Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Garcia YMLA

Travis County · Region 13: Austin · 243 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
85/1002025-26
Change
+4 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+7.2 ptsvs 77.8 average · 1,522 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
421 of 1,522tied with 53 others
B85

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 79 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 77.8 average for 1,522 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent movement

Overall score rose 14 points

71 to 85 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 85 is 7.2 points above the 77.8 average among 1,522 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Recent domain gain

Closing the Gaps rose 16 points

74 to 90 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 90 is 14.9 points above the 75.1 average among 1,402 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

STAAR result

Science above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
54%vs 33.4% avg · +20.6 pts
Masters
19%vs 13.7% avg · +5.3 pts

Among 1,337 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Garcia YMLA is rated B by TEA, scoring 85 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.8 average for 1,522 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 4 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 421st of 1,522 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 53 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
9080706050 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageGarcia YMLA 8162627185 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated C with 79 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8577.8 1,522 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25C7177.4 1,505 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24D6273.9 1,491 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23D6273.1 1,487 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22B8182.0 1,473 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement71 C+0.9 vs similar economic context · 1,414 reporting
  • School Progress83 B+4.1 vs similar economic context · 1,411 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps90 A+14.9 vs similar economic context · 1,402 reporting
  • Academic Growth83 B+9.5 vs similar economic context · 1,391 reporting
  • Relative Performance82 B+5.2 vs similar economic context · 1,410 reporting
  • Garcia YMLA
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,522 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement71C9
School Progress83B7
Closing the Gaps90A—
Academic Growth83B7
Relative Performance82B8

Closest to moving up: School Progress, 7 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (83), so Student Achievement (71) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 83.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level66%−0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,414 reporting
  • Meets grade level37%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,414 reporting
  • Masters grade level14%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,414 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level70%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,414 reporting
  • Meets grade level39%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,414 reporting
  • Masters grade level16%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,414 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level64%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,411 reporting
  • Meets grade level35%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,411 reporting
  • Masters grade level10%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,411 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level80%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,337 reporting
  • Meets grade level54%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,337 reporting
  • Masters grade level19%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,337 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level51%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 433 reporting
  • Meets grade level22%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 433 reporting
  • Masters grade level12%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 433 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,522 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
243
Economically disadvantaged
97.5%+4.2 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
63.8%+20.4 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
32.5%+15.3 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.2%+2.3 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
12.4%−11.2 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Garcia YMLA

African American: 11.5%Hispanic: 82.3%White: 2.5%American Indian: 0.4%Asian: 2.5%Pacific Islander: 0.4%Two or More Races: 0.4%
  • African American 11.5%
  • Hispanic 82.3%
  • White 2.5%
  • American Indian 0.4%
  • Asian 2.5%
  • Pacific Islander 0.4%
  • Two or More Races 0.4%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,522 reporting for every category shown · 1,522 in full cohort

African American: 15%Hispanic: 77.7%White: 4.4%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.2%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 1.4%
  • African American 15%
  • Hispanic 77.7%
  • White 4.4%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.2%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 1.4%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
243
Economically disadvantaged students
237
Emergent bilingual students
155
Special education students
79

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
27
Students in TEA mobility denominator
268
TEA-published mobility rate
10.1%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 243 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 12 (4.7%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
243

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−12

Decrease · −4.7%

Change since 2021–22
−29

Decrease · −10.7%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
243
Selected comparison
550.4

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,504 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Garcia YMLA
School yearStudents enrolledGarcia YMLAChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 272 First available year 600.8
2022–23 257 Decrease of 15 (5.5%) 596.3
2023–24 253 Decrease of 4 (1.6%) 586.1
2024–25 255 Increase of 2 (0.8%) 578
2025–26 243 Decrease of 12 (4.7%) 550.4

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
29

11.1% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
41

15.65 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
262

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
11.1%
Selected comparison
13.2%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 853 rated schools reporting

−2.1 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
15.65
Selected comparison
31.2

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 925 rated schools reporting

−15.5 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Garcia YMLA
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 350 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2021–22 291 60 20.6% 111 38.14 12.8% 30.1
2022–23 264 36 13.6% 55 20.83 13.7% 32.7
2023–24 258 40 15.5% 55 21.32 13.8% 33.1
2024–25 262 29 11.1% 41 15.65 13.2% 31.2
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Garcia YMLA in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 29 11.1% 41 15.65 13.2% 31.2
In-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Out-of-school suspensions 26 9.9% 36 13.74 9.8% 16.3
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$18k$28k20182020202220242025
  • Garcia YMLA
  • Parent district: Austin ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$19,239
Selected comparison
$13,513

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,504 rated schools reporting

+$5,726 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $19,239 per student for this campus, $26,839 per student for its parent district, Austin ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearGarcia YMLAParent district: Austin ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$12,939$13,757$13,054$8,395 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,440 rated schools reporting
2019$12,173$14,067$13,108$8,370 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,455 rated schools reporting
2020$12,533$16,747$14,058$8,879 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,458 rated schools reporting
2021$14,624$18,042$14,797$9,768 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,460 rated schools reporting
2022$16,589$18,220$15,708$11,249 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,473 rated schools reporting
2023$14,499$16,721$16,792$11,780 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,487 rated schools reporting
2024$18,522$19,064$18,125$12,854 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,494 rated schools reporting
2025$19,239$26,839$18,972$13,513 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,504 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$66,110−$2,613 vs similar economic context
Teachers
28−10.8 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
8.7−6.1 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Garcia YMLA

Beginning: 3.6%1 to 5 years: 46.4%6 to 10 years: 10.7%11 to 20 years: 28.6%21 to 30 years: 10.7%
  • Beginning 3.6%
  • 1 to 5 years 46.4%
  • 6 to 10 years 10.7%
  • 11 to 20 years 28.6%
  • 21 to 30 years 10.7%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,522 reporting for every category shown · 1,522 in full cohort

Beginning: 7.7%1 to 5 years: 27%6 to 10 years: 18.5%11 to 20 years: 27.1%21 to 30 years: 14.9%Over 30 years: 3.4%
  • Beginning 7.7%
  • 1 to 5 years 27%
  • 6 to 10 years 18.5%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.1%
  • 21 to 30 years 14.9%
  • Over 30 years 3.4%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Garcia YMLA in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classGarcia YMLA · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 612.517.1
Secondary English13.315.1
Secondary languages other than English28.518
Secondary math14.116.8
Secondary science6.917.6
Secondary social studies6.817.5

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 227901064.