Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus · Alternative Education Accountability

Ee College and Career Center

Hidalgo County · Region 01: Edinburg · 36 students

Current score
66/1002025-26
Score vs similar economic context
−11.6 ptsvs 77.6 average · 1,917 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,613 of 1,917tied with 26 others
D66

At a glance

The current score is below the 77.6 average for 1,917 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Current strength

School Progress above the similar-context average

81 +2.2 pts vs 78.8

  • 81 is 2.2 points above the 78.8 average among 1,773 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Student Achievement above the similar-context average

73 +2.8 pts vs 70.2

  • 73 is 2.8 points above the 70.2 average among 1,776 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Relative Performance above the similar-context average

81 +4.3 pts vs 76.7

  • 81 is 4.3 points above the 76.7 average among 1,772 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Ee College and Career Center is rated D by TEA, scoring 66 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 77.6 average for 1,917 rated schools serving a similar economic context. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.

Ranks 1,613th of 1,917 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 26 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. Official improvement and transfer notices
  3. 1 year of ratings
  4. Where the score comes from
  5. Student outcomes
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Teachers
  9. Where this school ranks best
  10. Where this comes from

Official improvement and transfer notices

Official state and federal designations can carry support, reporting requirements or a family transfer option that a single A–F rating does not explain.

2026 federal improvement status

Comprehensive Support and Improvement

Official support label: Comprehensive Identified

Identification reason: CSI Low Performance

TEA track year 1 · Title I campus

Open the official TEA list and methodology

Schools identified for improvement

This school
Listed
Selected comparison
33.3%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,917 rated schools reporting

Schools on the PEG list

This school
Not listed
Selected comparison
9.2%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,917 rated schools reporting

Selected comparison percentages are the share of reporting schools in that group found on each dated list. They are neutral prevalence context; changing the comparison never changes this school's official status.

These are dated TEA statuses, fetched 24 August 2026; they are not added to or subtracted from this site's rating.

1 year of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 66 2025-26

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26D6677.6 1,917 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement73 C+2.8 vs similar economic context · 1,776 reporting
  • School Progress81 B+2.2 vs similar economic context · 1,773 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps30 F−45.0 vs similar economic context · 1,763 reporting
  • Academic Growth—Not reported · similar economic context 73.2 · 1,750 reporting
  • Relative Performance81 B+4.3 vs similar economic context · 1,772 reporting
  • Ee College and Career Center
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,917 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement73C7
School Progress81B9
Closing the Gaps30F30
Academic Growth—Not rated—
Relative Performance81B9

Closest to moving up: School Progress, 9 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (81), so Student Achievement (73) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 81.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level52%−14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,776 reporting
  • Meets grade level13%−28 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,776 reporting
  • Masters grade level1%−15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,776 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level34%−35 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,776 reporting
  • Meets grade level6%−38 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,776 reporting
  • Masters grade level0%−18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,776 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level90%+24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,772 reporting
  • Meets grade level30%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,772 reporting
  • Masters grade level0%−15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,772 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level57%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,676 reporting
  • Meets grade level29%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,676 reporting
  • Masters grade level0%−14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,676 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level61%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 549 reporting
  • Meets grade level11%−23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 549 reporting
  • Masters grade level6%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 549 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,917 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Completion

Four-Year
0.0%−63.6 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 41 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
0.0%−66.9 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 41 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
0.0%−66.5 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 41 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−5.6 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 41 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's alternative-education accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
36
Economically disadvantaged
94.1%+2.3 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
26.5%−15.0 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
14.7%−2.8 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
—
Chronically absent
—

Student demographics

Ee College and Career Center

Hispanic: 100%
  • Hispanic 100%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,917 reporting for every category shown · 1,917 in full cohort

African American: 15%Hispanic: 76.9%White: 5.1%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.2%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 1.5%
  • African American 15%
  • Hispanic 76.9%
  • White 5.1%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.2%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 1.5%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
34
Economically disadvantaged students
32
Emergent bilingual students
9
Special education students
5

TEA context labels

  • New campus compared with last year’s fall enrollment
  • Alternative education campus under AEA procedures
  • Alternative education type: dropout recovery school
  • Rated under AEA procedures

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
Not reported
Students in TEA mobility denominator
Not reported
TEA-published mobility rate
Not reported

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Teachers

Average salary
$62,282−$6,140 vs similar economic context
Teachers
5−35.1 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
7.6−7.1 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Ee College and Career Center

Beginning: 22.2%1 to 5 years: 40%6 to 10 years: 15.6%21 to 30 years: 22.2%
  • Beginning 22.2%
  • 1 to 5 years 40%
  • 6 to 10 years 15.6%
  • 21 to 30 years 22.2%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,917 reporting for every category shown · 1,917 in full cohort

Beginning: 7.5%1 to 5 years: 27%6 to 10 years: 18.7%11 to 20 years: 27.2%21 to 30 years: 14.9%Over 30 years: 3.4%
  • Beginning 7.5%
  • 1 to 5 years 27%
  • 6 to 10 years 18.7%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.2%
  • 21 to 30 years 14.9%
  • Over 30 years 3.4%

Where this school ranks best

Out of 112 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

1 measure

  • 6of 45

    Math — Approaches

    Similar size · of the 45 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 108903005.