+5.1 ptsvs 79.9 average · 1,999 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
635 of 1,999tied with 76 others
Score vs region
+5.0 ptsvs 80 average · 352 rated schools in Region 07: Kilgore
Region 07: Kilgore placement
124 of 352tied with 13 others
Score vs county
+4.6 ptsvs 80.4 average · 24 rated schools in Nacogdoches County
Nacogdoches County placement
11 of 24among reporting schools
Score vs similar-size group
+3.5 ptsvs 81.5 average · 1,037 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
420 of 1,037tied with 40 others
Score vs state
+3.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
3,064 of 7,646tied with 260 others
B85
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 84 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 79.9 average for 1,999 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 80 average for 352 rated schools in Region 07: Kilgore.The current score is above the 80.4 average for 24 rated schools in Nacogdoches County.The current score is above the 81.5 average for 1,037 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
58%vs 48.1% avg · +9.9 pts
Masters
23%vs 19.6% avg · +3.4 pts
Among 1,894 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Garrison MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 85 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 79.9 average for 1,999 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 635th of 1,999 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 76 others).
Garrison MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 85 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80 average for 352 rated schools in Region 07: Kilgore. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 124th of 352 rated schools in Region 07: Kilgore (tied with 13 others).
Garrison MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 85 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.4 average for 24 rated schools in Nacogdoches County. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 11th of 24 rated schools in Nacogdoches County.
Garrison MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 85 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.5 average for 1,037 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 420th of 1,037 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 40 others).
Garrison MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 85 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Official state and federal designations can carry support, reporting requirements or a family transfer option that a single A–F rating does not explain.
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,999 rated schools reporting
Schools on the PEG list
This school
Not listed
Selected comparison
2.8%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,999 rated schools reporting
Selected comparison percentages are the share of reporting schools in that group found on each dated list. They are neutral prevalence context; changing the comparison never changes this school's official status.
These are dated TEA statuses, fetched 24 August 2026; they are not added to or subtracted from this site's rating.
5 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 84 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement85 B+7.1 vs similar economic context · 1,894 reporting
School Progress90 A+9.2 vs similar economic context · 1,886 reporting
Closing the Gaps72 C−5.2 vs similar economic context · 1,867 reporting
Academic Growth72 C−1.9 vs similar economic context · 1,829 reporting
Relative Performance90 A+10.9 vs similar economic context · 1,886 reporting
Garrison MS
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,999 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
85
B
5
School Progress
90
A
—
Closing the Gaps
72
C
8
Academic Growth
72
C
8
Relative Performance
90
A
—
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 8 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (90), so
Student Achievement (85) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 90.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level84%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,894 reporting
Meets grade level58%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,894 reporting
Masters grade level23%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,894 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level85%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,890 reporting
Meets grade level65%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,890 reporting
Masters grade level24%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,890 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level85%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,881 reporting
Meets grade level54%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,881 reporting
Masters grade level18%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,881 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level88%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,734 reporting
Meets grade level67%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,734 reporting
Masters grade level42%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,734 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level75%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 938 reporting
Meets grade level39%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 938 reporting
Masters grade level19%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 938 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,999 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
176
Economically disadvantaged
64.2%−0.2 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
1.1%−16.5 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
12.5%−6.4 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.5%+1.4 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
10.6%−6.0 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Garrison MS
African American 12.5%
Hispanic 13.6%
White 69.9%
Asian 0.6%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,999 reporting for every category shown · 1,999 in full cohort
African American 11.1%
Hispanic 51.3%
White 31.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.2%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 07: Kilgore · 352 reporting for every category shown · 352 in full cohort
African American 13.6%
Hispanic 28.4%
White 52.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 0.8%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Nacogdoches County · 24 reporting for every category shown · 24 in full cohort
African American 16.3%
Hispanic 30.6%
White 48.1%
American Indian 0.1%
Asian 0.9%
Two or More Races 4%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 1,037 reporting for every category shown · 1,037 in full cohort
African American 7.4%
Hispanic 45.5%
White 42.6%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.1%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.1%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
176
Economically disadvantaged students
113
Emergent bilingual students
2
Special education students
22
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
22
Students in TEA mobility denominator
181
TEA-published mobility rate
12.2%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
25
13.8% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
53
29.28 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
181
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
13.8%
Selected comparison
12.9%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,535 rated schools reporting
+0.9 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
29.28
Selected comparison
30.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,653 rated schools reporting
−1.0 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Garrison MS
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
169
29
17.2%
71
42.01
9.7%
19.4
2021–22
175
42
24.0%
89
50.86
12.8%
29.9
2022–23
194
36
18.6%
62
31.96
13.4%
32.1
2023–24
192
45
23.4%
96
50.00
13.1%
31.8
2024–25
181
25
13.8%
53
29.28
12.9%
30.3
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Garrison MS in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
25
13.8%
53
29.28
12.9%
30.3
In-school suspensions
23
12.7%
38
20.99
11.6%
23.1
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
13
7.18
—
10.6
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Garrison MS
Parent district: Garrison ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$7,526
Selected comparison
$12,661
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,971 rated schools reporting
−$5,135 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $7,526 per student for this campus, $18,181 per student for its parent district, Garrison ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Garrison MS
Parent district: Garrison ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$4,609
$12,181
$13,054
$7,917
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,828 rated schools reporting
2019
$4,485
$12,255
$13,108
$8,075
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,844 rated schools reporting
2020
$4,888
$12,715
$14,058
$8,660
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,866 rated schools reporting
2021
$5,962
$11,949
$14,797
$9,093
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,878 rated schools reporting
2022
$5,606
$18,482
$15,708
$10,413
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,899 rated schools reporting
2023
$5,224
$26,456
$16,792
$11,142
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,922 rated schools reporting
2024
$6,546
$19,049
$18,125
$12,061
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,951 rated schools reporting
2025
$7,526
$18,181
$18,972
$12,661
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,971 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$62,359−$4,011 vs similar economic context
Teachers
12−30.5 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.9+1.0 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Garrison MS
Beginning 11%
1 to 5 years 7.6%
6 to 10 years 9.3%
11 to 20 years 36.4%
21 to 30 years 27.1%
Over 30 years 8.5%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,999 reporting for every category shown · 1,999 in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 26.3%
6 to 10 years 19.1%
11 to 20 years 28%
21 to 30 years 15.8%
Over 30 years 4.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 07: Kilgore · 352 reporting for every category shown · 352 in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 24.6%
6 to 10 years 17.7%
11 to 20 years 28%
21 to 30 years 17.3%
Over 30 years 6%
Selected comparison averageFor Nacogdoches County · 24 reporting for every category shown · 24 in full cohort
Beginning 7%
1 to 5 years 25.2%
6 to 10 years 17.9%
11 to 20 years 26.1%
21 to 30 years 17.6%
Over 30 years 6.3%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 1,037 reporting for every category shown · 1,037 in full cohort
Beginning 6.8%
1 to 5 years 23.4%
6 to 10 years 17.4%
11 to 20 years 28.2%
21 to 30 years 17.7%
Over 30 years 5.8%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Garrison MS in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classGarrison MS · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 6
19.9
17.7
Secondary English
17.6
15.1
Secondary math
16.6
15.9
Secondary science
17.4
17.3
Secondary social studies
17.3
17.2
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
1 measure
2of 23
Science — Masters
Nacogdoches County · of the 23 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
16 measures
5of 23
School Progress
Nacogdoches County · of the 23 that report this measure · tied with 2
6of 23
All Subjects — Masters
Nacogdoches County · of the 23 that report this measure · tied with 1
6of 23
Reading — Approaches
Nacogdoches County · of the 23 that report this measure · tied with 1
6of 23
Math — Approaches
Nacogdoches County · of the 23 that report this measure
6of 23
Math — Meets
Nacogdoches County · of the 23 that report this measure · tied with 2
6of 23
Science — Meets
Nacogdoches County · of the 23 that report this measure
7of 23
Reading — Masters
Nacogdoches County · of the 23 that report this measure · tied with 1
7of 23
Math — Masters
Nacogdoches County · of the 23 that report this measure
7of 14
Social Studies — Masters
Nacogdoches County · of the 14 that report this measure
8of 23
All Subjects — Approaches
Nacogdoches County · of the 23 that report this measure · tied with 1
8of 23
All Subjects — Meets
Nacogdoches County · of the 23 that report this measure · tied with 1
9of 22
Academic Growth
Nacogdoches County · of the 22 that report this measure
9of 14
Social Studies — Meets
Nacogdoches County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1
10of 23
Science — Approaches
Nacogdoches County · of the 23 that report this measure
10of 23
Attendance
Nacogdoches County · of the 23 that report this measure · tied with 2
10of 14
Social Studies — Approaches
Nacogdoches County · of the 14 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 174903041.