Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Ganado JH

Jackson County · Region 03: Victoria · 171 students

Current score
76/1002025-26
Change
+4 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−5.8 ptsvs 81.8 average · 1,733 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,263 of 1,733tied with 53 others
C76

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 71 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 81.8 average for 1,733 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Current strength

Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average

13.1% −1.6 pts vs 14.7%

  • 13.1% is 1.6 percentage points lower than the 14.7% average among 1,682 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Ganado JH is rated C by TEA, scoring 76 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.8 average for 1,733 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 4 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 1,263rd of 1,733 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 53 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. Official improvement and transfer notices
  3. 5 years of ratings
  4. Where the score comes from
  5. Student outcomes
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this school ranks best
  13. Where this comes from

Official improvement and transfer notices

Official state and federal designations can carry support, reporting requirements or a family transfer option that a single A–F rating does not explain.

Schools identified for improvement

This school
Listed
Selected comparison
20.2%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,733 rated schools reporting

Schools on the PEG list

This school
Not listed
Selected comparison
1.1%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,733 rated schools reporting

Selected comparison percentages are the share of reporting schools in that group found on each dated list. They are neutral prevalence context; changing the comparison never changes this school's official status.

These are dated TEA statuses, fetched 24 August 2026; they are not added to or subtracted from this site's rating.

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageGanado JH 7275706876 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated C with 71 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26C7681.8 1,733 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25D6881.9 1,709 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24C7079.9 1,685 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23C7580.6 1,661 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22C7283.2 1,639 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement77 C−4.3 vs similar economic context · 1,671 reporting
  • School Progress75 C−6.4 vs similar economic context · 1,665 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps75 C−4.0 vs similar economic context · 1,650 reporting
  • Academic Growth75 C−0.5 vs similar economic context · 1,628 reporting
  • Relative Performance75 C−4.3 vs similar economic context · 1,665 reporting
  • Ganado JH
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,733 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement77C3
School Progress75C5
Closing the Gaps75C5
Academic Growth75C5
Relative Performance75C5

Closest to moving up: Student Achievement, 3 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (77), so School Progress (75) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 77.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level71%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,671 reporting
  • Meets grade level46%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,671 reporting
  • Masters grade level21%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,671 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level74%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,669 reporting
  • Meets grade level54%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,669 reporting
  • Masters grade level26%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,669 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level68%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,663 reporting
  • Meets grade level40%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,663 reporting
  • Masters grade level19%+0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,663 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level76%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,543 reporting
  • Meets grade level52%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,543 reporting
  • Masters grade level26%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,543 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level64%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 874 reporting
  • Meets grade level32%−17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 874 reporting
  • Masters grade level10%−13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 874 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,733 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
171
Economically disadvantaged
51.5%−0.6 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
12.9%−0.5 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
9.4%−9.4 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.1%+0.6 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
13.1%−1.6 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Ganado JH

African American: 1.2%Hispanic: 63.2%White: 35.7%
  • African American 1.2%
  • Hispanic 63.2%
  • White 35.7%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,733 reporting for every category shown · 1,733 in full cohort

African American: 9.6%Hispanic: 41.9%White: 40.9%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2.9%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4.2%
  • African American 9.6%
  • Hispanic 41.9%
  • White 40.9%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2.9%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4.2%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
171
Economically disadvantaged students
88
Emergent bilingual students
22
Special education students
16

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
10
Students in TEA mobility denominator
176
TEA-published mobility rate
5.7%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 171 students in 2025–26, an increase of 1 (0.6%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
171

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+1

Increase · +0.6%

Change since 2021–22
−1

Decrease · −0.6%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
171
Selected comparison
646.2

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,692 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Ganado JH
School yearStudents enrolledGanado JHChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 172 First available year 649
2022–23 164 Decrease of 8 (4.7%) 654.1
2023–24 152 Decrease of 12 (7.3%) 654.4
2024–25 170 Increase of 18 (11.8%) 650.1
2025–26 171 Increase of 1 (0.6%) 646.2

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
36

20.4% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
77

43.75 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
176

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
20.4%
Selected comparison
12.3%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,345 rated schools reporting

+8.1 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
43.75
Selected comparison
27.5

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,446 rated schools reporting

+16.3 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Ganado JH
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 180 55 30.6% 133 73.89 9.7% 18.8
2021–22 177 45 25.4% 139 78.53 12.1% 27
2022–23 175 23 13.1% 45 25.71 12.7% 29
2023–24 163 39 23.9% 77 47.24 12.6% 29.2
2024–25 176 36 20.4% 77 43.75 12.3% 27.5
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Ganado JH in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 36 20.4% 77 43.75 12.3% 27.5
In-school suspensions 29 16.5% 46 26.14 11.0% 21.2
Out-of-school suspensions 12 6.8% 19 10.80 6.2% 8.8
DAEP placements 10 5.7% 11 6.25 4.6% 5.4
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$5k$17k$29k20182020202220242025
  • Ganado JH
  • Parent district: Ganado ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$6,534
Selected comparison
$12,178

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,707 rated schools reporting

−$5,644 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $6,534 per student for this campus, $20,760 per student for its parent district, Ganado ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearGanado JHParent district: Ganado ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$5,787$27,542$13,054$7,852 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,584 rated schools reporting
2019$6,090$25,388$13,108$8,040 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,600 rated schools reporting
2020$7,268$14,516$14,058$8,570 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,614 rated schools reporting
2021$7,281$13,870$14,797$8,975 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,631 rated schools reporting
2022$6,658$14,196$15,708$10,274 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,641 rated schools reporting
2023$7,262$18,174$16,792$10,748 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,660 rated schools reporting
2024$8,241$17,880$18,125$11,655 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,683 rated schools reporting
2025$6,534$20,760$18,972$12,178 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,707 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$58,337−$8,469 vs similar economic context
Teachers
11−31.7 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
15.9−3.8 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Ganado JH

Beginning: 5.6%1 to 5 years: 31.5%6 to 10 years: 27.8%11 to 20 years: 30.6%21 to 30 years: 4.6%
  • Beginning 5.6%
  • 1 to 5 years 31.5%
  • 6 to 10 years 27.8%
  • 11 to 20 years 30.6%
  • 21 to 30 years 4.6%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,733 reporting for every category shown · 1,733 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.7%1 to 5 years: 24.6%6 to 10 years: 19.2%11 to 20 years: 29.2%21 to 30 years: 16.6%Over 30 years: 4.3%
  • Beginning 5.7%
  • 1 to 5 years 24.6%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.2%
  • 11 to 20 years 29.2%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.6%
  • Over 30 years 4.3%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Ganado JH in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classGanado JH · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 62217.7
Secondary English18.315
Secondary math18.315.9
Secondary science23.617.4
Secondary social studies15.717.4

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 117 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

19 measures

  • 4of 10

    Science — Masters

    Jackson County · of the 10 that report this measure

  • 5of 10

    Science — Meets

    Jackson County · of the 10 that report this measure

  • 6of 12

    Reading — Masters

    Jackson County · of the 12 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 6of 10

    Science — Approaches

    Jackson County · of the 10 that report this measure

  • 7of 12

    All Subjects — Masters

    Jackson County · of the 12 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 8of 12

    Reading — Meets

    Jackson County · of the 12 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 8of 11

    Closing the Gaps

    Jackson County · of the 11 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 8of 11

    Relative Performance

    Jackson County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 8of 10

    Academic Growth

    Jackson County · of the 10 that report this measure

  • 9of 12

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Jackson County · of the 12 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 9of 12

    All Subjects — Meets

    Jackson County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 9of 11

    School Progress

    Jackson County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 9of 11

    Math — Masters

    Jackson County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 10of 12

    Student Achievement

    Jackson County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 10of 12

    Reading — Approaches

    Jackson County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 10of 12

    Attendance

    Jackson County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 10of 12

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Jackson County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 10of 11

    Math — Approaches

    Jackson County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 10of 11

    Math — Meets

    Jackson County · of the 11 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 120902041.