Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Frazier Elem

Harris County · Region 04: Houston · 416 students

Current score
77/1002025-26
Change
−20 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−2.1 ptsvs 79.1 average · 2,017 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,229 of 2,017tied with 54 others
C77

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 95 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 79.1 average for 2,017 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
50%vs 46.2% avg · +3.8 pts
Masters
20%vs 18.5% avg · +1.5 pts

Among 1,899 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
45%vs 40.8% avg · +4.2 pts
Masters
22%vs 15.5% avg · +6.5 pts

Among 1,889 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Current strength

Relative Performance above the similar-context average

82 +3.5 pts vs 78.5

  • 82 is 3.5 points above the 78.5 average among 1,892 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Frazier Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 77 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 79.1 average for 2,017 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 20 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 1,229th of 2,017 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 54 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageFrazier Elem 9780918977 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 95 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26C7779.1 2,017 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8978.9 1,998 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24A9176.8 1,982 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8077.2 1,954 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22A9782.0 1,935 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement77 C+0.9 vs similar economic context · 1,899 reporting
  • School Progress82 B+1.8 vs similar economic context · 1,892 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps64 D−12.3 vs similar economic context · 1,879 reporting
  • Academic Growth65 D−8.2 vs similar economic context · 1,832 reporting
  • Relative Performance82 B+3.5 vs similar economic context · 1,892 reporting
  • Frazier Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,017 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement77C3
School Progress82B8
Closing the Gaps64D6
Academic Growth65D5
Relative Performance82B8

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 6 points below C in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (82), so Student Achievement (77) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 82.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level76%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,899 reporting
  • Meets grade level50%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,899 reporting
  • Masters grade level20%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,899 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level81%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,897 reporting
  • Meets grade level55%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,897 reporting
  • Masters grade level19%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,897 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level70%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,889 reporting
  • Meets grade level45%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,889 reporting
  • Masters grade level22%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,889 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,017 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
416
Economically disadvantaged
69.7%+0.1 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
21.6%+1.1 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
19.0%+0.2 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.5%+1.6 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
10.4%−7.2 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Frazier Elem

African American: 9.6%Hispanic: 75.5%White: 8.9%American Indian: 0.2%Asian: 3.1%Two or More Races: 2.6%
  • African American 9.6%
  • Hispanic 75.5%
  • White 8.9%
  • American Indian 0.2%
  • Asian 3.1%
  • Two or More Races 2.6%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,017 reporting for every category shown · 2,017 in full cohort

African American: 12.3%Hispanic: 56.4%White: 25.3%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3.4%
  • African American 12.3%
  • Hispanic 56.4%
  • White 25.3%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.4%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
416
Economically disadvantaged students
290
Emergent bilingual students
90
Special education students
79

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
26
Students in TEA mobility denominator
338
TEA-published mobility rate
7.7%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 416 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 23 (5.2%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
416

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−23

Decrease · −5.2%

Change since 2021–22
−8

Decrease · −1.9%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
416
Selected comparison
637.2

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,980 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Frazier Elem
School yearStudents enrolledFrazier ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 424 First available year 649.8
2022–23 456 Increase of 32 (7.5%) 657.4
2023–24 451 Decrease of 5 (1.1%) 656
2024–25 439 Decrease of 12 (2.7%) 653.1
2025–26 416 Decrease of 23 (5.2%) 637.2

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Not reported

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Not reported

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
459

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Frazier Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 464 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2021–22 456 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2022–23 476 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2023–24 470 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2024–25 459 Not reported — Not reported — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Frazier Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Not reported — Not reported — — —
In-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Frazier Elem
  • Parent district: Pasadena ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$13,835
Selected comparison
$13,200

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,997 rated schools reporting

+$635 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $13,835 per student for this campus, $18,084 per student for its parent district, Pasadena ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearFrazier ElemParent district: Pasadena ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$11,412$12,956$13,054$8,013 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,861 rated schools reporting
2019$10,898$12,390$13,108$8,167 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,878 rated schools reporting
2020$11,428$12,617$14,058$8,719 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,899 rated schools reporting
2021$11,836$13,595$14,797$9,218 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,913 rated schools reporting
2022$13,067$15,651$15,708$10,467 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,936 rated schools reporting
2023$13,037$17,367$16,792$11,143 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,956 rated schools reporting
2024$13,488$17,655$18,125$12,408 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,981 rated schools reporting
2025$13,835$18,084$18,972$13,200 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,997 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$72,144+$5,694 vs similar economic context
Teachers
36−7.0 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
11.6−2.4 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Frazier Elem

Beginning: 8.3%1 to 5 years: 25%6 to 10 years: 16.7%11 to 20 years: 38.9%21 to 30 years: 8.3%Over 30 years: 2.8%
  • Beginning 8.3%
  • 1 to 5 years 25%
  • 6 to 10 years 16.7%
  • 11 to 20 years 38.9%
  • 21 to 30 years 8.3%
  • Over 30 years 2.8%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,017 reporting for every category shown · 2,017 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.5%1 to 5 years: 26.9%6 to 10 years: 19%11 to 20 years: 27.6%21 to 30 years: 15.4%Over 30 years: 3.9%
  • Beginning 6.5%
  • 1 to 5 years 26.9%
  • 6 to 10 years 19%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.6%
  • 21 to 30 years 15.4%
  • Over 30 years 3.9%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Frazier Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classFrazier Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten14.718
Grade 11818.2
Grade 21618.3
Grade 32018.6
Grade 41918.9

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 101917127.