Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Groves Int

Jefferson County · Region 05: Beaumont · 618 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
76/1002025-26
Change
−5 ptssince 2023-24
Score vs similar economic context
−6.1 ptsvs 82.1 average · 1,712 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,266 of 1,712tied with 50 others
C76

At a glance

The available rating history is moving down. The current score is below the 82.1 average for 1,712 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Current strength

Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average

1.3% −13.1 pts vs 14.4%

  • 1.3% is 13.1 percentage points lower than the 14.4% average among 1,664 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Attendance above the similar-context average

97.7% +3.2 pts vs 94.5%

  • 97.7% is 3.2 percentage points above the 94.5% average among 1,664 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Groves Int is rated C by TEA, scoring 76 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 82.1 average for 1,712 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 5 points since 2023-24.

Ranks 1,266th of 1,712 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 50 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 3 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

3 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageGroves Int 818676 2023-242024-252025-26

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26C7682.1 1,712 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8682.3 1,688 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24B8180.2 1,661 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement76 C−5.7 vs similar economic context · 1,650 reporting
  • School Progress72 C−9.6 vs similar economic context · 1,645 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps75 C−4.4 vs similar economic context · 1,630 reporting
  • Academic Growth69 D−6.9 vs similar economic context · 1,610 reporting
  • Relative Performance72 C−7.3 vs similar economic context · 1,645 reporting
  • Groves Int
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,712 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement76C4
School Progress72C8
Closing the Gaps75C5
Academic Growth69D1
Relative Performance72C8

Closest to moving up: Student Achievement, 4 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (76), so School Progress (72) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 76.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level74%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,650 reporting
  • Meets grade level49%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,650 reporting
  • Masters grade level21%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,650 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level78%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,648 reporting
  • Meets grade level53%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,648 reporting
  • Masters grade level24%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,648 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level70%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,642 reporting
  • Meets grade level46%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,642 reporting
  • Masters grade level18%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,642 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level74%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,522 reporting
  • Meets grade level46%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,522 reporting
  • Masters grade level23%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,522 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,712 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
618
Economically disadvantaged
50.2%−0.6 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
16.8%+3.7 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
22.8%+4.0 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
97.7%+3.2 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
1.3%−13.1 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Groves Int

African American: 4.9%Hispanic: 44.5%White: 42.1%Asian: 2.9%Two or More Races: 5.7%
  • African American 4.9%
  • Hispanic 44.5%
  • White 42.1%
  • Asian 2.9%
  • Two or More Races 5.7%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,712 reporting for every category shown · 1,712 in full cohort

African American: 9.5%Hispanic: 41%White: 41.6%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 3.1%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4.2%
  • African American 9.5%
  • Hispanic 41%
  • White 41.6%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 3.1%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4.2%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
618
Economically disadvantaged students
310
Emergent bilingual students
104
Special education students
141

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
54
Students in TEA mobility denominator
641
TEA-published mobility rate
8.4%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 618 students in 2025–26, an increase of 9 (1.5%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
618

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+9

Increase · +1.5%

Change since 2023–24
+16

Increase · +2.7%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
618
Selected comparison
646.9

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,672 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Groves Int
School yearStudents enrolledGroves IntChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2023–24 602 First available year 654.9
2024–25 609 Increase of 7 (1.2%) 650.7
2025–26 618 Increase of 9 (1.5%) 646.9

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
18

2.8% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
33

5.18 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
637

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
2.8%
Selected comparison
12.0%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,325 rated schools reporting

−9.2 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
5.18
Selected comparison
26.9

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,421 rated schools reporting

−21.7 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Groves Int
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2023–24 630 17 2.7% 26 4.13 12.4% 28.6
2024–25 637 18 2.8% 33 5.18 12.0% 26.9
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Groves Int in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 18 2.8% 33 5.18 12.0% 26.9
In-school suspensions 18 2.8% 26 4.08 10.8% 20.7
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$8k$14k$20k20242025
  • Groves Int
  • Parent district: Port Neches-Groves ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$8,548
Selected comparison
$11,971

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,686 rated schools reporting

−$3,423 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $8,548 per student for this campus, $15,354 per student for its parent district, Port Neches-Groves ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearGroves IntParent district: Port Neches-Groves ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2024$10,100$15,660$18,125$11,511 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,659 rated schools reporting
2025$8,548$15,354$18,972$11,971 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,686 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$62,245−$4,652 vs similar economic context
Teachers
44+1.2 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.2−5.6 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Groves Int

Beginning: 2.3%1 to 5 years: 29.8%6 to 10 years: 20%11 to 20 years: 32.1%21 to 30 years: 13.8%Over 30 years: 2.1%
  • Beginning 2.3%
  • 1 to 5 years 29.8%
  • 6 to 10 years 20%
  • 11 to 20 years 32.1%
  • 21 to 30 years 13.8%
  • Over 30 years 2.1%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,712 reporting for every category shown · 1,712 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.6%1 to 5 years: 24.3%6 to 10 years: 19.3%11 to 20 years: 29.4%21 to 30 years: 16.8%Over 30 years: 4.3%
  • Beginning 5.6%
  • 1 to 5 years 24.3%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.3%
  • 11 to 20 years 29.4%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.8%
  • Over 30 years 4.3%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Groves Int in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classGroves Int · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 318.319
Grade 416.919.1
Grade 521.120

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 3 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#1 rankings

First-place results

2 measures

  • 1of 145

    Attendance

    Region 05: Beaumont · of the 145 that report this measure

  • 1of 145

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Region 05: Beaumont · of the 145 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 123908122.