Districts, charter school systems & campuses · Source: Texas Education Agency
Dumas South ElemB86vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Traditional public school campus
Dumas South Elem
Moore County · Region 16: Amarillo · 674 students
Current score
86/1002025-26
Change
−7 ptssince 2024-25
Score vs similar economic context
+6.9 ptsvs 79.1 average · 2,017 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
493 of 2,017tied with 77 others
Score vs region
+4.2 ptsvs 81.8 average · 208 rated schools in Region 16: Amarillo
Region 16: Amarillo placement
86 of 208tied with 7 others
Score vs county
+1.9 ptsvs 84.1 average · 10 rated schools in Moore County
Moore County placement
5 of 10among reporting schools
Score vs similar-size group
+5.4 ptsvs 80.6 average · 4,433 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
1,504 of 4,433tied with 154 others
Score vs state
+4.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
2,764 of 7,646tied with 299 others
B86
At a glance
The available rating history is moving down. The current score is above the 79.1 average for 2,017 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 81.8 average for 208 rated schools in Region 16: Amarillo.The current score is above the 84.1 average for 10 rated schools in Moore County.The current score is above the 80.6 average for 4,433 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
54%vs 46.2% avg · +7.8 pts
Masters
22%vs 18.5% avg · +3.5 pts
Among 1,899 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Dumas South Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 86 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 79.1 average for 2,017 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 7 points since 2024-25.
Ranks 493rd of 2,017 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 77 others).
Dumas South Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 86 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.8 average for 208 rated schools in Region 16: Amarillo. It is down 7 points since 2024-25.
Ranks 86th of 208 rated schools in Region 16: Amarillo (tied with 7 others).
Dumas South Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 86 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 84.1 average for 10 rated schools in Moore County. It is down 7 points since 2024-25.
Ranks 5th of 10 rated schools in Moore County.
Dumas South Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 86 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.6 average for 4,433 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 7 points since 2024-25.
Ranks 1,504th of 4,433 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 154 others).
Dumas South Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 86 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 7 points since 2024-25.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement79 C+2.9 vs similar economic context · 1,899 reporting
School Progress85 B+4.8 vs similar economic context · 1,892 reporting
Closing the Gaps88 B+11.7 vs similar economic context · 1,879 reporting
Academic Growth85 B+11.8 vs similar economic context · 1,832 reporting
Relative Performance85 B+6.5 vs similar economic context · 1,892 reporting
Dumas South Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,017 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
79
C
1
School Progress
85
B
5
Closing the Gaps
88
B
2
Academic Growth
85
B
5
Relative Performance
85
B
5
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 2 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (85), so
Student Achievement (79) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 85.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level81%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,899 reporting
Meets grade level54%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,899 reporting
Masters grade level22%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,899 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level83%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,897 reporting
Meets grade level58%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,897 reporting
Masters grade level18%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,897 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level78%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,889 reporting
Meets grade level51%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,889 reporting
Masters grade level26%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,889 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,017 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
674
Economically disadvantaged
69.7%+0.1 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
49.3%+28.8 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
15.4%−3.4 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.5%+0.6 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
13.8%−3.8 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Dumas South Elem
African American 6.3%
Hispanic 81.6%
White 8.8%
American Indian 0.1%
Asian 2.1%
Two or More Races 1%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,017 reporting for every category shown · 2,017 in full cohort
African American 12.3%
Hispanic 56.4%
White 25.3%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 16: Amarillo · 208 reporting for every category shown · 208 in full cohort
African American 4.1%
Hispanic 49.5%
White 41.7%
American Indian 0.4%
Asian 1.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Moore County · 10 reporting for every category shown · 10 in full cohort
African American 3.5%
Hispanic 74.6%
White 18.9%
American Indian 0.7%
Asian 1.6%
Two or More Races 0.6%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,433 reporting for every category shown · 4,433 in full cohort
African American 12.4%
Hispanic 54%
White 24.3%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.2%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.6%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
669
Economically disadvantaged students
466
Emergent bilingual students
330
Special education students
103
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
64
Students in TEA mobility denominator
535
TEA-published mobility rate
12%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 674 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 27 (3.9%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
674
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−27
Decrease · −3.9%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
674
Selected comparison
637.2
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,980 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Dumas South Elem
School year
Students enrolledDumas South Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2024–25
701
First available year
653.1
2025–26
674
Decrease of 27 (3.9%)
637.2
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
Suppressed
Rate not available
Cumulative year-end enrollment
747
2024–25
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Dumas South Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2024–25
747
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Dumas South Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
In-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Dumas South Elem
Parent district: Dumas ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$7,575
Selected comparison
$13,200
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,997 rated schools reporting
−$5,625 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $7,575 per student for this campus, $15,152 per student for its parent district, Dumas ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Dumas South Elem
Parent district: Dumas ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2025
$7,575
$15,152
$18,972
$13,200
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,997 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$54,888−$11,562 vs similar economic context
Teachers
52+8.9 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
12.9−1.1 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Dumas South Elem
Beginning 5.8%
1 to 5 years 40.5%
6 to 10 years 17.3%
11 to 20 years 19.8%
21 to 30 years 13.9%
Over 30 years 2.9%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,017 reporting for every category shown · 2,017 in full cohort
Beginning 6.5%
1 to 5 years 26.9%
6 to 10 years 19%
11 to 20 years 27.6%
21 to 30 years 15.4%
Over 30 years 3.9%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 16: Amarillo · 208 reporting for every category shown · 208 in full cohort
Beginning 6%
1 to 5 years 26.5%
6 to 10 years 18%
11 to 20 years 28.4%
21 to 30 years 16.2%
Over 30 years 5%
Selected comparison averageFor Moore County · 10 reporting for every category shown · 10 in full cohort
Beginning 5.5%
1 to 5 years 36.8%
6 to 10 years 16%
11 to 20 years 23.5%
21 to 30 years 14.8%
Over 30 years 3.4%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,433 reporting for every category shown · 4,433 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 26.6%
6 to 10 years 19.9%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 15.3%
Over 30 years 2.9%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Dumas South Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classDumas South Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
22.1
18
Grade 1
23.2
18.2
Grade 2
20.2
18.3
Grade 3
22.4
18.6
Grade 4
20
18.9
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 85 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
1 measure
2of 10
All Subjects — Masters
Moore County · of the 10 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
12 measures
4of 10
All Subjects — Approaches
Moore County · of the 10 that report this measure
4of 10
All Subjects — Meets
Moore County · of the 10 that report this measure
4of 10
Reading — Approaches
Moore County · of the 10 that report this measure
5of 10
Overall score
Moore County · of the 10 that report this measure
5of 10
School Progress
Moore County · of the 10 that report this measure
5of 10
Relative Performance
Moore County · of the 10 that report this measure
5of 10
Per-student spending
Moore County · of the 10 that report this measure
6of 10
Student Achievement
Moore County · of the 10 that report this measure
6of 10
Reading — Meets
Moore County · of the 10 that report this measure
6of 10
Reading — Masters
Moore County · of the 10 that report this measure
7of 10
Attendance
Moore County · of the 10 that report this measure · tied with 1
8of 10
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Moore County · of the 10 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 171901108.