Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Grace Hartman Elem

Rockwall County · Region 10: Richardson · 373 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
89/1002025-26
Change
−3 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−1.3 ptsvs 90.3 average · 707 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
477 of 707tied with 46 others
B89

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 93 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 90.3 average for 707 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Current strength

Academic Growth above the similar-context average

87 +2.6 pts vs 84.4

  • 87 is 2.6 points above the 84.4 average among 689 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Grace Hartman Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 90.3 average for 707 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 477th of 707 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 46 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageGrace Hartman Elem 9287879189 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 93 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8990.3 707 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25A9190.5 700 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24B8789.4 684 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8789.8 669 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22A9290.6 654 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement91 A−0.2 vs similar economic context · 695 reporting
  • School Progress87 B+0.5 vs similar economic context · 693 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps83 B−4.8 vs similar economic context · 691 reporting
  • Academic Growth87 B+2.6 vs similar economic context · 689 reporting
  • Relative Performance74 C−4.9 vs similar economic context · 693 reporting
  • Grace Hartman Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (707 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement91A—
School Progress87B3
Closing the Gaps83B7
Academic Growth87B3
Relative Performance74C6

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 7 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (91), so School Progress (87) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 91.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level84%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 695 reporting
  • Meets grade level66%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 695 reporting
  • Masters grade level42%+0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 695 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level87%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 695 reporting
  • Meets grade level75%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 695 reporting
  • Masters grade level50%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 695 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level82%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 693 reporting
  • Meets grade level60%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 693 reporting
  • Masters grade level36%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 693 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level83%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 653 reporting
  • Meets grade level53%−14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 653 reporting
  • Masters grade level36%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 653 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (707 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
373
Economically disadvantaged
16.8%−0.6 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
5.1%−5.9 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
23.0%+6.7 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.5%−0.3 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
8.0%+0.4 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Grace Hartman Elem

African American: 5.9%Hispanic: 21.4%White: 64.6%Asian: 2.2%Two or More Races: 5.9%
  • African American 5.9%
  • Hispanic 21.4%
  • White 64.6%
  • Asian 2.2%
  • Two or More Races 5.9%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 707 reporting for every category shown · 707 in full cohort

African American: 7%Hispanic: 22%White: 48.3%American Indian: 0.4%Asian: 16.7%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 5.5%
  • African American 7%
  • Hispanic 22%
  • White 48.3%
  • American Indian 0.4%
  • Asian 16.7%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 5.5%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
370
Economically disadvantaged students
62
Emergent bilingual students
19
Special education students
85

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
29
Students in TEA mobility denominator
399
TEA-published mobility rate
7.3%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 373 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 104 (21.8%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
373

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−104

Decrease · −21.8%

Change since 2021–22
−149

Decrease · −28.5%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
373
Selected comparison
863.1

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 703 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Grace Hartman Elem
School yearStudents enrolledGrace Hartman ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 522 First available year 879.5
2022–23 520 Decrease of 2 (0.4%) 894.8
2023–24 506 Decrease of 14 (2.7%) 880.9
2024–25 477 Decrease of 29 (5.7%) 872.9
2025–26 373 Decrease of 104 (21.8%) 863.1

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
10

2.1% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
16

3.31 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
484

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
2.1%
Selected comparison
6.0%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 460 rated schools reporting

−3.9 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
3.31
Selected comparison
11.1

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 531 rated schools reporting

−7.8 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Grace Hartman Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 489 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2021–22 515 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2022–23 508 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2023–24 506 35 6.9% 51 10.08 6.2% 11.5
2024–25 484 10 2.1% 16 3.31 6.0% 11.1
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Grace Hartman Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 10 2.1% 16 3.31 6.0% 11.1
In-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$16k$27k20182020202220242025
  • Grace Hartman Elem
  • Parent district: Rockwall ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$11,438
Selected comparison
$11,005

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 700 rated schools reporting

+$433 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $11,438 per student for this campus, $22,334 per student for its parent district, Rockwall ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearGrace Hartman ElemParent district: Rockwall ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$6,833$15,108$13,054$7,350 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 608 rated schools reporting
2019$6,825$13,589$13,108$7,446 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 623 rated schools reporting
2020$6,818$13,339$14,058$7,759 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 636 rated schools reporting
2021$7,160$14,484$14,797$8,309 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 644 rated schools reporting
2022$7,461$12,862$15,708$9,560 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 655 rated schools reporting
2023$8,249$18,988$16,792$9,934 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 669 rated schools reporting
2024$8,849$25,294$18,125$10,852 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 685 rated schools reporting
2025$11,438$22,334$18,972$11,005 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 700 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$70,045+$883 vs similar economic context
Teachers
29−26.8 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
13−2.0 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Grace Hartman Elem

Beginning: 8.4%1 to 5 years: 13.3%6 to 10 years: 28.1%11 to 20 years: 22.8%21 to 30 years: 17.5%Over 30 years: 9.8%
  • Beginning 8.4%
  • 1 to 5 years 13.3%
  • 6 to 10 years 28.1%
  • 11 to 20 years 22.8%
  • 21 to 30 years 17.5%
  • Over 30 years 9.8%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 707 reporting for every category shown · 707 in full cohort

Beginning: 4.4%1 to 5 years: 23.1%6 to 10 years: 20.1%11 to 20 years: 32.6%21 to 30 years: 17%Over 30 years: 2.7%
  • Beginning 4.4%
  • 1 to 5 years 23.1%
  • 6 to 10 years 20.1%
  • 11 to 20 years 32.6%
  • 21 to 30 years 17%
  • Over 30 years 2.7%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Grace Hartman Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classGrace Hartman Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten16.118.8
Grade 113.919.1
Grade 221.919.7
Grade 317.821.3
Grade 419.920.4
Grade 523.822.1
Grade 619.519.2
Secondary math618.3

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 8 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

1 measure

  • 3of 34

    Reading — Masters

    Rockwall County · of the 34 that report this measure

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

8 measures

  • 4of 34

    All Subjects — Masters

    Rockwall County · of the 34 that report this measure

  • 5of 34

    Reading — Meets

    Rockwall County · of the 34 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 7of 34

    Math — Masters

    Rockwall County · of the 34 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 7of 31

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Rockwall County · of the 31 that report this measure

  • 8of 33

    Academic Growth

    Rockwall County · of the 33 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 9of 34

    Science — Masters

    Rockwall County · of the 34 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 10of 34

    All Subjects — Meets

    Rockwall County · of the 34 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 10of 33

    School Progress

    Rockwall County · of the 33 that report this measure · tied with 2

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 199901110.