Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Edinburg Collegiate HS

Hidalgo County · Region 01: Edinburg · 534 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
99/1002025-26
Change
+3 ptssince 2022-23
Score vs similar economic context
+19.1 ptsvs 79.9 average · 2,002 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
2 of 2,002tied with 6 others
A99

At a glance

The available rating history is moving up. The current score is above the 79.9 average for 2,002 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent movement

Overall score rose 3 points

96 to 99 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 99 is 19.1 points above the 79.9 average among 2,002 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
  • Tied for 2nd of 2,002 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure; 7 schools share that value.
See the full measure

Recent domain gain

Student Achievement rose 4 points

94 to 98 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 98 is 20.3 points above the 77.7 average among 1,894 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
  • Tied for 1st of 1,894 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure; 12 schools share that value.
See the full measure

Current strength

Closing the Gaps above the similar-context average

100 +22.9 pts vs 77.1

  • 100 is 22.9 points above the 77.1 average among 1,868 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
  • Tied for 1st of 1,868 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure; 10 schools share that value.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Edinburg Collegiate HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 99 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 79.9 average for 2,002 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 3 points since 2022-23.

Ranks 2nd of 2,002 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 6 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 4 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

4 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageEdinburg Collegiate HS 96979699 2022-232023-242024-252025-26

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9979.9 2,002 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25A9679.6 1,978 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24A9777.6 1,963 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23A9678.2 1,931 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement98 A+20.3 vs similar economic context · 1,894 reporting
  • School Progress98 A+17.2 vs similar economic context · 1,887 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps100 A+22.9 vs similar economic context · 1,868 reporting
  • Academic Growth85 B+11.0 vs similar economic context · 1,827 reporting
  • Relative Performance98 A+18.9 vs similar economic context · 1,887 reporting
  • Edinburg Collegiate HS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,002 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement98A—
School Progress98A—
Closing the Gaps100A—
Academic Growth85B5
Relative Performance98A—

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level99%+25 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,894 reporting
  • Meets grade level90%+42 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,894 reporting
  • Masters grade level41%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,894 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level98%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,891 reporting
  • Meets grade level95%+42 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,891 reporting
  • Masters grade level28%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,891 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level98%+27 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,882 reporting
  • Meets grade level84%+42 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,882 reporting
  • Masters grade level53%+37 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,882 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level100%+26 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,732 reporting
  • Meets grade level97%+51 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,732 reporting
  • Masters grade level56%+36 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,732 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level100%+27 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 932 reporting
  • Meets grade level77%+31 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 932 reporting
  • Masters grade level39%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 932 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,002 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
0.0%−93.7 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 452 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
0.0%−93.2 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 449 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
0.0%−92.5 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 449 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−0.7 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 455 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
100.0%+12.1 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria100.0%87.9%+12.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 487 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course100.0%59.7%+40.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 491 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA100.0%27.6%+72.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 491 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)50.0%10.8%+39.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 491 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course100.0%33.6%+66.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 491 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification0.0%37.9%−37.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 491 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.0%1.8%−1.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 491 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%7.1%−7.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 491 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%3.7%−3.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 491 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness0.0%3.3%−3.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 491 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student0.0%8.0%−8.0 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 491 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces0.0%3.3%−3.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 491 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
534
Economically disadvantaged
65.2%−0.1 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
9.0%−9.1 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
2.2%−16.6 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.7%+2.6 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
6.6%−10.2 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Edinburg Collegiate HS

African American: 0.2%Hispanic: 96.4%White: 1.1%Asian: 1.9%Two or More Races: 0.4%
  • African American 0.2%
  • Hispanic 96.4%
  • White 1.1%
  • Asian 1.9%
  • Two or More Races 0.4%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,002 reporting for every category shown · 2,002 in full cohort

African American: 11.4%Hispanic: 52%White: 30.1%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2.2%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3.7%
  • African American 11.4%
  • Hispanic 52%
  • White 30.1%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2.2%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.7%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
534
Economically disadvantaged students
348
Emergent bilingual students
48
Special education students
12

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
49
Students in TEA mobility denominator
492
TEA-published mobility rate
10%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 534 students in 2025–26, an increase of 68 (14.6%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
534

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+68

Increase · +14.6%

Change since 2022–23
+328

Increase · +159.2%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
534
Selected comparison
625.5

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,968 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Edinburg Collegiate HS
School yearStudents enrolledEdinburg Collegiate HSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2022–23 206 First available year 648.7
2023–24 317 Increase of 111 (53.9%) 644.9
2024–25 466 Increase of 149 (47.0%) 640.7
2025–26 534 Increase of 68 (14.6%) 625.5

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
16

3.51 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
456

2024–25

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
3.51
Selected comparison
30.4

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,652 rated schools reporting

−26.9 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Edinburg Collegiate HS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2022–23 197 16 8.1% 28 14.21 13.4% 32.3
2023–24 308 Suppressed — 12 3.90 — 31.9
2024–25 456 Suppressed — 16 3.51 — 30.4
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Edinburg Collegiate HS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Suppressed — 16 3.51 — 30.4
In-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — 10 2.19 — 10.7
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$9k$37k$64k20232025
  • Edinburg Collegiate HS
  • Parent district: Edinburg CISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$9,886
Selected comparison
$12,738

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,977 rated schools reporting

−$2,852 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $9,886 per student for this campus, $14,448 per student for its parent district, Edinburg CISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearEdinburg Collegiate HSParent district: Edinburg CISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2023$61,385$15,718$16,792$11,222 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,932 rated schools reporting
2024$58,466$15,340$18,125$12,109 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,961 rated schools reporting
2025$9,886$14,448$18,972$12,738 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,977 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$72,212+$5,805 vs similar economic context
Teachers
31−11.8 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
17.3+3.4 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Edinburg Collegiate HS

Beginning: 2.9%1 to 5 years: 11.3%6 to 10 years: 19.7%11 to 20 years: 41.4%21 to 30 years: 22.7%Over 30 years: 1.9%
  • Beginning 2.9%
  • 1 to 5 years 11.3%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.7%
  • 11 to 20 years 41.4%
  • 21 to 30 years 22.7%
  • Over 30 years 1.9%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,002 reporting for every category shown · 2,002 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.3%1 to 5 years: 26.4%6 to 10 years: 19.1%11 to 20 years: 27.8%21 to 30 years: 15.8%Over 30 years: 4%
  • Beginning 6.3%
  • 1 to 5 years 26.4%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.1%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.8%
  • 21 to 30 years 15.8%
  • Over 30 years 4%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Edinburg Collegiate HS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classEdinburg Collegiate HS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English22.115
Secondary languages other than English16.817.5
Secondary math17.615.9
Secondary science21.617.3
Secondary social studies25.817.2

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 200 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#1 rankings

First-place results

17 measures

  • 1of 7,185

    Closing the Gaps

    Texas average · of the 7,185 that report this measure · tied with 39 · full ranking

  • 1of 4,149

    Science — Approaches

    Similar size · of the 4,149 that report this measure · tied with 59

  • 1of 1,894

    Student Achievement

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,894 that report this measure · tied with 11

  • 1of 1,887

    Relative Performance

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,887 that report this measure · tied with 8

  • 1of 1,606

    Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA

    Texas average · of the 1,606 that report this measure · tied with 12

  • 1of 492

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Region 01: Edinburg · of the 492 that report this measure · tied with 3

  • 1of 253

    Overall score

    Hidalgo County · of the 253 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 1of 242

    All Subjects — Meets

    Hidalgo County · of the 242 that report this measure

  • 1of 242

    Reading — Approaches

    Hidalgo County · of the 242 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 1of 242

    Reading — Meets

    Hidalgo County · of the 242 that report this measure

  • 1of 241

    School Progress

    Hidalgo County · of the 241 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 1of 241

    Math — Approaches

    Hidalgo County · of the 241 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 1of 241

    Math — Meets

    Hidalgo County · of the 241 that report this measure

  • 1of 241

    Math — Masters

    Hidalgo County · of the 241 that report this measure

  • 1of 239

    Science — Meets

    Hidalgo County · of the 239 that report this measure

  • 1of 86

    Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course

    Region 01: Edinburg · of the 86 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 1of 42

    Earned college credit for a dual credit course

    Hidalgo County · of the 42 that report this measure · tied with 1

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

5 measures

  • 5of 239

    Science — Masters

    Hidalgo County · of the 239 that report this measure

  • 6of 42

    Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)

    Hidalgo County · of the 42 that report this measure

  • 7of 242

    All Subjects — Masters

    Hidalgo County · of the 242 that report this measure · tied with 3

  • 9of 91

    Social Studies — Meets

    Hidalgo County · of the 91 that report this measure

  • 10of 91

    Social Studies — Masters

    Hidalgo County · of the 91 that report this measure

Other top-5% rankings

High placements in larger reporting groups

2 measures

  • 13of 240

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Hidalgo County · of the 240 that report this measure

  • 34of 1,937

    Attendance

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,937 that report this measure · tied with 3

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 108904008.