Recent movement
Overall score rose 3 points
79 to 82 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureTraditional public school campus
Groesbeck HS
Limestone County · Region 12: Waco · 465 students
Official school websiteSchool information and family resources
- Current score
- 82/1002025-26
- Change
- +13 ptssince 2021-22
- Score vs similar economic context
- +1.5 ptsvs 80.5 average · 1,962 rated schools serving a similar economic context
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
- 890 of 1,962tied with 82 others
- Score vs region
- +3.5 ptsvs 78.5 average · 301 rated schools in Region 12: Waco
- Region 12: Waco placement
- 114 of 301tied with 14 others
- Score vs county
- +5.4 ptsvs 76.6 average · 10 rated schools in Limestone County
- Limestone County placement
- 5 of 10among reporting schools
- Score vs similar-size group
- +1.9 ptsvs 80.1 average · 4,563 similarly sized rated schools
- Similar size placement
- 2,057 of 4,563tied with 185 others
- Score vs state
- +0.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
- Texas placement
- 3,846 of 7,646tied with 294 others
B82
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 83 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 80.5 average for 1,962 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 78.5 average for 301 rated schools in Region 12: Waco.The current score is above the 76.6 average for 10 rated schools in Limestone County.The current score is above the 80.1 average for 4,563 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Recent domain gain
School Progress rose 3 points
79 to 82 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureSTAAR result
Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 45%vs 43.2% avg · +1.8 pts
- Masters
- 20%vs 16.7% avg · +3.3 pts
Among 1,865 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measureRecent movement
Overall score rose 3 points
79 to 82 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 82 is 3.5 points above the 78.5 average among 301 schools in Region 12: Waco reporting this measure.
Recent domain gain
School Progress rose 3 points
79 to 82 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 82 is 3.4 points above the 78.6 average among 282 schools in Region 12: Waco reporting this measure.
STAAR result
Math above Region 12: Waco averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 45%vs 41.4% avg · +3.6 pts
- Masters
- 20%vs 15.5% avg · +4.5 pts
Among 282 schools in Region 12: Waco reporting this measure.
See the full measureRecent movement
Overall score rose 3 points
79 to 82 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureRecent domain gain
School Progress rose 3 points
79 to 82 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureRecent movement
Overall score rose 3 points
79 to 82 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureRecent domain gain
School Progress rose 3 points
79 to 82 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureSTAAR result
Science above similar-size averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 74%vs 42% avg · +32 pts
- Masters
- 29%vs 19.8% avg · +9.2 pts
Among 3,926 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
See the full measureRecent movement
Overall score rose 3 points
79 to 82 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureRecent domain gain
School Progress rose 3 points
79 to 82 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureSTAAR result
Science above Texas averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 74%vs 47.1% avg · +26.9 pts
- Masters
- 29%vs 22.8% avg · +6.2 pts
Among 6,717 Texas schools reporting this measure.
See the full measureSelected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Groesbeck HS is rated B by TEA, scoring 82 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.5 average for 1,962 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 13 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 890th of 1,962 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 82 others).
Groesbeck HS is rated B by TEA, scoring 82 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 78.5 average for 301 rated schools in Region 12: Waco. It is up 13 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 114th of 301 rated schools in Region 12: Waco (tied with 14 others).
Groesbeck HS is rated B by TEA, scoring 82 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 76.6 average for 10 rated schools in Limestone County. It is up 13 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 5th of 10 rated schools in Limestone County.
Groesbeck HS is rated B by TEA, scoring 82 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.1 average for 4,563 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 13 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 2,057th of 4,563 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 185 others).
Groesbeck HS is rated B by TEA, scoring 82 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 13 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 3,846th of 7,646 rated Texas schools (tied with 294 others).
Put the numbers in context
Compare with
Jump to a section
- Overview
- 5 years of ratings
- Where the score comes from
- Student outcomes
- After high school: the following fall
- Who this school serves
- Student counts behind the percentages
- Enrollment over time
- Discipline and removal from class
- Spending per student
- Teachers and actual class size
- Where this school ranks best
- Where this comes from
5 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 83 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
View the yearly scores and comparisons
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | B | 82 | 80.5 1,962 reporting | 81.3 7,646 reporting |
| 2024-25 | C | 79 | 80.3 1,938 reporting | 81.2 7,554 reporting |
| 2023-24 | C | 76 | 78.2 1,918 reporting | 78.9 7,466 reporting |
| 2022-23 | B | 85 | 78.7 1,887 reporting | 79.1 7,377 reporting |
| 2021-22 | D | 69 | 82.4 1,862 reporting | 83.7 7,283 reporting |
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- Groesbeck HS
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,962 in cohort)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | 80 | B | 10 |
| School Progress | 82 | B | 8 |
| Closing the Gaps | 81 | B | 9 |
| Academic Growth | 75 | C | 5 |
| Relative Performance | 82 | B | 8 |
Closest to moving up: School Progress, 8 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (82), so Student Achievement (80) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 82.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
- Approaches grade level
- Meets grade level
- Masters grade level
- Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,962 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Graduation
- Four-Year
- 97.0%+3.0 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 482 rated schools reporting
- Five-Year
- 95.8%+2.4 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 478 rated schools reporting
- Six-Year
- 96.7%+3.9 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 479 rated schools reporting
- Dropout Rate
- 0.6%+0.1 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 485 rated schools reporting
These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
College, career and military readiness
- Total credit for CCMR criteria
- 78.0%−10.0 pts vs similar economic context
| Criterion | This school% of graduates | Averagesimilar economic context | Differencepercentage points | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total credit for CCMR criteria | 78.0% | 88.0% | −10.0 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 518 rated schools reporting |
| Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course | 36.4% | 60.3% | −23.9 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 522 rated schools reporting |
| Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA | 19.2% | 28.1% | −8.9 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 522 rated schools reporting |
| Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s) | 0.0% | 10.6% | −10.6 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 522 rated schools reporting |
| Earned college credit for a dual credit course | 27.3% | 33.6% | −6.3 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 522 rated schools reporting |
| Earned an industry-based certification | 53.5% | 37.5% | +16.0 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 522 rated schools reporting |
| Earned a level I or level II certificate | 0.0% | 1.6% | −1.6 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 522 rated schools reporting |
| Earned an associate degree | 0.0% | 6.5% | −6.5 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 522 rated schools reporting |
| Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit | 0.0% | 3.6% | −3.6 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 522 rated schools reporting |
| Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness | 2.0% | 3.2% | −1.2 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 522 rated schools reporting |
| Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student | 11.1% | 7.9% | +3.2 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 522 rated schools reporting |
| Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces | 2.0% | 3.4% | −1.4 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 522 rated schools reporting |
Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
After high school: the following fall
Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.
- Graduates in the report
- 113
Class of 2023–24
- Enrolled in Texas public higher education
- 46
40.7% of graduates
- Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
- 64
56.6% of graduates
- Not trackable
- 3
Fall 2024
Graduates in the report
- This school
- 113
- Selected comparison
- 229.8
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
- This school
- 46
- Selected comparison
- 102.4
Texas-public enrollment rate
- This school
- 40.7%
- Selected comparison
- 44.4%
Not-found rate
- This school
- 56.6%
- Selected comparison
- 50.6%
Not-trackable rate
- This school
- 2.7%
- Selected comparison
- 5.0%
Most common named Texas public destinations
- MCLENNAN COMMUNITY COLLEGE (003590)12
- TEXAS STATE T. C. in WACO (003634)10
- NAVARRO COLLEGE (003593)6
Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.
Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.
“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.
“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 465
- Economically disadvantaged
- 61.6%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
- English learners
- 5.0%−11.5 pts vs similar economic context
- Special education
- 16.8%−2.1 pts vs similar economic context
- Attendance
- 93.7%−0.5 pts vs similar economic context
- Chronically absent
- 20.0%+3.8 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Groesbeck HS
- African American 10.8%
- Hispanic 30.5%
- White 54.6%
- American Indian 0.2%
- Asian 0.6%
- Two or More Races 3.2%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,962 reporting for every category shown · 1,962 in full cohort
- African American 10.6%
- Hispanic 49.3%
- White 33.5%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 2.3%
- Pacific Islander 0.2%
- Two or More Races 3.8%
Selected comparison average For Region 12: Waco · 301 reporting for every category shown · 301 in full cohort
- African American 14.2%
- Hispanic 37.4%
- White 40.7%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 1.1%
- Pacific Islander 0.7%
- Two or More Races 5.7%
Selected comparison average For Limestone County · 10 reporting for every category shown · 10 in full cohort
- African American 14.7%
- Hispanic 42.7%
- White 35.7%
- American Indian 0.2%
- Asian 0.8%
- Pacific Islander 0.4%
- Two or More Races 5.5%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 4,563 reporting for every category shown · 4,563 in full cohort
- African American 12%
- Hispanic 55.1%
- White 25.3%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 3.8%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.4%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- African American 11.5%
- Hispanic 52.6%
- White 27.8%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 4.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
- Students in this TEA accountability summary
- 463
- Economically disadvantaged students
- 285
- Emergent bilingual students
- 23
- Special education students
- 78
Campus mobility · 2024–25
- Mobile students
- 43
- Students in TEA mobility denominator
- 517
- TEA-published mobility rate
- 8.3%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 465 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 32 (6.4%) from 2024–25.
- Latest enrollment
- 465
2025–26
- Change from 2024–25
- −32
Decrease · −6.4%
- Change since 2021–22
- +44
Increase · +10.5%
Enrollment in 2025–26
- This school
- 465
- Selected comparison
- 626.2
| School year | Students enrolledGroesbeck HS | Change from previous school year | Average enrollmentselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021–22 | 421 | First available year | 638.9 |
| 2022–23 | 458 | Increase of 37 (8.8%) | 643.4 |
| 2023–24 | 499 | Increase of 41 (9.0%) | 640.8 |
| 2024–25 | 497 | Decrease of 2 (0.4%) | 636.9 |
| 2025–26 | 465 | Decrease of 32 (6.4%) | 626.2 |
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
- Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
- 43
8.3% of cumulative year-end enrollment
- Disciplinary actions
- 112
21.66 per 100 students
- Cumulative year-end enrollment
- 517
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
- This school
- 8.3%
- Selected comparison
- 12.8%
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
- This school
- 21.66
- Selected comparison
- 29.2
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020–21 | 463 | 45 | 9.7% | 89 | 19.22 | 9.7% | 19 |
| 2021–22 | 464 | 69 | 14.9% | 118 | 25.43 | 12.6% | 29 |
| 2022–23 | 482 | 63 | 13.1% | 92 | 19.09 | 13.1% | 31 |
| 2023–24 | 533 | 55 | 10.3% | 118 | 22.14 | 13.0% | 30.8 |
| 2024–25 | 517 | 43 | 8.3% | 112 | 21.66 | 12.8% | 29.2 |
See 2024–25 discipline categories
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | 43 | 8.3% | 112 | 21.66 | 12.8% | 29.2 |
| In-school suspensions | 36 | 7.0% | 79 | 15.28 | 11.5% | 22.5 |
| Out-of-school suspensions | 17 | 3.3% | 24 | 4.64 | 6.8% | 9.9 |
| DAEP placements | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
- Groesbeck HS
- Parent district: Groesbeck ISD
- Texas average
- Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
- This school
- $10,157
- Selected comparison
- $12,551
For 2025, TEA reported $10,157 per student for this campus, $14,214 per student for its parent district, Groesbeck ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
| Year | Groesbeck HS | Parent district: Groesbeck ISD | Texas average | Selected comparison average | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | $10,928 | $12,229 | $13,054 | $7,932 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,791 rated schools reporting |
| 2019 | $11,735 | $12,794 | $13,108 | $8,077 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,807 rated schools reporting |
| 2020 | $13,492 | $14,881 | $14,058 | $8,684 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,828 rated schools reporting |
| 2021 | $13,464 | $14,353 | $14,797 | $9,103 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,843 rated schools reporting |
| 2022 | $12,607 | $16,467 | $15,708 | $10,469 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,863 rated schools reporting |
| 2023 | $13,174 | $16,747 | $16,792 | $11,121 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,887 rated schools reporting |
| 2024 | $10,502 | $15,329 | $18,125 | $11,960 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,914 rated schools reporting |
| 2025 | $10,157 | $14,214 | $18,972 | $12,551 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,934 rated schools reporting |
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
- Average salary
- $59,305−$7,081 vs similar economic context
- Teachers
- 38−3.9 vs similar economic context
- Students per staff member
- 12.1−7.0 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Groesbeck HS
- Beginning 5.2%
- 1 to 5 years 33.6%
- 6 to 10 years 17.7%
- 11 to 20 years 15.9%
- 21 to 30 years 19.8%
- Over 30 years 8.1%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,962 reporting for every category shown · 1,962 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.2%
- 1 to 5 years 25.7%
- 6 to 10 years 19.1%
- 11 to 20 years 28.3%
- 21 to 30 years 16.1%
- Over 30 years 4.2%
Selected comparison average For Region 12: Waco · 301 reporting for every category shown · 301 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.8%
- 1 to 5 years 26.8%
- 6 to 10 years 19%
- 11 to 20 years 27.1%
- 21 to 30 years 16.2%
- Over 30 years 4.2%
Selected comparison average For Limestone County · 10 reporting for every category shown · 10 in full cohort
- Beginning 6%
- 1 to 5 years 25.1%
- 6 to 10 years 18.3%
- 11 to 20 years 28.3%
- 21 to 30 years 15.9%
- Over 30 years 6.3%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 4,563 reporting for every category shown · 4,563 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.1%
- 1 to 5 years 26%
- 6 to 10 years 19.3%
- 11 to 20 years 28.9%
- 21 to 30 years 16%
- Over 30 years 3.3%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- Beginning 6.2%
- 1 to 5 years 25.6%
- 6 to 10 years 19.2%
- 11 to 20 years 28.7%
- 21 to 30 years 15.9%
- Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
| Grade or subject | Average students per classGroesbeck HS · 2024–25 | Average students per classselected comparison |
|---|---|---|
| Secondary English | 16.4 | 14.9 |
| Secondary languages other than English | 23.5 | 17.3 |
| Secondary math | 19.1 | 15.8 |
| Secondary science | 22.9 | 17.2 |
| Secondary social studies | 19.9 | 17.2 |
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
Where this school ranks best
Out of 164 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
4 measures
-
5of 10
Overall score
Limestone County · of the 10 that report this measure
-
6of 10
Per-student spending
Limestone County · of the 10 that report this measure
-
8of 10
Attendance
Limestone County · of the 10 that report this measure
-
8of 10
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Limestone County · of the 10 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 147902001.