Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Goodwin Frazier Elem

Comal County · Region 20: San Antonio · 664 students

Current score
88/1002025-26
Change
−3 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+6.9 ptsvs 81.1 average · 1,849 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
419 of 1,849tied with 76 others
B88

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 93 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 81.1 average for 1,849 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent movement

Overall score rose 11 points

77 to 88 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 88 is 6.9 points above the 81.1 average among 1,849 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Recent domain gain

Closing the Gaps rose 18 points

73 to 91 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 91 is 12.6 points above the 78.4 average among 1,754 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
56%vs 51.1% avg · +4.9 pts
Masters
26%vs 21.5% avg · +4.5 pts

Among 1,778 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Goodwin Frazier Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 88 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.1 average for 1,849 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 419th of 1,849 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 76 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageGoodwin Frazier Elem 9187797788 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 93 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8881.1 1,849 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25C7781.2 1,824 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24C7979.2 1,796 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8779.9 1,764 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22A9182.8 1,736 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement80 B−0.3 vs similar economic context · 1,778 reporting
  • School Progress86 B+4.7 vs similar economic context · 1,770 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps91 A+12.6 vs similar economic context · 1,754 reporting
  • Academic Growth86 B+11.2 vs similar economic context · 1,723 reporting
  • Relative Performance82 B+2.6 vs similar economic context · 1,770 reporting
  • Goodwin Frazier Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,849 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement80B10
School Progress86B4
Closing the Gaps91A—
Academic Growth86B4
Relative Performance82B8

Closest to moving up: School Progress, 4 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (86), so Student Achievement (80) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 86.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level78%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,778 reporting
  • Meets grade level56%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,778 reporting
  • Masters grade level26%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,778 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level85%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,775 reporting
  • Meets grade level65%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,775 reporting
  • Masters grade level35%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,775 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level73%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,765 reporting
  • Meets grade level50%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,765 reporting
  • Masters grade level21%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,765 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level73%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,627 reporting
  • Meets grade level46%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,627 reporting
  • Masters grade level19%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,627 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,849 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
664
Economically disadvantaged
55.5%−0.5 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
5.6%−8.8 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
23.7%+4.9 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
93.4%−1.0 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
18.0%+2.8 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Goodwin Frazier Elem

African American: 2.9%Hispanic: 47.4%White: 45.7%American Indian: 0.2%Asian: 1.1%Two or More Races: 2.9%
  • African American 2.9%
  • Hispanic 47.4%
  • White 45.7%
  • American Indian 0.2%
  • Asian 1.1%
  • Two or More Races 2.9%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,849 reporting for every category shown · 1,849 in full cohort

African American: 10%Hispanic: 44.8%White: 38.1%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2.6%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4%
  • African American 10%
  • Hispanic 44.8%
  • White 38.1%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2.6%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
663
Economically disadvantaged students
368
Emergent bilingual students
37
Special education students
157

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
69
Students in TEA mobility denominator
565
TEA-published mobility rate
12.2%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 664 students in 2025–26, an increase of 2 (0.3%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
664

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+2

Increase · +0.3%

Change since 2021–22
+14

Increase · +2.2%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
664
Selected comparison
635.2

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,810 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Goodwin Frazier Elem
School yearStudents enrolledGoodwin Frazier ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 650 First available year 639.5
2022–23 633 Decrease of 17 (2.6%) 645.4
2023–24 643 Increase of 10 (1.6%) 643.9
2024–25 662 Increase of 19 (3.0%) 640.5
2025–26 664 Increase of 2 (0.3%) 635.2

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
20

2.7% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
34

4.61 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
737

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
2.7%
Selected comparison
12.4%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,426 rated schools reporting

−9.7 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
4.61
Selected comparison
27.8

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,542 rated schools reporting

−23.2 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Goodwin Frazier Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 656 43 6.5% 85 12.96 9.7% 18.8
2021–22 724 26 3.6% 47 6.49 12.4% 28
2022–23 710 24 3.4% 41 5.77 12.8% 29.6
2023–24 691 Suppressed — 14 2.03 — 29.7
2024–25 737 20 2.7% 34 4.61 12.4% 27.8
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Goodwin Frazier Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 20 2.7% 34 4.61 12.4% 27.8
In-school suspensions 19 2.6% 32 4.34 11.2% 21.7
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$14k$21k20182020202220242025
  • Goodwin Frazier Elem
  • Parent district: Comal ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$9,877
Selected comparison
$12,268

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,821 rated schools reporting

−$2,391 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $9,877 per student for this campus, $20,119 per student for its parent district, Comal ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearGoodwin Frazier ElemParent district: Comal ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$6,617$14,916$13,054$7,910 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,672 rated schools reporting
2019$7,604$14,099$13,108$8,086 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,688 rated schools reporting
2020$7,989$16,438$14,058$8,660 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,705 rated schools reporting
2021$8,300$14,988$14,797$9,038 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,721 rated schools reporting
2022$10,467$14,178$15,708$10,443 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,738 rated schools reporting
2023$14,115$18,425$16,792$10,890 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,764 rated schools reporting
2024$10,338$18,904$18,125$11,733 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,793 rated schools reporting
2025$9,877$20,119$18,972$12,268 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,821 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$63,559−$2,991 vs similar economic context
Teachers
53+10.7 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
12.6−6.7 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Goodwin Frazier Elem

Beginning: 3.8%1 to 5 years: 25.1%6 to 10 years: 38%11 to 20 years: 10.3%21 to 30 years: 22.8%
  • Beginning 3.8%
  • 1 to 5 years 25.1%
  • 6 to 10 years 38%
  • 11 to 20 years 10.3%
  • 21 to 30 years 22.8%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,849 reporting for every category shown · 1,849 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.8%1 to 5 years: 24.8%6 to 10 years: 19.3%11 to 20 years: 28.8%21 to 30 years: 16.4%Over 30 years: 4.4%
  • Beginning 5.8%
  • 1 to 5 years 24.8%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.3%
  • 11 to 20 years 28.8%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.4%
  • Over 30 years 4.4%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Goodwin Frazier Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classGoodwin Frazier Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten22.318
Grade 117.718.2
Grade 223.118.4
Grade 322.918.8
Grade 41919
Grade 518.719.8

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 046902104.