%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
518
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+10
Increase · +2.0%
Change since 2021–22
−8
Decrease · −1.5%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
518
Selected comparison
647.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,653 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Gus Winston Cain Elem
School year
Students enrolledGus Winston Cain Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
526
First available year
649.4
2022–23
515
Decrease of 11 (2.1%)
653.6
2023–24
523
Increase of 8 (1.6%)
653.6
2024–25
508
Decrease of 15 (2.9%)
650.5
2025–26
518
Increase of 10 (2.0%)
647.9
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
39
7.4% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
78
14.72 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
530
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
7.4%
Selected comparison
12.0%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,306 rated schools reporting
−4.6 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
14.72
Selected comparison
26.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,401 rated schools reporting
−12.1 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Gus Winston Cain Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
553
31
5.6%
66
11.93
9.6%
18.3
2021–22
558
32
5.7%
50
8.96
11.9%
26.1
2022–23
543
41
7.5%
65
11.97
12.4%
28
2023–24
559
40
7.2%
94
16.82
12.3%
28.4
2024–25
530
39
7.4%
78
14.72
12.0%
26.8
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Gus Winston Cain Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
39
7.4%
78
14.72
12.0%
26.8
In-school suspensions
39
7.4%
76
14.34
10.8%
20.6
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Gus Winston Cain Elem
Parent district: Whitehouse ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$9,588
Selected comparison
$12,010
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,663 rated schools reporting
−$2,422 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $9,588 per student for this campus, $14,221 per student for its parent district, Whitehouse ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Gus Winston Cain Elem
Parent district: Whitehouse ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$6,468
$24,241
$13,054
$7,840
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,536 rated schools reporting
2019
$6,952
$12,453
$13,108
$8,023
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,555 rated schools reporting
2020
$7,746
$10,251
$14,058
$8,522
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,567 rated schools reporting
2021
$8,259
$11,525
$14,797
$8,924
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,585 rated schools reporting
2022
$8,911
$12,702
$15,708
$10,265
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,596 rated schools reporting
2023
$8,629
$12,785
$16,792
$10,744
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,616 rated schools reporting
2024
$9,330
$13,988
$18,125
$11,523
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,636 rated schools reporting
2025
$9,588
$14,221
$18,972
$12,010
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,663 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$63,331−$3,581 vs similar economic context
Teachers
38−4.7 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
13.7−6.2 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Gus Winston Cain Elem
Beginning 5.3%
1 to 5 years 23.8%
6 to 10 years 30.7%
11 to 20 years 23.8%
21 to 30 years 16.1%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,691 reporting for every category shown · 1,691 in full cohort
Beginning 5.6%
1 to 5 years 24.3%
6 to 10 years 19.3%
11 to 20 years 29.5%
21 to 30 years 16.7%
Over 30 years 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 07: Kilgore · 352 reporting for every category shown · 352 in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 24.6%
6 to 10 years 17.7%
11 to 20 years 28%
21 to 30 years 17.3%
Over 30 years 6%
Selected comparison averageFor Smith County · 59 reporting for every category shown · 59 in full cohort
Beginning 7.5%
1 to 5 years 28%
6 to 10 years 18.3%
11 to 20 years 27%
21 to 30 years 15.3%
Over 30 years 3.8%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,747 reporting for every category shown · 4,747 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 26.2%
6 to 10 years 19.5%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 15.8%
Over 30 years 3.2%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Gus Winston Cain Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classGus Winston Cain Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
16
18
Grade 1
20.3
18.3
Grade 2
18
18.5
Grade 3
18.3
19
Grade 4
19.6
19
Grade 5
19
20
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
4 measures
2of 55
Math — Meets
Smith County · of the 55 that report this measure · tied with 1
3of 55
All Subjects — Approaches
Smith County · of the 55 that report this measure
3of 55
Math — Approaches
Smith County · of the 55 that report this measure
3of 48
Science — Masters
Smith County · of the 48 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
9 measures
4of 55
All Subjects — Meets
Smith County · of the 55 that report this measure · tied with 1
4of 55
Reading — Approaches
Smith County · of the 55 that report this measure
4of 50
Academic Growth
Smith County · of the 50 that report this measure · tied with 1
4of 48
Science — Meets
Smith County · of the 48 that report this measure
5of 55
Reading — Meets
Smith County · of the 55 that report this measure
5of 48
Science — Approaches
Smith County · of the 48 that report this measure · tied with 1
6of 55
All Subjects — Masters
Smith County · of the 55 that report this measure
6of 55
Math — Masters
Smith County · of the 55 that report this measure
9of 55
Reading — Masters
Smith County · of the 55 that report this measure · tied with 1
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
5 measures
45of 1,614
Closing the Gaps
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,614 that report this measure · tied with 22
60of 1,633
Student Achievement
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,633 that report this measure · tied with 22
70of 1,691
Overall score
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,691 that report this measure · tied with 28
82of 1,628
Relative Performance
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,628 that report this measure · tied with 30
210of 4,533
School Progress
Similar size · of the 4,533 that report this measure · tied with 81
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 212906111.