Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Fisher Elem

Harris County · Region 04: Houston · 494 students

Current score
75/1002025-26
Change
−6 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−2.5 ptsvs 77.5 average · 2,228 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,374 of 2,228tied with 66 others
C75

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 75 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 77.5 average for 2,228 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Current strength

Relative Performance above the similar-context average

80 +3 pts vs 77

  • 80 is 3 points above the 77 average among 2,051 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average

17.9% −3.1 pts vs 21%

  • 17.9% is 3.1 percentage points lower than the 21% average among 2,130 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Attendance above the similar-context average

94.3% +1 pts vs 93.3%

  • 94.3% is 1 percentage points above the 93.3% average among 2,134 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Fisher Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 75 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 77.5 average for 2,228 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 6 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 1,374th of 2,228 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 66 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageFisher Elem 8182788875 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated C with 75 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26C7577.5 2,228 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8877.1 2,213 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24C7874.5 2,196 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8274.9 2,180 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22B8181.7 2,159 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement72 C±0.0 vs similar economic context · 2,058 reporting
  • School Progress80 B+1.3 vs similar economic context · 2,051 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps62 D−12.6 vs similar economic context · 2,037 reporting
  • Academic Growth59 F−13.2 vs similar economic context · 2,005 reporting
  • Relative Performance80 B+3.0 vs similar economic context · 2,051 reporting
  • Fisher Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,228 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement72C8
School Progress80B10
Closing the Gaps62D8
Academic Growth59F1
Relative Performance80B10

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 8 points below C in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (80), so Student Achievement (72) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 80.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level73%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,058 reporting
  • Meets grade level41%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,058 reporting
  • Masters grade level17%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,058 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level76%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,056 reporting
  • Meets grade level44%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,056 reporting
  • Masters grade level21%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,056 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level70%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,046 reporting
  • Meets grade level38%±0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,046 reporting
  • Masters grade level13%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,046 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,228 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
494
Economically disadvantaged
81.4%−0.7 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
42.5%+11.7 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
19.0%+0.4 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.3%+1.0 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
17.9%−3.1 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Fisher Elem

African American: 5.3%Hispanic: 83%White: 8.5%Asian: 0.6%Pacific Islander: 0.4%Two or More Races: 2.2%
  • African American 5.3%
  • Hispanic 83%
  • White 8.5%
  • Asian 0.6%
  • Pacific Islander 0.4%
  • Two or More Races 2.2%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,228 reporting for every category shown · 2,228 in full cohort

African American: 14.2%Hispanic: 69.1%White: 12.2%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.6%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 2.5%
  • African American 14.2%
  • Hispanic 69.1%
  • White 12.2%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.6%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 2.5%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
494
Economically disadvantaged students
402
Emergent bilingual students
210
Special education students
94

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
58
Students in TEA mobility denominator
448
TEA-published mobility rate
12.9%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 494 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 72 (12.7%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
494

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−72

Decrease · −12.7%

Change since 2021–22
−66

Decrease · −11.8%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
494
Selected comparison
625.4

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,198 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Fisher Elem
School yearStudents enrolledFisher ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 560 First available year 653.2
2022–23 592 Increase of 32 (5.7%) 654.7
2023–24 578 Decrease of 14 (2.4%) 648.3
2024–25 566 Decrease of 12 (2.1%) 644.7
2025–26 494 Decrease of 72 (12.7%) 625.4

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
19

3.1% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
29

4.76 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
609

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
3.1%
Selected comparison
13.4%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,610 rated schools reporting

−10.3 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
4.76
Selected comparison
32.5

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,720 rated schools reporting

−27.7 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Fisher Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 634 18 2.8% 26 4.10 8.3% 16.4
2021–22 606 40 6.6% 59 9.74 13.0% 31.1
2022–23 626 21 3.4% 25 3.99 13.8% 34.4
2023–24 623 15 2.4% 18 2.89 13.8% 34.3
2024–25 609 19 3.1% 29 4.76 13.4% 32.5
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Fisher Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 19 3.1% 29 4.76 13.4% 32.5
In-school suspensions 19 3.1% 29 4.76 11.8% 23.5
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Fisher Elem
  • Parent district: Pasadena ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$12,701
Selected comparison
$13,152

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,212 rated schools reporting

−$451 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $12,701 per student for this campus, $18,084 per student for its parent district, Pasadena ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearFisher ElemParent district: Pasadena ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$8,024$12,956$13,054$8,199 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,091 rated schools reporting
2019$8,584$12,390$13,108$8,302 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,117 rated schools reporting
2020$9,752$12,617$14,058$8,804 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,132 rated schools reporting
2021$10,892$13,595$14,797$9,477 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,142 rated schools reporting
2022$11,948$15,651$15,708$10,912 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,160 rated schools reporting
2023$11,863$17,367$16,792$11,443 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,180 rated schools reporting
2024$12,154$17,655$18,125$12,421 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,196 rated schools reporting
2025$12,701$18,084$18,972$13,152 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,212 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$72,074+$4,783 vs similar economic context
Teachers
44+1.1 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
11.2−3.1 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Fisher Elem

Beginning: 4.5%1 to 5 years: 27.3%6 to 10 years: 15.9%11 to 20 years: 34.1%21 to 30 years: 15.9%Over 30 years: 2.3%
  • Beginning 4.5%
  • 1 to 5 years 27.3%
  • 6 to 10 years 15.9%
  • 11 to 20 years 34.1%
  • 21 to 30 years 15.9%
  • Over 30 years 2.3%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,228 reporting for every category shown · 2,228 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.9%1 to 5 years: 27.7%6 to 10 years: 19%11 to 20 years: 27%21 to 30 years: 15%Over 30 years: 3.6%
  • Beginning 6.9%
  • 1 to 5 years 27.7%
  • 6 to 10 years 19%
  • 11 to 20 years 27%
  • 21 to 30 years 15%
  • Over 30 years 3.6%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Fisher Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classFisher Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten19.318
Grade 116.618.4
Grade 212.818.4
Grade 311.918.9
Grade 414.918.9

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 101917102.