Districts, charter school systems & campuses · Source: Texas Education Agency
E J Moss IntB86vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Traditional public school campus
E J Moss Int
Smith County · Region 07: Kilgore · 1,159 students
Current score
86/1002025-26
Change
−4 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+3.6 ptsvs 82.4 average · 1,611 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
591 of 1,611tied with 68 others
Score vs region
+6.0 ptsvs 80 average · 352 rated schools in Region 07: Kilgore
Region 07: Kilgore placement
113 of 352tied with 10 others
Score vs county
+3.6 ptsvs 82.4 average · 59 rated schools in Smith County
Smith County placement
26 of 59tied with 2 others
Score vs similar-size group
+3.3 ptsvs 82.7 average · 1,861 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
766 of 1,861tied with 67 others
Score vs state
+4.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
2,764 of 7,646tied with 299 others
B86
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 90 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 82.4 average for 1,611 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 80 average for 352 rated schools in Region 07: Kilgore.The current score is above the 82.4 average for 59 rated schools in Smith County.The current score is above the 82.7 average for 1,861 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
62%vs 54.3% avg · +7.7 pts
Masters
33%vs 23.9% avg · +9.1 pts
Among 1,561 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
E J Moss Int is rated B by TEA, scoring 86 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.4 average for 1,611 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 591st of 1,611 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 68 others).
E J Moss Int is rated B by TEA, scoring 86 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80 average for 352 rated schools in Region 07: Kilgore. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 113th of 352 rated schools in Region 07: Kilgore (tied with 10 others).
E J Moss Int is rated B by TEA, scoring 86 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.4 average for 59 rated schools in Smith County. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 26th of 59 rated schools in Smith County (tied with 2 others).
E J Moss Int is rated B by TEA, scoring 86 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.7 average for 1,861 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 766th of 1,861 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 67 others).
E J Moss Int is rated B by TEA, scoring 86 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 90 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement90 A+7.6 vs similar economic context · 1,561 reporting
School Progress85 B+3.3 vs similar economic context · 1,556 reporting
Closing the Gaps77 C−2.8 vs similar economic context · 1,546 reporting
Academic Growth71 C−5.1 vs similar economic context · 1,529 reporting
Relative Performance85 B+5.7 vs similar economic context · 1,556 reporting
E J Moss Int
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,611 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
90
A
—
School Progress
85
B
5
Closing the Gaps
77
C
3
Academic Growth
71
C
9
Relative Performance
85
B
5
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 3 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (90), so
School Progress (85) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 90.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level84%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,561 reporting
Meets grade level62%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,561 reporting
Masters grade level33%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,561 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level85%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,559 reporting
Meets grade level63%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,559 reporting
Masters grade level33%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,559 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level83%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,553 reporting
Meets grade level62%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,553 reporting
Masters grade level31%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,553 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level81%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,442 reporting
Meets grade level60%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,442 reporting
Masters grade level35%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,442 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,611 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
1,159
Economically disadvantaged
47.5%−0.7 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
4.7%−7.9 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
29.1%+10.6 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.9%+0.3 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
11.1%−2.7 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
E J Moss Int
African American 4.8%
Hispanic 20.7%
White 66.5%
American Indian 0.6%
Asian 0.8%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 6.5%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,611 reporting for every category shown · 1,611 in full cohort
African American 9.3%
Hispanic 39.5%
White 43.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 3.3%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 07: Kilgore · 352 reporting for every category shown · 352 in full cohort
African American 13.6%
Hispanic 28.4%
White 52.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 0.8%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Smith County · 59 reporting for every category shown · 59 in full cohort
African American 17.9%
Hispanic 35.7%
White 40.6%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.3%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 1,861 reporting for every category shown · 1,861 in full cohort
African American 12.9%
Hispanic 51.1%
White 24.5%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 7.3%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.7%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
1,156
Economically disadvantaged students
549
Emergent bilingual students
54
Special education students
336
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
94
Students in TEA mobility denominator
1,131
TEA-published mobility rate
8.3%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 1,159 students in 2025–26, an increase of 77 (7.1%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
1,159
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+77
Increase · +7.1%
Change since 2021–22
+200
Increase · +20.9%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
1,159
Selected comparison
660.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,573 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for E J Moss Int
School year
Students enrolledE J Moss Int
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
959
First available year
659.3
2022–23
981
Increase of 22 (2.3%)
664.5
2023–24
1,048
Increase of 67 (6.8%)
663.6
2024–25
1,082
Increase of 34 (3.2%)
660.7
2025–26
1,159
Increase of 77 (7.1%)
660.5
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
115
10.2% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
255
22.55 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
1,131
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
10.2%
Selected comparison
11.8%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,257 rated schools reporting
−1.6 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
22.55
Selected comparison
26.2
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,349 rated schools reporting
−3.6 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for E J Moss Int
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
1,022
148
14.5%
305
29.84
9.5%
18.1
2021–22
1,036
115
11.1%
262
25.29
11.8%
25.8
2022–23
1,043
162
15.5%
363
34.80
12.2%
27.3
2023–24
1,104
127
11.5%
286
25.91
12.2%
27.8
2024–25
1,131
115
10.2%
255
22.55
11.8%
26.2
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for E J Moss Int in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
115
10.2%
255
22.55
11.8%
26.2
In-school suspensions
112
9.9%
239
21.13
10.7%
20.2
Out-of-school suspensions
12
1.1%
14
1.24
5.9%
8.3
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
E J Moss Int
Parent district: Lindale ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$10,768
Selected comparison
$12,036
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,581 rated schools reporting
−$1,268 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $10,768 per student for this campus, $14,186 per student for its parent district, Lindale ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
E J Moss Int
Parent district: Lindale ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$6,442
$10,078
$13,054
$7,818
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,458 rated schools reporting
2019
$6,746
$14,226
$13,108
$8,003
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,477 rated schools reporting
2020
$6,746
$15,722
$14,058
$8,490
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,489 rated schools reporting
2021
$7,567
$12,393
$14,797
$8,904
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,508 rated schools reporting
2022
$9,843
$13,766
$15,708
$10,194
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,520 rated schools reporting
2023
$8,656
$13,023
$16,792
$10,634
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,538 rated schools reporting
2024
$8,746
$13,718
$18,125
$11,615
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,556 rated schools reporting
2025
$10,768
$14,186
$18,972
$12,036
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,581 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$64,592−$2,406 vs similar economic context
Teachers
78+35.1 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.8−5.5 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
E J Moss Int
Beginning 7.7%
1 to 5 years 14.8%
6 to 10 years 19.6%
11 to 20 years 30.9%
21 to 30 years 18.5%
Over 30 years 8.4%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,611 reporting for every category shown · 1,611 in full cohort
Beginning 5.6%
1 to 5 years 24.1%
6 to 10 years 19.4%
11 to 20 years 29.8%
21 to 30 years 16.7%
Over 30 years 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 07: Kilgore · 352 reporting for every category shown · 352 in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 24.6%
6 to 10 years 17.7%
11 to 20 years 28%
21 to 30 years 17.3%
Over 30 years 6%
Selected comparison averageFor Smith County · 59 reporting for every category shown · 59 in full cohort
Beginning 7.5%
1 to 5 years 28%
6 to 10 years 18.3%
11 to 20 years 27%
21 to 30 years 15.3%
Over 30 years 3.8%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 1,861 reporting for every category shown · 1,861 in full cohort
Beginning 6.4%
1 to 5 years 27.1%
6 to 10 years 20.5%
11 to 20 years 28.8%
21 to 30 years 14.2%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for E J Moss Int in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classE J Moss Int · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 4
18
19.1
Grade 5
19
20
Grade 6
19.6
17.6
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 3 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 212903103.