+20.4 ptsvs 77.6 average · 2,363 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
7 of 2,363tied with 7 others
Score vs region
+15.8 ptsvs 82.2 average · 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson
Region 10: Richardson placement
6 of 1,157tied with 13 others
Score vs county
+20.4 ptsvs 77.6 average · 62 rated schools in Kaufman County
Kaufman County placement
1 of 62among reporting schools
Score vs similar-size group
+13.3 ptsvs 84.7 average · 27 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
2 of 27among reporting schools
Score vs state
+16.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
35 of 7,646tied with 46 others
A98
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 97 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 77.6 average for 2,363 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 82.2 average for 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson.The current score is above the 77.6 average for 62 rated schools in Kaufman County.The current score is above the 84.7 average for 27 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Current strength
Student Achievement above the similar-context average
98+27.5 pts vs 70.5
98 is 27.5 points above
the 70.5 average among 2,200 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Tied for 1st of 2,200 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure; 10 schools share that value.
100%Tied for 1st of 15 schools in Region 10: Richardson (alternative-education accountability only) reporting this measure · 2025-26 · 2 share this value
100%Tied for 1st of 15 schools in Region 10: Richardson (alternative-education accountability only) reporting this measure · 2025-26 · 2 share this value
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Gary W Campbell HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 98 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.6 average for 2,363 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 10 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 7th of 2,363 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 7 others).
Gary W Campbell HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 98 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.2 average for 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson. It is up 10 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 6th of 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson (tied with 13 others).
Gary W Campbell HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 98 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.6 average for 62 rated schools in Kaufman County. It is up 10 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1st of 62 rated schools in Kaufman County.
Gary W Campbell HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 98 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 84.7 average for 27 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 10 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 2nd of 27 similarly sized rated schools.
Gary W Campbell HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 98 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 10 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 97 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement98 A+27.5 vs similar economic context · 2,200 reporting
School Progress—Not reported · similar economic context 78.7 · 2,195 reporting
Closing the Gaps—Not reported · similar economic context 74.9 · 2,181 reporting
Approaches grade level100%+38 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 732 reporting
Meets grade level88%+54 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 732 reporting
Masters grade level13%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 732 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,363 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Completion
Four-Year
100.0%+32.2 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 54 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
100.0%+27.7 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 54 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
100.0%+26.9 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 54 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−5.8 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 54 rated schools reporting
These measures use TEA's alternative-education accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
College, career and military readiness
Total credit for CCMR criteria
97.0%+13.6 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
Criterion
This school% of graduates
Averagesimilar economic context
Differencepercentage points
Reportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria
97.0%
83.4%
+13.6
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 297 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
95.5%
56.4%
+39.1
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 298 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
1.1%
20.5%
−19.4
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 298 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
1.1%
13.2%
−12.1
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 298 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
0.0%
26.7%
−26.7
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 298 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification
15.7%
33.7%
−18.0
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 298 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate
0.0%
2.9%
−2.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 298 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree
0.0%
6.8%
−6.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 298 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit
0.0%
6.5%
−6.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 298 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness
0.0%
2.6%
−2.6
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 298 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student
6.7%
7.3%
−0.6
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 298 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces
3.4%
2.7%
+0.7
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 298 rated schools reporting
Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of
meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this
school minus the average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate,
counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that
criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
After high school: the following fall
Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.
Graduates in the report
61
Class of 2023–24
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
7
11.5% of graduates
Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
53
86.9% of graduates
Not trackable
1
Fall 2024
Graduates in the report
This school
61
Selected comparison
265.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 275 rated schools reporting
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
This school
7
Selected comparison
102.1
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 275 rated schools reporting
Texas-public enrollment rate
This school
11.5%
Selected comparison
37.1%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 275 rated schools reporting
−25.6 pts vs similar economic context
Not-found rate
This school
86.9%
Selected comparison
55.1%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 275 rated schools reporting
+31.8 pts vs similar economic context
Not-trackable rate
This school
1.6%
Selected comparison
7.8%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 275 rated schools reporting
−6.2 pts vs similar economic context
Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.
Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.
“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.
“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
19
Economically disadvantaged
89.5%±0.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
26.3%−12.6 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
36.8%+18.8 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
91.9%−1.1 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
31.0%+8.2 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Gary W Campbell HS
Hispanic 68.4%
White 26.3%
Two or More Races 5.3%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,363 reporting for every category shown · 2,363 in full cohort
African American 14.6%
Hispanic 75.4%
White 6.6%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.3%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 1.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 10: Richardson · 1,157 reporting for every category shown · 1,157 in full cohort
African American 17.4%
Hispanic 43.5%
White 24.5%
American Indian 0.6%
Asian 9.9%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4%
Selected comparison averageFor Kaufman County · 62 reporting for every category shown · 62 in full cohort
African American 24.7%
Hispanic 39.8%
White 29.6%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.3%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 27 reporting for every category shown · 27 in full cohort
African American 6.9%
Hispanic 55.8%
White 33%
Asian 1.1%
Two or More Races 3.2%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
19
Economically disadvantaged students
17
Emergent bilingual students
5
Special education students
7
TEA context labels
Alternative education campus under AEA procedures
Alternative education type: dropout recovery school
Rated under AEA procedures
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
103
Students in TEA mobility denominator
104
TEA-published mobility rate
99%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 19 students in 2025–26, an increase of 6 (46.2%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
19
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+6
Increase · +46.2%
Change since 2021–22
−4
Decrease · −17.4%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
19
Selected comparison
582.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,339 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Gary W Campbell HS
School year
Students enrolledGary W Campbell HS
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
23
First available year
624.2
2022–23
27
Increase of 4 (17.4%)
619.9
2023–24
22
Decrease of 5 (18.5%)
611
2024–25
13
Decrease of 9 (40.9%)
605
2025–26
19
Increase of 6 (46.2%)
582.5
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
Suppressed
Rate not available
Cumulative year-end enrollment
98
2024–25
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Gary W Campbell HS
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
54
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2021–22
50
Suppressed
—
12
24.00
—
30.7
2022–23
56
Suppressed
—
14
25.00
—
33.4
2023–24
75
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2024–25
98
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Gary W Campbell HS in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
In-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Gary W Campbell HS
Parent district: Kaufman ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$93,416
Selected comparison
$13,026
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,350 rated schools reporting
+$80,390 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $93,416 per student for this campus, $15,525 per student for its parent district, Kaufman ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Gary W Campbell HS
Parent district: Kaufman ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$23,375
$13,033
$13,054
$8,280
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,235 rated schools reporting
2019
$29,854
$10,781
$13,108
$8,307
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,266 rated schools reporting
2020
$38,439
$11,518
$14,058
$8,823
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,274 rated schools reporting
2021
$31,519
$11,996
$14,797
$9,611
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,278 rated schools reporting
2022
$44,060
$13,095
$15,708
$11,122
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,297 rated schools reporting
2023
$44,660
$13,715
$16,792
$11,692
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,323 rated schools reporting
2024
$62,454
$14,263
$18,125
$12,524
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,336 rated schools reporting
2025
$93,416
$15,525
$18,972
$13,026
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,350 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$70,874+$2,786 vs similar economic context
Teachers
6−34.3 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
3−11.5 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Gary W Campbell HS
1 to 5 years 15.6%
6 to 10 years 15.6%
11 to 20 years 45.3%
21 to 30 years 15.6%
Over 30 years 9.4%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,363 reporting for every category shown · 2,363 in full cohort
Beginning 7.5%
1 to 5 years 27.4%
6 to 10 years 18.9%
11 to 20 years 27%
21 to 30 years 15%
Over 30 years 3.5%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 10: Richardson · 1,157 reporting for every category shown · 1,157 in full cohort
Beginning 6.9%
1 to 5 years 29%
6 to 10 years 20.1%
11 to 20 years 27.5%
21 to 30 years 13.7%
Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Kaufman County · 62 reporting for every category shown · 62 in full cohort
Beginning 8.2%
1 to 5 years 34%
6 to 10 years 18.6%
11 to 20 years 21.9%
21 to 30 years 14.8%
Over 30 years 2.5%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 27 reporting for every category shown · 27 in full cohort
Beginning 2.8%
1 to 5 years 16.3%
6 to 10 years 12.3%
11 to 20 years 21.2%
21 to 30 years 16.9%
Over 30 years 8.2%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Gary W Campbell HS in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classGary W Campbell HS · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary math
45
16.7
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 1 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 146 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
10 measures
1of 2,200
Student Achievement
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,200 that report this measure · tied with 9
1of 732
Social Studies — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 732 that report this measure · tied with 14
1of 62
Overall score
Kaufman County · of the 62 that report this measure
1of 61
Per-student spending
Kaufman County · of the 61 that report this measure
1of 24
Social Studies — Meets
Kaufman County · of the 24 that report this measure
1of 20
Reading — Meets
Similar size · of the 20 that report this measure
1of 19
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
Similar size · of the 19 that report this measure
1of 18
College, career or military ready
Similar size · of the 18 that report this measure
1of 15
Four-Year Completion Rate
Region 10: Richardson (alternative-education accountability only) · of the 15 that report this measure · tied with 1
1of 15
Five-Year Completion Rate
Region 10: Richardson (alternative-education accountability only) · of the 15 that report this measure · tied with 1
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
3 measures
2of 59
All Subjects — Approaches
Kaufman County · of the 59 that report this measure
2of 59
All Subjects — Meets
Kaufman County · of the 59 that report this measure · tied with 1
2of 59
Reading — Approaches
Kaufman County · of the 59 that report this measure · tied with 1
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
8 measures
4of 17
Social Studies — Masters
Similar size · of the 17 that report this measure · tied with 1
4of 13
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces
Kaufman County · of the 13 that report this measure
5of 19
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
Similar size · of the 19 that report this measure
6of 19
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student
Similar size · of the 19 that report this measure
7of 22
Attendance
Similar size · of the 22 that report this measure
8of 22
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Similar size · of the 22 that report this measure
8of 19
Earned an industry-based certification
Similar size · of the 19 that report this measure
10of 23
All Subjects — Masters
Similar size · of the 23 that report this measure · tied with 2
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 129903003.