Current strength
Overall score above the similar-context average
85 +3.8 pts vs 81.2
- 85 is 3.8 points above the 81.2 average among 1,839 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Traditional public school campus
Early Learning Academy
Hutchinson County · Region 16: Amarillo · 49 students
- Current score
- 85/1002025-26
- Change
- −1 ptssince 2024-25
- Score vs similar economic context
- +3.8 ptsvs 81.2 average · 1,839 rated schools serving a similar economic context
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
- 658 of 1,839tied with 65 others
- Score vs region
- +3.2 ptsvs 81.8 average · 208 rated schools in Region 16: Amarillo
- Region 16: Amarillo placement
- 94 of 208tied with 10 others
- Score vs county
- +6.4 ptsvs 78.6 average · 12 rated schools in Hutchinson County
- Hutchinson County placement
- 4 of 12tied with 1 other
- Score vs similar-size group
- +2.3 ptsvs 82.7 average · 106 similarly sized rated schools
- Similar size placement
- 49 of 106tied with 3 others
- Score vs state
- +3.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
- Texas placement
- 3,064 of 7,646tied with 260 others
B85
At a glance
The available rating history is moving down. The current score is above the 81.2 average for 1,839 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 81.8 average for 208 rated schools in Region 16: Amarillo.The current score is above the 78.6 average for 12 rated schools in Hutchinson County.The current score is above the 82.7 average for 106 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Current strength
Overall score above the Region 16: Amarillo average
85 +3.2 pts vs 81.8
- 85 is 3.2 points above the 81.8 average among 208 schools in Region 16: Amarillo reporting this measure.
No academic result met this site’s published threshold for a selected positive signal against Hutchinson County.
Current strength
Overall score above the similar-size average
85 +2.3 pts vs 82.7
- 85 is 2.3 points above the 82.7 average among 106 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
Current strength
Overall score above the Texas average
85 +3.7 pts vs 81.3
- 85 is 3.7 points above the 81.3 average among 7,646 Texas schools reporting this measure.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Early Learning Academy is rated B by TEA, scoring 85 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.2 average for 1,839 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 1 point since 2024-25.
Ranks 658th of 1,839 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 65 others).
Early Learning Academy is rated B by TEA, scoring 85 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.8 average for 208 rated schools in Region 16: Amarillo. It is down 1 point since 2024-25.
Ranks 94th of 208 rated schools in Region 16: Amarillo (tied with 10 others).
Early Learning Academy is rated B by TEA, scoring 85 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 78.6 average for 12 rated schools in Hutchinson County. It is down 1 point since 2024-25.
Ranks 4th of 12 rated schools in Hutchinson County (tied with 1 other).
Early Learning Academy is rated B by TEA, scoring 85 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.7 average for 106 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 1 point since 2024-25.
Ranks 49th of 106 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 3 others).
Early Learning Academy is rated B by TEA, scoring 85 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 1 point since 2024-25.
Ranks 3,064th of 7,646 rated Texas schools (tied with 260 others).
Put the numbers in context
Compare with
Jump to a section
2 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
View the yearly scores and comparisons
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | B | 85 | 81.2 1,839 reporting | 81.3 7,646 reporting |
| 2024-25 | B | 86 | 81.4 1,813 reporting | 81.2 7,554 reporting |
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- Early Learning Academy
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,839 in cohort)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | — | Not rated | — |
| School Progress | — | Not rated | — |
| Closing the Gaps | — | Not rated | — |
| Academic Growth | — | Not rated | — |
| Relative Performance | — | Not rated | — |
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 49
- Economically disadvantaged
- 55.1%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
- English learners
- 2.0%−12.3 pts vs similar economic context
- Special education
- 10.2%−8.6 pts vs similar economic context
- Attendance
- —
- Chronically absent
- —
Student demographics
Early Learning Academy
- Hispanic 12.2%
- White 81.6%
- Pacific Islander 4.1%
- Two or More Races 2%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,839 reporting for every category shown · 1,839 in full cohort
- African American 9.9%
- Hispanic 44.4%
- White 38.6%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 2.6%
- Pacific Islander 0.2%
- Two or More Races 4%
Selected comparison average For Region 16: Amarillo · 208 reporting for every category shown · 208 in full cohort
- African American 4.1%
- Hispanic 49.5%
- White 41.7%
- American Indian 0.4%
- Asian 1.7%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 2.6%
Selected comparison average For Hutchinson County · 12 reporting for every category shown · 12 in full cohort
- African American 1.2%
- Hispanic 31.6%
- White 61.3%
- American Indian 0.8%
- Asian 0.4%
- Pacific Islander 0.4%
- Two or More Races 4.3%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 106 reporting for every category shown · 106 in full cohort
- African American 9.4%
- Hispanic 51.6%
- White 34.2%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 1.3%
- Pacific Islander 0.2%
- Two or More Races 3%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- African American 11.5%
- Hispanic 52.6%
- White 27.8%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 4.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
- Students in this TEA accountability summary
- 49
- Economically disadvantaged students
- 27
- Emergent bilingual students
- 1
- Special education students
- 5
TEA context labels
- Highest grade is early education, pre-K or kindergarten
Campus mobility · 2024–25
- Mobile students
- Not reported
- Students in TEA mobility denominator
- Not reported
- TEA-published mobility rate
- Not reported
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 49 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 3 (5.8%) from 2024–25.
- Latest enrollment
- 49
2025–26
- Change from 2024–25
- −3
Decrease · −5.8%
Enrollment in 2025–26
- This school
- 49
- Selected comparison
- 631.4
| School year | Students enrolledEarly Learning Academy | Change from previous school year | Average enrollmentselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024–25 | 52 | First available year | 636.3 |
| 2025–26 | 49 | Decrease of 3 (5.8%) | 631.4 |
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
- Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
- Not reported
Rate not available
- Disciplinary actions
- Not reported
Rate not available
- Cumulative year-end enrollment
- 50
2024–25
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024–25 | 50 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
See 2024–25 discipline categories
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| In-school suspensions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Out-of-school suspensions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Teachers
- Average salary
- $53,010−$13,550 vs similar economic context
- Teachers
- 3−38.8 vs similar economic context
- Students per staff member
- 17−2.3 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Early Learning Academy
- Beginning 65.5%
- 11 to 20 years 34.5%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,839 reporting for every category shown · 1,839 in full cohort
- Beginning 5.8%
- 1 to 5 years 24.8%
- 6 to 10 years 19.3%
- 11 to 20 years 28.8%
- 21 to 30 years 16.4%
- Over 30 years 4.4%
Selected comparison average For Region 16: Amarillo · 208 reporting for every category shown · 208 in full cohort
- Beginning 6%
- 1 to 5 years 26.5%
- 6 to 10 years 18%
- 11 to 20 years 28.4%
- 21 to 30 years 16.2%
- Over 30 years 5%
Selected comparison average For Hutchinson County · 12 reporting for every category shown · 12 in full cohort
- Beginning 13.9%
- 1 to 5 years 31.2%
- 6 to 10 years 18.9%
- 11 to 20 years 22.8%
- 21 to 30 years 9.4%
- Over 30 years 3.9%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 106 reporting for every category shown · 106 in full cohort
- Beginning 7.1%
- 1 to 5 years 21.4%
- 6 to 10 years 13.4%
- 11 to 20 years 27.5%
- 21 to 30 years 15.5%
- Over 30 years 6.7%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- Beginning 6.2%
- 1 to 5 years 25.6%
- 6 to 10 years 19.2%
- 11 to 20 years 28.7%
- 21 to 30 years 15.9%
- Over 30 years 3.7%
Where this school ranks best
Out of 5 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
1 measure
-
4of 12
Overall score
Hutchinson County · of the 12 that report this measure · tied with 1
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 117904103.