Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Forest Park Magnet School

Gregg County · Region 07: Kilgore · 418 students

Current score
80/1002025-26
Change
−3 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+2.4 ptsvs 77.6 average · 1,879 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
839 of 1,879tied with 66 others
B80

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 83 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 77.6 average for 1,879 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

Reading above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
47%vs 44% avg · +3 pts
Masters
19%vs 17.6% avg · +1.4 pts

Among 1,743 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Science above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
44%vs 33.5% avg · +10.5 pts
Masters
23%vs 13.8% avg · +9.2 pts

Among 1,646 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Current strength

Overall score above the similar-context average

80 +2.4 pts vs 77.6

  • 80 is 2.4 points above the 77.6 average among 1,879 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Forest Park Magnet School is rated B by TEA, scoring 80 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.6 average for 1,879 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 839th of 1,879 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 66 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageForest Park Magnet School 8381808580 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 83 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8077.6 1,879 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8577.4 1,862 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24B8073.8 1,844 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8173.2 1,840 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22B8381.9 1,816 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement72 C+1.8 vs similar economic context · 1,743 reporting
  • School Progress83 B+4.2 vs similar economic context · 1,740 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps74 C−1.0 vs similar economic context · 1,730 reporting
  • Academic Growth73 C−0.3 vs similar economic context · 1,717 reporting
  • Relative Performance83 B+6.3 vs similar economic context · 1,739 reporting
  • Forest Park Magnet School
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,879 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement72C8
School Progress83B7
Closing the Gaps74C6
Academic Growth73C7
Relative Performance83B7

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 6 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (83), so Student Achievement (72) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 83.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level65%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,743 reporting
  • Meets grade level41%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,743 reporting
  • Masters grade level15%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,743 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level68%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,743 reporting
  • Meets grade level47%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,743 reporting
  • Masters grade level19%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,743 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level67%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,739 reporting
  • Meets grade level40%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,739 reporting
  • Masters grade level12%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,739 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level66%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,646 reporting
  • Meets grade level44%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,646 reporting
  • Masters grade level23%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,646 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level47%−15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 540 reporting
  • Meets grade level21%−13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 540 reporting
  • Masters grade level5%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 540 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,879 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
418
Economically disadvantaged
94.5%+2.6 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
34.9%−6.9 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
21.8%+4.3 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.4%+3.4 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
10.1%−13.1 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Forest Park Magnet School

African American: 33%Hispanic: 53.6%White: 9.1%American Indian: 0.2%Asian: 1%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 2.9%
  • African American 33%
  • Hispanic 53.6%
  • White 9.1%
  • American Indian 0.2%
  • Asian 1%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 2.9%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,879 reporting for every category shown · 1,879 in full cohort

African American: 15%Hispanic: 77%White: 4.9%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.2%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 1.5%
  • African American 15%
  • Hispanic 77%
  • White 4.9%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.2%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 1.5%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
418
Economically disadvantaged students
395
Emergent bilingual students
146
Special education students
91

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
81
Students in TEA mobility denominator
524
TEA-published mobility rate
15.5%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 418 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 56 (11.8%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
418

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−56

Decrease · −11.8%

Change since 2021–22
−62

Decrease · −12.9%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
418
Selected comparison
560.9

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,860 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Forest Park Magnet School
School yearStudents enrolledForest Park Magnet SchoolChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 480 First available year 608.7
2022–23 453 Decrease of 27 (5.6%) 604.8
2023–24 465 Increase of 12 (2.6%) 594.7
2024–25 474 Increase of 9 (1.9%) 587.5
2025–26 418 Decrease of 56 (11.8%) 560.9

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
75

14.7% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
116

22.75 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
510

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
14.7%
Selected comparison
13.0%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,110 rated schools reporting

+1.7 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
22.75
Selected comparison
30.7

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,201 rated schools reporting

−7.9 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Forest Park Magnet School
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 563 27 4.8% 35 6.22 6.8% 13
2021–22 537 67 12.5% 107 19.93 12.5% 29.6
2022–23 493 86 17.4% 154 31.24 13.6% 32.6
2023–24 506 109 21.5% 214 42.29 13.6% 32.8
2024–25 510 75 14.7% 116 22.75 13.0% 30.7
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Forest Park Magnet School in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 75 14.7% 116 22.75 13.0% 30.7
In-school suspensions 56 11.0% 68 13.33 11.3% 21.8
Out-of-school suspensions 27 5.3% 33 6.47 9.5% 15.7
DAEP placements 15 2.9% 15 2.94 5.1% 6.2
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$15k$25k20182020202220242025
  • Forest Park Magnet School
  • Parent district: Longview ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$14,386
Selected comparison
$13,274

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,861 rated schools reporting

+$1,112 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $14,386 per student for this campus, $23,597 per student for its parent district, Longview ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearForest Park Magnet SchoolParent district: Longview ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$7,999$11,258$13,054$8,348 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,770 rated schools reporting
2019$9,255$12,245$13,108$8,362 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,794 rated schools reporting
2020$10,918$13,308$14,058$8,856 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,798 rated schools reporting
2021$10,715$15,792$14,797$9,696 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,800 rated schools reporting
2022$12,807$17,809$15,708$11,229 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,817 rated schools reporting
2023$12,920$17,283$16,792$11,835 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,840 rated schools reporting
2024$13,614$19,461$18,125$12,709 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,848 rated schools reporting
2025$14,386$23,597$18,972$13,274 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,861 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$62,781−$5,668 vs similar economic context
Teachers
44+4.9 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
9.4−5.3 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Forest Park Magnet School

Beginning: 5.6%1 to 5 years: 30.9%6 to 10 years: 20.3%11 to 20 years: 29.3%21 to 30 years: 9.2%Over 30 years: 4.5%
  • Beginning 5.6%
  • 1 to 5 years 30.9%
  • 6 to 10 years 20.3%
  • 11 to 20 years 29.3%
  • 21 to 30 years 9.2%
  • Over 30 years 4.5%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,879 reporting for every category shown · 1,879 in full cohort

Beginning: 7.6%1 to 5 years: 27.1%6 to 10 years: 18.7%11 to 20 years: 27.1%21 to 30 years: 14.9%Over 30 years: 3.4%
  • Beginning 7.6%
  • 1 to 5 years 27.1%
  • 6 to 10 years 18.7%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.1%
  • 21 to 30 years 14.9%
  • Over 30 years 3.4%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Forest Park Magnet School in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classForest Park Magnet School · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 614.317.3
Secondary English13.915.1
Secondary languages other than English1518.2
Secondary math14.416.8
Secondary science17.617.7
Secondary social studies17.617.7

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

2 measures

  • 5of 40

    Attendance

    Gregg County · of the 40 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 5of 40

    Per-student spending

    Gregg County · of the 40 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 092903041.