Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Greenwood HS

Midland County · Region 18: Midland · 1,002 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
88/1002025-26
Change
+3 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+2.1 ptsvs 85.9 average · 1,193 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
540 of 1,193tied with 37 others
B88

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 88 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 85.9 average for 1,193 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Current strength

Overall score above the similar-context average

88 +2.1 pts vs 85.9

  • 88 is 2.1 points above the 85.9 average among 1,193 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Closing the Gaps above the similar-context average

90 +6.7 pts vs 83.3

  • 90 is 6.7 points above the 83.3 average among 1,153 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Greenwood HS is rated B by TEA, scoring 88 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 85.9 average for 1,193 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 540th of 1,193 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 37 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. After high school: the following fall
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this school ranks best
  13. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageGreenwood HS 8586848788 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 88 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8885.9 1,193 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8785.9 1,169 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24B8484.4 1,153 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8684.7 1,140 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22B8586.4 1,123 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement87 B+0.5 vs similar economic context · 1,165 reporting
  • School Progress82 B−1.4 vs similar economic context · 1,162 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps90 A+6.7 vs similar economic context · 1,153 reporting
  • Academic Growth81 B+1.8 vs similar economic context · 1,143 reporting
  • Relative Performance82 B+2.2 vs similar economic context · 1,162 reporting
  • Greenwood HS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,193 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement87B3
School Progress82B8
Closing the Gaps90A—
Academic Growth81B9
Relative Performance82B8

Closest to moving up: Student Achievement, 3 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (87), so School Progress (82) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 87.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level82%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,165 reporting
  • Meets grade level56%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,165 reporting
  • Masters grade level13%−17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,165 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level74%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,164 reporting
  • Meets grade level55%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,164 reporting
  • Masters grade level7%−24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,164 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level83%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,161 reporting
  • Meets grade level41%−14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,161 reporting
  • Masters grade level7%−18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,161 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level92%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,073 reporting
  • Meets grade level70%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,073 reporting
  • Masters grade level29%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,073 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level91%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 600 reporting
  • Meets grade level59%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 600 reporting
  • Masters grade level17%−14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 600 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,193 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
98.4%+5.1 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 340 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
99.4%+6.7 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 339 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
98.8%+6.4 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 340 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−0.3 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 340 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
93.0%+3.8 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria93.0%89.2%+3.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 341 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course62.8%63.1%−0.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 341 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA19.1%38.9%−19.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 341 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)7.4%16.9%−9.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 341 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course61.2%37.2%+24.0 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 341 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification31.9%36.4%−4.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 341 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate3.2%0.9%+2.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 341 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%4.1%−4.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 341 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%6.2%−6.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 341 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness2.7%2.7%+0.0 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 341 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student7.4%7.1%+0.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 341 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces1.6%3.3%−1.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 341 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

After high school: the following fall

Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.

Graduates in the report
171

Class of 2023–24

Enrolled in Texas public higher education
88

51.5% of graduates

Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
78

45.6% of graduates

Not trackable
5

Fall 2024

Graduates in the report

This school
171
Selected comparison
271.1

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 295 rated schools reporting

Enrolled in Texas public higher education

This school
88
Selected comparison
130.4

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 295 rated schools reporting

Texas-public enrollment rate

This school
51.5%
Selected comparison
49.0%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 295 rated schools reporting

+2.5 pts vs similar economic context

Not-found rate

This school
45.6%
Selected comparison
45.6%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 295 rated schools reporting

+0.0 pts vs similar economic context

Not-trackable rate

This school
2.9%
Selected comparison
5.3%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 295 rated schools reporting

−2.4 pts vs similar economic context

Most common named Texas public destinations

  1. MIDLAND COLLEGE (009797)32
  2. U. OF TEXAS PERMIAN BASIN (009930)18
  3. TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY (003644)9

Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.

Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.

“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.

“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
1,002
Economically disadvantaged
35.1%−0.9 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
11.1%+0.4 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
12.0%−5.8 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
93.6%−1.5 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
19.6%+7.9 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Greenwood HS

African American: 0.3%Hispanic: 55.5%White: 42.1%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 0.2%Two or More Races: 1.6%
  • African American 0.3%
  • Hispanic 55.5%
  • White 42.1%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 1.6%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,193 reporting for every category shown · 1,193 in full cohort

African American: 9.1%Hispanic: 32.3%White: 47.5%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 5.9%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 4.7%
  • African American 9.1%
  • Hispanic 32.3%
  • White 47.5%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 5.9%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 4.7%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
1,002
Economically disadvantaged students
352
Emergent bilingual students
111
Special education students
120

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
103
Students in TEA mobility denominator
937
TEA-published mobility rate
11%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 1,002 students in 2025–26, an increase of 123 (14.0%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
1,002

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+123

Increase · +14.0%

Change since 2021–22
+196

Increase · +24.3%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
1,002
Selected comparison
756.9

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,168 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Greenwood HS
School yearStudents enrolledGreenwood HSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 806 First available year 767.7
2022–23 808 Increase of 2 (0.2%) 769.2
2023–24 848 Increase of 40 (5.0%) 769.1
2024–25 879 Increase of 31 (3.7%) 764.3
2025–26 1,002 Increase of 123 (14.0%) 756.9

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
114

12.2% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
286

30.52 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
937

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
12.2%
Selected comparison
9.9%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 919 rated schools reporting

+2.3 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
30.52
Selected comparison
21

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 998 rated schools reporting

+9.5 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Greenwood HS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 777 116 14.9% 196 25.23 8.2% 15
2021–22 858 146 17.0% 299 34.85 10.1% 21.1
2022–23 854 165 19.3% 299 35.01 10.4% 22.1
2023–24 895 178 19.9% 357 39.89 10.2% 22.4
2024–25 937 114 12.2% 286 30.52 9.9% 21
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Greenwood HS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 114 12.2% 286 30.52 9.9% 21
In-school suspensions 86 9.2% 142 15.15 8.9% 16.1
Out-of-school suspensions 58 6.2% 94 10.03 4.9% 6.7
DAEP placements 40 4.3% 50 5.34 3.6% 4.3
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$27k$48k20182020202220242025
  • Greenwood HS
  • Parent district: Greenwood ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$14,462
Selected comparison
$11,928

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,169 rated schools reporting

+$2,534 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $14,462 per student for this campus, $46,017 per student for its parent district, Greenwood ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearGreenwood HSParent district: Greenwood ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$8,186$10,026$13,054$7,674 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,066 rated schools reporting
2019$8,792$13,556$13,108$7,805 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,082 rated schools reporting
2020$9,811$11,723$14,058$8,133 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,090 rated schools reporting
2021$10,666$13,035$14,797$8,595 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,104 rated schools reporting
2022$11,610$14,561$15,708$9,818 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,122 rated schools reporting
2023$11,896$17,790$16,792$10,409 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,141 rated schools reporting
2024$13,205$21,982$18,125$11,522 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,153 rated schools reporting
2025$14,462$46,017$18,972$11,928 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,169 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$80,127+$12,279 vs similar economic context
Teachers
68+17.7 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.8+0.5 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Greenwood HS

Beginning: 2.7%1 to 5 years: 21.9%6 to 10 years: 16.9%11 to 20 years: 29%21 to 30 years: 25.3%Over 30 years: 4.3%
  • Beginning 2.7%
  • 1 to 5 years 21.9%
  • 6 to 10 years 16.9%
  • 11 to 20 years 29%
  • 21 to 30 years 25.3%
  • Over 30 years 4.3%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,193 reporting for every category shown · 1,193 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.1%1 to 5 years: 22.8%6 to 10 years: 19.6%11 to 20 years: 31.6%21 to 30 years: 17.3%Over 30 years: 3.4%
  • Beginning 5.1%
  • 1 to 5 years 22.8%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.6%
  • 11 to 20 years 31.6%
  • 21 to 30 years 17.3%
  • Over 30 years 3.4%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Greenwood HS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classGreenwood HS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English21.416.3
Secondary languages other than English2518.5
Secondary math23.317.2
Secondary science21.918.6
Secondary social studies22.318.6

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 184 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

1 measure

  • 2of 42

    Per-student spending

    Midland County · of the 42 that report this measure

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

15 measures

  • 4of 12

    Social Studies — Meets

    Midland County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 5of 43

    Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness

    Region 18: Midland · of the 43 that report this measure

  • 5of 43

    Overall score

    Midland County · of the 43 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 5of 41

    Math — Approaches

    Midland County · of the 41 that report this measure

  • 5of 12

    Social Studies — Approaches

    Midland County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 5of 12

    Social Studies — Masters

    Midland County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 6of 41

    Closing the Gaps

    Midland County · of the 41 that report this measure

  • 6of 41

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Midland County · of the 41 that report this measure

  • 7of 41

    Student Achievement

    Midland County · of the 41 that report this measure

  • 7of 41

    Science — Approaches

    Midland County · of the 41 that report this measure

  • 7of 41

    Science — Meets

    Midland County · of the 41 that report this measure

  • 8of 41

    All Subjects — Meets

    Midland County · of the 41 that report this measure

  • 9of 41

    Relative Performance

    Midland County · of the 41 that report this measure

  • 10of 43

    Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)

    Region 18: Midland · of the 43 that report this measure

  • 10of 41

    Science — Masters

    Midland County · of the 41 that report this measure

Other top-5% rankings

High placements in larger reporting groups

1 measure

  • 16of 293

    Earned college credit for a dual credit course

    Similar size · of the 293 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 165902001.