+8.8 ptsvs 81.2 average · 1,818 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
287 of 1,818tied with 71 others
Score vs region
+7.8 ptsvs 82.2 average · 94 rated schools in Region 09: Wichita Falls
Region 09: Wichita Falls placement
21 of 94tied with 1 other
Score vs county
+11.8 ptsvs 78.2 average · 34 rated schools in Wichita County
Wichita County placement
4 of 34among reporting schools
Score vs similar-size group
+9.8 ptsvs 80.2 average · 4,766 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
834 of 4,766tied with 194 others
Score vs state
+8.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
1,571 of 7,646tied with 341 others
A90
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 91 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 81.2 average for 1,818 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 82.2 average for 94 rated schools in Region 09: Wichita Falls.The current score is above the 78.2 average for 34 rated schools in Wichita County.The current score is above the 80.2 average for 4,766 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
63%vs 51.3% avg · +11.7 pts
Masters
35%vs 21.7% avg · +13.3 pts
Among 1,749 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Fowler Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.2 average for 1,818 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 287th of 1,818 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 71 others).
Fowler Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.2 average for 94 rated schools in Region 09: Wichita Falls. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 21st of 94 rated schools in Region 09: Wichita Falls (tied with 1 other).
Fowler Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 78.2 average for 34 rated schools in Wichita County. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 4th of 34 rated schools in Wichita County.
Fowler Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.2 average for 4,766 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 834th of 4,766 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 194 others).
Fowler Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 91 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement90 A+9.5 vs similar economic context · 1,749 reporting
School Progress89 B+7.7 vs similar economic context · 1,742 reporting
Closing the Gaps90 A+11.6 vs similar economic context · 1,726 reporting
Academic Growth88 B+13.1 vs similar economic context · 1,698 reporting
Relative Performance89 B+9.7 vs similar economic context · 1,742 reporting
Fowler Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,818 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
90
A
—
School Progress
89
B
1
Closing the Gaps
90
A
—
Academic Growth
88
B
2
Relative Performance
89
B
1
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (90), so
School Progress (89) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 90.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level84%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,749 reporting
Meets grade level63%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,749 reporting
Masters grade level35%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,749 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level88%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,747 reporting
Meets grade level71%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,747 reporting
Masters grade level40%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,747 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level85%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,737 reporting
Meets grade level62%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,737 reporting
Masters grade level34%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,737 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level72%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,605 reporting
Meets grade level43%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,605 reporting
Masters grade level25%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,605 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,818 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
533
Economically disadvantaged
54.7%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
6.4%−7.8 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
22.6%+3.8 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.8%+1.4 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
8.4%−6.6 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Fowler Elem
African American 9.6%
Hispanic 30.8%
White 48.1%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 4.3%
Two or More Races 7%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,818 reporting for every category shown · 1,818 in full cohort
African American 9.9%
Hispanic 44.1%
White 38.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.6%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 4%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 09: Wichita Falls · 94 reporting for every category shown · 94 in full cohort
African American 5.2%
Hispanic 29%
White 58.7%
American Indian 0.6%
Asian 1%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 5.5%
Selected comparison averageFor Wichita County · 34 reporting for every category shown · 34 in full cohort
African American 11.7%
Hispanic 32.8%
White 45.8%
American Indian 0.4%
Asian 1.3%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 7.8%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,766 reporting for every category shown · 4,766 in full cohort
African American 12.1%
Hispanic 54.9%
White 24.7%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.5%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
532
Economically disadvantaged students
291
Emergent bilingual students
34
Special education students
120
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
38
Students in TEA mobility denominator
403
TEA-published mobility rate
9.4%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 533 students in 2025–26, an increase of 43 (8.8%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
533
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+43
Increase · +8.8%
Change since 2021–22
−22
Decrease · −4.0%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
533
Selected comparison
633.7
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,779 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Fowler Elem
School year
Students enrolledFowler Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
555
First available year
635.9
2022–23
548
Decrease of 7 (1.3%)
641.9
2023–24
507
Decrease of 41 (7.5%)
641.4
2024–25
490
Decrease of 17 (3.4%)
638.5
2025–26
533
Increase of 43 (8.8%)
633.7
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
40
7.8% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
80
15.66 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
511
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
7.8%
Selected comparison
12.4%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,401 rated schools reporting
−4.6 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
15.66
Selected comparison
27.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,511 rated schools reporting
−12.2 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Fowler Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
618
26
4.2%
40
6.47
9.8%
19
2021–22
588
16
2.7%
24
4.08
12.4%
28
2022–23
577
34
5.9%
76
13.17
12.9%
29.6
2023–24
528
38
7.2%
86
16.29
12.8%
29.7
2024–25
511
40
7.8%
80
15.66
12.4%
27.9
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Fowler Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
40
7.8%
80
15.66
12.4%
27.9
In-school suspensions
35
6.8%
62
12.13
11.2%
21.7
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
18
3.52
—
9
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Fowler Elem
Parent district: Wichita Falls ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$7,826
Selected comparison
$12,285
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,790 rated schools reporting
−$4,459 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $7,826 per student for this campus, $16,256 per student for its parent district, Wichita Falls ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Fowler Elem
Parent district: Wichita Falls ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$6,128
$10,240
$13,054
$7,905
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,649 rated schools reporting
2019
$5,767
$9,938
$13,108
$8,077
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,666 rated schools reporting
2020
$7,098
$11,086
$14,058
$8,646
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,682 rated schools reporting
2021
$7,056
$12,729
$14,797
$9,024
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,698 rated schools reporting
2022
$7,404
$16,921
$15,708
$10,386
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,713 rated schools reporting
2023
$6,712
$22,796
$16,792
$10,896
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,738 rated schools reporting
2024
$8,781
$22,647
$18,125
$11,764
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,764 rated schools reporting
2025
$7,826
$16,256
$18,972
$12,285
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,790 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$66,424−$128 vs similar economic context
Teachers
36−5.8 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.8−4.6 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Fowler Elem
1 to 5 years 25%
6 to 10 years 27.8%
11 to 20 years 25%
21 to 30 years 22.2%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,818 reporting for every category shown · 1,818 in full cohort
Beginning 5.8%
1 to 5 years 24.8%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.9%
21 to 30 years 16.4%
Over 30 years 4.4%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 09: Wichita Falls · 94 reporting for every category shown · 94 in full cohort
Beginning 5.3%
1 to 5 years 21.6%
6 to 10 years 18.7%
11 to 20 years 28.8%
21 to 30 years 20%
Over 30 years 5.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Wichita County · 34 reporting for every category shown · 34 in full cohort
Beginning 3%
1 to 5 years 24%
6 to 10 years 24%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 16.5%
Over 30 years 3.8%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,766 reporting for every category shown · 4,766 in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 26.3%
6 to 10 years 19.6%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 15.7%
Over 30 years 3.2%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Fowler Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classFowler Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
18.5
18
Grade 1
20
18.3
Grade 2
21
18.5
Grade 3
18.5
18.8
Grade 4
18.8
19
Grade 5
19.3
19.8
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
3 measures
1of 30
School Progress
Wichita County · of the 30 that report this measure
1of 30
Academic Growth
Wichita County · of the 30 that report this measure
1of 30
Relative Performance
Wichita County · of the 30 that report this measure
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
8 measures
2of 30
All Subjects — Masters
Wichita County · of the 30 that report this measure · tied with 1
2of 30
Reading — Meets
Wichita County · of the 30 that report this measure
2of 30
Reading — Masters
Wichita County · of the 30 that report this measure
3of 30
Student Achievement
Wichita County · of the 30 that report this measure · tied with 1
3of 30
Closing the Gaps
Wichita County · of the 30 that report this measure · tied with 1
3of 30
All Subjects — Meets
Wichita County · of the 30 that report this measure · tied with 1
3of 30
Reading — Approaches
Wichita County · of the 30 that report this measure · tied with 1
3of 30
Math — Approaches
Wichita County · of the 30 that report this measure · tied with 1
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
6 measures
4of 34
Overall score
Wichita County · of the 34 that report this measure
4of 30
All Subjects — Approaches
Wichita County · of the 30 that report this measure · tied with 1
4of 30
Math — Meets
Wichita County · of the 30 that report this measure
4of 30
Math — Masters
Wichita County · of the 30 that report this measure
6of 32
Attendance
Wichita County · of the 32 that report this measure
7of 32
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Wichita County · of the 32 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 243905111.