Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Fine Arts Academy at Tannahill

Tarrant County · Region 11: Fort Worth · 433 students

Current score
77/1002025-26
Change
−13 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−6.8 ptsvs 83.8 average · 1,437 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,115 of 1,437tied with 45 others
C77

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 94 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 83.8 average for 1,437 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Current strength

Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average

8.6% −4.3 pts vs 12.9%

  • 8.6% is 4.3 percentage points lower than the 12.9% average among 1,390 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Fine Arts Academy at Tannahill is rated C by TEA, scoring 77 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 83.8 average for 1,437 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 13 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 1,115th of 1,437 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 45 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Discipline and removal from class
  8. Spending per student
  9. Teachers and actual class size
  10. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageFine Arts Academy at Tannahill 9087859177 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 94 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26C7783.8 1,437 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25A9184.1 1,406 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24B8582.3 1,384 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8782.8 1,368 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22A9084.8 1,347 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement78 C−6.1 vs similar economic context · 1,396 reporting
  • School Progress72 C−10.3 vs similar economic context · 1,393 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps73 C−8.1 vs similar economic context · 1,384 reporting
  • Academic Growth70 C−7.3 vs similar economic context · 1,370 reporting
  • Relative Performance72 C−7.5 vs similar economic context · 1,393 reporting
  • Fine Arts Academy at Tannahill
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,437 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement78C2
School Progress72C8
Closing the Gaps73C7
Academic Growth70C10
Relative Performance72C8

Closest to moving up: Student Achievement, 2 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (78), so School Progress (72) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 78.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level76%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,396 reporting
  • Meets grade level53%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,396 reporting
  • Masters grade level24%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,396 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level81%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,395 reporting
  • Meets grade level59%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,395 reporting
  • Masters grade level29%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,395 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level71%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,391 reporting
  • Meets grade level50%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,391 reporting
  • Masters grade level19%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,391 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level76%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,295 reporting
  • Meets grade level45%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,295 reporting
  • Masters grade level25%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,295 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,437 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
433
Economically disadvantaged
42.0%−1.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
8.8%−2.8 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
20.8%+2.6 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.7%+0.9 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
8.6%−4.3 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Fine Arts Academy at Tannahill

African American: 9.2%Hispanic: 31.2%White: 49.4%American Indian: 0.2%Asian: 1.2%Two or More Races: 8.8%
  • African American 9.2%
  • Hispanic 31.2%
  • White 49.4%
  • American Indian 0.2%
  • Asian 1.2%
  • Two or More Races 8.8%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,437 reporting for every category shown · 1,437 in full cohort

African American: 9.3%Hispanic: 36.7%White: 44.8%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 4.2%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4.4%
  • African American 9.3%
  • Hispanic 36.7%
  • White 44.8%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 4.2%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4.4%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
433
Economically disadvantaged students
182
Emergent bilingual students
38
Special education students
90

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
11
Students in TEA mobility denominator
280
TEA-published mobility rate
3.9%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
11

3.96 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
278

2024–25

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
3.96
Selected comparison
23.7

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,195 rated schools reporting

−19.7 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Fine Arts Academy at Tannahill
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 309 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2021–22 440 10 2.3% 13 2.95 11.2% 23.8
2022–23 312 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2023–24 318 Suppressed — 10 3.14 — 25.3
2024–25 278 Suppressed — 11 3.96 — 23.7
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Fine Arts Academy at Tannahill in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Suppressed — 11 3.96 — 23.7
In-school suspensions Suppressed — 11 3.96 — 18.2
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$14k$22k20182020202220242025
  • Fine Arts Academy at Tannahill
  • Parent district: White Settlement ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$10,937
Selected comparison
$12,039

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,407 rated schools reporting

−$1,102 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $10,937 per student for this campus, $21,054 per student for its parent district, White Settlement ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearFine Arts Academy at TannahillParent district: White Settlement ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$7,243$10,454$13,054$7,801 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,287 rated schools reporting
2019$6,702$10,986$13,108$8,007 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,307 rated schools reporting
2020$7,929$11,050$14,058$8,388 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,316 rated schools reporting
2021$8,178$11,814$14,797$8,795 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,336 rated schools reporting
2022$6,385$12,891$15,708$10,138 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,348 rated schools reporting
2023$8,543$14,726$16,792$10,577 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,368 rated schools reporting
2024$8,477$20,532$18,125$11,632 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,385 rated schools reporting
2025$10,937$21,054$18,972$12,039 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,407 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$67,823+$501 vs similar economic context
Teachers
32−13.2 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
13.4−0.6 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Fine Arts Academy at Tannahill

Beginning: 9.3%1 to 5 years: 21.7%6 to 10 years: 27.9%11 to 20 years: 23.5%21 to 30 years: 16.1%Over 30 years: 1.5%
  • Beginning 9.3%
  • 1 to 5 years 21.7%
  • 6 to 10 years 27.9%
  • 11 to 20 years 23.5%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.1%
  • Over 30 years 1.5%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,437 reporting for every category shown · 1,437 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.3%1 to 5 years: 23.4%6 to 10 years: 19.6%11 to 20 years: 30.6%21 to 30 years: 17%Over 30 years: 3.8%
  • Beginning 5.3%
  • 1 to 5 years 23.4%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.6%
  • 11 to 20 years 30.6%
  • 21 to 30 years 17%
  • Over 30 years 3.8%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Fine Arts Academy at Tannahill in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classFine Arts Academy at Tannahill · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 120.518.5
Grade 222.518.8
Grade 32319.5
Grade 421.519.3
Grade 520.920.6
Grade 62118

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 220920106.