Campus · Traditional
Frank Stone MS
Lamar County · Region 08: Mt Pleasant · 544 students
Frank Stone MS is rated C by TEA, scoring 71 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.9 average of the 1,729 schools serving a similar share of economically disadvantaged students, and below the statewide average of 81.3. It is down 5 points since 2021-22 — both years scored under TEA's current rules, since TEA rewrote them in 2023; under the rules in force back then it scored 76.
Ranks 6,354th of 7,646 Texas schools (tied with 116 others), and 124th of 142 in Region 08: Mt Pleasant.
Jump to a section
5 years of ratings
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated C with 76 that year.
| Year | Rating | Score | Similar | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | C | 71 | 81.9 | 81.3 |
| 2024-25 | D | 68 | 82.1 | 81.2 |
| 2023-24 | C | 78 | 80.1 | 78.9 |
| 2022-23 | C | 73 | 80.7 | 79.1 |
| 2021-22 | C | 76 | 83.3 | 83.7 |
How this school's change over time is ranked
TEA publishes most measures for one year only, so a change ranking exists just where the same figure is published across years — the overall score, the five score domains, and per-student spending. This page does not yet state where Frank Stone MS itself places on these lists, only that the lists exist; open one to find this school's own row.
Texas schools
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- Frank Stone MS
- Similar student population (1,729)
- Region 08: Mt Pleasant (142)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | 72 | C | 8 |
| School Progress | 60 | D | 10 |
| Closing the Gaps | 69 | D | 1 |
| Academic Growth | 60 | D | 10 |
| Relative Performance | 60 | D | 10 |
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 1 point below C in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (72), so School Progress (60) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 72.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
- Approaches grade level
- Meets grade level
- Masters grade level
- Tick: Similar student population (1,729)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The tick on each bar marks the average for Similar student population (1,729 schools) — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 544
- Economically disadvantaged
- 50.7%−0.6 pts vs similar
- English learners
- 5.0%−8.2 pts vs similar
- Special education
- 20.2%+1.4 pts vs similar
- Attendance
- 96.2%+1.7 pts vs similar
- Chronically absent
- 7.8%−6.7 pts vs similar
Student demographics
- African American 3.7%
- Hispanic 14.9%
- White 70.2%
- American Indian 1.8%
- Asian 0.9%
- Two or More Races 8.5%
Spending per student
Compared against TEA's own peer group, which controls for size and student population, and against the state.
- Frank Stone MS
- TEA peer group
- Texas average
TEA's published file does not include peer-group spending for this entity, so no comparison is shown.
Not reported by TEA for this entity: peer.
Teachers
- Average salary
- $62,067−$4,784 vs similar
- Teachers
- 37
- Students per staff member
- 14.8
Teaching experience
- Beginning 3%
- 1 to 5 years 27.2%
- 6 to 10 years 15.3%
- 11 to 20 years 32.2%
- 21 to 30 years 17.2%
- Over 30 years 4.9%
Where this school ranks best
Out of 97 rankings computed across every published metric and every comparison group, these are the placements that stand out. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
-
1of 18
Attendance
Lamar County · of the 18 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
6of 18
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Lamar County · of the 18 that report this measure
-
7of 17
Reading — Masters
Lamar County · of the 17 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
8of 14
Science — Masters
Lamar County · of the 14 that report this measure
-
9of 134
Attendance
Region 08: Mt Pleasant · of the 134 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
9of 14
Science — Meets
Lamar County · of the 14 that report this measure
-
4of 20
Per-student spending
Lamar County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 4
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this campus ranks poorly. Each statement below states its cohort and its denominator so it can be checked — a rank without an n is a boast, not a fact. Ties are shown because a shared ceiling is not a sole first place. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
Every figure on this page comes from data the Texas Education Agency publishes at txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026 and archived with a checksum so each number stays traceable to the bytes TEA served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for districts only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here — 9,086 entities in two formats is 18,172 assets, on top of everything else this site
publishes, and that is past the 20,000-asset limit this site is published under. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 139911042.