Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Grant MS

Nueces County · Region 02: Corpus Christi · 757 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
83/1002025-26
Change
+5 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+2.1 ptsvs 80.9 average · 1,926 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
823 of 1,926tied with 72 others
B83

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 78 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 80.9 average for 1,926 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

Reading above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
59%vs 55% avg · +4 pts
Masters
26%vs 22.3% avg · +3.7 pts

Among 1,847 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Current strength

Overall score above the similar-context average

83 +2.1 pts vs 80.9

  • 83 is 2.1 points above the 80.9 average among 1,926 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Grant MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 83 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.9 average for 1,926 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 5 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 823rd of 1,926 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 72 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageGrant MS 7872758483 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated C with 78 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8380.9 1,926 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8480.8 1,899 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24C7578.8 1,878 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23C7279.4 1,846 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22C7882.7 1,821 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement80 B+0.4 vs similar economic context · 1,850 reporting
  • School Progress83 B+1.6 vs similar economic context · 1,843 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps84 B+5.9 vs similar economic context · 1,826 reporting
  • Academic Growth78 C+3.5 vs similar economic context · 1,790 reporting
  • Relative Performance83 B+3.5 vs similar economic context · 1,843 reporting
  • Grant MS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,926 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement80B10
School Progress83B7
Closing the Gaps84B6
Academic Growth78C2
Relative Performance83B7

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 6 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (83), so Student Achievement (80) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 83.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level75%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,850 reporting
  • Meets grade level50%−0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,850 reporting
  • Masters grade level21%+0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,850 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level82%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,847 reporting
  • Meets grade level59%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,847 reporting
  • Masters grade level26%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,847 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level75%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,838 reporting
  • Meets grade level48%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,838 reporting
  • Masters grade level18%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,838 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level78%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,696 reporting
  • Meets grade level50%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,696 reporting
  • Masters grade level21%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,696 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level54%−22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 943 reporting
  • Meets grade level29%−19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 943 reporting
  • Masters grade level13%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 943 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,926 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
757
Economically disadvantaged
58.7%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
3.2%−12.1 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
20.8%+2.0 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
93.3%−1.0 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
23.4%+7.8 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Grant MS

African American: 3.4%Hispanic: 82%White: 11.9%Asian: 1.3%Two or More Races: 1.3%
  • African American 3.4%
  • Hispanic 82%
  • White 11.9%
  • Asian 1.3%
  • Two or More Races 1.3%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,926 reporting for every category shown · 1,926 in full cohort

African American: 10.2%Hispanic: 47%White: 36%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2.4%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3.9%
  • African American 10.2%
  • Hispanic 47%
  • White 36%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2.4%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.9%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
756
Economically disadvantaged students
444
Emergent bilingual students
24
Special education students
157

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
113
Students in TEA mobility denominator
834
TEA-published mobility rate
13.5%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 757 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 15 (1.9%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
757

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−15

Decrease · −1.9%

Change since 2021–22
−68

Decrease · −8.2%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
757
Selected comparison
631.6

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,892 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Grant MS
School yearStudents enrolledGrant MSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 825 First available year 637.2
2022–23 789 Decrease of 36 (4.4%) 641.7
2023–24 821 Increase of 32 (4.1%) 640.9
2024–25 772 Decrease of 49 (6.0%) 638.4
2025–26 757 Decrease of 15 (1.9%) 631.6

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
213

26.5% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
577

71.77 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
804

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
26.5%
Selected comparison
12.5%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,463 rated schools reporting

+14.0 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
71.77
Selected comparison
28.2

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,582 rated schools reporting

+43.6 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Grant MS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 982 Suppressed — 11 1.12 — 18.8
2021–22 865 239 27.6% 604 69.83 12.4% 28.1
2022–23 832 293 35.2% 903 108.53 12.9% 30
2023–24 853 237 27.8% 693 81.24 12.8% 29.8
2024–25 804 213 26.5% 577 71.77 12.5% 28.2
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Grant MS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 213 26.5% 577 71.77 12.5% 28.2
In-school suspensions 213 26.5% 501 62.31 11.2% 21.8
Out-of-school suspensions 29 3.6% 52 6.47 6.5% 9.3
DAEP placements 19 2.4% 23 2.86 4.8% 5.7
Mandatory DAEP placements 10 1.2% 10 1.24 3.4% 3.9
Discretionary DAEP placements 11 1.4% 13 1.62 2.7% 3.1
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$4k$12k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Grant MS
  • Parent district: Corpus Christi ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$8,525
Selected comparison
$12,425

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,895 rated schools reporting

−$3,900 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $8,525 per student for this campus, $17,521 per student for its parent district, Corpus Christi ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearGrant MSParent district: Corpus Christi ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$6,120$12,440$13,054$7,921 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,753 rated schools reporting
2019$8,991$13,333$13,108$8,084 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,773 rated schools reporting
2020$7,681$12,530$14,058$8,690 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,792 rated schools reporting
2021$4,960$13,918$14,797$9,051 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,804 rated schools reporting
2022$7,514$13,018$15,708$10,432 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,822 rated schools reporting
2023$8,864$16,350$16,792$10,979 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,846 rated schools reporting
2024$8,039$17,648$18,125$11,785 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,874 rated schools reporting
2025$8,525$17,521$18,972$12,425 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,895 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$64,728−$1,745 vs similar economic context
Teachers
42+0.4 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
18−1.2 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Grant MS

Beginning: 2.4%1 to 5 years: 26.6%6 to 10 years: 16.2%11 to 20 years: 26.1%21 to 30 years: 20.2%Over 30 years: 8.6%
  • Beginning 2.4%
  • 1 to 5 years 26.6%
  • 6 to 10 years 16.2%
  • 11 to 20 years 26.1%
  • 21 to 30 years 20.2%
  • Over 30 years 8.6%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,926 reporting for every category shown · 1,926 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.9%1 to 5 years: 25.3%6 to 10 years: 19.2%11 to 20 years: 28.4%21 to 30 years: 16.3%Over 30 years: 4.3%
  • Beginning 5.9%
  • 1 to 5 years 25.3%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.2%
  • 11 to 20 years 28.4%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.3%
  • Over 30 years 4.3%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Grant MS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classGrant MS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 622.417.5
Secondary English25.414.8
Secondary languages other than English27.817.3
Secondary math25.315.7
Secondary science24.817.1
Secondary social studies26.917

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 178904056.