Districts, charter school systems & campuses · Source: Texas Education Agency
Griffith ElemB83vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Traditional public school campus
Griffith Elem
Brazoria County · Region 04: Houston · 497 students
Current score
83/1002025-26
Change
−1 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+4.2 ptsvs 78.8 average · 2,055 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
713 of 2,055tied with 82 others
Score vs region
−0.3 ptsvs 83.3 average · 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston
Region 04: Houston placement
697 of 1,303tied with 44 others
Score vs county
−2.4 ptsvs 85.4 average · 96 rated schools in Brazoria County
Brazoria County placement
65 of 96tied with 2 others
Score vs similar-size group
+2.9 ptsvs 80.1 average · 4,682 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
1,965 of 4,682tied with 147 others
Score vs state
+1.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
3,601 of 7,646tied with 244 others
B83
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 83 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 78.8 average for 2,055 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is level with the 83.3 average for 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston.The current score is below the 85.4 average for 96 rated schools in Brazoria County.The current score is above the 80.1 average for 4,682 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
53%vs 45.1% avg · +7.9 pts
Masters
21%vs 17.9% avg · +3.1 pts
Among 1,917 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Griffith Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 83 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 78.8 average for 2,055 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 713th of 2,055 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 82 others).
Griffith Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 83 out of 100 for 2025-26 — level with the 83.3 average for 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 697th of 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston (tied with 44 others).
Griffith Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 83 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 85.4 average for 96 rated schools in Brazoria County. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 65th of 96 rated schools in Brazoria County (tied with 2 others).
Griffith Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 83 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.1 average for 4,682 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 1,965th of 4,682 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 147 others).
Griffith Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 83 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 83 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement79 C+3.8 vs similar economic context · 1,917 reporting
School Progress85 B+5.0 vs similar economic context · 1,911 reporting
Closing the Gaps79 C+3.0 vs similar economic context · 1,898 reporting
Academic Growth68 D−4.9 vs similar economic context · 1,854 reporting
Relative Performance85 B+6.6 vs similar economic context · 1,911 reporting
Griffith Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,055 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
79
C
1
School Progress
85
B
5
Closing the Gaps
79
C
1
Academic Growth
68
D
2
Relative Performance
85
B
5
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 1 point below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (85), so
Student Achievement (79) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 85.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level81%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,917 reporting
Meets grade level53%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,917 reporting
Masters grade level21%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,917 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level86%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,915 reporting
Meets grade level56%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,915 reporting
Masters grade level24%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,915 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level77%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,907 reporting
Meets grade level50%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,907 reporting
Masters grade level19%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,907 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,055 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
497
Economically disadvantaged
72.6%±0.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
38.6%+16.5 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
22.1%+3.3 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.0%+1.2 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
13.6%−4.8 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Griffith Elem
African American 3%
Hispanic 78.3%
White 13.9%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 1.2%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,055 reporting for every category shown · 2,055 in full cohort
African American 12.7%
Hispanic 59.6%
White 22.1%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.9%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 04: Houston · 1,303 reporting for every category shown · 1,303 in full cohort
African American 19.1%
Hispanic 53.8%
White 16.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 6.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Brazoria County · 96 reporting for every category shown · 96 in full cohort
African American 16.1%
Hispanic 44.3%
White 28.5%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 6.5%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,682 reporting for every category shown · 4,682 in full cohort
African American 12.1%
Hispanic 55%
White 24.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.5%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
497
Economically disadvantaged students
361
Emergent bilingual students
192
Special education students
110
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
44
Students in TEA mobility denominator
367
TEA-published mobility rate
12%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 497 students in 2025–26, an increase of 4 (0.8%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
497
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+4
Increase · +0.8%
Change since 2021–22
−21
Decrease · −4.1%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
497
Selected comparison
636.7
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,024 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Griffith Elem
School year
Students enrolledGriffith Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
518
First available year
653.4
2022–23
541
Increase of 23 (4.4%)
658.3
2023–24
519
Decrease of 22 (4.1%)
656.3
2024–25
493
Decrease of 26 (5.0%)
652.8
2025–26
497
Increase of 4 (0.8%)
636.7
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
15
2.8% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
21
3.96 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
530
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
2.8%
Selected comparison
13.3%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,558 rated schools reporting
−10.5 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
3.96
Selected comparison
31.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,670 rated schools reporting
−27.8 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Griffith Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
506
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2021–22
579
Suppressed
—
12
2.07
—
31
2022–23
572
15
2.6%
18
3.15
13.6%
33.3
2023–24
546
16
2.9%
39
7.14
13.5%
32.9
2024–25
530
15
2.8%
21
3.96
13.3%
31.8
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Griffith Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
15
2.8%
21
3.96
13.3%
31.8
In-school suspensions
15
2.8%
20
3.77
11.8%
23.9
Out-of-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Griffith Elem
Parent district: Brazosport ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$10,885
Selected comparison
$13,182
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,037 rated schools reporting
−$2,297 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $10,885 per student for this campus, $19,880 per student for its parent district, Brazosport ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Griffith Elem
Parent district: Brazosport ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$7,417
$15,191
$13,054
$8,042
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,905 rated schools reporting
2019
$8,050
$15,566
$13,108
$8,198
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,925 rated schools reporting
2020
$8,481
$20,536
$14,058
$8,741
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,947 rated schools reporting
2021
$10,044
$23,809
$14,797
$9,283
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,960 rated schools reporting
2022
$9,717
$21,001
$15,708
$10,559
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,982 rated schools reporting
2023
$10,698
$20,584
$16,792
$11,268
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,001 rated schools reporting
2024
$12,081
$20,103
$18,125
$12,362
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,024 rated schools reporting
2025
$10,885
$19,880
$18,972
$13,182
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,037 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$67,629+$1,088 vs similar economic context
Teachers
37−5.8 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
13.3−0.7 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Griffith Elem
Beginning 10.7%
1 to 5 years 21.4%
6 to 10 years 23.8%
11 to 20 years 26.2%
21 to 30 years 15.5%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,055 reporting for every category shown · 2,055 in full cohort
Beginning 6.7%
1 to 5 years 27.1%
6 to 10 years 19%
11 to 20 years 27.3%
21 to 30 years 15.4%
Over 30 years 3.9%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 04: Houston · 1,303 reporting for every category shown · 1,303 in full cohort
Beginning 7.7%
1 to 5 years 27.3%
6 to 10 years 20.6%
11 to 20 years 27.2%
21 to 30 years 13.5%
Over 30 years 2.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Brazoria County · 96 reporting for every category shown · 96 in full cohort
Beginning 4.6%
1 to 5 years 24.5%
6 to 10 years 21.4%
11 to 20 years 32.7%
21 to 30 years 14.7%
Over 30 years 2.1%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,682 reporting for every category shown · 4,682 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 26.2%
6 to 10 years 19.5%
11 to 20 years 28.9%
21 to 30 years 15.8%
Over 30 years 3.2%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Griffith Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classGriffith Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
15.8
17.9
Grade 1
20
18.2
Grade 2
20.7
18.2
Grade 3
16.7
18.6
Grade 4
17.7
18.9
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 020905114.