Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Gloria Marshall Elem

Harris County · Region 04: Houston · 878 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
71/1002025-26
Change
−17 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−7.7 ptsvs 78.7 average · 2,084 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,607 of 2,084tied with 41 others
C71

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 87 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 78.7 average for 2,084 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Read the full rating context and placement

Gloria Marshall Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 71 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 78.7 average for 2,084 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 17 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 1,607th of 2,084 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 41 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
9080706050 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageGloria Marshall Elem 8862697471 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 87 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26C7178.7 2,084 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25C7478.3 2,067 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24D6976.2 2,055 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23D6276.7 2,029 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22B8881.8 2,013 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement58 F−16.8 vs similar economic context · 1,949 reporting
  • School Progress71 C−8.8 vs similar economic context · 1,943 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps72 C−3.9 vs similar economic context · 1,928 reporting
  • Academic Growth71 C−1.8 vs similar economic context · 1,882 reporting
  • Relative Performance58 F−20.2 vs similar economic context · 1,943 reporting
  • Gloria Marshall Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,084 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement58F2
School Progress71C9
Closing the Gaps72C8
Academic Growth71C9
Relative Performance58F2

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 8 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (71), so Student Achievement (58) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 71.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level56%−15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,949 reporting
  • Meets grade level31%−14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,949 reporting
  • Masters grade level12%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,949 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level61%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,946 reporting
  • Meets grade level36%−14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,946 reporting
  • Masters grade level14%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,946 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level57%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,938 reporting
  • Meets grade level33%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,938 reporting
  • Masters grade level12%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,938 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level37%−33 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,794 reporting
  • Meets grade level13%−28 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,794 reporting
  • Masters grade level5%−13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,794 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,084 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
878
Economically disadvantaged
73.8%+0.1 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
26.0%+3.1 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
14.1%−4.7 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.4%+0.7 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
18.8%+0.1 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Gloria Marshall Elem

African American: 43.2%Hispanic: 45.7%White: 4.3%American Indian: 0.1%Asian: 1.6%Pacific Islander: 0.3%Two or More Races: 4.8%
  • African American 43.2%
  • Hispanic 45.7%
  • White 4.3%
  • American Indian 0.1%
  • Asian 1.6%
  • Pacific Islander 0.3%
  • Two or More Races 4.8%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,084 reporting for every category shown · 2,084 in full cohort

African American: 12.9%Hispanic: 60.6%White: 20.9%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.9%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3.2%
  • African American 12.9%
  • Hispanic 60.6%
  • White 20.9%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.9%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.2%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
878
Economically disadvantaged students
648
Emergent bilingual students
228
Special education students
124

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
136
Students in TEA mobility denominator
747
TEA-published mobility rate
18.2%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 878 students in 2025–26, an increase of 2 (0.2%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
878

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+2

Increase · +0.2%

Change since 2021–22
+1

Increase · +0.1%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
878
Selected comparison
639.2

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,053 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Gloria Marshall Elem
School yearStudents enrolledGloria Marshall ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 877 First available year 656.4
2022–23 953 Increase of 76 (8.7%) 660.4
2023–24 874 Decrease of 79 (8.3%) 657.7
2024–25 876 Increase of 2 (0.2%) 655.4
2025–26 878 Increase of 2 (0.2%) 639.2

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
56

5.8% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
78

8.07 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
967

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
5.8%
Selected comparison
13.2%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,580 rated schools reporting

−7.4 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
8.07
Selected comparison
31.9

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,691 rated schools reporting

−23.8 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Gloria Marshall Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 822 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2021–22 1,004 30 3.0% 44 4.38 13.0% 31
2022–23 1,056 58 5.5% 144 13.64 13.6% 33.3
2023–24 996 66 6.6% 119 11.95 13.5% 33.1
2024–25 967 56 5.8% 78 8.07 13.2% 31.9
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Gloria Marshall Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 56 5.8% 78 8.07 13.2% 31.9
In-school suspensions 31 3.2% 33 3.41 11.8% 23.7
Out-of-school suspensions 34 3.5% 44 4.55 7.7% 11.8
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Gloria Marshall Elem
  • Parent district: Spring ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$8,780
Selected comparison
$13,185

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,065 rated schools reporting

−$4,405 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $8,780 per student for this campus, $18,440 per student for its parent district, Spring ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearGloria Marshall ElemParent district: Spring ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$7,239$12,612$13,054$8,051 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,942 rated schools reporting
2019$6,810$15,637$13,108$8,196 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,959 rated schools reporting
2020$7,082$15,486$14,058$8,749 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,980 rated schools reporting
2021$7,959$14,638$14,797$9,283 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,992 rated schools reporting
2022$6,967$14,042$15,708$10,567 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,012 rated schools reporting
2023$8,358$15,536$16,792$11,188 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,029 rated schools reporting
2024$9,284$17,211$18,125$12,335 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,053 rated schools reporting
2025$8,780$18,440$18,972$13,185 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,065 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$66,148−$450 vs similar economic context
Teachers
55+11.7 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
16+2.0 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Gloria Marshall Elem

Beginning: 12.2%1 to 5 years: 45.1%6 to 10 years: 18.2%11 to 20 years: 18.2%21 to 30 years: 6.2%
  • Beginning 12.2%
  • 1 to 5 years 45.1%
  • 6 to 10 years 18.2%
  • 11 to 20 years 18.2%
  • 21 to 30 years 6.2%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,084 reporting for every category shown · 2,084 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.7%1 to 5 years: 27.2%6 to 10 years: 19%11 to 20 years: 27.3%21 to 30 years: 15.3%Over 30 years: 3.8%
  • Beginning 6.7%
  • 1 to 5 years 27.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 19%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.3%
  • 21 to 30 years 15.3%
  • Over 30 years 3.8%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Gloria Marshall Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classGloria Marshall Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten2217.9
Grade 119.118.2
Grade 218.318.3
Grade 316.418.6
Grade 421.818.9
Grade 517.619.9

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 101919128.