Recent domain gain
Academic Growth rose 16 points
74 to 90 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 90 is 5.2 points above the 84.8 average among 669 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Traditional public school campus
Grady School
Martin County · Region 18: Midland · 243 students
Official school websiteSchool information and family resources
- Current score
- 97/1002025-26
- Change
- +4 ptssince 2021-22
- Score vs similar economic context
- +6.4 ptsvs 90.6 average · 686 rated schools serving a similar economic context
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
- 16 of 686tied with 10 others
- Score vs region
- +19.2 ptsvs 77.8 average · 157 rated schools in Region 18: Midland
- Region 18: Midland placement
- 4 of 157tied with 3 others
- Score vs county
- +10.2 ptsvs 86.8 average · 4 rated schools in Martin County
- Score vs similar-size group
- +16.3 ptsvs 80.7 average · 1,829 similarly sized rated schools
- Similar size placement
- 28 of 1,829tied with 23 others
- Score vs state
- +15.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
- Texas placement
- 82 of 7,646tied with 63 others
A97
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 97 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 90.6 average for 686 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 77.8 average for 157 rated schools in Region 18: Midland.The current score is above the 86.8 average for 4 rated schools in Martin County.The current score is above the 80.7 average for 1,829 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
Reading above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 90%vs 77.3% avg · +12.7 pts
- Masters
- 56%vs 45.2% avg · +10.8 pts
Among 674 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measureCurrent strength
Overall score above the similar-context average
97 +6.4 pts vs 90.6
- 97 is 6.4 points above the 90.6 average among 686 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Recent domain gain
Academic Growth rose 16 points
74 to 90 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 90 is 18.2 points above the 71.8 average among 140 schools in Region 18: Midland reporting this measure.
Current strength
Closing the Gaps above the Region 18: Midland average
98 +22.4 pts vs 75.6
- 98 is 22.4 points above the 75.6 average among 141 schools in Region 18: Midland reporting this measure.
- Tied for 3rd of 141 schools in Region 18: Midland reporting this measure; 2 schools share that value.
STAAR result
All Subjects above Region 18: Midland averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 78%vs 44.4% avg · +33.6 pts
- Masters
- 43%vs 17.2% avg · +25.8 pts
Among 144 schools in Region 18: Midland reporting this measure.
See the full measureRecent domain gain
Academic Growth rose 16 points
74 to 90 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureRecent domain gain
Academic Growth rose 16 points
74 to 90 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 90 is 15.7 points above the 74.3 average among 1,604 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-size averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 78%vs 49.4% avg · +28.6 pts
- Masters
- 43%vs 20.1% avg · +22.9 pts
Among 1,635 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
See the full measureSTAAR result
Math above similar-size averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 69%vs 44.1% avg · +24.9 pts
- Masters
- 31%vs 16.9% avg · +14.1 pts
Among 1,635 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
See the full measureRecent domain gain
Academic Growth rose 16 points
74 to 90 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 90 is 14.3 points above the 75.7 average among 7,090 Texas schools reporting this measure.
STAAR result
All Subjects above Texas averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 78%vs 50.8% avg · +27.2 pts
- Masters
- 43%vs 22.8% avg · +20.2 pts
Among 7,260 Texas schools reporting this measure.
See the full measureSTAAR result
Math above Texas averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 69%vs 46.3% avg · +22.7 pts
- Masters
- 31%vs 19.7% avg · +11.3 pts
Among 7,227 Texas schools reporting this measure.
See the full measureSelected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Grady School is rated A by TEA, scoring 97 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 90.6 average for 686 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 16th of 686 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 10 others).
Grady School is rated A by TEA, scoring 97 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.8 average for 157 rated schools in Region 18: Midland. It is up 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 4th of 157 rated schools in Region 18: Midland (tied with 3 others).
Grady School is rated A by TEA, scoring 97 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 86.8 average for 4 rated schools in Martin County. It is up 4 points since 2021-22.
Grady School is rated A by TEA, scoring 97 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.7 average for 1,829 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 28th of 1,829 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 23 others).
Grady School is rated A by TEA, scoring 97 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 82nd of 7,646 rated Texas schools (tied with 63 others).
Put the numbers in context
Compare with
Jump to a section
5 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 97 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
View the yearly scores and comparisons
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | A | 97 | 90.6 686 reporting | 81.3 7,646 reporting |
| 2024-25 | A | 96 | 90.8 678 reporting | 81.2 7,554 reporting |
| 2023-24 | A | 93 | 89.7 662 reporting | 78.9 7,466 reporting |
| 2022-23 | A | 93 | 90.2 647 reporting | 79.1 7,377 reporting |
| 2021-22 | A | 93 | 90.9 633 reporting | 83.7 7,283 reporting |
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- Grady School
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate (686 in cohort)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | 97 | A | — |
| School Progress | 93 | A | — |
| Closing the Gaps | 98 | A | — |
| Academic Growth | 90 | A | — |
| Relative Performance | 93 | A | — |
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (97), so School Progress (93) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 97.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
- Approaches grade level
- Meets grade level
- Masters grade level
- Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (686 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Graduation
- Four-Year
- 100.0%+12.6 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 134 rated schools reporting
- Five-Year
- 100.0%+12.4 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 134 rated schools reporting
- Six-Year
- 100.0%+13.0 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 134 rated schools reporting
- Dropout Rate
- 0.0%−0.3 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 135 rated schools reporting
These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
College, career and military readiness
- Total credit for CCMR criteria
- 100.0%+11.3 pts vs similar economic context
| Criterion | This school% of graduates | Averagesimilar economic context | Differencepercentage points | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total credit for CCMR criteria | 100.0% | 88.7% | +11.3 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 129 rated schools reporting |
| Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course | 17.6% | 68.3% | −50.7 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 131 rated schools reporting |
| Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA | 17.6% | 56.3% | −38.7 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 131 rated schools reporting |
| Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s) | 0.0% | 34.0% | −34.0 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 131 rated schools reporting |
| Earned college credit for a dual credit course | 100.0% | 38.0% | +62.0 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 131 rated schools reporting |
| Earned an industry-based certification | 0.0% | 29.2% | −29.2 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 131 rated schools reporting |
| Earned a level I or level II certificate | 0.0% | 0.3% | −0.3 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 131 rated schools reporting |
| Earned an associate degree | 0.0% | 3.5% | −3.5 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 131 rated schools reporting |
| Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit | 0.0% | 10.0% | −10.0 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 131 rated schools reporting |
| Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness | 0.0% | 2.1% | −2.1 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 131 rated schools reporting |
| Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student | 0.0% | 5.8% | −5.8 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 131 rated schools reporting |
| Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces | 5.9% | 1.9% | +4.0 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 131 rated schools reporting |
Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 243
- Economically disadvantaged
- 15.7%−0.6 pts vs similar economic context
- English learners
- 7.9%−2.9 pts vs similar economic context
- Special education
- 9.1%−7.0 pts vs similar economic context
- Attendance
- 95.4%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
- Chronically absent
- 7.6%+0.2 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Grady School
- Hispanic 29.8%
- White 69.4%
- Two or More Races 0.8%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 686 reporting for every category shown · 686 in full cohort
- African American 6.8%
- Hispanic 21.4%
- White 48.3%
- American Indian 0.4%
- Asian 17.4%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 5.6%
Selected comparison average For Region 18: Midland · 157 reporting for every category shown · 157 in full cohort
- African American 3.4%
- Hispanic 72.1%
- White 20.8%
- American Indian 0.2%
- Asian 1.5%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 1.8%
Selected comparison average For Martin County · 4 reporting for every category shown · 4 in full cohort
- African American 0.4%
- Hispanic 61.7%
- White 36.8%
- American Indian 0.5%
- Asian 0.1%
- Two or More Races 0.7%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 1,829 reporting for every category shown · 1,829 in full cohort
- African American 9.6%
- Hispanic 50.5%
- White 35%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 1.5%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.1%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- African American 11.5%
- Hispanic 52.6%
- White 27.8%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 4.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
- Students in this TEA accountability summary
- 242
- Economically disadvantaged students
- 38
- Emergent bilingual students
- 19
- Special education students
- 22
Campus mobility · 2024–25
- Mobile students
- 6
- Students in TEA mobility denominator
- 212
- TEA-published mobility rate
- 2.8%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 243 students in 2025–26, an increase of 2 (0.8%) from 2024–25.
- Latest enrollment
- 243
2025–26
- Change from 2024–25
- +2
Increase · +0.8%
- Change since 2021–22
- −6
Decrease · −2.4%
Enrollment in 2025–26
- This school
- 243
- Selected comparison
- 858.4
| School year | Students enrolledGrady School | Change from previous school year | Average enrollmentselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021–22 | 249 | First available year | 872 |
| 2022–23 | 258 | Increase of 9 (3.6%) | 888.5 |
| 2023–24 | 250 | Decrease of 8 (3.1%) | 874 |
| 2024–25 | 241 | Decrease of 9 (3.6%) | 866.4 |
| 2025–26 | 243 | Increase of 2 (0.8%) | 858.4 |
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
- Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
- 17
7.0% of cumulative year-end enrollment
- Disciplinary actions
- 25
10.25 per 100 students
- Cumulative year-end enrollment
- 244
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
- This school
- 7.0%
- Selected comparison
- 5.8%
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
- This school
- 10.25
- Selected comparison
- 10.7
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020–21 | 237 | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| 2021–22 | 253 | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| 2022–23 | 262 | 11 | 4.2% | 15 | 5.73 | 6.3% | 11.3 |
| 2023–24 | 256 | 16 | 6.3% | 16 | 6.25 | 6.1% | 11.2 |
| 2024–25 | 244 | 17 | 7.0% | 25 | 10.25 | 5.8% | 10.7 |
See 2024–25 discipline categories
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | 17 | 7.0% | 25 | 10.25 | 5.8% | 10.7 |
| In-school suspensions | 10 | 4.1% | 11 | 4.51 | 5.5% | 8.5 |
| Out-of-school suspensions | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| DAEP placements | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
- Grady School
- Parent district: Grady ISD
- Texas average
- Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
- This school
- $24,726
- Selected comparison
- $11,113
For 2025, TEA reported $24,726 per student for this campus, $43,065 per student for its parent district, Grady ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
| Year | Grady School | Parent district: Grady ISD | Texas average | Selected comparison average | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | $11,798 | $23,940 | $13,054 | $7,368 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 586 rated schools reporting |
| 2019 | $12,602 | $25,945 | $13,108 | $7,463 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 601 rated schools reporting |
| 2020 | $13,053 | $121,932 | $14,058 | $7,769 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 614 rated schools reporting |
| 2021 | $18,577 | $101,801 | $14,797 | $8,328 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 622 rated schools reporting |
| 2022 | $18,972 | $57,559 | $15,708 | $9,593 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 634 rated schools reporting |
| 2023 | $20,249 | $83,515 | $16,792 | $9,882 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 647 rated schools reporting |
| 2024 | $21,987 | $30,291 | $18,125 | $10,902 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 663 rated schools reporting |
| 2025 | $24,726 | $43,065 | $18,972 | $11,113 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 678 rated schools reporting |
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
- Average salary
- $84,440+$15,168 vs similar economic context
- Teachers
- 22−33.0 vs similar economic context
- Students per staff member
- 11−4.0 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Grady School
- Beginning 4.5%
- 1 to 5 years 4.5%
- 6 to 10 years 20.9%
- 11 to 20 years 21.8%
- 21 to 30 years 39.5%
- Over 30 years 8.6%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 686 reporting for every category shown · 686 in full cohort
- Beginning 4.3%
- 1 to 5 years 23%
- 6 to 10 years 20.2%
- 11 to 20 years 32.6%
- 21 to 30 years 17%
- Over 30 years 2.7%
Selected comparison average For Region 18: Midland · 157 reporting for every category shown · 157 in full cohort
- Beginning 7.8%
- 1 to 5 years 27.9%
- 6 to 10 years 17.4%
- 11 to 20 years 24.1%
- 21 to 30 years 13.1%
- Over 30 years 4.6%
Selected comparison average For Martin County · 4 reporting for every category shown · 4 in full cohort
- Beginning 5.9%
- 1 to 5 years 29.2%
- 6 to 10 years 25.3%
- 11 to 20 years 15.8%
- 21 to 30 years 15.9%
- Over 30 years 7.9%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 1,829 reporting for every category shown · 1,829 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.6%
- 1 to 5 years 24.2%
- 6 to 10 years 17.9%
- 11 to 20 years 28.5%
- 21 to 30 years 17.5%
- Over 30 years 4.8%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- Beginning 6.2%
- 1 to 5 years 25.6%
- 6 to 10 years 19.2%
- 11 to 20 years 28.7%
- 21 to 30 years 15.9%
- Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
| Grade or subject | Average students per classGrady School · 2024–25 | Average students per classselected comparison |
|---|---|---|
| Kindergarten | 17 | 18.8 |
| Grade 1 | 22 | 19.1 |
| Grade 2 | 14 | 19.6 |
| Grade 3 | 23 | 21.3 |
| Grade 4 | 14 | 20.4 |
| Grade 5 | 20 | 22.2 |
| Grade 6 | 14.8 | 19.3 |
| Secondary English | 16 | 18.1 |
| Secondary math | 20.3 | 18.2 |
| Secondary science | 21.2 | 20.7 |
| Secondary social studies | 15.3 | 21 |
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 11 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
Where this school ranks best
Out of 160 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
1 measure
-
3of 141
Closing the Gaps
Region 18: Midland · of the 141 that report this measure · tied with 1
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
15 measures
-
4of 157
Overall score
Region 18: Midland · of the 157 that report this measure · tied with 3
-
4of 144
Reading — Masters
Region 18: Midland · of the 144 that report this measure
-
4of 43
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces
Region 18: Midland · of the 43 that report this measure
-
5of 144
Reading — Approaches
Region 18: Midland · of the 144 that report this measure
-
6of 144
All Subjects — Masters
Region 18: Midland · of the 144 that report this measure
-
6of 144
Reading — Meets
Region 18: Midland · of the 144 that report this measure
-
6of 140
Academic Growth
Region 18: Midland · of the 140 that report this measure
-
6of 67
Social Studies — Masters
Region 18: Midland · of the 67 that report this measure
-
7of 144
All Subjects — Approaches
Region 18: Midland · of the 144 that report this measure
-
8of 144
School Progress
Region 18: Midland · of the 144 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
8of 144
Relative Performance
Region 18: Midland · of the 144 that report this measure
-
8of 144
All Subjects — Meets
Region 18: Midland · of the 144 that report this measure
-
8of 144
Math — Meets
Region 18: Midland · of the 144 that report this measure
-
8of 137
Science — Approaches
Region 18: Midland · of the 137 that report this measure · tied with 2
-
10of 144
Math — Approaches
Region 18: Midland · of the 144 that report this measure
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
2 measures
-
17of 674
Student Achievement
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 674 that report this measure · tied with 10
-
26of 678
Per-student spending
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 678 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 156905001.