+19.1 ptsvs 79.9 average · 2,002 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
2 of 2,002tied with 6 others
Score vs region
+13.3 ptsvs 85.7 average · 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg
Region 01: Edinburg placement
2 of 505tied with 4 others
Score vs county
+14.5 ptsvs 84.5 average · 253 rated schools in Hidalgo County
Hidalgo County placement
1 of 253tied with 2 others
Score vs similar-size group
+18.8 ptsvs 80.2 average · 4,761 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
3 of 4,761tied with 23 others
Score vs state
+17.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
5 of 7,646tied with 29 others
A99
At a glance
The available rating history is moving up. The current score is above the 79.9 average for 2,002 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 85.7 average for 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg.The current score is above the 84.5 average for 253 rated schools in Hidalgo County.The current score is above the 80.2 average for 4,761 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Recent movement
Overall score rose 3 points
96 to 992024-25 to 2025-26
99 is 19.1 points above
the 79.9 average among 2,002 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Tied for 2nd of 2,002 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure; 7 schools share that value.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Edinburg Collegiate HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 99 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 79.9 average for 2,002 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 3 points since 2022-23.
Ranks 2nd of 2,002 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 6 others).
Edinburg Collegiate HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 99 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 85.7 average for 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg. It is up 3 points since 2022-23.
Ranks 2nd of 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg (tied with 4 others).
Edinburg Collegiate HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 99 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 84.5 average for 253 rated schools in Hidalgo County. It is up 3 points since 2022-23.
Ranks 1st of 253 rated schools in Hidalgo County (tied with 2 others).
Edinburg Collegiate HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 99 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.2 average for 4,761 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 3 points since 2022-23.
Ranks 3rd of 4,761 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 23 others).
Edinburg Collegiate HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 99 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 3 points since 2022-23.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement98 A+20.3 vs similar economic context · 1,894 reporting
School Progress98 A+17.2 vs similar economic context · 1,887 reporting
Closing the Gaps100 A+22.9 vs similar economic context · 1,868 reporting
Academic Growth85 B+11.0 vs similar economic context · 1,827 reporting
Relative Performance98 A+18.9 vs similar economic context · 1,887 reporting
Edinburg Collegiate HS
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,002 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
98
A
—
School Progress
98
A
—
Closing the Gaps
100
A
—
Academic Growth
85
B
5
Relative Performance
98
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level99%+25 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,894 reporting
Meets grade level90%+42 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,894 reporting
Masters grade level41%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,894 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level98%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,891 reporting
Meets grade level95%+42 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,891 reporting
Masters grade level28%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,891 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level98%+27 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,882 reporting
Meets grade level84%+42 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,882 reporting
Masters grade level53%+37 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,882 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level100%+26 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,732 reporting
Meets grade level97%+51 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,732 reporting
Masters grade level56%+36 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,732 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level100%+27 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 932 reporting
Meets grade level77%+31 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 932 reporting
Masters grade level39%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 932 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,002 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Graduation
Four-Year
0.0%−93.7 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 452 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
0.0%−93.2 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 449 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
0.0%−92.5 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 449 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−0.7 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 455 rated schools reporting
These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
College, career and military readiness
Total credit for CCMR criteria
100.0%+12.1 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
Criterion
This school% of graduates
Averagesimilar economic context
Differencepercentage points
Reportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria
100.0%
87.9%
+12.1
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 487 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
100.0%
59.7%
+40.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 491 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
100.0%
27.6%
+72.4
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 491 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
50.0%
10.8%
+39.2
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 491 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
100.0%
33.6%
+66.4
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 491 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification
0.0%
37.9%
−37.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 491 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate
0.0%
1.8%
−1.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 491 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree
0.0%
7.1%
−7.1
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 491 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit
0.0%
3.7%
−3.7
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 491 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness
0.0%
3.3%
−3.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 491 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student
0.0%
8.0%
−8.0
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 491 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces
0.0%
3.3%
−3.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 491 rated schools reporting
Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of
meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this
school minus the average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate,
counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that
criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
534
Economically disadvantaged
65.2%−0.1 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
9.0%−9.1 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
2.2%−16.6 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.7%+2.6 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
6.6%−10.2 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Edinburg Collegiate HS
African American 0.2%
Hispanic 96.4%
White 1.1%
Asian 1.9%
Two or More Races 0.4%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,002 reporting for every category shown · 2,002 in full cohort
African American 11.4%
Hispanic 52%
White 30.1%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.2%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 01: Edinburg · 505 reporting for every category shown · 505 in full cohort
African American 0.2%
Hispanic 97.5%
White 1.9%
Asian 0.3%
Two or More Races 0.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Hidalgo County · 253 reporting for every category shown · 253 in full cohort
African American 0.2%
Hispanic 97.8%
White 1.5%
Asian 0.3%
Two or More Races 0.1%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,761 reporting for every category shown · 4,761 in full cohort
African American 12.2%
Hispanic 54.9%
White 24.6%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.5%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
534
Economically disadvantaged students
348
Emergent bilingual students
48
Special education students
12
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
49
Students in TEA mobility denominator
492
TEA-published mobility rate
10%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 534 students in 2025–26, an increase of 68 (14.6%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
534
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+68
Increase · +14.6%
Change since 2022–23
+328
Increase · +159.2%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
534
Selected comparison
625.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,968 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Edinburg Collegiate HS
School year
Students enrolledEdinburg Collegiate HS
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2022–23
206
First available year
648.7
2023–24
317
Increase of 111 (53.9%)
644.9
2024–25
466
Increase of 149 (47.0%)
640.7
2025–26
534
Increase of 68 (14.6%)
625.5
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
16
3.51 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
456
2024–25
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
3.51
Selected comparison
30.4
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,652 rated schools reporting
−26.9 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Edinburg Collegiate HS
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2022–23
197
16
8.1%
28
14.21
13.4%
32.3
2023–24
308
Suppressed
—
12
3.90
—
31.9
2024–25
456
Suppressed
—
16
3.51
—
30.4
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Edinburg Collegiate HS in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Suppressed
—
16
3.51
—
30.4
In-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
10
2.19
—
10.7
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Edinburg Collegiate HS
Parent district: Edinburg CISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$9,886
Selected comparison
$12,738
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,977 rated schools reporting
−$2,852 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $9,886 per student for this campus, $14,448 per student for its parent district, Edinburg CISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Edinburg Collegiate HS
Parent district: Edinburg CISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2023
$61,385
$15,718
$16,792
$11,222
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,932 rated schools reporting
2024
$58,466
$15,340
$18,125
$12,109
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,961 rated schools reporting
2025
$9,886
$14,448
$18,972
$12,738
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,977 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$72,212+$5,805 vs similar economic context
Teachers
31−11.8 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
17.3+3.4 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Edinburg Collegiate HS
Beginning 2.9%
1 to 5 years 11.3%
6 to 10 years 19.7%
11 to 20 years 41.4%
21 to 30 years 22.7%
Over 30 years 1.9%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,002 reporting for every category shown · 2,002 in full cohort
Beginning 6.3%
1 to 5 years 26.4%
6 to 10 years 19.1%
11 to 20 years 27.8%
21 to 30 years 15.8%
Over 30 years 4%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 01: Edinburg · 505 reporting for every category shown · 505 in full cohort
Beginning 2.7%
1 to 5 years 19.3%
6 to 10 years 16.2%
11 to 20 years 35%
21 to 30 years 22.6%
Over 30 years 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Hidalgo County · 253 reporting for every category shown · 253 in full cohort
Beginning 2.3%
1 to 5 years 18.4%
6 to 10 years 17.1%
11 to 20 years 37.2%
21 to 30 years 21.6%
Over 30 years 3.5%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,761 reporting for every category shown · 4,761 in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 26.3%
6 to 10 years 19.6%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 15.7%
Over 30 years 3.2%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Edinburg Collegiate HS in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classEdinburg Collegiate HS · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English
22.1
15
Secondary languages other than English
16.8
17.5
Secondary math
17.6
15.9
Secondary science
21.6
17.3
Secondary social studies
25.8
17.2
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 200 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
17 measures
1of 7,185
Closing the Gaps
Texas average · of the 7,185 that report this measure · tied with 39 · full ranking
1of 4,149
Science — Approaches
Similar size · of the 4,149 that report this measure · tied with 59
1of 1,894
Student Achievement
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,894 that report this measure · tied with 11
1of 1,887
Relative Performance
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,887 that report this measure · tied with 8
1of 1,606
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
Texas average · of the 1,606 that report this measure · tied with 12
1of 492
All Subjects — Approaches
Region 01: Edinburg · of the 492 that report this measure · tied with 3
1of 253
Overall score
Hidalgo County · of the 253 that report this measure · tied with 2
1of 242
All Subjects — Meets
Hidalgo County · of the 242 that report this measure
1of 242
Reading — Approaches
Hidalgo County · of the 242 that report this measure · tied with 2
1of 242
Reading — Meets
Hidalgo County · of the 242 that report this measure
1of 241
School Progress
Hidalgo County · of the 241 that report this measure · tied with 2
1of 241
Math — Approaches
Hidalgo County · of the 241 that report this measure · tied with 2
1of 241
Math — Meets
Hidalgo County · of the 241 that report this measure
1of 241
Math — Masters
Hidalgo County · of the 241 that report this measure
1of 239
Science — Meets
Hidalgo County · of the 239 that report this measure
1of 86
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
Region 01: Edinburg · of the 86 that report this measure · tied with 2
1of 42
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
Hidalgo County · of the 42 that report this measure · tied with 1
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
5 measures
5of 239
Science — Masters
Hidalgo County · of the 239 that report this measure
6of 42
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
Hidalgo County · of the 42 that report this measure
7of 242
All Subjects — Masters
Hidalgo County · of the 242 that report this measure · tied with 3
9of 91
Social Studies — Meets
Hidalgo County · of the 91 that report this measure
10of 91
Social Studies — Masters
Hidalgo County · of the 91 that report this measure
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
2 measures
13of 240
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Hidalgo County · of the 240 that report this measure
34of 1,937
Attendance
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,937 that report this measure · tied with 3
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 108904008.