Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Griffith Elem

Brazoria County · Region 04: Houston · 497 students

Current score
83/1002025-26
Change
−1 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+4.2 ptsvs 78.8 average · 2,055 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
713 of 2,055tied with 82 others
B83

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 83 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 78.8 average for 2,055 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
53%vs 45.1% avg · +7.9 pts
Masters
21%vs 17.9% avg · +3.1 pts

Among 1,917 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
50%vs 39.9% avg · +10.1 pts
Masters
19%vs 15% avg · +4 pts

Among 1,907 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Reading above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
56%vs 49.9% avg · +6.1 pts
Masters
24%vs 19.5% avg · +4.5 pts

Among 1,915 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Griffith Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 83 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 78.8 average for 2,055 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.

Ranks 713th of 2,055 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 82 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageGriffith Elem 8480849083 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 83 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8378.8 2,055 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25A9078.4 2,038 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24B8476.4 2,025 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8076.8 2,000 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22B8481.9 1,982 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement79 C+3.8 vs similar economic context · 1,917 reporting
  • School Progress85 B+5.0 vs similar economic context · 1,911 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps79 C+3.0 vs similar economic context · 1,898 reporting
  • Academic Growth68 D−4.9 vs similar economic context · 1,854 reporting
  • Relative Performance85 B+6.6 vs similar economic context · 1,911 reporting
  • Griffith Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,055 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement79C1
School Progress85B5
Closing the Gaps79C1
Academic Growth68D2
Relative Performance85B5

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 1 point below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (85), so Student Achievement (79) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 85.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level81%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,917 reporting
  • Meets grade level53%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,917 reporting
  • Masters grade level21%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,917 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level86%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,915 reporting
  • Meets grade level56%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,915 reporting
  • Masters grade level24%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,915 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level77%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,907 reporting
  • Meets grade level50%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,907 reporting
  • Masters grade level19%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,907 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,055 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
497
Economically disadvantaged
72.6%±0.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
38.6%+16.5 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
22.1%+3.3 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.0%+1.2 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
13.6%−4.8 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Griffith Elem

African American: 3%Hispanic: 78.3%White: 13.9%American Indian: 0.2%Asian: 1.2%Two or More Races: 3.4%
  • African American 3%
  • Hispanic 78.3%
  • White 13.9%
  • American Indian 0.2%
  • Asian 1.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.4%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,055 reporting for every category shown · 2,055 in full cohort

African American: 12.7%Hispanic: 59.6%White: 22.1%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.9%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3.2%
  • African American 12.7%
  • Hispanic 59.6%
  • White 22.1%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.9%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.2%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
497
Economically disadvantaged students
361
Emergent bilingual students
192
Special education students
110

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
44
Students in TEA mobility denominator
367
TEA-published mobility rate
12%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 497 students in 2025–26, an increase of 4 (0.8%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
497

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+4

Increase · +0.8%

Change since 2021–22
−21

Decrease · −4.1%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
497
Selected comparison
636.7

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,024 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Griffith Elem
School yearStudents enrolledGriffith ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 518 First available year 653.4
2022–23 541 Increase of 23 (4.4%) 658.3
2023–24 519 Decrease of 22 (4.1%) 656.3
2024–25 493 Decrease of 26 (5.0%) 652.8
2025–26 497 Increase of 4 (0.8%) 636.7

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
15

2.8% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
21

3.96 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
530

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
2.8%
Selected comparison
13.3%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,558 rated schools reporting

−10.5 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
3.96
Selected comparison
31.8

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,670 rated schools reporting

−27.8 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Griffith Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 506 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2021–22 579 Suppressed — 12 2.07 — 31
2022–23 572 15 2.6% 18 3.15 13.6% 33.3
2023–24 546 16 2.9% 39 7.14 13.5% 32.9
2024–25 530 15 2.8% 21 3.96 13.3% 31.8
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Griffith Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 15 2.8% 21 3.96 13.3% 31.8
In-school suspensions 15 2.8% 20 3.77 11.8% 23.9
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$16k$25k20182020202220242025
  • Griffith Elem
  • Parent district: Brazosport ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$10,885
Selected comparison
$13,182

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,037 rated schools reporting

−$2,297 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $10,885 per student for this campus, $19,880 per student for its parent district, Brazosport ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearGriffith ElemParent district: Brazosport ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$7,417$15,191$13,054$8,042 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,905 rated schools reporting
2019$8,050$15,566$13,108$8,198 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,925 rated schools reporting
2020$8,481$20,536$14,058$8,741 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,947 rated schools reporting
2021$10,044$23,809$14,797$9,283 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,960 rated schools reporting
2022$9,717$21,001$15,708$10,559 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,982 rated schools reporting
2023$10,698$20,584$16,792$11,268 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,001 rated schools reporting
2024$12,081$20,103$18,125$12,362 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,024 rated schools reporting
2025$10,885$19,880$18,972$13,182 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,037 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$67,629+$1,088 vs similar economic context
Teachers
37−5.8 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
13.3−0.7 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Griffith Elem

Beginning: 10.7%1 to 5 years: 21.4%6 to 10 years: 23.8%11 to 20 years: 26.2%21 to 30 years: 15.5%Over 30 years: 2.7%
  • Beginning 10.7%
  • 1 to 5 years 21.4%
  • 6 to 10 years 23.8%
  • 11 to 20 years 26.2%
  • 21 to 30 years 15.5%
  • Over 30 years 2.7%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,055 reporting for every category shown · 2,055 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.7%1 to 5 years: 27.1%6 to 10 years: 19%11 to 20 years: 27.3%21 to 30 years: 15.4%Over 30 years: 3.9%
  • Beginning 6.7%
  • 1 to 5 years 27.1%
  • 6 to 10 years 19%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.3%
  • 21 to 30 years 15.4%
  • Over 30 years 3.9%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Griffith Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classGriffith Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten15.817.9
Grade 12018.2
Grade 220.718.2
Grade 316.718.6
Grade 417.718.9

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 020905114.