+5.1 ptsvs 87.9 average · 947 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
145 of 947tied with 70 others
Score vs region
+12.6 ptsvs 80.4 average · 314 rated schools in Region 06: Huntsville
Region 06: Huntsville placement
19 of 314tied with 11 others
Score vs county
+10.8 ptsvs 82.2 average · 43 rated schools in Brazos County
Brazos County placement
3 of 43tied with 2 others
Score vs similar-size group
+12.9 ptsvs 80.1 average · 4,670 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
264 of 4,670tied with 124 others
Score vs state
+11.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
588 of 7,646tied with 249 others
A93
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 97 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 87.9 average for 947 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 80.4 average for 314 rated schools in Region 06: Huntsville.The current score is above the 82.2 average for 43 rated schools in Brazos County.The current score is above the 80.1 average for 4,670 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
79%vs 65.8% avg · +13.2 pts
Masters
55%vs 33.9% avg · +21.1 pts
Among 926 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Forest Ridge is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 87.9 average for 947 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 145th of 947 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 70 others).
Forest Ridge is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.4 average for 314 rated schools in Region 06: Huntsville. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 19th of 314 rated schools in Region 06: Huntsville (tied with 11 others).
Forest Ridge is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.2 average for 43 rated schools in Brazos County. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 3rd of 43 rated schools in Brazos County (tied with 2 others).
Forest Ridge is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.1 average for 4,670 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 264th of 4,670 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 124 others).
Forest Ridge is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 97 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement94 A+5.3 vs similar economic context · 926 reporting
School Progress92 A+7.4 vs similar economic context · 924 reporting
Closing the Gaps92 A+6.6 vs similar economic context · 918 reporting
Academic Growth92 A+10.9 vs similar economic context · 909 reporting
Relative Performance91 A+11.1 vs similar economic context · 924 reporting
Forest Ridge
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (947 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
94
A
—
School Progress
92
A
—
Closing the Gaps
92
A
—
Academic Growth
92
A
—
Relative Performance
91
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (94), so
School Progress (92) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 94.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level91%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 926 reporting
Meets grade level79%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 926 reporting
Masters grade level55%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 926 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level92%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 926 reporting
Meets grade level78%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 926 reporting
Masters grade level56%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 926 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level90%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 924 reporting
Meets grade level80%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 924 reporting
Masters grade level55%+26 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 924 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (947 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
491
Economically disadvantaged
27.4%−1.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
16.8%+6.7 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
17.3%+0.1 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.2%+0.8 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
5.6%−4.6 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Forest Ridge
African American 11%
Hispanic 17.3%
White 53%
American Indian 0.4%
Asian 14.3%
Two or More Races 4%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 947 reporting for every category shown · 947 in full cohort
African American 8.8%
Hispanic 28.6%
White 48.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 8.9%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 5%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 06: Huntsville · 314 reporting for every category shown · 314 in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 38.9%
White 42.7%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.3%
Selected comparison averageFor Brazos County · 43 reporting for every category shown · 43 in full cohort
African American 16.1%
Hispanic 44.2%
White 31.7%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 3.8%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.8%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,670 reporting for every category shown · 4,670 in full cohort
African American 12.1%
Hispanic 55.1%
White 25%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.5%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
481
Economically disadvantaged students
132
Emergent bilingual students
81
Special education students
83
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
12
Students in TEA mobility denominator
378
TEA-published mobility rate
3.2%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 491 students in 2025–26, an increase of 2 (0.4%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
491
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+2
Increase · +0.4%
Change since 2021–22
−46
Decrease · −8.6%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
491
Selected comparison
815.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 938 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Forest Ridge
School year
Students enrolledForest Ridge
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
537
First available year
829.4
2022–23
514
Decrease of 23 (4.3%)
834.5
2023–24
498
Decrease of 16 (3.1%)
828.8
2024–25
489
Decrease of 9 (1.8%)
825
2025–26
491
Increase of 2 (0.4%)
815.3
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
Suppressed
Rate not available
Cumulative year-end enrollment
502
2024–25
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Forest Ridge
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
542
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2021–22
565
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2022–23
534
Suppressed
—
10
1.87
—
18.2
2023–24
527
Suppressed
—
15
2.85
—
17.5
2024–25
502
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Forest Ridge in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
In-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Forest Ridge
Parent district: College Station ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$9,796
Selected comparison
$11,434
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 934 rated schools reporting
−$1,638 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $9,796 per student for this campus, $18,325 per student for its parent district, College Station ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Forest Ridge
Parent district: College Station ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$6,614
$15,299
$13,054
$7,614
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 840 rated schools reporting
2019
$7,017
$13,238
$13,108
$7,709
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 854 rated schools reporting
2020
$8,298
$12,261
$14,058
$8,036
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 864 rated schools reporting
2021
$9,301
$12,943
$14,797
$8,504
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 873 rated schools reporting
2022
$8,722
$13,475
$15,708
$9,722
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 890 rated schools reporting
2023
$9,496
$15,630
$16,792
$10,194
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 906 rated schools reporting
2024
$12,318
$16,944
$18,125
$11,382
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 920 rated schools reporting
2025
$9,796
$18,325
$18,972
$11,434
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 934 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$60,062−$8,307 vs similar economic context
Teachers
34−18.9 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.2−0.4 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Forest Ridge
Beginning 16.2%
1 to 5 years 14.7%
6 to 10 years 14.7%
11 to 20 years 27.9%
21 to 30 years 17.6%
Over 30 years 8.8%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 947 reporting for every category shown · 947 in full cohort
Beginning 4.8%
1 to 5 years 22.5%
6 to 10 years 19.6%
11 to 20 years 32.4%
21 to 30 years 17.4%
Over 30 years 3.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 06: Huntsville · 314 reporting for every category shown · 314 in full cohort
Beginning 7.5%
1 to 5 years 27.7%
6 to 10 years 18.9%
11 to 20 years 27.6%
21 to 30 years 13.6%
Over 30 years 4%
Selected comparison averageFor Brazos County · 43 reporting for every category shown · 43 in full cohort
Beginning 13.4%
1 to 5 years 24.9%
6 to 10 years 16.6%
11 to 20 years 27.1%
21 to 30 years 14.3%
Over 30 years 3.6%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,670 reporting for every category shown · 4,670 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 26.2%
6 to 10 years 19.4%
11 to 20 years 28.9%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.3%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Forest Ridge in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classForest Ridge · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
18.3
18.5
Grade 1
20.3
18.9
Grade 2
25.4
19.5
Grade 3
23.5
20.5
Grade 4
31.3
20
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 90 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
4 measures
1of 43
All Subjects — Masters
Brazos County · of the 43 that report this measure
1of 43
Reading — Masters
Brazos County · of the 43 that report this measure
1of 42
Math — Meets
Brazos County · of the 42 that report this measure
1of 42
Math — Masters
Brazos County · of the 42 that report this measure
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
10 measures
2of 43
All Subjects — Meets
Brazos County · of the 43 that report this measure
2of 43
Reading — Approaches
Brazos County · of the 43 that report this measure
2of 43
Reading — Meets
Brazos County · of the 43 that report this measure
2of 42
Math — Approaches
Brazos County · of the 42 that report this measure · tied with 1
3of 43
Overall score
Brazos County · of the 43 that report this measure · tied with 2
3of 43
Student Achievement
Brazos County · of the 43 that report this measure
3of 43
Relative Performance
Brazos County · of the 43 that report this measure · tied with 1
3of 43
All Subjects — Approaches
Brazos County · of the 43 that report this measure
3of 43
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Brazos County · of the 43 that report this measure
3of 42
Closing the Gaps
Brazos County · of the 42 that report this measure · tied with 1
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
3 measures
4of 42
Academic Growth
Brazos County · of the 42 that report this measure · tied with 2
6of 43
School Progress
Brazos County · of the 43 that report this measure · tied with 2
6of 43
Attendance
Brazos County · of the 43 that report this measure · tied with 1
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 021901108.