Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Open-enrollment charter campus

Golden Rule Sunnyside

Golden Rule Charter School · Dallas · 102 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
69/1002025-26
Change
−26 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−10.9 ptsvs 79.9 average · 271 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
214 of 271tied with 14 others
D69

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 94 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 79.9 average for 271 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Current strength

Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average

3.4% −20 pts vs 23.4%

  • 3.4% is 20 percentage points lower than the 23.4% average among 268 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Attendance above the similar-context average

96.3% +3.5 pts vs 92.8%

  • 96.3% is 3.5 percentage points above the 92.8% average among 268 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Golden Rule Sunnyside is rated D by TEA, scoring 69 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 79.9 average for 271 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context. It is down 26 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 214th of 271 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context (tied with 14 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas charter averageGolden Rule Sunnyside 9581908369 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 94 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas charter average
2025-26D6979.9 271 reporting81.7 829 reporting
2024-25B8378.7 266 reporting81.3 797 reporting
2023-24A9076.3 258 reporting79.5 776 reporting
2022-23B8175.7 249 reporting79.6 749 reporting
2021-22A9583.7 234 reporting84.5 700 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement64 D−9.9 vs similar economic context · 271 reporting
  • School Progress72 C−8.9 vs similar economic context · 271 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps65 D−11.4 vs similar economic context · 266 reporting
  • Academic Growth52 F−20.9 vs similar economic context · 258 reporting
  • Relative Performance72 C−7.3 vs similar economic context · 267 reporting
  • Golden Rule Sunnyside
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (271 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement64D6
School Progress72C8
Closing the Gaps65D5
Academic Growth52F8
Relative Performance72C8

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 5 points below C in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (72), so Student Achievement (64) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 72.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level68%+0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 271 reporting
  • Meets grade level33%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 271 reporting
  • Masters grade level9%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 271 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level76%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 271 reporting
  • Meets grade level41%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 271 reporting
  • Masters grade level12%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 271 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level71%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 269 reporting
  • Meets grade level29%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 269 reporting
  • Masters grade level6%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 269 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level33%−38 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 252 reporting
  • Meets grade level17%−22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 252 reporting
  • Masters grade level8%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 252 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (271 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
102
Economically disadvantaged
97.1%+4.1 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
65.7%+19.9 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
4.9%−7.4 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.3%+3.5 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
3.4%−20.0 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Golden Rule Sunnyside

Hispanic: 98%White: 2%
  • Hispanic 98%
  • White 2%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 271 reporting for every category shown · 271 in full cohort

African American: 17.8%Hispanic: 76.2%White: 2.9%American Indian: 0.2%Asian: 1.5%Two or More Races: 1.3%
  • African American 17.8%
  • Hispanic 76.2%
  • White 2.9%
  • American Indian 0.2%
  • Asian 1.5%
  • Two or More Races 1.3%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
102
Economically disadvantaged students
99
Emergent bilingual students
67
Special education students
5

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
5
Students in TEA mobility denominator
59
TEA-published mobility rate
8.5%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 102 students in 2025–26, an increase of 3 (3.0%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
102

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+3

Increase · +3.0%

Change since 2021–22
+3

Increase · +3.0%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
102
Selected comparison
507.7

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 269 rated charter campuses reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Golden Rule Sunnyside
School yearStudents enrolledGolden Rule SunnysideChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 99 First available year 482.5
2022–23 90 Decrease of 9 (9.1%) 495.2
2023–24 101 Increase of 11 (12.2%) 506.4
2024–25 99 Decrease of 2 (2.0%) 507.5
2025–26 102 Increase of 3 (3.0%) 507.7

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting charter campuses in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Suppressed

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
104

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Golden Rule Sunnyside
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 84 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2021–22 99 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2022–23 100 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2023–24 105 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2024–25 104 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Golden Rule Sunnyside in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
In-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter campuses can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$5k$12k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Golden Rule Sunnyside
  • Parent district: Golden Rule Charter School
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$10,834
Selected comparison
$11,999

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 268 rated charter campuses reporting

−$1,165 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $10,834 per student for this campus, $16,120 per student for its parent district, Golden Rule Charter School, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearGolden Rule SunnysideParent district: Golden Rule Charter SchoolTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$5,499$10,324$13,054$8,725 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 158 rated charter campuses reporting
2019$6,568$10,278$13,108$8,437 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 203 rated charter campuses reporting
2020$9,018$11,017$14,058$9,087 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 211 rated charter campuses reporting
2021$9,491$12,352$14,797$9,581 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 230 rated charter campuses reporting
2022$8,204$13,274$15,708$11,530 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 243 rated charter campuses reporting
2023$11,663$14,969$16,792$11,515 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 252 rated charter campuses reporting
2024$10,125$15,824$18,125$11,429 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 259 rated charter campuses reporting
2025$10,834$16,120$18,972$11,999 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 268 rated charter campuses reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$60,905−$3,406 vs similar economic context
Teachers
9−19.8 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
11.6−6.4 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Golden Rule Sunnyside

Beginning: 11.4%1 to 5 years: 34.1%6 to 10 years: 11.4%11 to 20 years: 31.8%Over 30 years: 11.4%
  • Beginning 11.4%
  • 1 to 5 years 34.1%
  • 6 to 10 years 11.4%
  • 11 to 20 years 31.8%
  • Over 30 years 11.4%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 271 reporting for every category shown · 271 in full cohort

Beginning: 13.3%1 to 5 years: 47.3%6 to 10 years: 19.7%11 to 20 years: 14.7%21 to 30 years: 4.1%Over 30 years: 0.8%
  • Beginning 13.3%
  • 1 to 5 years 47.3%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.7%
  • 11 to 20 years 14.7%
  • 21 to 30 years 4.1%
  • Over 30 years 0.8%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Golden Rule Sunnyside in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classGolden Rule Sunnyside · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten17.921.5
Grade 11822
Grade 21222.3
Grade 31323.9
Grade 41324
Grade 51023.6

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 63 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

1 measure

  • 3of 117

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Similar size · of the 117 that report this measure

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

1 measure

  • 6of 117

    Attendance

    Similar size · of the 117 that report this measure · tied with 1

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 057835101.