Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Ezzell School

Lavaca County · Region 03: Victoria · 124 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
89/1002025-26
Change
+7 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+5.4 ptsvs 83.6 average · 1,451 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
405 of 1,451tied with 55 others
B89

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 83 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 83.6 average for 1,451 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent movement

Overall score rose 6 points

83 to 89 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 89 is 5.4 points above the 83.6 average among 1,451 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Recent domain gain

Academic Growth rose 26 points

59 to 85 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 85 is 7.8 points above the 77.2 average among 1,382 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
63%vs 56.8% avg · +6.2 pts
Masters
27%vs 25.7% avg · +1.3 pts

Among 1,409 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Ezzell School is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.6 average for 1,451 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 7 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 405th of 1,451 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 55 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageEzzell School 8285818389 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 83 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8983.6 1,451 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8384.0 1,420 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24B8182.1 1,398 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8582.6 1,383 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22B8284.7 1,362 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement89 B+5.1 vs similar economic context · 1,409 reporting
  • School Progress86 B+3.8 vs similar economic context · 1,406 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps90 A+9.2 vs similar economic context · 1,397 reporting
  • Academic Growth85 B+7.8 vs similar economic context · 1,382 reporting
  • Relative Performance86 B+6.6 vs similar economic context · 1,406 reporting
  • Ezzell School
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,451 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement89B1
School Progress86B4
Closing the Gaps90A—
Academic Growth85B5
Relative Performance86B4

Closest to moving up: Student Achievement, 1 point below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (89), so School Progress (86) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 89.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level86%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,409 reporting
  • Meets grade level63%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,409 reporting
  • Masters grade level27%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,409 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level89%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,408 reporting
  • Meets grade level66%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,408 reporting
  • Masters grade level26%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,408 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level87%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,404 reporting
  • Meets grade level64%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,404 reporting
  • Masters grade level25%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,404 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level67%−14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,307 reporting
  • Meets grade level33%−23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,307 reporting
  • Masters grade level17%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,307 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level91%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 729 reporting
  • Meets grade level91%+37 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 729 reporting
  • Masters grade level55%+29 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 729 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,451 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
0.0%−92.7 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 403 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
0.0%−92.7 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 402 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
0.0%−91.8 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 401 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 403 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
86.0%−2.3 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria86.0%88.3%−2.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 410 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course0.0%59.6%−59.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 410 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA0.0%32.7%−32.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 410 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)0.0%12.8%−12.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 410 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course0.0%35.6%−35.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 410 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification85.7%37.4%+48.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 410 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.0%1.4%−1.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 410 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%4.0%−4.0 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 410 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%5.9%−5.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 410 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness0.0%2.9%−2.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 410 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student0.0%7.3%−7.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 410 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces0.0%3.2%−3.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 410 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
124
Economically disadvantaged
42.7%−0.9 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
0.0%−11.6 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
13.7%−4.5 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.7%−0.1 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
17.8%+4.8 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Ezzell School

African American: 0.8%Hispanic: 16.1%White: 76.6%Two or More Races: 6.5%
  • African American 0.8%
  • Hispanic 16.1%
  • White 76.6%
  • Two or More Races 6.5%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,451 reporting for every category shown · 1,451 in full cohort

African American: 9.3%Hispanic: 37.1%White: 44.7%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 4.1%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4.4%
  • African American 9.3%
  • Hispanic 37.1%
  • White 44.7%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 4.1%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4.4%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
124
Economically disadvantaged students
53
Emergent bilingual students
0
Special education students
17

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
27
Students in TEA mobility denominator
130
TEA-published mobility rate
20.8%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 124 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 4 (3.1%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
124

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−4

Decrease · −3.1%

Change since 2021–22
+29

Increase · +30.5%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
124
Selected comparison
696.9

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,417 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Ezzell School
School yearStudents enrolledEzzell SchoolChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 95 First available year 694.3
2022–23 112 Increase of 17 (17.9%) 700.1
2023–24 130 Increase of 18 (16.1%) 701.3
2024–25 128 Decrease of 2 (1.5%) 698.1
2025–26 124 Decrease of 4 (3.1%) 696.9

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Suppressed

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
151

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Ezzell School
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 90 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2021–22 97 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2022–23 122 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2023–24 140 16 11.4% 22 15.71 11.4% 25.7
2024–25 151 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Ezzell School in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
In-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$14k$21k20182020202220242025
  • Ezzell School
  • Parent district: Ezzell ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$14,130
Selected comparison
$12,011

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,421 rated schools reporting

+$2,119 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $14,130 per student for this campus, $17,614 per student for its parent district, Ezzell ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearEzzell SchoolParent district: Ezzell ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$7,234$11,186$13,054$7,789 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,302 rated schools reporting
2019$8,460$15,411$13,108$8,000 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,322 rated schools reporting
2020$9,282$19,533$14,058$8,409 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,331 rated schools reporting
2021$11,374$18,124$14,797$8,830 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,351 rated schools reporting
2022$9,578$15,177$15,708$10,199 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,363 rated schools reporting
2023$12,482$17,319$16,792$10,647 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,383 rated schools reporting
2024$15,112$19,967$18,125$11,661 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,399 rated schools reporting
2025$14,130$17,614$18,972$12,011 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,421 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$55,571−$11,648 vs similar economic context
Teachers
13−31.9 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
9.5−11.6 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Ezzell School

Beginning: 16.8%1 to 5 years: 22.9%11 to 20 years: 38.2%21 to 30 years: 7.6%Over 30 years: 15.3%
  • Beginning 16.8%
  • 1 to 5 years 22.9%
  • 11 to 20 years 38.2%
  • 21 to 30 years 7.6%
  • Over 30 years 15.3%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,451 reporting for every category shown · 1,451 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.4%1 to 5 years: 23.5%6 to 10 years: 19.5%11 to 20 years: 30.5%21 to 30 years: 17%Over 30 years: 3.9%
  • Beginning 5.4%
  • 1 to 5 years 23.5%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.5%
  • 11 to 20 years 30.5%
  • 21 to 30 years 17%
  • Over 30 years 3.9%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Ezzell School in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classEzzell School · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten10.418
Grade 11218.5
Grade 21618.7
Grade 31319.4
Grade 41419.3
Grade 51520.5
Grade 611.517.9
Secondary English5.215.5
Secondary languages other than English3.218.1
Secondary math616.6
Secondary science9.518
Secondary social studies5.118

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 12 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 178 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

5 measures

  • 2of 66

    Social Studies — Meets

    Region 03: Victoria · of the 66 that report this measure

  • 2of 66

    Social Studies — Masters

    Region 03: Victoria · of the 66 that report this measure

  • 2of 10

    Reading — Approaches

    Lavaca County · of the 10 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 2of 10

    Reading — Meets

    Lavaca County · of the 10 that report this measure

  • 3of 10

    Academic Growth

    Lavaca County · of the 10 that report this measure · tied with 1

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

16 measures

  • 4of 10

    Overall score

    Lavaca County · of the 10 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 4of 10

    Closing the Gaps

    Lavaca County · of the 10 that report this measure

  • 4of 10

    Relative Performance

    Lavaca County · of the 10 that report this measure

  • 4of 10

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Lavaca County · of the 10 that report this measure

  • 4of 10

    Math — Approaches

    Lavaca County · of the 10 that report this measure

  • 5of 35

    Earned an industry-based certification

    Region 03: Victoria · of the 35 that report this measure

  • 5of 10

    Student Achievement

    Lavaca County · of the 10 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 5of 10

    Math — Meets

    Lavaca County · of the 10 that report this measure

  • 5of 10

    Math — Masters

    Lavaca County · of the 10 that report this measure

  • 5of 10

    Per-student spending

    Lavaca County · of the 10 that report this measure

  • 6of 10

    School Progress

    Lavaca County · of the 10 that report this measure

  • 6of 10

    All Subjects — Meets

    Lavaca County · of the 10 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 6of 10

    All Subjects — Masters

    Lavaca County · of the 10 that report this measure

  • 7of 10

    Reading — Masters

    Lavaca County · of the 10 that report this measure

  • 10of 10

    Attendance

    Lavaca County · of the 10 that report this measure

  • 10of 10

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Lavaca County · of the 10 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 143906101.