Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Elysian Fields HS

Harrison County · Region 07: Kilgore · 207 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
84/1002025-26
Change
+8 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+0.4 ptsvs 83.6 average · 1,447 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
730 of 1,447tied with 60 others
B84

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 85 in 2021-22. The current score is level with the 83.6 average for 1,447 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent domain gain

Closing the Gaps rose 31 points

58 to 89 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 89 is 8.1 points above the 80.9 average among 1,394 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Relative Performance above the similar-context average

82 +2.6 pts vs 79.4

  • 82 is 2.6 points above the 79.4 average among 1,403 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Elysian Fields HS is rated B by TEA, scoring 84 out of 100 for 2025-26 — level with the 83.6 average for 1,447 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 8 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 730th of 1,447 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 60 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. After high school: the following fall
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this school ranks best
  13. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageElysian Fields HS 7681767184 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 85 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8483.6 1,447 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25C7184.0 1,416 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24C7682.2 1,394 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8182.7 1,379 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22C7684.7 1,359 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement81 B−3.0 vs similar economic context · 1,406 reporting
  • School Progress82 B−0.2 vs similar economic context · 1,403 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps89 B+8.1 vs similar economic context · 1,394 reporting
  • Academic Growth67 D−10.2 vs similar economic context · 1,379 reporting
  • Relative Performance82 B+2.6 vs similar economic context · 1,403 reporting
  • Elysian Fields HS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,447 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement81B9
School Progress82B8
Closing the Gaps89B1
Academic Growth67D3
Relative Performance82B8

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 1 point below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (82), so Student Achievement (81) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 82.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level90%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,406 reporting
  • Meets grade level65%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,406 reporting
  • Masters grade level16%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,406 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level88%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,405 reporting
  • Meets grade level69%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,405 reporting
  • Masters grade level11%−17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,405 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level88%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,401 reporting
  • Meets grade level43%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,401 reporting
  • Masters grade level12%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,401 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level97%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,305 reporting
  • Meets grade level75%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,305 reporting
  • Masters grade level23%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,305 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level90%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 728 reporting
  • Meets grade level74%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 728 reporting
  • Masters grade level21%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 728 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,447 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
96.0%+3.3 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 403 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
96.8%+4.1 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 402 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
96.8%+5.1 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 401 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
2.1%+1.7 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 403 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
73.0%−15.3 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria73.0%88.3%−15.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 410 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course27.1%59.7%−32.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 410 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA27.1%32.8%−5.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 410 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)4.2%12.7%−8.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 410 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course43.8%35.8%+8.0 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 410 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification45.8%37.4%+8.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 410 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.0%1.4%−1.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 410 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%4.2%−4.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 410 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%5.9%−5.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 410 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness2.1%2.9%−0.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 410 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student8.3%7.4%+0.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 410 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces4.2%3.2%+1.0 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 410 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

After high school: the following fall

Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.

Graduates in the report
62

Class of 2023–24

Enrolled in Texas public higher education
34

54.8% of graduates

Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
28

45.2% of graduates

Not trackable
0

Fall 2024

Graduates in the report

This school
62
Selected comparison
233.8

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 351 rated schools reporting

Enrolled in Texas public higher education

This school
34
Selected comparison
103.8

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 351 rated schools reporting

Texas-public enrollment rate

This school
54.8%
Selected comparison
47.5%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 351 rated schools reporting

+7.3 pts vs similar economic context

Not-found rate

This school
45.2%
Selected comparison
47.8%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 351 rated schools reporting

−2.6 pts vs similar economic context

Not-trackable rate

This school
0.0%
Selected comparison
4.7%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 351 rated schools reporting

−4.7 pts vs similar economic context

Most common named Texas public destinations

  1. PANOLA COLLEGE (003600)12

Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.

Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.

“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.

“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
207
Economically disadvantaged
42.5%−0.9 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
0.5%−11.2 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
9.2%−9.0 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
92.2%−2.6 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
25.7%+12.7 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Elysian Fields HS

African American: 8.7%Hispanic: 11.1%White: 76.8%Two or More Races: 3.4%
  • African American 8.7%
  • Hispanic 11.1%
  • White 76.8%
  • Two or More Races 3.4%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,447 reporting for every category shown · 1,447 in full cohort

African American: 9.3%Hispanic: 36.9%White: 44.7%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 4.1%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4.4%
  • African American 9.3%
  • Hispanic 36.9%
  • White 44.7%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 4.1%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4.4%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
207
Economically disadvantaged students
88
Emergent bilingual students
1
Special education students
19

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
32
Students in TEA mobility denominator
243
TEA-published mobility rate
13.2%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 207 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 22 (9.6%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
207

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−22

Decrease · −9.6%

Change since 2021–22
−46

Decrease · −18.2%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
207
Selected comparison
697.9

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,413 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Elysian Fields HS
School yearStudents enrolledElysian Fields HSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 253 First available year 695.3
2022–23 259 Increase of 6 (2.4%) 701.5
2023–24 241 Decrease of 18 (6.9%) 702.8
2024–25 229 Decrease of 12 (5.0%) 699.5
2025–26 207 Decrease of 22 (9.6%) 697.9

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
31

12.8% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
77

31.69 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
243

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
12.8%
Selected comparison
10.9%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,120 rated schools reporting

+1.9 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
31.69
Selected comparison
23.8

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,200 rated schools reporting

+7.9 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Elysian Fields HS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 275 26 9.4% 41 14.91 9.1% 17.2
2021–22 262 37 14.1% 75 28.63 11.2% 23.9
2022–23 270 41 15.2% 92 34.07 11.5% 25
2023–24 251 43 17.1% 76 30.28 11.4% 25.6
2024–25 243 31 12.8% 77 31.69 10.9% 23.8
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Elysian Fields HS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 31 12.8% 77 31.69 10.9% 23.8
In-school suspensions 29 11.9% 48 19.75 9.8% 18.3
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — 21 8.64 — 7.4
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$21k$36k20182020202220242025
  • Elysian Fields HS
  • Parent district: Elysian Fields ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$12,798
Selected comparison
$12,025

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,417 rated schools reporting

+$773 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $12,798 per student for this campus, $34,435 per student for its parent district, Elysian Fields ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearElysian Fields HSParent district: Elysian Fields ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$8,571$11,137$13,054$7,800 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,299 rated schools reporting
2019$8,442$10,946$13,108$8,008 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,319 rated schools reporting
2020$9,695$12,411$14,058$8,413 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,328 rated schools reporting
2021$9,863$14,666$14,797$8,836 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,348 rated schools reporting
2022$19,541$18,515$15,708$10,200 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,360 rated schools reporting
2023$11,512$16,911$16,792$10,621 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,379 rated schools reporting
2024$14,164$21,255$18,125$11,644 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,395 rated schools reporting
2025$12,798$34,435$18,972$12,025 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,417 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$58,288−$8,971 vs similar economic context
Teachers
27−18.4 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
7.8−13.3 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Elysian Fields HS

Beginning: 14.6%1 to 5 years: 30.3%6 to 10 years: 10.9%11 to 20 years: 18.4%21 to 30 years: 14.2%Over 30 years: 11.2%
  • Beginning 14.6%
  • 1 to 5 years 30.3%
  • 6 to 10 years 10.9%
  • 11 to 20 years 18.4%
  • 21 to 30 years 14.2%
  • Over 30 years 11.2%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,447 reporting for every category shown · 1,447 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.3%1 to 5 years: 23.5%6 to 10 years: 19.5%11 to 20 years: 30.6%21 to 30 years: 16.9%Over 30 years: 3.8%
  • Beginning 5.3%
  • 1 to 5 years 23.5%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.5%
  • 11 to 20 years 30.6%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.9%
  • Over 30 years 3.8%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Elysian Fields HS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classElysian Fields HS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English9.815.5
Secondary languages other than English20.618
Secondary math13.816.6
Secondary science15.318
Secondary social studies15.518

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 184 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

5 measures

  • 2of 21

    Science — Approaches

    Harrison County · of the 21 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 2of 13

    Social Studies — Meets

    Harrison County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 3of 24

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Harrison County · of the 24 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 3of 24

    Math — Approaches

    Harrison County · of the 24 that report this measure

  • 3of 21

    Science — Meets

    Harrison County · of the 21 that report this measure

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

12 measures

  • 4of 24

    Closing the Gaps

    Harrison County · of the 24 that report this measure

  • 4of 24

    All Subjects — Meets

    Harrison County · of the 24 that report this measure

  • 4of 13

    Social Studies — Approaches

    Harrison County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 5of 24

    Reading — Approaches

    Harrison County · of the 24 that report this measure

  • 5of 24

    Reading — Meets

    Harrison County · of the 24 that report this measure

  • 6of 21

    Science — Masters

    Harrison County · of the 21 that report this measure

  • 6of 13

    Social Studies — Masters

    Harrison County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 7of 25

    Overall score

    Harrison County · of the 25 that report this measure

  • 7of 25

    Per-student spending

    Harrison County · of the 25 that report this measure

  • 8of 24

    Relative Performance

    Harrison County · of the 24 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 9of 24

    School Progress

    Harrison County · of the 24 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 10of 24

    Student Achievement

    Harrison County · of the 24 that report this measure · tied with 1

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 102906001.