Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Early Childhood Academy

Parker County · Region 11: Fort Worth · 181 students

Current score
93/1002025-26
Change
±0 ptssince 2022-23
Score vs similar economic context
+6.9 ptsvs 86.1 average · 1,165 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
136 of 1,165tied with 59 others
A93

At a glance

The available rating history is flat. The current score is above the 86.1 average for 1,165 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Current strength

Overall score above the similar-context average

93 +6.9 pts vs 86.1

  • 93 is 6.9 points above the 86.1 average among 1,165 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Early Childhood Academy is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 86.1 average for 1,165 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is unchanged since 2022-23.

Ranks 136th of 1,165 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 59 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 4 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Who this school serves
  5. Student counts behind the percentages
  6. Enrollment over time
  7. Discipline and removal from class
  8. Spending per student
  9. Teachers
  10. Where this school ranks best
  11. Where this comes from

4 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageEarly Childhood Academy 93919593 2022-232023-242024-252025-26

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9386.1 1,165 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25A9586.0 1,141 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24A9184.6 1,125 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23A9384.9 1,112 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement—Not reported · similar economic context 86.6 · 1,139 reporting
  • School Progress—Not reported · similar economic context 83.5 · 1,136 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps—Not reported · similar economic context 83.5 · 1,127 reporting
  • Academic Growth—Not reported · similar economic context 79.3 · 1,117 reporting
  • Relative Performance—Not reported · similar economic context 79.8 · 1,136 reporting
  • Early Childhood Academy
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,165 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement—Not rated—
School Progress—Not rated—
Closing the Gaps—Not rated—
Academic Growth—Not rated—
Relative Performance—Not rated—

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
181
Economically disadvantaged
34.5%−0.9 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
23.0%+12.3 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
22.3%+4.5 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
—
Chronically absent
—

Student demographics

Early Childhood Academy

African American: 1.4%Hispanic: 35.8%White: 53.4%Asian: 2%Two or More Races: 7.4%
  • African American 1.4%
  • Hispanic 35.8%
  • White 53.4%
  • Asian 2%
  • Two or More Races 7.4%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,165 reporting for every category shown · 1,165 in full cohort

African American: 9.2%Hispanic: 32%White: 47.5%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 6.1%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 4.7%
  • African American 9.2%
  • Hispanic 32%
  • White 47.5%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 6.1%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 4.7%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
148
Economically disadvantaged students
51
Emergent bilingual students
34
Special education students
33

TEA context labels

  • Highest grade is early education, pre-K or kindergarten

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
Not reported
Students in TEA mobility denominator
Not reported
TEA-published mobility rate
Not reported

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 181 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 8 (4.2%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
181

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−8

Decrease · −4.2%

Change since 2022–23
+38

Increase · +26.6%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
181
Selected comparison
764.1

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,141 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Early Childhood Academy
School yearStudents enrolledEarly Childhood AcademyChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2022–23 143 First available year 777
2023–24 149 Increase of 6 (4.2%) 776.1
2024–25 189 Increase of 40 (26.8%) 771.7
2025–26 181 Decrease of 8 (4.2%) 764.1

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Not reported

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Not reported

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
179

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Early Childhood Academy
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2022–23 130 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2023–24 152 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2024–25 179 Not reported — Not reported — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Early Childhood Academy in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Not reported — Not reported — — —
In-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$8k$15k$23k20232025
  • Early Childhood Academy
  • Parent district: Aledo ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$10,977
Selected comparison
$11,852

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,141 rated schools reporting

−$875 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $10,977 per student for this campus, $16,370 per student for its parent district, Aledo ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearEarly Childhood AcademyParent district: Aledo ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2023$13,568$15,972$16,792$10,375 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,113 rated schools reporting
2024$13,337$21,873$18,125$11,429 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,125 rated schools reporting
2025$10,977$16,370$18,972$11,852 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,141 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers

Average salary
$70,457+$2,526 vs similar economic context
Teachers
11−39.6 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.1−0.3 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Early Childhood Academy

Beginning: 9.5%1 to 5 years: 28.6%6 to 10 years: 14.3%11 to 20 years: 9.5%21 to 30 years: 38.1%
  • Beginning 9.5%
  • 1 to 5 years 28.6%
  • 6 to 10 years 14.3%
  • 11 to 20 years 9.5%
  • 21 to 30 years 38.1%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,165 reporting for every category shown · 1,165 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.1%1 to 5 years: 22.8%6 to 10 years: 19.6%11 to 20 years: 31.7%21 to 30 years: 17.3%Over 30 years: 3.4%
  • Beginning 5.1%
  • 1 to 5 years 22.8%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.6%
  • 11 to 20 years 31.7%
  • 21 to 30 years 17.3%
  • Over 30 years 3.4%

Where this school ranks best

Out of 10 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

1 measure

  • 7of 44

    Per-student spending

    Parker County · of the 44 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 184907107.