Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Fairfield HS

Freestone County · Region 12: Waco · 507 students

Current score
90/1002025-26
Change
+5 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+6.3 ptsvs 83.7 average · 1,439 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
335 of 1,439tied with 74 others
A90

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 86 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 83.7 average for 1,439 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent domain gain

Academic Growth rose 13 points

70 to 83 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 83 is 5.7 points above the 77.3 average among 1,371 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

STAAR result

Science above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
72%vs 55.9% avg · +16.1 pts
Masters
34%vs 28% avg · +6 pts

Among 1,300 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Current strength

Overall score above the similar-context average

90 +6.3 pts vs 83.7

  • 90 is 6.3 points above the 83.7 average among 1,439 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Fairfield HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.7 average for 1,439 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 5 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 335th of 1,439 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 74 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. After high school: the following fall
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this school ranks best
  13. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageFairfield HS 8590918990 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 86 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9083.7 1,439 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8984.0 1,409 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24A9182.2 1,387 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23A9082.8 1,372 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22B8584.8 1,352 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement89 B+5.0 vs similar economic context · 1,398 reporting
  • School Progress89 B+6.7 vs similar economic context · 1,395 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps93 A+12.0 vs similar economic context · 1,386 reporting
  • Academic Growth83 B+5.7 vs similar economic context · 1,371 reporting
  • Relative Performance89 B+9.5 vs similar economic context · 1,395 reporting
  • Fairfield HS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,439 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement89B1
School Progress89B1
Closing the Gaps93A—
Academic Growth83B7
Relative Performance89B1

Closest to moving up: Student Achievement, 1 point below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level83%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,398 reporting
  • Meets grade level61%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,398 reporting
  • Masters grade level18%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,398 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level76%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,397 reporting
  • Meets grade level62%+0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,397 reporting
  • Masters grade level9%−19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,397 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level83%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,393 reporting
  • Meets grade level53%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,393 reporting
  • Masters grade level16%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,393 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level96%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,300 reporting
  • Meets grade level72%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,300 reporting
  • Masters grade level34%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,300 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level89%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 724 reporting
  • Meets grade level58%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 724 reporting
  • Masters grade level26%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 724 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,439 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
94.4%+1.8 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 399 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
94.7%+2.0 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 398 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
97.9%+6.2 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 397 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.9%+0.5 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 399 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
97.0%+8.7 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria97.0%88.3%+8.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course93.2%59.8%+33.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA33.9%32.7%+1.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)12.7%12.8%−0.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course36.4%35.7%+0.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification8.5%37.5%−29.0 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate6.8%1.4%+5.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%4.1%−4.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%5.9%−5.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness5.1%2.9%+2.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student4.2%7.3%−3.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces3.4%3.3%+0.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

After high school: the following fall

Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.

Graduates in the report
108

Class of 2023–24

Enrolled in Texas public higher education
59

54.6% of graduates

Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
47

43.5% of graduates

Not trackable
2

Fall 2024

Graduates in the report

This school
108
Selected comparison
235.3

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 348 rated schools reporting

Enrolled in Texas public higher education

This school
59
Selected comparison
104.4

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 348 rated schools reporting

Texas-public enrollment rate

This school
54.6%
Selected comparison
47.4%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 348 rated schools reporting

+7.2 pts vs similar economic context

Not-found rate

This school
43.5%
Selected comparison
47.8%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 348 rated schools reporting

−4.3 pts vs similar economic context

Not-trackable rate

This school
1.9%
Selected comparison
4.7%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 348 rated schools reporting

−2.8 pts vs similar economic context

Most common named Texas public destinations

  1. NAVARRO COLLEGE (003593)15
  2. TEXAS STATE T. C. in WACO (003634)9
  3. TARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY (003631)6

Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.

Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.

“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.

“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
507
Economically disadvantaged
42.4%−0.9 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
4.2%−7.4 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
14.7%−3.5 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.4%+0.6 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
14.0%+1.0 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Fairfield HS

African American: 13.5%Hispanic: 29.3%White: 50.2%Asian: 1.4%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 5.4%
  • African American 13.5%
  • Hispanic 29.3%
  • White 50.2%
  • Asian 1.4%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 5.4%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,439 reporting for every category shown · 1,439 in full cohort

African American: 9.3%Hispanic: 36.8%White: 44.8%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 4.2%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4.4%
  • African American 9.3%
  • Hispanic 36.8%
  • White 44.8%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 4.2%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4.4%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
502
Economically disadvantaged students
213
Emergent bilingual students
21
Special education students
74

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
72
Students in TEA mobility denominator
533
TEA-published mobility rate
13.5%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 507 students in 2025–26, an increase of 7 (1.4%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
507

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+7

Increase · +1.4%

Change since 2021–22
+14

Increase · +2.8%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
507
Selected comparison
699.1

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,406 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Fairfield HS
School yearStudents enrolledFairfield HSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 493 First available year 696.6
2022–23 489 Decrease of 4 (0.8%) 702.6
2023–24 523 Increase of 34 (7.0%) 703.7
2024–25 500 Decrease of 23 (4.4%) 700.5
2025–26 507 Increase of 7 (1.4%) 699.1

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
70

13.1% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
165

30.96 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
533

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
13.1%
Selected comparison
10.9%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,116 rated schools reporting

+2.2 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
30.96
Selected comparison
23.9

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,194 rated schools reporting

+7.1 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Fairfield HS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 523 60 11.5% 127 24.28 9.2% 17.3
2021–22 516 84 16.3% 221 42.83 11.2% 24
2022–23 533 108 20.3% 291 54.60 11.5% 25.1
2023–24 567 120 21.2% 325 57.32 11.4% 25.6
2024–25 533 70 13.1% 165 30.96 10.9% 23.9
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Fairfield HS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 70 13.1% 165 30.96 10.9% 23.9
In-school suspensions 41 7.7% 72 13.51 9.8% 18.3
Out-of-school suspensions 47 8.8% 63 11.82 5.4% 7.5
DAEP placements 25 4.7% 30 5.63 4.1% 4.8
Mandatory DAEP placements 15 2.8% 19 3.56 3.2% 3.7
Discretionary DAEP placements 11 2.1% 11 2.06 2.3% 2.6
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Fairfield HS
  • Parent district: Fairfield ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$11,778
Selected comparison
$11,999

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,410 rated schools reporting

−$221 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $11,778 per student for this campus, $18,252 per student for its parent district, Fairfield ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearFairfield HSParent district: Fairfield ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$8,709$13,064$13,054$7,803 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,292 rated schools reporting
2019$8,981$12,563$13,108$8,014 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,312 rated schools reporting
2020$9,241$12,793$14,058$8,410 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,321 rated schools reporting
2021$9,765$13,803$14,797$8,809 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,341 rated schools reporting
2022$10,096$15,464$15,708$10,150 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,353 rated schools reporting
2023$12,077$16,439$16,792$10,580 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,372 rated schools reporting
2024$11,507$17,612$18,125$11,637 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,388 rated schools reporting
2025$11,778$18,252$18,972$11,999 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,410 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$66,259−$1,038 vs similar economic context
Teachers
41−4.5 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
12.4−8.7 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Fairfield HS

Beginning: 7.4%1 to 5 years: 14.8%6 to 10 years: 14.8%11 to 20 years: 15.3%21 to 30 years: 39.2%Over 30 years: 8.4%
  • Beginning 7.4%
  • 1 to 5 years 14.8%
  • 6 to 10 years 14.8%
  • 11 to 20 years 15.3%
  • 21 to 30 years 39.2%
  • Over 30 years 8.4%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,439 reporting for every category shown · 1,439 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.3%1 to 5 years: 23.4%6 to 10 years: 19.5%11 to 20 years: 30.6%21 to 30 years: 17%Over 30 years: 3.8%
  • Beginning 5.3%
  • 1 to 5 years 23.4%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.5%
  • 11 to 20 years 30.6%
  • 21 to 30 years 17%
  • Over 30 years 3.8%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Fairfield HS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classFairfield HS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English15.715.5
Secondary languages other than English13.518.1
Secondary math15.116.6
Secondary science13.518
Secondary social studies18.617.9

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 178 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

11 measures

  • 2of 10

    Closing the Gaps

    Freestone County · of the 10 that report this measure

  • 3of 12

    Overall score

    Freestone County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 3of 12

    Attendance

    Freestone County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 3of 12

    Per-student spending

    Freestone County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 3of 11

    Student Achievement

    Freestone County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 3of 11

    All Subjects — Meets

    Freestone County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 3of 10

    School Progress

    Freestone County · of the 10 that report this measure

  • 3of 10

    Academic Growth

    Freestone County · of the 10 that report this measure

  • 3of 10

    Relative Performance

    Freestone County · of the 10 that report this measure

  • 3of 10

    Math — Meets

    Freestone County · of the 10 that report this measure

  • 3of 10

    Math — Masters

    Freestone County · of the 10 that report this measure

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

8 measures

  • 4of 85

    Earned a level I or level II certificate

    Region 12: Waco · of the 85 that report this measure

  • 4of 11

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Freestone County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 4of 11

    All Subjects — Masters

    Freestone County · of the 11 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 4of 11

    Reading — Meets

    Freestone County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 4of 10

    Math — Approaches

    Freestone County · of the 10 that report this measure

  • 6of 11

    Reading — Approaches

    Freestone County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 7of 12

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Freestone County · of the 12 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 9of 11

    Reading — Masters

    Freestone County · of the 11 that report this measure

Other top-5% rankings

High placements in larger reporting groups

1 measure

  • 202of 4,106

    Science — Approaches

    Similar size · of the 4,106 that report this measure · tied with 49

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 081902002.