Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Galena Park ISD Career & Technical ECHS

Harris County · Region 04: Houston · 472 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
99/1002025-26
Change
+4 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+21.6 ptsvs 77.4 average · 2,378 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1 of 2,378tied with 7 others
A99

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 97 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 77.4 average for 2,378 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent movement

Overall score rose 2 points

97 to 99 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 99 is 21.6 points above the 77.4 average among 2,378 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
  • Tied for 1st of 2,378 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure; 8 schools share that value.
See the full measure

Recent domain gain

Academic Growth rose 4 points

80 to 84 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 84 is 11.6 points above the 72.4 average among 2,169 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Closing the Gaps above the similar-context average

100 +25.5 pts vs 74.5

  • 100 is 25.5 points above the 74.5 average among 2,197 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
  • Tied for 1st of 2,197 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure; 11 schools share that value.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Galena Park ISD Career & Technical ECHS is rated A by TEA, scoring 99 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.4 average for 2,378 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 4 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 1st of 2,378 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 7 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. After high school: the following fall
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this school ranks best
  13. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageGalena Park ISD Career & Technical ECHS 9597979799 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 97 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9977.4 2,378 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25A9777.1 2,365 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24A9773.9 2,348 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23A9774.2 2,335 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22A9581.7 2,306 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement98 A+27.1 vs similar economic context · 2,218 reporting
  • School Progress98 A+19.5 vs similar economic context · 2,211 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps100 A+25.5 vs similar economic context · 2,197 reporting
  • Academic Growth84 B+11.6 vs similar economic context · 2,169 reporting
  • Relative Performance98 A+21.3 vs similar economic context · 2,211 reporting
  • Galena Park ISD Career & Technical ECHS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,378 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement98A—
School Progress98A—
Closing the Gaps100A—
Academic Growth84B6
Relative Performance98A—

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level99%+32 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,218 reporting
  • Meets grade level88%+47 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,218 reporting
  • Masters grade level37%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,218 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level98%+29 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,217 reporting
  • Meets grade level92%+47 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,217 reporting
  • Masters grade level20%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,217 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level99%+33 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,207 reporting
  • Meets grade level73%+35 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,207 reporting
  • Masters grade level32%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,207 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level100%+36 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,066 reporting
  • Meets grade level97%+62 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,066 reporting
  • Masters grade level62%+48 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,066 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level99%+35 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 790 reporting
  • Meets grade level84%+48 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 790 reporting
  • Masters grade level51%+36 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 790 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,378 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
100.0%+9.0 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 296 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
100.0%+8.8 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 296 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
98.9%+8.3 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 297 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−1.6 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 298 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
100.0%+15.8 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria100.0%84.2%+15.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 346 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course44.2%57.0%−12.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 348 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA44.2%21.1%+23.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 348 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)3.8%12.5%−8.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 348 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course100.0%28.6%+71.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 348 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification0.0%33.9%−33.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 348 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate42.3%2.7%+39.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 348 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree37.5%7.1%+30.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 348 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%6.2%−6.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 348 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness0.0%2.9%−2.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 348 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student3.8%7.8%−4.0 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 348 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces1.0%2.8%−1.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 348 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

After high school: the following fall

Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.

Graduates in the report
114

Class of 2023–24

Enrolled in Texas public higher education
66

57.9% of graduates

Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
38

33.3% of graduates

Not trackable
10

Fall 2024

Graduates in the report

This school
114
Selected comparison
265.6

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 311 rated schools reporting

Enrolled in Texas public higher education

This school
66
Selected comparison
103.8

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 311 rated schools reporting

Texas-public enrollment rate

This school
57.9%
Selected comparison
38.3%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 311 rated schools reporting

+19.6 pts vs similar economic context

Not-found rate

This school
33.3%
Selected comparison
54.6%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 311 rated schools reporting

−21.3 pts vs similar economic context

Not-trackable rate

This school
8.8%
Selected comparison
7.2%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 311 rated schools reporting

+1.6 pts vs similar economic context

Most common named Texas public destinations

  1. SAN JACINTO COLLEGE (029137)38
  2. U. OF HOUSTON-DOWNTOWN (012826)5

Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.

Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.

“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.

“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
472
Economically disadvantaged
86.2%−0.6 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
14.8%−21.1 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
3.8%−14.5 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.0%+2.9 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
10.5%−11.7 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Galena Park ISD Career & Technical ECHS

African American: 4.2%Hispanic: 91.3%White: 3.4%Asian: 0.6%Two or More Races: 0.4%
  • African American 4.2%
  • Hispanic 91.3%
  • White 3.4%
  • Asian 0.6%
  • Two or More Races 0.4%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,378 reporting for every category shown · 2,378 in full cohort

African American: 14.2%Hispanic: 73.6%White: 8.4%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.4%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 2%
  • African American 14.2%
  • Hispanic 73.6%
  • White 8.4%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.4%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 2%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
472
Economically disadvantaged students
407
Emergent bilingual students
70
Special education students
18

Early college pathways

Early College High School
472

TEA-published share: 100%

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
58
Students in TEA mobility denominator
497
TEA-published mobility rate
11.7%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 472 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 15 (3.1%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
472

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−15

Decrease · −3.1%

Change since 2021–22
+16

Increase · +3.5%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
472
Selected comparison
605.5

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,350 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Galena Park ISD Career & Technical ECHS
School yearStudents enrolledGalena Park ISD Career & Technical ECHSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 456 First available year 640.5
2022–23 464 Increase of 8 (1.8%) 638.1
2023–24 494 Increase of 30 (6.5%) 629.9
2024–25 487 Decrease of 7 (1.4%) 626.3
2025–26 472 Decrease of 15 (3.1%) 605.5

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
16

3.4% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
30

6.40 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
469

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
3.4%
Selected comparison
13.3%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,606 rated schools reporting

−9.9 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
6.4
Selected comparison
32

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,725 rated schools reporting

−25.6 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Galena Park ISD Career & Technical ECHS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 446 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2021–22 457 20 4.4% 34 7.44 12.7% 30.4
2022–23 443 Suppressed — 11 2.48 — 33.8
2023–24 480 Suppressed — 11 2.29 — 34
2024–25 469 16 3.4% 30 6.40 13.3% 32
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Galena Park ISD Career & Technical ECHS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 16 3.4% 30 6.40 13.3% 32
In-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Out-of-school suspensions 12 2.6% 14 2.99 8.8% 14.2
DAEP placements 11 2.4% 11 2.35 5.3% 6.4
Mandatory DAEP placements 11 2.4% 11 2.35 4.0% 4.6
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$4k$12k$20k2019202120232025
  • Galena Park ISD Career & Technical ECHS
  • Parent district: Galena Park ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$5,050
Selected comparison
$13,321

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,363 rated schools reporting

−$8,271 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $5,050 per student for this campus, $16,675 per student for its parent district, Galena Park ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearGalena Park ISD Career & Technical ECHSParent district: Galena Park ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2019$4,191$14,159$13,108$8,328 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,270 rated schools reporting
2020$4,278$14,134$14,058$8,845 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,280 rated schools reporting
2021$4,410$15,211$14,797$9,558 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,286 rated schools reporting
2022$5,249$16,274$15,708$11,063 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,306 rated schools reporting
2023$5,433$18,149$16,792$11,588 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,333 rated schools reporting
2024$4,756$17,805$18,125$12,566 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,348 rated schools reporting
2025$5,050$16,675$18,972$13,321 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,363 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$74,720+$7,014 vs similar economic context
Teachers
17−25.2 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
28.2+13.8 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Galena Park ISD Career & Technical ECHS

1 to 5 years: 29.3%6 to 10 years: 24%11 to 20 years: 23.4%21 to 30 years: 24%
  • 1 to 5 years 29.3%
  • 6 to 10 years 24%
  • 11 to 20 years 23.4%
  • 21 to 30 years 24%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,378 reporting for every category shown · 2,378 in full cohort

Beginning: 7.1%1 to 5 years: 27.4%6 to 10 years: 19%11 to 20 years: 27.3%21 to 30 years: 15.1%Over 30 years: 3.5%
  • Beginning 7.1%
  • 1 to 5 years 27.4%
  • 6 to 10 years 19%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.3%
  • 21 to 30 years 15.1%
  • Over 30 years 3.5%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Galena Park ISD Career & Technical ECHS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classGalena Park ISD Career & Technical ECHS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English19.115.3
Secondary languages other than English16.518.3
Secondary math18.816.7
Secondary science2317.9
Secondary social studies2617.9

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 200 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#1 rankings

First-place results

9 measures

  • 1of 7,185

    Closing the Gaps

    Texas average · of the 7,185 that report this measure · tied with 39 · full ranking

  • 1of 3,953

    Science — Approaches

    Similar size · of the 3,953 that report this measure · tied with 63

  • 1of 2,378

    Overall score

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,378 that report this measure · tied with 7

  • 1of 2,218

    Student Achievement

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,218 that report this measure · tied with 11

  • 1of 2,211

    School Progress

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,211 that report this measure · tied with 10

  • 1of 2,211

    Relative Performance

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,211 that report this measure · tied with 10

  • 1of 2,207

    Math — Approaches

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,207 that report this measure · tied with 5

  • 1of 348

    Earned college credit for a dual credit course

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 348 that report this measure · tied with 6

  • 1of 348

    Earned a level I or level II certificate

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 348 that report this measure

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

2 measures

  • 2of 2,218

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,218 that report this measure · tied with 10

  • 3of 2,066

    Science — Meets

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,066 that report this measure · tied with 2

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

1 measure

  • 10of 2,217

    Reading — Approaches

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,217 that report this measure · tied with 8

Other top-5% rankings

High placements in larger reporting groups

11 measures

  • 11of 2,218

    All Subjects — Meets

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,218 that report this measure · tied with 3

  • 11of 2,217

    Reading — Meets

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,217 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 13of 2,066

    Science — Masters

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,066 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 18of 790

    Social Studies — Masters

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 790 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 20of 348

    Earned an associate degree

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 348 that report this measure

  • 23of 790

    Social Studies — Meets

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 790 that report this measure

  • 28of 790

    Social Studies — Approaches

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 790 that report this measure · tied with 4

  • 35of 2,218

    All Subjects — Masters

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,218 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 36of 2,207

    Math — Meets

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,207 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 73of 2,207

    Math — Masters

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,207 that report this measure · tied with 13

  • 95of 2,275

    Attendance

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,275 that report this measure · tied with 17

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 101910030.