Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus · Alternative Education Accountability

Everman Academy HS

Tarrant County · Region 11: Fort Worth · 56 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
87/1002025-26
Change
+10 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+9.3 ptsvs 77.7 average · 1,869 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
366 of 1,869tied with 62 others
B87

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 83 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 77.7 average for 1,869 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Current strength

Overall score above the similar-context average

87 +9.3 pts vs 77.7

  • 87 is 9.3 points above the 77.7 average among 1,869 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Closing the Gaps above the similar-context average

90 +14.9 pts vs 75.1

  • 90 is 14.9 points above the 75.1 average among 1,720 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Student Achievement above the similar-context average

86 +15.8 pts vs 70.2

  • 86 is 15.8 points above the 70.2 average among 1,733 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Everman Academy HS is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.7 average for 1,869 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 10 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 366th of 1,869 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 62 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. After high school: the following fall
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageEverman Academy HS 7783808887 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 83 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8777.7 1,869 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8877.4 1,852 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24B8073.9 1,834 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8373.3 1,830 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22C7781.9 1,806 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement86 B+15.8 vs similar economic context · 1,733 reporting
  • School Progress56 F−22.9 vs similar economic context · 1,730 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps90 A+14.9 vs similar economic context · 1,720 reporting
  • Academic Growth—Not reported · similar economic context 73.4 · 1,707 reporting
  • Relative Performance56 F−20.8 vs similar economic context · 1,729 reporting
  • Everman Academy HS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,869 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement86B4
School Progress56F4
Closing the Gaps90A—
Academic Growth—Not rated—
Relative Performance56F4

Closest to moving up: Student Achievement, 4 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (86), so School Progress (56) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 86.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level39%−27 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,733 reporting
  • Meets grade level10%−31 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,733 reporting
  • Masters grade level2%−14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,733 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level26%−43 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,733 reporting
  • Meets grade level10%−34 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,733 reporting
  • Masters grade level0%−18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,733 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level25%−41 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,729 reporting
  • Meets grade level3%−36 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,729 reporting
  • Masters grade level3%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,729 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level63%+0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,637 reporting
  • Meets grade level13%−21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,637 reporting
  • Masters grade level0%−14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,637 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level72%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 538 reporting
  • Meets grade level14%−20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 538 reporting
  • Masters grade level5%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 538 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,869 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Completion

Four-Year
94.9%+31.3 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 41 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
97.5%+30.6 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 41 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
92.3%+25.8 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 41 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
4.0%−1.6 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 41 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's alternative-education accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
94.0%+10.5 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria94.0%83.5%+10.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 211 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course90.9%56.4%+34.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 212 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA0.0%19.4%−19.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 212 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)1.8%13.6%−11.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 212 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course1.8%26.6%−24.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 212 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification0.9%33.1%−32.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 212 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.0%2.8%−2.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 212 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%6.9%−6.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 212 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%6.2%−6.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 212 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness6.4%2.5%+3.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 212 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student0.0%7.4%−7.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 212 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces0.9%2.5%−1.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 212 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

After high school: the following fall

Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.

Graduates in the report
133

Class of 2023–24

Enrolled in Texas public higher education
11

8.3% of graduates

Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
117

88.0% of graduates

Not trackable
5

Fall 2024

Graduates in the report

This school
133
Selected comparison
259.9

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 197 rated schools reporting

Enrolled in Texas public higher education

This school
11
Selected comparison
97.5

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 197 rated schools reporting

Texas-public enrollment rate

This school
8.3%
Selected comparison
36.3%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 197 rated schools reporting

−28.0 pts vs similar economic context

Not-found rate

This school
88.0%
Selected comparison
55.4%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 197 rated schools reporting

+32.6 pts vs similar economic context

Not-trackable rate

This school
3.8%
Selected comparison
8.4%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 197 rated schools reporting

−4.6 pts vs similar economic context

Most common named Texas public destinations

  1. TARRANT COUNTY COLLEGE DIST (003626)7

Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.

Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.

“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.

“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
56
Economically disadvantaged
94.6%+2.6 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
44.6%+2.8 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
7.1%−10.4 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.9%+1.9 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
17.1%−6.2 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Everman Academy HS

African American: 39.3%Hispanic: 55.4%White: 3.6%Pacific Islander: 1.8%
  • African American 39.3%
  • Hispanic 55.4%
  • White 3.6%
  • Pacific Islander 1.8%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,869 reporting for every category shown · 1,869 in full cohort

African American: 15%Hispanic: 77%White: 4.9%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.2%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 1.5%
  • African American 15%
  • Hispanic 77%
  • White 4.9%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.2%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 1.5%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
56
Economically disadvantaged students
53
Emergent bilingual students
25
Special education students
4

TEA context labels

  • Alternative education campus under AEA procedures
  • Alternative education type: dropout recovery school
  • Rated under AEA procedures

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
139
Students in TEA mobility denominator
172
TEA-published mobility rate
80.8%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
10

5.8% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
10

5.85 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
171

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
5.8%
Selected comparison
13.0%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,102 rated schools reporting

−7.2 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
5.85
Selected comparison
30.7

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,193 rated schools reporting

−24.9 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Everman Academy HS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 102 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2021–22 137 Suppressed — 10 7.30 — 29.5
2022–23 174 Suppressed — 11 6.32 — 32.7
2023–24 166 16 9.6% 19 11.45 13.6% 32.8
2024–25 171 10 5.8% 10 5.85 13.0% 30.7
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Everman Academy HS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 10 5.8% 10 5.85 13.0% 30.7
In-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements 10 5.8% 10 5.85 5.1% 6.2
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$0k$10k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Everman Academy HS
  • Parent district: Everman ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$10,557
Selected comparison
$13,292

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,851 rated schools reporting

−$2,735 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $10,557 per student for this campus, $17,822 per student for its parent district, Everman ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearEverman Academy HSParent district: Everman ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$225$11,933$13,054$8,350 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,760 rated schools reporting
2019$361$11,881$13,108$8,364 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,784 rated schools reporting
2020$11,443$14,107$14,058$8,860 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,788 rated schools reporting
2021$16,892$17,534$14,797$9,701 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,790 rated schools reporting
2022$12,926$18,170$15,708$11,228 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,807 rated schools reporting
2023$16,695$16,634$16,792$11,847 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,830 rated schools reporting
2024$15,358$16,051$18,125$12,723 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,838 rated schools reporting
2025$10,557$17,822$18,972$13,292 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,851 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$70,208+$1,751 vs similar economic context
Teachers
5−34.6 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
11.3−3.4 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Everman Academy HS

1 to 5 years: 38.8%6 to 10 years: 61.2%
  • 1 to 5 years 38.8%
  • 6 to 10 years 61.2%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,869 reporting for every category shown · 1,869 in full cohort

Beginning: 7.6%1 to 5 years: 27%6 to 10 years: 18.7%11 to 20 years: 27.1%21 to 30 years: 14.9%Over 30 years: 3.4%
  • Beginning 7.6%
  • 1 to 5 years 27%
  • 6 to 10 years 18.7%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.1%
  • 21 to 30 years 14.9%
  • Over 30 years 3.4%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Everman Academy HS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classEverman Academy HS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English2.415.1
Secondary languages other than English1.918.2
Secondary math1.416.8
Secondary science1.317.7
Secondary social studies3.417.7

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 195 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

1 measure

  • 3of 11

    Five-Year Completion Rate

    Tarrant County (alternative-education accountability only) · of the 11 that report this measure

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

4 measures

  • 5of 11

    Four-Year Completion Rate

    Tarrant County (alternative-education accountability only) · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 5of 11

    Six-Year Completion Rate

    Tarrant County (alternative-education accountability only) · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 7of 74

    Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness

    Tarrant County · of the 74 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 9of 11

    Dropout Rate (lowest is best)

    Tarrant County (alternative-education accountability only) · of the 11 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 220904003.