Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Frankston Elem

Anderson County · Region 07: Kilgore · 372 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
87/1002025-26
Change
−2 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+6.1 ptsvs 80.9 average · 1,935 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
521 of 1,935tied with 88 others
B87

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 93 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 80.9 average for 1,935 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent domain gain

Student Achievement rose 2 points

89 to 91 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 91 is 11.3 points above the 79.7 average among 1,859 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
66%vs 50.3% avg · +15.7 pts
Masters
37%vs 20.9% avg · +16.1 pts

Among 1,859 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
57%vs 44.1% avg · +12.9 pts
Masters
33%vs 17.3% avg · +15.7 pts

Among 1,847 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Frankston Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.9 average for 1,935 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 521st of 1,935 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 88 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageFrankston Elem 8986809087 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 93 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8780.9 1,935 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25A9080.8 1,907 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24B8078.9 1,884 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8679.4 1,851 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22B8982.6 1,825 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement91 A+11.3 vs similar economic context · 1,859 reporting
  • School Progress90 A+8.7 vs similar economic context · 1,852 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps79 C+0.8 vs similar economic context · 1,835 reporting
  • Academic Growth74 C−0.6 vs similar economic context · 1,799 reporting
  • Relative Performance90 A+10.5 vs similar economic context · 1,852 reporting
  • Frankston Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,935 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement91A—
School Progress90A—
Closing the Gaps79C1
Academic Growth74C6
Relative Performance90A—

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 1 point below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (91), so School Progress (90) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 91.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level84%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,859 reporting
  • Meets grade level66%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,859 reporting
  • Masters grade level37%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,859 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level88%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,856 reporting
  • Meets grade level75%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,856 reporting
  • Masters grade level42%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,856 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level79%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,847 reporting
  • Meets grade level57%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,847 reporting
  • Masters grade level33%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,847 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level85%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,705 reporting
  • Meets grade level63%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,705 reporting
  • Masters grade level35%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,705 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,935 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
372
Economically disadvantaged
58.3%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
1.9%−13.4 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
17.2%−1.6 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.8%+1.5 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
3.6%−12.0 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Frankston Elem

African American: 8.1%Hispanic: 14.8%White: 72.6%Asian: 0.3%Two or More Races: 4.3%
  • African American 8.1%
  • Hispanic 14.8%
  • White 72.6%
  • Asian 0.3%
  • Two or More Races 4.3%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,935 reporting for every category shown · 1,935 in full cohort

African American: 10.2%Hispanic: 46.8%White: 36.1%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2.4%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3.9%
  • African American 10.2%
  • Hispanic 46.8%
  • White 36.1%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2.4%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.9%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
372
Economically disadvantaged students
217
Emergent bilingual students
7
Special education students
64

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
24
Students in TEA mobility denominator
306
TEA-published mobility rate
7.8%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 372 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 9 (2.4%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
372

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−9

Decrease · −2.4%

Change since 2021–22
−1

Decrease · −0.3%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
372
Selected comparison
634.4

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,901 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Frankston Elem
School yearStudents enrolledFrankston ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 373 First available year 639.8
2022–23 373 No change 644.7
2023–24 377 Increase of 4 (1.1%) 643.4
2024–25 381 Increase of 4 (1.1%) 641
2025–26 372 Decrease of 9 (2.4%) 634.4

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
15

3.7% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
26

6.48 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
401

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
3.7%
Selected comparison
12.5%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,470 rated schools reporting

−8.8 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
6.48
Selected comparison
28.1

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,590 rated schools reporting

−21.6 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Frankston Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 382 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2021–22 358 16 4.5% 21 5.87 12.4% 28
2022–23 402 34 8.5% 65 16.17 12.9% 29.9
2023–24 415 35 8.4% 55 13.25 12.8% 29.8
2024–25 401 15 3.7% 26 6.48 12.5% 28.1
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Frankston Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 15 3.7% 26 6.48 12.5% 28.1
In-school suspensions 15 3.7% 25 6.23 11.2% 21.7
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$5k$12k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Frankston Elem
  • Parent district: Frankston ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$8,216
Selected comparison
$12,409

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,903 rated schools reporting

−$4,193 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $8,216 per student for this campus, $18,098 per student for its parent district, Frankston ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearFrankston ElemParent district: Frankston ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$5,559$10,693$13,054$7,930 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,757 rated schools reporting
2019$5,923$12,626$13,108$8,091 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,777 rated schools reporting
2020$7,408$13,211$14,058$8,693 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,796 rated schools reporting
2021$7,261$13,762$14,797$9,052 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,809 rated schools reporting
2022$7,293$15,695$15,708$10,446 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,827 rated schools reporting
2023$7,540$16,865$16,792$10,958 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,851 rated schools reporting
2024$8,068$17,807$18,125$11,800 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,880 rated schools reporting
2025$8,216$18,098$18,972$12,409 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,903 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$69,903+$3,410 vs similar economic context
Teachers
25−16.8 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.8−4.4 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Frankston Elem

1 to 5 years: 12.4%6 to 10 years: 29.1%11 to 20 years: 29.9%21 to 30 years: 21.9%Over 30 years: 7.2%
  • 1 to 5 years 12.4%
  • 6 to 10 years 29.1%
  • 11 to 20 years 29.9%
  • 21 to 30 years 21.9%
  • Over 30 years 7.2%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,935 reporting for every category shown · 1,935 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.9%1 to 5 years: 25.2%6 to 10 years: 19.3%11 to 20 years: 28.5%21 to 30 years: 16.3%Over 30 years: 4.3%
  • Beginning 5.9%
  • 1 to 5 years 25.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.3%
  • 11 to 20 years 28.5%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.3%
  • Over 30 years 4.3%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Frankston Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classFrankston Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten17.617.9
Grade 120.818.2
Grade 219.918.4
Grade 315.618.7
Grade 417.818.9
Grade 519.419.7

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#1 rankings

First-place results

2 measures

  • 1of 23

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Anderson County · of the 23 that report this measure

  • 1of 20

    Reading — Masters

    Anderson County · of the 20 that report this measure

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

2 measures

  • 2of 20

    All Subjects — Masters

    Anderson County · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 3of 20

    Math — Masters

    Anderson County · of the 20 that report this measure

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

15 measures

  • 4of 20

    School Progress

    Anderson County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 4of 20

    Relative Performance

    Anderson County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 4of 20

    Reading — Approaches

    Anderson County · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 4of 20

    Reading — Meets

    Anderson County · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 4of 20

    Math — Meets

    Anderson County · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 5of 20

    All Subjects — Meets

    Anderson County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 6of 20

    Student Achievement

    Anderson County · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 6of 20

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Anderson County · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 6of 19

    Science — Masters

    Anderson County · of the 19 that report this measure

  • 7of 24

    Overall score

    Anderson County · of the 24 that report this measure

  • 7of 19

    Science — Meets

    Anderson County · of the 19 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 9of 23

    Attendance

    Anderson County · of the 23 that report this measure

  • 10of 20

    Closing the Gaps

    Anderson County · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 10of 20

    Math — Approaches

    Anderson County · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 10of 19

    Science — Approaches

    Anderson County · of the 19 that report this measure · tied with 1

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 001904102.